harlekin.me

Laut sei­nen in depth Recher­che­er­geb­nis­sen nach “You­tube Video schaun”, von You­tuber Roy - han­delt es sich bei der Donut Labs Bat­te­rie (deut­scher Erfin­der) um - Zitat Standard: 

“Das und ande­re Aspek­te deu­ten laut Roy stark dar­auf hin, dass es sich tat­säch­lich um einen Solid-State-Akku han­delt, selbst wenn das Betriebs­span­nungs­pro­fil einem NMC-Lithiumakku ähnelt, wie er in E-Autos genutzt wird. Aller­dings fehlt es noch an ent­schei­den­den Infor­ma­tio­nen, um kon­kre­te­re Ein­schät­zun­gen zur che­mi­schen Zusam­men­set­zung des Akkus machen zu können.”

src: click

Klar ist mitt­ler­wei­le also, dass es sich bei der Donut-Batterie nicht um einen Kon­den­sa­tor han­delt und wohl auch um kei­nen her­kömm­li­chen Lithium-Akku.

src: click

Genau.

At the battery’s unvei­ling in Janu­a­ry 2026, no inde­pen­dent tes­ting was given in sup­port of the claims pre­sen­ted. The com­pa­ny pre­sen­ted mock­ups in place of actu­al batteries.[29][30] When ques­tio­ned by jour­na­lists in Janu­a­ry 2026, the com­pa­ny did not dis­c­lo­se the loca­ti­on of its bat­te­ry pro­duc­tion facility.[31] The CEO of Donut Lab said they are alrea­dy capa­ble of gigawatt-hour year­ly pro­duc­tion in Janu­a­ry 2026.[32]

The CEO of Donut Lab said in a video released on 20 Febru­a­ry 2026 that VTT Tech­ni­cal Rese­arch Cent­re of Fin­land had been hired to con­duct inde­pen­dent tes­ting of the battery.[24] Donut Lab cho­se to gra­du­al­ly release the infor­ma­ti­on over several mon­ths ins­tead of releasing it immedia­te­ly so the com­pa­ny can “con­trol the narrative”.[24] Tech­no­lo­gy jour­na­lists have cri­ti­ci­zed the slow, pie­ce­me­al, unclear, thea­tri­cal release of evi­dence that ero­des trust in the company.[21]

Bat­te­ry rese­ar­chers and engi­neers ana­ly­zing the publis­hed VTT results found they are con­sis­tent with results for currently-available bat­te­ry cells with a Si-Gr anode and Li-NMC cathode,[33] and the vol­ta­ge cur­ve stron­gly indi­ca­tes the device che­mi­stry is Li-NMC.[34][35][36] The capa­ci­ty degra­dati­on at 11C indi­ca­tes the bat­te­ry reaches 70% of its ori­gi­nal capa­ci­ty after 30-50 such cycles.[37] The­re is con­sen­sus among solid-state bat­te­ry experts that the results from the first two sets of tests per­for­med by VTT for Donut Lab are mea­ningless in terms of com­mer­cial use, as they do not test capa­ci­ty fade and pack-level performance.[38]

[…]

A cri­mi­nal com­p­laint was filed in April 2026 against Donut Lab by the chief com­mer­cial offi­cer of Nor­dic Nano, a com­pa­ny par­ti­al­ly owned by Donut Lab, who was named by Hel­sin­gin Sano­mat as the manu­fac­tu­rer of the Donut Lab bat­te­ry. The cri­mi­nal com­p­laint alle­ges that the bat­te­ry ener­gy den­si­ty, char­ging cycle endu­ran­ce, and mass-production rea­di­ness adver­ti­sed by Donut Lab have not been achie­ved. Cor­re­spon­dence seen by Hel­sin­gin Sano­mat sup­ports the claims made in the com­p­laint, and gives the impres­si­on that Donut Lab is the pro­duc­ti­zer of the bat­te­ry, Nor­dic Nano is the manu­fac­tu­rer, and CT-Coating is the deve­lo­per and sup­plier of the manu­fac­tu­ring equip­ment. The cor­re­spon­dence says that CT-Coating stop­ped the deve­lo­p­ment of the bat­te­ry pre­sen­ted by Donut Lab which was sub­mit­ted to tests by VTT Tech­ni­cal Rese­arch Cent­re of Fin­land; CT-Coating star­ted exclu­si­ve­ly deve­lo­ping a dif­fe­rent bat­te­ry, lea­ving Donut Lab and Nor­dic Nano without the pro­duc­tion equip­ment requi­red to manu­fac­tu­re the adver­ti­sed battery.[15]

src: click

Wie­der mal alles rich­tig gemacht im Öster­rei­chi­schen Qualitätsjournalismus.

Die Ener­gie­wen­de kann kommen.

edit: Dem Stan­dard is es wider erwar­ten nur zwei Tgae spä­ter auf­ge­fal­len. Hat das einer von euch ihnen gesteckt?

src: click

Veröffentlicht by me am Montag, 08. Juni 2026 unter Allgemein, Media.