Here is what a ukrainian diplomat looks like

11. April 2022

try­ing hard to bro­ker a peace agree­ment, and mini­mi­ze loss of life as well as pre­vent harm in the medi­um and long term:

Here is what a shun­ned geo­stra­te­gist loo­ks like lis­ting the exact opi­ni­on arti­cle whe­re posi­tio­ning of the US is han­ded over to the lea­ders­hip of the Ukrai­ne. In tho­se panels you make sure to also add at least one struc­tu­ral extre­mist to dis­credit the head­liner. This is the second video whe­re I see this happening.

I %&&THIS SOCIETY.

Why? Becau­se the posi­ti­on of the Ukrai­ne, try­ing to get back ter­ri­to­ri­al inte­gri­ty inclu­ding the Krim, can be pin­poin­ted to a time, when FLIPPING NEWSMEDIA PUSHED HEADLINE ARTICLES ON SELENSKYJ CALLING FOR PEACE, WITH THE BYLINE TER­RI­TO­Ri­AL INTEGRATY HAS TO BE KEPT INTACT, WHEN EVEN LISTENING TO THE PUBLIC POSITION OF THE ENEMY HAS BECOME SOMETHING WORTH RIDICULING PEOPLE OVER (“Should rus­sia be black­bal­led?”) NOT TO MENTION NEWS MEDIA INVENTING POSITIONS OF - WE DONT POST THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL, BECAUSE WE WOULD HAVE TO PUBLISH RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA, THEN PUBLISHING ENTIRE WRITEUPS OF SELEN­SKYj EVENING SPEECHES WITHOUT CONTEXT, FULL TO THE BRIM WITH flip­ping PROPAGANDA MESSAGING (OBJECTIVELY, BASED ON CONSTRUCTION OF ARGUMENTS), THEN flip­ping, NOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE HARDLINE STANCE OF US HAWKS, which - btw. glad you asked, by now is -- we want to beat Rus­sia in Ukrai­ne, even if it takes 3-5 years, full stop, also Selen­skyj wouldnt sur­vi­ve being seen as ‘han­ding over a vic­to­ry to Putin’ lar­ge­ly becau­se of the poli­ti­cal right in the Ukrai­ne, and Selen­skyj wouldnt sur­vi­ve being drop­ped by the US, which has no inte­rest in ending the war ear­ly, USED AS a flip­ping GUNG HO GAMBIT IN POLITICAL POSTERING, AND THE BENEFITS OF ACTUALLY KEEPING COMMUNICATION CHANNELS OPEN IS NOW FORBIDDEN, WHILE SWITCHING FROM “we want peace” to WEAPONS, WEAPONS, WEAPONS, AS SOON AS THE OTHER SIDE SHOWS ANY SIGNS OF EVEN POTENTIAL WEAKNESS (COORDINATED RETREAT).

We now have bul­ly on the schoo­ly­ard beha­vi­or as the only per­mis­si­ble stance one can cur­r­ent­ly hold, while rear­ma­ment con­ti­nues for the next lar­ge con­fron­ta­ti­on. With one side sug­ges­ting, not to talk to the other side, until they are dri­ven out of the coun­try. While the other side needs just one more major city - pre­fer­a­b­ly func­tio­n­ing and not flat­te­ned - to redu­ce Ukrai­ne to a land­lo­cked sta­te until the last of the occu­p­iers mili­ta­ry units have left the country.

Again, time hori­zon 3-5 years (two, if Putin gets topp­led in 2024) if at all. 12% of world food pro­duc­tion (mea­su­red in calo­ries) not avail­ab­le to the deve­lo­ping world (becau­se of uneven dis­tri­bu­ti­on, thats qui­te a bit more hor­ri­fic than it sounds), OPEC that has con­fir­med that it cant pick up the ent­i­re Del­ta if the­re is a wes­tern ban on rus­si­an oil (7mio bar­rels a day cant be com­pen­sa­ted, 50 mio peop­le in the regi­on fal­ling into pover­ty, Ukrai­ne cur­r­ent­ly at 50% loss of GDP, thats befo­re they might beco­me a land­lo­cked coun­try… And many more dead peop­le inco­m­ing. This game of chi­cken sucks.

Gree­tings from the WP edi­to­ri­al board: click

- from Selen­skyj hel­ming two oppo­sing posi­ti­ons at once, as usu­al: click

- from a for­mer U.S. spe­cial repre­sen­ta­ti­ve to the Ukrai­ne: click

(To cir­cum­vent the WP pay­wall, clear coo­kies (you get a few arti­cles for free, befo­re the sub­scrip­ti­on nag).)









Hinterlasse eine Antwort