Point 1 - According to Stoltenberg “There is really no difference between the russian war in Ukraine and the upcoming attack of China on Taiwan” - even though one didnt happen yet.
Point 2 - Moderator: How is the Arctic different in terms of Nato is safeguarding peace? “Its really not different. The Arctic is also a buch of land and water and ice, but less ice now, and more sea, so the Arctic also very important in Natos mission to safeguard peace”!
Point 3 - Compare and contrast with a google search for “nato attacks without un mandate”.
Compare and contrast with a google search for “nato exceeded un mandate”.
Or if you can stomach it - with this:
Point 4 - “China wants to join the Arctic circle alliance, someone told me - they also want to be part of this, but they arent even an Arctic country!”
Meanwhile - North Atlantic Treaty Organisation opens “headquaters” in Japan, …
NATO to set up liaison office in Tokyo, beef up regional ties (Reuters)
Oh, sorry - the most important point:
Point 5: Ukraine has to join Nato - otherwise we can not be sure Russia wont attack Ukraine again!
For that to happen, Ukraine has to be closely brought up to Nato standards, so that “WHEN THE TIME IS RIGHT” in a Moment of weakness for russia, when Turkey can be convinced as well, the actual joining process can happen without the normal path of action, in a quicktrack fashion, within a few weeks. “This is the only way to just and permanent peace.”
SO NOT MUCH CHANGED THEN, SINCE THE BEFORE THE WAR PERIOD, I RECON?
Diese Gesellschaft ist das absolut grotesk und abartigst Allerletzte.
Point 6:
“Nato has been so successful, because its mission statement was so clear, to protect peace.” (Jens Stoltenberg)
but also
“I’m optimistic, Nato is so successful, because we have proven so agile and adaptable over time.” (Jens Stoltenberg, same Press conference)
Gut, Propaganda hat wieder niemand entdeckt, was will man machen…
