harlekin.me

Front „zusam­men­ge­bro­chen“: Ukrai­ni­scher Gene­ral­ma­jor bestä­tigt Pro­ble­me in Donezk

src: click (Die Presse)

Und das wo sie doch gera­de am gewin­nen waren!

Es gibt aber natür­lich auch wie­der gute Nach­rich­ten, laut der Haup­thead­line heu­te auf diepresse.com haben sich öster­rei­chi­sche Bun­des­heer­sol­da­ten auf UN Mis­si­on im Liba­non selbst in den Fuss geschos­sen, oder so… 

Gleich acht von denen.

Rake­ten­tref­fer bei Camp: Bun­des­heer­sol­da­ten bei UNO-Einsatz im Liba­non leicht verletzt

Bei Rake­ten­ein­schlä­gen in unmit­tel­ba­rer Nähe des Unifil-Camps im Süden des Liba­non wur­den meh­re­re öster­rei­chi­sche Sol­da­ten leicht ver­letzt, gab das Ver­tei­di­gungs­mi­nis­te­ri­um bekannt.

src: click (Die Presse)

Gut, da brauch ma jetzt nicht dazu­schrei­ben wer das war, nicht?

edit: Die Infor­ma­ti­on wur­de jetzt nachgereicht:

Laut Anga­ben der Uni­fil kam die Rake­te aus dem Libanon.

src: click

The offi­cial results show the Geor­gi­an Dream’s share slight­ly lower com­pa­red to the Gor­bi exit polls com­mis­sio­ned by pro-government Ime­di TV, while the offi­cial results are in dra­ma­tic con­trast to the exit polls con­duc­ted by Har­risX (for pro-opposition Mta­va­ri Arkhi) Edi­son Rese­arch (for opposition-leaning Formula-TV), with the lat­ter being known tra­di­tio­nal­ly as most accu­ra­te in election-day pol­ling. Both Har­risX and Edi­son Rese­arch had pro­jec­ted the oppo­si­ti­on as winners.

src: click

Dif­fe­rence (Geor­gi­an Dream results) Edi­son pol­ling (40.9%) to offi­cial 2024 elec­tion result (53.93%) = 13,03% points

Voter tur­nout 58.94%

Geor­gi­an popu­la­ti­on: 3.8 million

3.8 mil­li­on -23% (round­about, see click) to get eli­gi­ble voters is 2.93

2.93 mil­li­on - (100-58,94=41,06)% = 1,73 mil­li­on to account for voter turnout.

13,03% of 1,73 mil­li­on = 225.419 of alle­ged (by oppo­si­ti­on par­ties) wron­gly allo­ca­ted votes.

Geor­gi­an CEC of cour­se now decla­red the Mar­neu­li district results inva­lid becau­se of the aformen­tio­ned video evi­dence of bal­lot stuffing.

That district has a popu­la­ti­on of 20.211 minus 23% for eli­gi­ble voters minus 41,06% to account for voter tur­nout (20211-23%)-41,06% = 9172 voters.

Geor­gi­an Dream Vote per­cen­ta­ge in Mar­neu­li: 79,62%

79,62% of 9172 = 7303

So now we have 7303 votes of an alle­ged 225.419 frau­du­lent­ly cast under reevaluation!

Gre­at, so whats next?

My Vote poin­ted to “mass” inci­dents of voters being given two or more bal­lots ins­tead of one during the first half of the day, and said the­re were also cases whe­re the ruling party’s field was alrea­dy mar­ked on the bal­lot. The mis­si­on said it also “beca­me clear” that nume­rous reports of con­fis­ca­ting or “ren­ting” voters’ ID cards and collec­ting their per­so­nal infor­ma­ti­on during the cam­pai­gn were used to car­ry out the same rig­ging scheme.

[…]

Accord­ing to My Vote, as of 10-11 p.m., the mission’s obser­vers iden­ti­fied 347 vio­la­ti­ons of the mar­king pro­cess, 89 reports of vio­la­ti­ons of the secrecy of the vote, 341 cases of unaut­ho­ri­zed per­sons in the pol­ling sta­ti­on, and 96 cases of phy­si­cal vio­lence, thre­ats, and con­fron­ta­ti­ons, as well as 163 cases of obst­ruc­tion of My Vote observers.

The vio­la­ti­ons were “sys­te­ma­tic” in some are­as, inclu­ding in Mar­neu­li, Bol­ni­si, Kare­li, Gori, Kas­pi, Khas­h­u­ri, Sen­a­ki, Garda­ba­ni, Gur­jaa­ni, Signaghi, Dedo­p­lists­ka­ro, Kobu­leti, Sag­a­re­jo, Batu­mi, Zug­di­di, Tela­vi, Chkho­rot­s­ku, Akhalts­ik­he, Mts­k­he­ta, Akhal­ka­la­ki, Rus­ta­vi, Gld­ani (Tbi­li­si), Isa­ni (Tbi­li­si), Sam­go­ri (Tbi­li­si), and Kha­ragau­li districts.

src: click

Total popu­la­ti­on of the alle­ged districts:

20211+8967+6654+48143+13423+26135+21596+10753+8024+
1485+5940+16546+10871+172100+42998+19629+3141+17903+
7940+8295+130100+177500+125610+177844+1965 ==

(1.083.773-23%)-41,06% = 491857 actu­al peop­le voting. (Inclu­ding Marneuli.) 

Geor­gi­an dreams alle­ged vote per­cen­ta­ge = 53.93%

53.93% of 491857 == 265258 poten­ti­al­ly affec­ted voting opportunities.

So thats 265.258 poten­ti­al­ly affec­ted voting oppor­tu­nities out of an alle­ged 225.419 alle­ged frau­du­lent votes. (The 13,03% dif­fe­rence of Geor­gi­an Dreams results in exit polls com­pa­red to offi­cial results.)

Mea­ning 8.5 out of 10 of tho­se 265.258 MUST have voted at least twice, for the result to be exp­lai­ned by dou­ble voting.

For tho­se (225.419 alle­ged frau­du­lent votes) the NGO My Vote offers up

Accord­ing to My Vote, as of 10-11 p.m., the mission’s obser­vers iden­ti­fied 347 vio­la­ti­ons of the mar­king pro­cess, 89 reports of vio­la­ti­ons of the secrecy of the vote, 341 cases of unaut­ho­ri­zed per­sons in the pol­ling sta­ti­on, and 96 cases of phy­si­cal vio­lence, thre­ats, and con­fron­ta­ti­ons, as well as 163 cases of obst­ruc­tion of My Vote observers.

src: click

347 cases of vio­la­ti­ons in the mar­king pro­cess, and 89 vio­la­ti­ons of the secrecy of the vote, as well as 96 cases of poten­ti­al threats.

347+89+96 = 532

Wolf­ram Alpha, what per­cen­ta­ge is 532 out of 225419?

Ans­wer: 0,236%

Which we all lear­ned in the case of the US elec­tions by now is not sta­tis­ti­cal­ly signi­fi­cant. To pro­ve that the vio­la­ti­ons were “sys­te­ma­tic”.

Geor­gia, oh my Georgia.

So asi­de from this making no sen­se sta­tis­ti­cal­ly, any other plea­sant surprises?

Well…

Spea­ker Papuash­vi­li Claims Oppo­si­ti­on, CSOs Spread “Election-Related Disinformation”

Geor­gi­an Par­lia­ment Spea­ker Shal­va Papuash­vi­li defen­ded the ruling Geor­gi­an Dream party’s high­ly con­tro­ver­si­al near­ly 54 per­cent vic­to­ry in the Octo­ber 26 elec­tions, deny­ing alle­ga­ti­ons of fraud by oppo­si­ti­on and obser­vers. At the Octo­ber 28 brie­fing, he accu­sed oppo­si­ti­on for­ces and civil socie­ty orga­niz­a­ti­ons of try­ing to stir unrest in the coun­try through dis­in­for­ma­ti­on cam­pai­gns. “They don’t want to accept people’s will,” he said.

src: click

con­tras­ting this:

.@edisonresearch exit poll (blue) vs the CEC offi­cial results (oran­ge) over the years. Ano­t­her mathe­ma­ti­cal pro­of of bla­tant rig­ging. pic.twitter.com/YLmVcpKzXA

— Gior­gi Kan­de­la­ki (@kandelakigiorgi) Octo­ber 27, 2024

(That Del­ta shows the 13,03% points dif­fe­rence in 2024.)

Sigh…

So 2 minu­te summery?

- Dou­ble voting in the districts whe­re irre­gu­la­ri­ties were docu­men­ted, cant exp­lain the dis­crepan­cy in alle­ged votes.
- The docu­men­ted bal­lot stuf­fing (one or two cases docu­men­ted) cant exp­lain the dis­crepan­cy in alle­ged votes.
- The docu­men­ted alle­ged instan­ces of voting irre­gu­la­ri­ties are not sta­tis­ti­cal­ly signi­fi­cant to account for an alle­ged vote dis­crepan­cy of 225419 votes

Which lea­ves elec­tro­nic voting mani­pu­la­ti­on as the most likely means remai­ning to account for a 225419 votes dis­crepan­cy (13,03% points) bet­ween the usual­ly most reli­able exit poll pol­ling agen­cy and the offi­cial elec­tion result figures.

Thanks to newsukraine.rbc.ua

https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/massive-fraud-and-fights-erupt-at-georgia-1729942937.html

That must have been… SEVEN bal­lots at least!

So of cour­se the NDI INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION TO GEORGIA’S OCTOBER 26, 2024 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS prompt­ly speaks of “instan­ces of bal­lot stuf­fing” (plu­ral). Without pro­vi­ding any refe­ren­ces of cour­se. (Media reports are avail­ab­le for the one that is on tape.)

In addi­ti­on to one obser­ver beat down that resul­ted in hospitalization.

In addi­ti­ons to several quar­rels at pol­ling stations.

In addi­ti­on to… Ehm…

Throughout elec­tion day, reports from citi­zen obser­vers pro­vi­ded valu­able infor­ma­ti­on to sup­port our obser­va­ti­on fin­dings. On elec­tion day, citi­zen obser­vers wit­nessed widespread vio­la­ti­ons of the neu­tra­li­ty zone around pol­ling sta­ti­ons by gathe­rings of ruling par­ty figu­res and unaut­ho­ri­zed per­sons. Our short-term obser­vers and citi­zen obser­vers also repor­ted intimi­da­ti­on of voters. Citi­zen obser­vers also repor­ted an incre­a­se in cri­ti­cal inci­dents, inclu­ding vio­lence against obser­vers, voters and par­ty representatives.

NDI stres­ses that this state­ment is preli­mi­na­ry in natu­re and that the post-election envi­ron­ment con­ti­nues to unfold.

src: click

So of cour­se this happens:

Blin­ken: U.S. Con­demns Breaches of Int. Norms During Oct.26 Elec­tions, Calls for Investigation

Short­ly befo­re this happens:

A day after Georgia’s par­lia­men­ta­ry elec­tions, in which the Cen­tral Elec­tion Com­mis­si­on decla­red the ruling Geor­gi­an Dream par­ty the win­ner, seni­or Euro­pean par­lia­men­ta­ri­ans issued a joint state­ment with their Cana­di­an coun­ter­part say­ing “the elec­tions were neit­her free nor fair” and that “the Euro­pean Uni­on can­not reco­gni­ze the result.”

src: click

Wait, so all it takes to call an elec­tion frau­du­lent as Blin­ken is one instance of 7 bal­lots being stuf­fed into a box, several out­breaks of vio­lence at pol­ling sta­ti­ons and several vio­la­ti­ons of the neu­tra­li­ty zone around pol­ling stations?

Well, not exact­ly -- the main argu­ment for this elec­tion having been sto­len are intimi­da­ti­on cam­pai­gns weeks and mon­ths befo­re the elec­tions, as well as sta­te spon­so­red intimi­da­ti­on based on fears around cuts in sta­te spen­ding being used to “moti­va­te” voters to vote for the lea­ding party.

Tho­se are all well documented:

“Orga­ni­zed cri­mi­nal gangs … are try­ing to under­mi­ne the voting pro­cess with aggres­si­on and intimi­da­ti­on,” oppo­si­ti­on poli­ti­ci­an Ana Nats­vlish­vi­li said.

src: click

It is clear that the pre-election peri­od fai­led to meet fun­da­men­tal stan­dards for demo­cra­tic elec­tions. The government’s pas­sa­ge of legis­la­ti­on that labels civic actors as for­eign agents and its cam­pai­gn to intimi­da­te tho­se that cri­ti­ci­zed ruling par­ty poli­ci­es gene­ra­ted a cli­ma­te of fear.
State-sponsored efforts to dis­credit and legal­ly restrict elec­tion obser­vers for­ced them to divert resour­ces to self-defense from their cen­tral acti­vi­ties to safe­guard the elec­tions. The legis­la­ti­on also had a chil­ling effect on advo­ca­tes, civic edu­ca­tors and other groups con­tri­bu­ting to the poli­ti­cal dis­cour­se. Ruling par­ty lea­ders also threa­tened to cri­mi­na­li­ze oppo­si­ti­on poli­ti­cal par­ties. Legis­la­ti­on pas­sed by the government restric­ted the rights of and stig­ma­ti­zed vul­nerable LGBTQI+ com­mu­nities in con­tra­ven­ti­on to regio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal human rights stan­dards to which Geor­gia is obli­ged. Taken tog­e­ther, the government’s actions cau­sed the Euro­pean Uni­on to halt Georgia’s acces­si­on path.
A frag­men­ted, poli­ti­ci­zed media envi­ron­ment limi­ted voters’ access to impar­ti­al information.

The ruling par­ty had dis­pro­por­tio­na­te influ­ence on this envi­ron­ment given its con­trol over sta­te media as well as pri­va­te­ly held channels.

src: click

But I still found it note­wor­thy how litt­le it takes in regards to on the day evi­dence, to call an elec­tion stolen.

Cant wait for the deman­ded inves­ti­ga­ti­on into the matter.

edit: That, and the exit poll vary vast­ly depen­ding on who did them. I have to men­ti­on that as well: click

edit2: Elec­tro­nic voting was in place and bad­ly vetted.

The EETs were used in 2,263 (74.6 per­cent) of PECs repre­sen­ting appro­xi­mate­ly 90 per­cent of voters.

While the CEC’s online por­tal for rapid results publi­ca­ti­on enhan­ced trans­pa­ren­cy, it was also unclear whe­ther the addi­tio­nal preli­mi­na­ry results trans­mis­si­on com­po­nent from elec­tro­nic PECs was tes­ted for hea­vy user traf­fic, or whe­ther results infor­ma­ti­on would be made avail­ab­le in an open data format.

src: click

edit3: France24 has addi­tio­nal info:

Oppo­si­ti­on par­ties alle­ged inci­dents of bal­lot stuf­fing and intimi­da­ti­on during voting, and cal­led the results “frau­du­lent”.

src: click

So thats the source of the mul­ti­ple bal­lot stuf­fing inci­den­ces. Claims by the oppo­si­ti­on parties.

Oh, and swissinfo.ch sta­tes, that the OSCE sees it more in line with.… ehm, facts.…

Howe­ver, moni­tors from the Orga­ni­sa­ti­on for Secu­ri­ty and Co-operation in Euro­pe (OSCE) said they had regis­tered inci­dents of vote-buying, voter intimi­da­ti­on, and ballot-stuffing that could have affec­ted the out­co­me. But they stop­ped short of say­ing the elec­tion was rigged.

src: click

2004 erscheint John Per­kins “Con­fes­si­ons of an Eco­no­mic Hit Man”

Laut sei­nem Buch bestand Per­kins’ Funk­ti­on dar­in, die poli­ti­sche und wirt­schaft­li­che Füh­rungs­eli­te unter­ent­wi­ckel­ter Staa­ten dazu zu brin­gen, enor­me Ent­wick­lungs­hil­fe­kre­di­te von Insti­tu­tio­nen wie der Welt­bank und der United Sta­tes Agen­cy for Inter­na­tio­nal Deve­lo­p­ment (USAID) auf­zu­neh­men. Belas­tet mit rie­si­gen Schul­den, die sie nie zurück­zu­zah­len erhof­fen konn­ten, waren die­se Län­der gezwun­gen, sich bei den ver­schie­dens­ten Gele­gen­hei­ten dem poli­ti­schen Druck der USA zu beu­gen. Per­kins beschreibt, wie die Ent­wick­lungs­län­der effek­tiv poli­tisch neu­tra­li­siert wur­den und ihre Einkommens- und Ver­mö­gens­dis­pa­ri­tät (Gini-Koeffizient) immer wei­ter her­auf­ge­trie­ben wurde.

src: click

Hier kurz die Rezep­ti­on sei­ner­zeit aus der Wiki­pe­dia kopiert:

Jim Gar­ri­son, der mit Michail Gor­bat­schow das Sta­te of the World Forum grün­de­te, merk­te an:[1]

„Jeder, der weiß, wie die Welt­bank oder der inter­na­tio­na­le Wäh­rungs­fonds arbei­ten, könn­te bestä­ti­gen, dass das, was John Per­kins in sei­nem Buch beschreibt, grund­sätz­lich stimmt. Es gibt einen Grund, war­um unse­re Ent­wick­lungs­hil­fe und der gan­ze Ein­satz von Welt­bank und Wäh­rungs­fonds die Lage ver­schlim­mert und nicht ver­bes­sert: Alles ist so kon­stru­iert, nicht den Ärms­ten zu hel­fen, son­dern die­se Län­der ein­fach zu benut­zen, um west­li­che Unter­neh­men wei­ter zu berei­chern. So läuft der Hase.“ 

Das Deutsch­land­ra­dio schreibt:[2]

„Wüss­te man nicht inzwi­schen so viel über die ille­ga­len Akti­vi­tä­ten der US-Geheimdienste zur Desta­bi­li­sie­rung von Regie­run­gen, zum Sturz von miss­lie­bi­gen Staats­chefs, wür­de man die Bekennt­nis­se die­ses so genann­ten Eco­no­mic Hit Man, also Wirt­schafts­kil­lers, auf den gro­ßen Hau­fen von Ver­schwö­rungs­theo­rien packen. […] Her­aus­ge­kom­men ist ein enga­gier­tes Schuld­be­kennt­nis, bis­wei­len arg sim­pli­fi­zie­rend, mora­li­sie­rend, gene­ra­li­sie­rend. Statt kon­kre­ter und neu­er Bewei­se: Bekennt­nis­se und sei­ten­lan­ge Auf­zäh­lun­gen längst bekann­ter, andern­orts bereits abge­druck­ter Hin­ter­grün­de. Trotz vie­ler Details feh­len die wirk­lich har­ten Fak­ten, sen­sa­tio­nel­le Ent­hül­lun­gen sucht man ver­ge­bens. Man muss ihm glau­ben - oder auch nicht.“ 

Die Deut­sche Wel­le urteilt:[3]

„Von einem Insi­der aber könn­te man statt­des­sen doch etwas mehr Details über die beschrie­be­nen Kre­dit­ge­schäf­te erwar­ten. Aber eine Ana­ly­se der öko­no­mi­schen Grund­la­ge sei­nes Tuns lie­fert Per­kins nicht. Auch mit sen­sa­tio­nel­len Ent­hül­lun­gen kann er nicht auf­war­ten. Viel­leicht ist dies auch dem Umstand geschul­det, dass weder Per­kins noch sein Ver­lag Spaß haben, hor­ren­de Scha­den­er­satz­for­de­run­gen zu zah­len. Wer die Din­ge im Unge­fäh­ren lässt und sich auf ver­öf­fent­lich­te Quel­len beruft, kann kaum belangt wer­den. Eine Urlaubs­lek­tü­re für die, die dach­ten, Ent­wick­lungs­po­li­tik sei im Prin­zip von edlen Moti­ven getra­gen und wür­de manch­mal wegen hand­werk­li­cher Feh­ler schei­tern. Wer die­se Illu­si­on schon ver­lo­ren hat, für den bringt das Buch nicht viel Neues.“

src: click

2013 adap­tiert Chi­na Belt & Road, das dar­auf aus­ge­legt ist die bis­he­ri­ge Ent­wick­lungs­po­li­tik des Wer­te­wes­tens so zu ver­än­dern, dass Ent­wick­lungs­staa­ten deren Lage sich ver­schlim­mert hat, nicht für Jahr­zehn­te in der Schul­den­til­gung hän­gen­blei­ben, son­dern Ent­wick­lungs­po­li­tik sub­til an zwei neue Aspek­te bin­det - zum einen Infra­struk­tur­pro­jek­te, die dem jewei­li­gen Emp­fän­ger­land geschenkt wer­den (aber von chi­ne­si­schen con­trac­tors aus­ge­führt, die dann oft auch im Emp­fän­ger­land ver­blei­ben), zum ande­ren Kre­di­te bei Schlüs­sel­in­fra­struk­tur, die bei Nicht­til­gung als Kon­di­ti­on auf­wei­sen, dass wesent­li­che Häfen oder Flug­hä­fen des Emp­fän­ger­lan­des unter die Kon­trol­le und Ver­wal­tung Chi­nas fal­len - meist beschränkt auf einen län­ge­ren Zeit­raum (100 Jah­re). Durch die Kon­trol­le der wich­tigs­ten Infrastruktur-Routen des Emp­fän­ger­lan­des ergibt sich dann eben­falls wie­der poli­ti­scher Einfluss.

Ver­glei­che z.B.: China’s Belt and Road Initia­ti­ve and aviation

(Tenor des ver­link­ten Artikels:)

Bet­ween 2014 and 2016, China’s total tra­de volu­me in the coun­tries along Belt and Road Initia­ti­ve excee­ded USD3 tril­li­on, while China’s invest­ment in the­se nati­ons sur­pas­sed USD50 bil­li­on. Howe­ver, the­re are con­cerns in tho­se part­ne­ring coun­tries about the lar­ge debt bur­den on Chi­na to pro­mo­te the Initia­ti­ve. The­re are dif­fe­ring views on whe­ther the BRI is an idea­listic recon­struc­tion of the Silk Road con­cept or a colos­sal stra­te­gic move to expand China’s influence.

src: click

ZWANZIG JAHRE SPÄTER

also am 16. Okto­ber 2024

ver­kauft Con­do­leez­za Rice, an der Uni­ver­si­tät Not­re Dame in einem “Not­re Dame Forum event” vor einem Pater als Mode­ra­tor, der ver­sam­mel­ten Stu­den­ten­schaft den “Poli­ti­sche Ein­fluss­nah­me durch Schul­den­bin­dung” Aspekt von Ent­wick­lungs­po­li­tik als “Erfin­dung der Chinesen”.

Con­do­leez­za Rice: We need to go and say that uh and we need to edu­ca­te incre­a­singly sophisti­ca­ted popu­la­ti­ons about this -- we did a pro­gram at the Hoo­ver Insti­tu­ti­on [Con­do­leez­za Rice is the Tad and Dian­ne Tau­be Direc­tor of the Hoo­ver Insti­tu­ti­on] for Afri­can jour­na­list uh try­ing to help them under­stand how Belt and Road real­ly works, becau­se if you under­stand that you are -- your coun­try is about to take on a lot of debt uh which if you can’t pay back the Chi­ne­se are going to claim that port or claim that uh that buil­ding may­be you’ll start to say to your government even uh what’s hap­pe­ning to our money we need to keep pres­sing for trans­pa­ren­cy uh we have a trans­pa­ren­cy index and we have a trans­pa­ren­cy um initia­ti­ve through the UN that’s kind of more abund at this point nobo­dy pays much atten­ti­on to it, but if you can get trans­pa­ren­cy on how some of this works, I think the­re will be pres­su­re on governments to start to do what’s right for their peop­le and what’s right for for their peop­le is for them to fight cor­rup­ti­on which as many have said is a tax on the poor, they will have to reco­gni­ze that they real­ly ought to be brin­ging jobs to their peop­le not just uh lar­ge sums for them­sel­ves and uh I think we can start to turn it around, but then we bet­ter actual­ly fol­low through on our side.

Mode­ra­tor: Awe­so­me thank you very much.

Also noch mehr die eige­nen Kin­der in der Funk­ti­ons­eli­te ver­ar­schen geht nicht mehr.

2004: DW und Deutsch­land­funk: “Weiss doch eh jeder dass von der Welt­bank Abhän­gig­kei­ten geschaf­fen wer­den und Ent­wick­lungs­po­li­tik nicht von edlen Moti­ven getrie­ben ist, und oft­mals nicht zufäl­lig schei­tert.” Wäh­rend die Infra­struk­tur von US Unter­neh­men errich­tet wird und selbst­re­dend bis zur Til­gung der Kre­di­te im Eigen­tum des Kre­dit­ge­bers verbleibt.

2014: Chi­na switcht auf: Wir schen­ken euch erst­mals die Infra­struk­tur, die wir für euch bau­en, bau­en die eben­falls vor Ort selbst und las­sen euch dann gleich noch eine Expat Com­mu­ni­ty im Land, und Schlüs­sel­in­fra­struk­tur gibt es nur gegen Kre­di­te bei deren Nicht-Tilgung wir für 100 Jah­re die Ver­wal­tung und den Betrieb eures Hafens/Flughafens übernehmen.

2024: Con­do­leez­za Rice vor den Stu­den­ten der Uni­ver­si­ty of Not­re Dame: “We did a pro­gram at the Hoo­ver Insti­tu­ti­on for Afri­can jour­na­list uh try­ing to help them under­stand how Belt and Road real­ly works, becau­se if you under­stand that you are -- your coun­try is about to take on a lot of debt, uh which if you can’t pay back the Chi­ne­se are going to claim that port, or claim that uh that building…”

Wir sind die Guten.

Bes­ser kann man das Wer­te­wes­ten Kon­zept wirk­lich kei­nem Stu­den­ten mehr erklären…

Aber gut dass sich die Hoo­ver Insti­tu­ti­on so gut um afri­ka­ni­sche Jour­na­lis­ten kümmert!

Und gut auch, dass der Pater und Pro­fes­sor an der Not­re Dame das awe­so­me fin­det. Ich hät­te ja eher kot­zen bis nichts mehr nach­kommt vor­ge­schla­gen, aber ich hab auch nicht so einen guten Draht zum Her­ren wie der Herr mit dem wei­ßen Kragen…

Wer­te.
West­li­che Werte.
West­li­che Wer­te Ethik.

Haha. Ah… Ah.

Der ZDF Kor­re­spon­dent (nicht im you­tube Thumb­nail) hat Sumi besucht, und kann bestä­ti­gen, dass es in Sumi jetzt mehr Luft­an­grif­fe gibt als vor dem ukrai­ni­schen Ein­marsch in Kursk, “da die Ukrai­ne zu wenig Luft­ver­tei­di­gung habe”.

Ja genau, DARAN wirds liegen.

Vie­le Grü­ße von den “Leu­ten die rech­nen kön­nen” an den ZDF Kor­re­spon­den­ten in der Ukrai­ne, der darf immer so tol­le Geschich­ten von den Erleb­nis­rei­sen erzäh­len die die Ukrai­ne für ihn vor­be­rei­tet, das ist immer ganz toll, wie der das macht.

Enorm sym­pa­tisch der Kerl.