harlekin.me

Fin­nish For­eign Minis­ter, Eli­na Valtonen.

Mrs. For­eign Minis­ter, what can Ukrai­ne learn from Finn­land as the newest NATO members?

Val­to­nen: Non corruption.

Mrs. For­eign Minis­ter, have the hybrid rus­si­an attacks on Fin­land increased?

Val­to­nen: Weeeeeeeeeeeell, it is important.

Mrs. For­eign Minis­ter, how will this war end?

Val­to­nen: Rus­sia will implo­de like in the cold war.

In other words, the soa­ring defen­se and social spen­ding in the [rus­si­an] bud­get will be lar­ge­ly finan­ced through the gra­du­al deva­lua­ti­on of the ruble, a pro­cess that is alrea­dy well under way. A mode­ra­te bud­get defi­cit may, inde­ed, help restrain inflation.

Defen­se spen­ding in 2024 will almost dou­ble com­pa­red to this year. While that is less than the 12–17 per­cent of GDP that the Soviet Uni­on was spen­ding on defen­se at the height of the Cold War, it is com­pa­ra­ble to U.S. mili­ta­ry expen­dit­u­re in the 1980s. [5-7% of GDP see world bank data: click]

src: click (carnegieendowment.org)

Mrs. For­eign Minis­ter, why should NATO eco­no­mies inte­gra­te more?

Val­to­nen: Well look at the others like Chi­na and rus­sia, It seems to me thats what we should do. Some­thing has to finan­ce what we spend on weapons!

Bloom­berg Mode­ra­tor: “So are you cal­ling for a free tra­de agree­ment wit­hin NATO?!”

Val­to­nen: “Well I know this sounds like, eh he he, … very biz­za­re at a time whe­re peop­le are --”

Bloom­berg Mode­ra­tor “Put­ting up the wall!”

Val­to­nen: “Exact­ly!”

Val­to­nen: “Well, look at fin­land for examp­le! Now that we joi­ned NATO we bring in both Nokia and Erics­son! The most secure…”

Thank you for the inter­view Mrs. For­eign Minis­ter Eli­na Val­to­nen, you valu­able ehm mem­ber of the Nato alliance.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Nato sum­mit panel from the 10th of Juli 2024, at about 1 hour 13min in:

Fox Mode­ra­tor: “Is the goal still to take back all of Ukrai­ne, to the 1991 bor­ders. Is that still the goal today, or could you see a nego­tia­ted sett­le­ment that ends this war for you and your people?”

Selen­skyj: “The best way the best way of cour­se uh after the first Peace Sum­mit to orga­ni­ze and pre­pa­re the plan and to orga­ni­ze during some mon­ths the second Sum­mit and have this docu­ment and to put in by majo­ri­ty of the world to put him and to push him to stop the war this -- is the best way and when we speak about ter­ri­to­ries you have to to know that first of all, of cour­se we need to save peop­le, Nati­ons and and that’s fine and and of cour­se we are not -- need mem­bers we don’t have such you know umbrel­la and that’s why we need Putin to lose, we don’t want him to be on our ter­ri­to­ry, becau­se any­way it’s a fro­zen con­flict and it will depends on years when he will pre­pa­re and come back, come back again with Inva­si­on. He will do it to you.”

Mode­ra­tor: “So yeah of cour­se, the the Munich agree­ment did­n’t work, uh 1938 -- a poten­ti­al agree­ment you’­re say­ing with Putin may not work”

Selen­skyj: “The docu­ment with Hit­ler did­n’t work why it has to work second time? I don’t know. I think he loves the pro­cess but the pro­blem he loves the pro­cess it does­n’t mat­ter what occu­py he love the pro­cess and pro­cess and this is his his his histo­ry and he will do it to one coun­try or ano­t­her to uh occup­a­ti­on with mili­ta­ry occup­a­ti­on or poli­ti­cal occup­a­ti­on of Bela­rus like he did it alrea­dy to divi­de Geor­gia and for today to begin and he real­ly began to chan­ge their Direc­tion from EU direc­tion again back to Rus­sia. Now he’s doing we love Geor­gia peop­le very much and I hope that it will not be this way it will not finish this way but he he loves this pro­cess. So it does­n’t mat­ter when when the the ques­ti­on is who can stop him.”

So here you have it.

Selen­skyj lets Switz­er­land and short­ly “some coun­try in the glo­bal south” orga­ni­ze his peace sum­mits to:

“The best way the best way of cour­se uh after the first Peace Sum­mit to orga­ni­ze and pre­pa­re the plan and to orga­ni­ze during some mon­ths the second Sum­mit and have this docu­ment and to put in by majo­ri­ty of the world to put him and to push him to stop the war this -- is the best way.”

But so sad Selen­skyj only got 78 signa­tures (out of 193 UN mem­ber sta­tes) under the end comu­ni­quee in Bür­gen­stock, after chan­ging it to repre­sent the Selen­skyj peace for­mu­la more bet­ter, on the NINETH of June 2024 (final day of Bür­gen­stock was the 16th of June 2024, first draft by Switz­er­land was sent out on May 28), striking out every and all advan­ces toward a real peace con­fe­rence that Switz­er­land had made (as well as making sure that food secu­ri­ty now also inclu­ded metals), see: 

Food secu­ri­ty now also inclu­des metals

Which Selen­skyj in the video abo­ve actual­ly recognizes:

“of cour­se we need to save peop­le, nati­ons and - and that’s fine and and of cour­se we are not -- need mem­bers we don’t have such you know umbrel­la and that’s why we need Putin to lose, we don’t want him to be on our territory”

Becau­se, accord­ing to Selen­skyj, Putin will do it to you:

“becau­se any­way it’s a fro­zen con­flict and it will depends on years when he will pre­pa­re and come back, come back again with Inva­si­on. He will do it to you.”

Gre­at achie­ve­ments to be reached at the next Selen­skyj glo­bal peace summit!

Es wird kein ein­zi­ges deutsch­spra­chi­ges Medi­um dar­über berichten.

Sie wer­den die Bevöl­ke­rung alle wei­ter verarschen.

Als Teil der gro­tes­kes­ten aller mög­li­chen Gesell­schaf­ten, die das abso­lut abgrund­tief Abar­tigs­te ist was man sich nur aus­den­ken kann.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

edit: Es gibt aber natür­lich auch wie­der gute Nachrichten -

Head­lineer Arti­kel gera­de eben bei der NZZ:

src: click

Einem Bericht zufol­ge soll sich unter­des­sen der demo­kra­ti­sche Mehr­heits­füh­rer im US-Senat, Chuck Schu­mer, gegen­über Spen­dern offen gezeigt haben, Biden aus­zu­tau­schen. Das berich­te­te das Por­tal Axi­os unter Beru­fung auf zwei nicht nament­lich genann­te Quel­len. In einer Stel­lung­nah­me nach der Ver­öf­fent­li­chung des Axios-Berichts bekräf­tig­te Schu­mer jedoch sei­ne Unter­stüt­zung für Biden. “Wie ich wie­der­holt öffent­lich und pri­vat erklärt habe, unter­stüt­ze ich Prä­si­dent Biden und set­ze mich wei­ter­hin dafür ein, dass Donald Trump im Novem­ber besiegt wird”, sag­te Schu­mer in einer von sei­nem Büro ver­öf­fent­lich­ten Erklärung.

src: click

Aus­tau­schen? Na sicher, geht doch - immer offen für sowas, mei­ne Her­ren. Wie aus­tau­schen, nein - also Biden sicher nicht, der hat mei­ne volls­te Unterstützung.

Gut, aber was wis­sen die schon frü­her als die Pres­se, ich meine…

Ein ein­fluss­rei­cher Par­tei­spen­der berich­te­te von Plä­nen füh­ren­der Demo­kra­ten, nach dem Nato-Gipfel besorg­te Erklä­run­gen abzu­ge­ben, ohne Schu­mer direkt zu erwäh­nen. “Es wird ein Blut­bad geben”, warn­te der Insi­der ange­sichts des wach­sen­den Drucks auf Kan­di­da­ten selbst in US-Staaten, die bis­her als sicher gal­ten. Die Abge­ord­ne­ten und Sena­to­ren, die zur Wie­der­wahl ste­hen, befürch­ten, dass Bidens Pro­ble­me auch ihre eige­nen Wahl­chan­cen nega­tiv beein­flus­sen könnten.

Sie mer­ken sich: Donor class.

Sind natür­lich nicht die Plä­ne der Donors, neiiin.

Shi­ning city on the hill.

All the news thats fit to print.

“Is that what he is doing?!”

As soon as he does, expert goes babb­ling. For three minutes.

*con­cer­non­mo­de­ra­tors­face­in­ten­si­fies*

da hat ihm der Stan­dard einen öffent­li­chen Ver­eh­rungs­brief geschrie­ben.

Dies­mal muss ich nicht mal mehr kom­men­tie­ren - die Gro­tes­ke wur­de auch von Ande­ren erkannt.

See also: India invo­kes emer­gen­cy laws to ban BBC Modi documentary

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.