What the f*ck is the press reporting currently?

12. April 2025

So the most sane explana­ti­on of why the sud­den Trump posi­ti­on rever­sal on tarifs took place, is becau­se Cana­da star­ted to slow­ly sell US 10 year yield bonds, while then also direct­ly reinves­ting the gains into cana­di­an and euro­pean assets, and tal­king to the euro­peans to fol­low suit.

This spoo­ked the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on into immedia­te action, becau­se appar­ent­ly the mid term play was to hike up US tre­a­su­ry bond yiel­ds, rela­ti­ve to other secu­re 10 year assets, so the US would be able to refi­nan­ce its­elf under more favor­able con­di­ti­ons. May­be - becau­se none of this is sup­por­ted by hard evidence.

But here is the kicker. It worked?

edit: It did not. Lower 10 year bond yield is bet­ter for refi­nan­cing. So Trumps plan back­fired. Got it now.
edit2: Actual­ly, yes but no - this gets cra­zier by the minu­te. Again, bond yiel­ds at the time of issuing should reflect long term inte­rest rates. Bonds are issued mon­th­ly at then cur­rent rates - and the Fed doesnt have to refi­nan­ce anything. Says some cur­ren­cy ana­lyst at for­ex­li­ve (click).

Which means, what I read from the “Bit­pan­da CEO” in exx­press past week was wrong. Sho­cker. But more pro­ble­ma­ti­cly - what a Fran­ce 24 expert hin­ted at here also was off.

You got­ta love it, when peop­le are rea­ding memes the­se days and then are cited by media that never fact­checks them…

In short - bond yield rates are important - but “refi­nan­cing” at lower yiel­ds would have requi­red sus­tai­ned long peri­ods (years), not mon­ths by reis­suing them the nor­mal way - and the FED is not requi­red to buy US government debt to refi­nan­ce at any rate/point in time. Becau­se sepa­ra­ti­on of power.

Gre­at, if only someo­ne could have told that to the Bit­pan­da CEO and Fran­ce 24…

edit3: Next step: What the U.S. Tre­a­su­ries sell-off means for Cana­da and Online posts clai­ming Cana­da ‘off­loading’ $400 bil­li­on in U.S. bonds are false

Ger­man 10 year bond yiel­ds are down from April 2nd:
Bildschirmfoto 2025 04 12 um 19 03 18
src: click

Stock indi­ces in all major wes­tern mar­kets are down com­pa­ra­tively to the star­ting point on April 2nd, and com­pa­red to the US cur­rent stock mar­ket index rela­ti­ve to that point:
Bildschirmfoto 2025 04 12 um 19 05 50
src: click

After the mar­ket reco­very (Trump announ­ced 90 day “pau­se” for all but 10% base­li­ne tariffs) the S&P 500 star­ted to decli­ne again, but then reco­ve­r­ed again, so cur­r­ent­ly it only took a minor loss com­pa­red to the high of the reco­very pic­tu­red above.

And most import­ant­ly - US 10 year tre­a­su­ry bond yiel­ds are up com­pa­red to April 2nd:

Bildschirmfoto 2025 04 12 um 19 09 19
src: click

So what the fly­ing fuck is euro­pean media repor­ting here? Gran­ted the incre­a­se in US 10 year tre­a­su­ry yiel­ds wasnt huge at this point - but if you have to refi­nan­ce $7 tril­li­on of matu­ring debt in 2025, like the US does, you just saved 6.72% or 470.4 bil­li­on, if I’m not mista­ken. (I was mista­ken, see above.)

Ok the US and the rest of the world lost $6.5 tril­li­on in stock mar­ket value at the same time (com­bi­ned figu­re), but what does the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on care? They main­ly should care about vola­ti­li­ty risk.

Of cour­se the US pro­bab­ly didnt refi­nan­ce much in the past days and ever­ything still remains some­what vola­ti­le, but what the fuck is the euro­pean and US press repor­ting currently?

Also rela­ted ques­ti­on, why the heck is the Euro rising in worth com­pa­red to the USD?

Are inves­tors buy­ing spa­nish stocks again?

Well no, not so much: click

So what the fly­ing fuck…?

Ah - yes, 

Mean­while, the euro got a boost from posi­ti­ve deve­lo­p­ments in Euro­pe. Germany’s pro­po­sed €500 bil­li­on infra­st­ruc­tu­re fund and coali­ti­on agree­ment reports signal­ed incre­a­sed government spen­ding, which can sti­mu­la­te growth and infla­ti­on expec­ta­ti­ons. This likely redu­ced bets on aggres­si­ve Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank (ECB) rate cuts, sup­por­ting the euro. Unli­ke the US, whe­re Federal Reser­ve signals remain mixed, Europe’s out­look appeared less shaky to some tra­ders, espe­cial­ly with hopes of sta­bi­li­zing ener­gy cos­ts if geo­po­li­ti­cal ten­si­ons (like Ukraine’s cease­fire talks) ease.

src: click

The ger­man infra­st­ruc­tu­re invest­ments might exp­lain some of it - BUT 0.0151 USD per Euro worth of it? With all other indi­ca­tors poin­ting at the value gap wide­ning? (Stocks, 10 year tre­a­su­ry bond yields, …)

Gosh, I wish I had media that could exp­lain this to me.









Hinterlasse eine Antwort