(This is necessary context for the Ukrainska Pravda investigative piece in the previous posting. (Refering to this part of the article: click
English Translation
The option of “dispersing” [parliament] is currently the most desired for the parliamentary wing of Ze!Team. Previously, Zelensky motivated the Rada with threats of dissolution. Now, deputies are dreaming of finally being rid of their mandates.
Over the last few years, behind the scenes of parliament, dozens of resignation statements from “Servants of the People” have occasionally been discussed, which David Arakhamia refuses to put in motion. The head of the “mono-minority” constantly convinces parliamentarians that the term will “soon” be over. But the promised “soon” never arrives.
Deputies had placed great hopes on successful negotiations and quick elections. But the war in Iran has effectively put the negotiation process in the Ukraine–USA–Russia format on pause. Therefore, the majority of Ukrainska Pravda’s sources in the Rada are convinced that elections in Ukraine will not happen anytime soon.
“There are no specific deadlines for developing legislation on elections. At the meetings of Kornienko’s working group, various options and possible risks are being discussed, but it’s small talk with no concrete results,” one of the top figures in “Servants of the People” explains to UP.
“The Europeans said: ‘Fight for another year and a half to two years. We will give you money.’ Under their influence, Zelensky tasked the political leadership with developing a scenario under which Ukraine will have no elections for several more years, and how the Rada would function in such a situation,” adds another source among influential representatives of Ze!Team.
Hopes for the end of the war and the laying down of deputy mandates proved to be in vain. Intimidation by dissolution and “envelope motivation” [i.e., cash incentives] have lost their encouraging effect on deputies.
Perhaps it is here that one should look for the origin of various kinds of extravagant ideas — such as, for example, the adoption of a law on the mobilization of parliament members.
For now, this is being told as a joke. But the level of officials who resort to such jokes is, in fact, alarming.
src: click
))
- before (!) he (Selenskyj) actually pronounced the latest rounds of peace negotiation of “having gone nowhere”. “Because of Russia.”
11.21 Uhr: Selenskyj – “Schwierige” Verhandlungen mit Russland wegen Verzögerungstaktiken Moskaus
Der ukrainische Präsident Wolodymyr Selenskyj hat die jüngste Verhandlungsrunde zwischen Vertretern Kiews und Moskaus in Genf als “schwierig” bezeichnet und Russland Verzögerungstaktiken vorgeworfen. “Die gestrigen [das sagt der Wichser einen Tag später, als alle wissen wollen, warum die Verhandlungen des Folgetags kurzgeführt wurden] Treffen waren in der Tat schwierig, und wir können feststellen, dass Russland versucht, die Verhandlungen, die bereits in die Endphase hätten eintreten können, hinauszuzögern”, erklärte Selenskyj in Onlinediensten.
src: click
And then Selenskyj subsequently lied when stating, that the US now would know, that Russia is sabotaging the peace negotiations. Typisch Selenskyj, nicht?
Propaganda
src: clickDem Standard ist das Scheiss egal. Der druckt einfach.
src: click
Initial source:
Yes — I traced the exact paragraph you quoted.
The sentence
„Selenskyj sagte dagegen, dass den USA bei den Verhandlungen in Genf in der vergangenen Woche klar geworden sei, dass Moskau einem Frieden im Weg stehe“
is not an invention or summary by derStandard. It is a near-verbatim translation of what Zelenskyy actually said in his official evening video address („Вечірнє звернення“ / abendliche Videobotschaft) on 21 February 2026.Initial / primary source:
Zelenskyy’s official evening video address of 21 February 2026
(published the same evening by the Office of the President of Ukraine)This is confirmed by every outlet that used the identical wording on 21 February 2026 (including Der Spiegel, which was among the first to publish it and explicitly states:
„sagte Selenskyj in seiner in Kiew verbreiteten abendlichen Videobotschaft“).
The German media (derStandard, Spiegel, Tages-Anzeiger, BR, Watson, etc.) all picked up the statement directly from that video and translated the relevant passage almost word-for-word. No earlier interview, press conference, X post, or Ukrainian article contains this specific claim — the evening address on 21 Feb is the absolute origin.
You can find the original video here:
- Official page on the President’s website (the exact item referenced by Spiegel and others):
This is the necessary context for the Ukrainska Pravda investigative piece in the previous posting:
Translate this to english if you have to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc7KnBC5REM
Bitte anhören. Danke.
Boyan Panchevsky - WSJ Journalist: „Was mich am stärksten skeptisch macht, ist ein Treffen. Am vorherigen Donnerstag [vor der MSC, vor Genf] hat Zelenskyi ein Treffen seines Privatkabinetts einberufen. Das sind nicht die Minister, sondern seine engsten Mitarbeiter im Präsidialamt, also seine engsten Berater. Das war einen Tag vor der Anreise nach München, wo sie an der Sicherheitskonferenz teilgenommen haben. Bei diesem Treffen hat er seinen engsten Leuten mitgeteilt, dass die Verhandlungen quasi gescheitert seien und dass sie jetzt einen Plan für noch drei Jahre Krieg ausarbeiten müssen.“
Die ukrainische Propaganda dreht schon wieder auf Hochtouren:
The OP called the fake about Zelensky’s “instruction” to prepare to fight for another three years a “stupid fake”
WSJ journalist Panczewski tells about Zelensky’s alleged conversation with advisers, during which he declared the talks a failure. The OP denies
Senior editor at LIGA.net [FUCK, learn english, man.]
13:12The OP called the fake about Zelensky’s “instruction” to prepare to fight for another three years a “stupid fake”
The information about the alleged order of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to prepare to fight for another three years is not true. This was stated to journalists by presidential communications adviser Dmytro Lytvyn.
On February 20, a number of Russian Telegram channels quoted The Wall Street Journal journalist Boyan Panchevsky as saying in the podcast: “What I am most skeptical about is [Zelensky’s] personal meeting with his closest advisers. There he said that the negotiations had failed and now they had to develop a war plan for another three years. Everyone was shocked.”.
Lytvyn says there was no such conversation with advisers and no negative talks about the negotiations, nor was there such a task to “fight for another three years.”.
“It’s just a stupid fake,” he concluded .
src: click
Klar - was WSJ Reporter unter Berufung auf ihre Quellen sagen ist immer “Nur ein dummer Fake.” Vor allem, wenn sies mit Datum und Ort und Art des Treffens unterlegen. Und der Reaktion aller Beteiligten.
Weils uns doch der presidential communications adviser Dmytro Lytvyn sagt.
Sie wissen schon “Nein, Druck auf die ukrainischen Medien haben wir von der Regierung nie ausgeübt!” Dmytro Lytvyn.
src: clickDU VERFICKTER BAUER DU!
Willst du Bauer gerade eine Quelle eines WSJ Reporters mit “the fake is a stupid fake” debunken du Bauer?! Vor allem wenn der Journalist mit Datum, Ort und Art des Treffens an die Öffentlichkeit geht?
Just stupid fake! Reicht da ja ums aus der Welt zu schaffen. Für nen Ukrainier wie Dmytro…
In der Ukraine unter dem Telemarathon geht sowas…
Wie - Selenskyj hat bereits vor der MSC die Verhandlungen platzen lassen und auf der MSC gelogen, ohne einen Plan für die kommenden drei Jahre zu haben?
NA SEHR GUT.
ENTWICKELN EH DIE ANDERN.
WARUM SICH ALS PRÄSIDENT GEDANKEN MACHEN? PISSER.
