Wie kann man die Öffentlichkeit eigentlich noch verarschen?

23. Juli 2023

Ein­fach ver­ar­schen ist eine Möglichkeit…

Mos­kaus Hun­ger­waf­fe wird zum Bumerang

Mit dem Ende des Getrei­de­ab­kom­mens scha­det Wla­di­mir Putin sei­nen Ver­bün­de­ten. Aber noch wich­ti­ger ist es für ihn, innen­po­li­tisch Stär­ke zu zeigen

[…]

Aus­wir­kun­gen hal­ten sich in Grenzen

Die Aus­wir­kun­gen auf die glo­ba­le Lebens­mit­tel­ver­sor­gung dürf­ten sich den­noch in Gren­zen hal­ten. Die Welt hat sich auf die­ses Sze­na­rio ein­ge­stellt, es gibt zahl­rei­che alter­na­ti­ve Quel­len, und selbst unter dem Abkom­men ist deut­lich weni­ger Getrei­de aus der Ukrai­ne expor­tiert wor­den als vor dem Krieg. Gera­de die gerin­ge­re Dring­lich­keit kann dazu bei­tra­gen, dass sich die Ver­hand­lun­gen in die Län­ge ziehen.

src: click

Frey vom Stan­dard, dazu der CFR vor vier Tagen:

Moscow’s exit from the deal gene­ra­ted alarm in a num­ber of popu­lous lower-income coun­tries depen­dent on Ukrai­ni­an grain.

[…]

In addi­ti­on to rai­sing food pri­ces, the grain deal’s demi­se could mean coun­tries will wait lon­ger for imports as Ukrai­ne is for­ced to use lower-capacity land rou­tes to ship its pro­ducts. It could also cau­se Ukrai­ni­an far­mers to plan for smal­ler har­ve­sts next year, mea­ning food inse­cu­ri­ty for hund­reds of mil­li­ons of peop­le will remain a con­cern even if Rus­sia agrees to rejoin the deal.

src: click

Das Getrei­de über Bahn­ver­bin­dun­gen zu schi­cken ist so teu­er, dass es sich für die meis­ten Bau­ern in der Ukrai­ne nicht mehr rentiert…

Naja, der Frey hats wohl anders gehört…

Quel­len­an­ga­be? Wozu.

edit: Frey liegt richtig.

Experts say not renewing the Black Sea grain deal could cau­se food pri­ces to again climb. Howe­ver, they say the world­wi­de food situa­ti­on is not as vola­ti­le as it was last year becau­se other coun­tries are now pro­du­cing more grain to coun­ter­ba­lan­ce los­ses from Ukrai­ne, inclu­ding Argen­ti­na, Bra­zil, and Euro­pean nations.

src: click

Argen­ti­ni­en:

Pro­duc­tion is esti­ma­ted at 19.5 mil­li­on ton­nes, but the FAS said more rains are nee­ded to rech­ar­ge soil mois­tu­re pro­files befo­re the June plan­ting win­dow. Pro­duc­tion for 2022-23 is esti­ma­ted at 12.5 mil­li­on tonnes.

Argen­ti­ne wheat exports in 2023-24 are pro­jec­ted to rebound at 13.7 mil­li­on ton­nes, more than dou­ble the exports expec­ted in 2022-23, and the third hig­hest on record.

[…]

Exports for 2022-23 are esti­ma­ted at 5.8 mil­li­on ton­nes, the lowest in the past eight years.

src: click

Bra­si­li­en:

Bra­zil is expec­ted to har­vest a record 317.5 mil­li­on ton­nes of grains for the 2022-23 cycle, which is 44.9 mil­li­on ton­nes (16.5%) more than the pre­vious year, accord­ing to the 10th Grain Har­vest Sur­vey by Con­ab, the country’s food sup­ply and sta­tis­tics agency.

src: click

Und Trans­port­we­ge über die Donau haben sich aufgetan:

While Rus­sia may pledge to get out of the deal, are others going to step in here?” Bas­se said. “Are the Turks going to pro­vi­de mili­ta­ry con­voys to get grain out of the cor­ri­dor? Tho­se are pos­si­bi­li­ties, and I think the mar­ket also may be under­stan­ding that the­re are other export ave­nues for Ukraine.”

The Danu­be River, for instance, incre­a­sed its grain export capa­ci­ty from several hund­red thousand ton­nes per mon­th befo­re the war began 17 mon­ths ago to more than 2 mil­li­on ton­nes today.

If inde­ed the cor­ri­dor stay­ed down — I think that’s the big ques­ti­on, if the cor­ri­dor went out of com­mis­si­on for the next 12 mon­ths — it would rai­se the pri­ce to Ukrai­ni­an far­mers in terms of logistics and cost to get grain to mar­ket,” Bas­se said. “But becau­se Ukrai­ne has smal­ler carry-in stocks, and becau­se their crops are going to be far smal­ler this year, I think they would be able to export through Eas­tern Euro­pe and the Danu­be (River) and get out some 3 mil­li­on ton­nes per mon­th. That would allow them to rid them­sel­ves of any crop pro­duc­tion this year.

Unless the Danu­be gets plug­ged, the oppor­tu­ni­ty for Ukrai­ne to still get grain out is going to be OK. In the Euro­pean Uni­on, becau­se of wea­ther adver­si­ties, they may need a fair por­ti­on of the Ukrai­ni­an corn crop any­way. So, if Ukraine’s corn crop ends up being 20 mil­li­on ton­nes, and exports end up being 12 mil­li­on ton­nes, pro­bab­ly 10 mil­li­on of tho­se ton­nes could flow into the EU.”

Lang­fris­tig wird es für die ukrai­ni­schen Bau­ern zum Problem:

Deve­lo­ping coun­tries, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in Afri­ca and the Midd­le East, tra­di­tio­nal­ly have been depen­dent on afford­a­ble wheat from Ukrai­ne to feed its peop­le. The Russia-Ukraine con­flict has desta­bi­li­zed the mar­ket in terms of pri­ce and sup­ply in tho­se regions.

In terms of wheat, (Ukrai­ne) is still nee­ded in the world wheat mar­ket, and it would have an adver­se impact for por­ti­ons of cen­tral Afri­ca and Sub-Saharan Afri­ca,” Bas­se said. “The cost would be hig­her, but I don’t think ton­nages from what they would have put out through the cor­ri­dor are going to be dis­rup­ted all that much.

I do think the­re are work­arounds that the Ukrai­ni­ans can find with their smal­ler har­vest this year. Unfor­tu­n­a­te­ly, it will cost more money logisti­cal­ly spea­king, so the pri­ce of that grain may be more expen­si­ve in Sub-Saharan Afri­ca or North Afri­ca. But I still think the­re are ave­nues for that grain to make it out of Ukrai­ne. They’ve been working on the­se ave­nues, not just in the last three mon­ths, but real­ly going back­wards the last six to nine mon­ths. We now have export chan­nels down the Danu­be, and the Con­stan­ta (port) has been expor­ting more grain.”

While buy­ers may be equip­ped to wea­ther the storm, a leng­thy sus­pen­si­on of the grain deal would devas­ta­te Ukrai­ni­an far­mers, who alrea­dy have been bat­te­red by the war’s impact, high infla­ti­on on inputs such as fuel and fer­ti­li­zer, and a signi­fi­cant incre­a­se in trans­por­ta­ti­on cos­ts and logisti­cal chal­len­ges, Bas­se said.

You won­der how long they keep ope­ra­ting without a finan­cial life­li­ne, becau­se there’s no finan­cing avail­ab­le,” Bas­se said. “I know some Ukrai­ni­an aid agen­ci­es are going around the US and Euro­pe, try­ing to rai­se money. But incre­a­singly, the Ukrai­ni­an far­mer is the one that’s going to suf­fer, both lar­ge and small. May­be the smal­ler ones can hold on bet­ter than the lar­ger ones, but it’s a ques­ti­on of capi­tal. The lon­ger this war goes on, the more adver­se­ly it impacts Ukrai­ni­an agriculture.

You can pro­bab­ly take this year’s corn and wheat crops that are cut by 30% to 40% from last year and cut them by a third again. Incre­a­singly, this is wea­ring on the Ukrai­ni­an farmer.”

The For­eign Agri­cul­tu­ral Ser­vice of the US Depart­ment of Agri­cul­tu­re pro­jects wheat out­put in Ukrai­ne to decli­ne to 17.5 mil­li­on ton­nes in the 2023-24 mar­ke­ting year, down from the record 33 mil­li­on in 2021-22. It sees exports decli­ning to 10.5 mil­li­on ton­nes from 16.8 mil­li­on in 2022-23 and 18.9 mil­li­on the year pri­or to that.

The USDA fore­cast corn pro­duc­tion to dip slight­ly to 25 mil­li­on ton­nes from 27 mil­li­on, while it expects exports to be slas­hed to 19.5 mil­li­on this year from 28 mil­li­on ton­nes in 2022-23.

Tan­ner Ehm­ke, lead eco­no­mist, grains and oil­seeds, CoBank, noted in a social media post that “the announ­ce­ment comes at a low point in the ship­ping sea­son, which buys time for Ukrai­ne to work out alter­na­ti­ve rou­tes befo­re traf­fic picks up this fall. Glo­bal demand can easi­ly shift to alter­na­ti­ve ori­gins: Rus­si­an wheat ship­ments remain record lar­ge, while Brazil’s safrih­na corn crop is also record large.”

src: click









Hinterlasse eine Antwort