Moderatorenwechsel bei ZDF heute!
YAY! Moderatorenkarusell!
Der Neue fängt vom Wissen her wieder bei Null an und ist blank wie n Diehlenboden.
Ich freu mich!
Endlich wieder ein Gesicht das sechs Monate hält! Der Reisner freut sich auch, endlich wieder jemand dem er alles wieder von null auf erklären kann.
edit: Sogar mit neuem Korrespondenten! Der hat herausgefunden, dass Russland, oder die russische Armee völkerrechtlich auf dem Gebiet der Ukraine ist.
Pause für den Effekt.
Nicht mal völkerrechtswidrig!
Nein, die sind schon physisch dort, und nicht völkerrechtlich. und Starlink ist in der Ukraine auch nicht völkerrechtlich freigeschalten, sondern mehr so… - vertragsrechtlich. Oder meinetwegen kommunikationsrechtlich.
Aber der Korrespondent ist - und das war ja auch die Vorbedingung für seine Einstellung, derart Ukrainepropaganda geschädigt - dass der lieber völkerrechtlich sagt, weil er sich an völkerrechtswidrig nicht erinnert hat, aber der “muss so reden wie erwünscht” Impuls zu groß war.
Dann muss der Reisner das ZDF noch korrigieren dass die Russen Telegram an der Front garnicht gedrosselt haben - weil das ZDF lieber 15 Minuten das Gegenteil spekuliert hat.
Ich mein - ich kenns von der Publizistik - wenn da einer mehr kann als Public Relations ablesen wird er gecancelt, weil er nicht dazu passt.
Der ZDF Zuschauer ist begeistert, 1460 likes. Und damit ne siebenfach bessere Quote (ratio to views) als Selenskyj gestern bei Piers Morgan erreicht hat.
edit: Das sind die drei Artikel die Reisner referenziert hat:
https://www.economist.com/europe/2026/02/17/the-war-room-newsletter-is-a-peace-deal-possible
Alles natürlich komplett normal…
A meeting in Paris left Ukraine believing its interests were beginning to be heard by the American negotiators, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. There were the outlines of a stronger-than-expected bilateral security agreement. There were changes in the negotiation teams. Russia and Ukraine had chosen more pragmatic players to represent them, with Ukraine’s former spy chief Kyrylo Budanov making a particular impression as the de facto new head of the delegation. One source close to the Ukrainian team even rated the chance of a breakthrough as “50-50”.
Even if that always seemed optimistic, this past week has brought a few hiccups. An article in the Financial Times alleging plans for quick and dirty elections under American pressure caused a stir in Kyiv. The article appeared to get a few things wrong. The push for quick elections, for example, is actually coming from Volodymyr Zelensky’s own team. In any case, there is no concrete deal to present to an electorate, nor, just as crucially, any agreed sequencing. But the story was enough to put deal optimists on the defensive and slow the talks down.
[…]
Divisions are also emerging within Ukraine’s delegation. One wing, centred on Mr Budanov, believes Ukraine’s interests are best served by a swift American-led agreement, and fears the window for action may soon close. But another wing, apparently still influenced by the controversial former chief of staff Andriy Yermak, who departed in a corruption scandal, is much less keen. Mr Zelensky appears to be balancing between them, while also having his own ideas.
Whether Ukraine is indeed best served by a quick deal, or whether it can gain more by waiting, is a finely balanced judgment. Clear risks run both ways. Mr Putin is obviously not a man of his word. Some believe Ukraine’s strategic position could improve in time—with new defence reforms in Ukraine and economic and military recruitment pressures in Russia. This is essentially the position of Europe, driven as much by its own hard self-interest of buying time to ramp up its own defence industries. But Ukraine’s margin for error is also incredibly small. We talk of potential problems in Russia at some unclear point in the future. Ukraine is already in crisis, struggling to fill gaps on the front lines and with businesses and homes struggling under blackouts.
src: click
https://www.ft.com/content/50d3d86b-2d2a-4d06-845e-a4e089382cad
https://www.ft.com/content/d9389b99-f168-4e32-8247-bbfc206f3779
