Witness the one documented case of ballot stuffing in Georgia

28. Oktober 2024

Thanks to newsukraine.rbc.ua

https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/massive-fraud-and-fights-erupt-at-georgia-1729942937.html

That must have been… SEVEN bal­lots at least!

So of cour­se the NDI INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVER MISSION TO GEORGIA’S OCTOBER 26, 2024 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS prompt­ly speaks of “instan­ces of bal­lot stuf­fing” (plu­ral). Without pro­vi­ding any refe­ren­ces of cour­se. (Media reports are avail­ab­le for the one that is on tape.)

In addi­ti­on to one obser­ver beat down that resul­ted in hospitalization.

In addi­ti­ons to several quar­rels at pol­ling stations.

In addi­ti­on to… Ehm…

Throughout elec­tion day, reports from citi­zen obser­vers pro­vi­ded valu­able infor­ma­ti­on to sup­port our obser­va­ti­on fin­dings. On elec­tion day, citi­zen obser­vers wit­nessed widespread vio­la­ti­ons of the neu­tra­li­ty zone around pol­ling sta­ti­ons by gathe­rings of ruling par­ty figu­res and unaut­ho­ri­zed per­sons. Our short-term obser­vers and citi­zen obser­vers also repor­ted intimi­da­ti­on of voters. Citi­zen obser­vers also repor­ted an incre­a­se in cri­ti­cal inci­dents, inclu­ding vio­lence against obser­vers, voters and par­ty representatives.

NDI stres­ses that this state­ment is preli­mi­na­ry in natu­re and that the post-election envi­ron­ment con­ti­nues to unfold.

src: click

So of cour­se this happens:

Blin­ken: U.S. Con­demns Breaches of Int. Norms During Oct.26 Elec­tions, Calls for Investigation

Short­ly befo­re this happens:

A day after Georgia’s par­lia­men­ta­ry elec­tions, in which the Cen­tral Elec­tion Com­mis­si­on decla­red the ruling Geor­gi­an Dream par­ty the win­ner, seni­or Euro­pean par­lia­men­ta­ri­ans issued a joint state­ment with their Cana­di­an coun­ter­part say­ing “the elec­tions were neit­her free nor fair” and that “the Euro­pean Uni­on can­not reco­gni­ze the result.”

src: click

Wait, so all it takes to call an elec­tion frau­du­lent as Blin­ken is one instance of 7 bal­lots being stuf­fed into a box, several out­breaks of vio­lence at pol­ling sta­ti­ons and several vio­la­ti­ons of the neu­tra­li­ty zone around pol­ling stations?

Well, not exact­ly -- the main argu­ment for this elec­tion having been sto­len are intimi­da­ti­on cam­pai­gns weeks and mon­ths befo­re the elec­tions, as well as sta­te spon­so­red intimi­da­ti­on based on fears around cuts in sta­te spen­ding being used to “moti­va­te” voters to vote for the lea­ding party.

Tho­se are all well documented:

Orga­ni­zed cri­mi­nal gangs … are try­ing to under­mi­ne the voting pro­cess with aggres­si­on and intimi­da­ti­on,” oppo­si­ti­on poli­ti­ci­an Ana Nats­vlish­vi­li said.

src: click

It is clear that the pre-election peri­od fai­led to meet fun­da­men­tal stan­dards for demo­cra­tic elec­tions. The government’s pas­sa­ge of legis­la­ti­on that labels civic actors as for­eign agents and its cam­pai­gn to intimi­da­te tho­se that cri­ti­ci­zed ruling par­ty poli­ci­es gene­ra­ted a cli­ma­te of fear.
State-sponsored efforts to dis­credit and legal­ly restrict elec­tion obser­vers for­ced them to divert resour­ces to self-defense from their cen­tral acti­vi­ties to safe­guard the elec­tions. The legis­la­ti­on also had a chil­ling effect on advo­ca­tes, civic edu­ca­tors and other groups con­tri­bu­ting to the poli­ti­cal dis­cour­se. Ruling par­ty lea­ders also threa­tened to cri­mi­na­li­ze oppo­si­ti­on poli­ti­cal par­ties. Legis­la­ti­on pas­sed by the government restric­ted the rights of and stig­ma­ti­zed vul­nerable LGBTQI+ com­mu­nities in con­tra­ven­ti­on to regio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal human rights stan­dards to which Geor­gia is obli­ged. Taken tog­e­ther, the government’s actions cau­sed the Euro­pean Uni­on to halt Georgia’s acces­si­on path.
A frag­men­ted, poli­ti­ci­zed media envi­ron­ment limi­ted voters’ access to impar­ti­al information.

The ruling par­ty had dis­pro­por­tio­na­te influ­ence on this envi­ron­ment given its con­trol over sta­te media as well as pri­va­te­ly held channels.

src: click

But I still found it note­wor­thy how litt­le it takes in regards to on the day evi­dence, to call an elec­tion stolen.

Cant wait for the deman­ded inves­ti­ga­ti­on into the matter.

edit: That, and the exit poll vary vast­ly depen­ding on who did them. I have to men­ti­on that as well: click

edit2: Elec­tro­nic voting was in place and bad­ly vetted.

The EETs were used in 2,263 (74.6 per­cent) of PECs repre­sen­ting appro­xi­mate­ly 90 per­cent of voters.

While the CEC’s online por­tal for rapid results publi­ca­ti­on enhan­ced trans­pa­ren­cy, it was also unclear whe­ther the addi­tio­nal preli­mi­na­ry results trans­mis­si­on com­po­nent from elec­tro­nic PECs was tes­ted for hea­vy user traf­fic, or whe­ther results infor­ma­ti­on would be made avail­ab­le in an open data format.

src: click

edit3: France24 has addi­tio­nal info:

Oppo­si­ti­on par­ties alle­ged inci­dents of bal­lot stuf­fing and intimi­da­ti­on during voting, and cal­led the results “frau­du­lent”.

src: click

So thats the source of the mul­ti­ple bal­lot stuf­fing inci­den­ces. Claims by the oppo­si­ti­on parties.

Oh, and swissinfo.ch sta­tes, that the OSCE sees it more in line with.… ehm, facts.…

Howe­ver, moni­tors from the Orga­ni­sa­ti­on for Secu­ri­ty and Co-operation in Euro­pe (OSCE) said they had regis­tered inci­dents of vote-buying, voter intimi­da­ti­on, and ballot-stuffing that could have affec­ted the out­co­me. But they stop­ped short of say­ing the elec­tion was rigged.

src: click









Hinterlasse eine Antwort