Autorenarchiv

Last Week Tonight just decided to handle the Gaza crisis in a first segment so it will never be published on youtube

04. August 2025

BRAVO. BRAVO. HBO was so hap­py about that, I’m sure…

edit: Kind of relie­ved, kind of even more annoy­ed - they publis­hed it - but with a very restric­ti­ve regi­onlock, so that no one that speaks english…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMk28nV9nkI

edit2: I take the relie­ved back. The S**E** naming sche­me and the length of the lin­ked you­tube video indi­ca­tes, that this is a spe­cial release of the ent­i­re epi­so­de for the mar­kets the HBO cor­po­ra­ti­on has no com­mer­cial inte­rest in, but still wants to address becau­se of the good will of their heart, or for poli­ti­cal rea­sons. We in the west never get full epi­so­des on you­tube. Rus­si­ans (f.e.) do. We always only get Seg­ment 2 of the show (the main segment).

(Red coun­try means you­tube video of the full epi­so­de blocked.)

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 04 um 11 25 24

Also we need a new jour­na­listic cate­go­ry cal­led “stuff only a bought out ass­ho­le would publish at this point”.

Yes:

Schock über „leben­de Hun­gerex­pe­ri­men­te“ der Hamas (Die Presse)

Of cour­se:

Deutsch­land macht einen Rie­sen­feh­ler“ – Kie­se­wet­ter atta­ckiert Nahost-Politik [nein, das ist nicht rich­tig, Kie­se­wet­ter atta­ckiert die Luft­brü­cke] der Bun­des­re­gie­rung (Welt)

Sure:

Sie fres­sen, wäh­rend Gei­seln ver­hun­gern“: Exper­te ent­larvt Hunger-Lüge der Hamas (exx­press)

Exact­ly:

Oppo­si­tio­nel­ler in Gaza: «Die Hamas stiehlt den Ein­woh­nern das Essen» (NZZ)

Sicher doch:

Selbst­ver­tei­di­gung oder Geno­zid – was ist es, das Isra­el in Gaza macht?
(Der Standard)

Und am Ende dann noch gegen frin­ge media und Tucker in den USA wet­tern, damit die Bevöl­ke­rung das nicht zu sehen bekommt.

Nicht das Titel­pho­to - die Video­auf­nah­men in dem Interview.

Das ist heut­zu­ta­ge die Auf­ga­be von deutsch­spra­chi­gen Qua­li­täts­me­di­en. Nichts anderes.

Bra­vo.

I hope it at least pays well.

edit: Btw - here is the json out­put direct­ly from the goog­le API, for peop­le that might not belie­ve it:

{
“kind”: “youtube#videoListResponse”,
“etag”: “pFlxcXAuOvXqFSdXRnlZt1sTg50”,
“items”: [
{
“kind”: “youtube#video”,
“etag”: “sMi1FOdwA2CAq0Dw8YqmnD7SMuM”,
“id”: “TMk28nV9nkI”,
“content­De­tails”: {
“dura­ti­on”: “PT39M26S”,
“dimen­si­on”: “2d”,
“defi­ni­ti­on”: “hd”,
“cap­ti­on”: “fal­se”,
“licen­sed­Con­tent”: true,
“regi­on­Restric­tion”: {
“blo­cked”: [
AD”,
AE”,
AF”,
AO”,
AT”,
AU”,
BF”,
BH”,
BI”,
BJ”,
BW”,
CA”,
CD”,
CF”,
CG”,
CH”,
CI”,
CM”,
CN”,
CV”,
DE”,
DJ”,
DZ”,
EG”,
EH”,
ER”,
ES”,
ET”,
FO”,
GA”,
GB”,
GH”,
GI”,
GL”,
GN”,
GQ”,
GW”,
IE”,
IN”,
IQ”,
IS”,
IT”,
JO”,
KE”,
KM”,
KW”,
LB”,
LI”,
LR”,
LS”,
LU”,
LY”,
MA”,
MG”,
ML”,
MR”,
MT”,
MU”,
MW”,
MZ”,
NA”,
NE”,
NG”,
NL”,
NO”,
NZ”,
OM”,
PS”,
PT”,
QA”,
RE”,
RW”,
SA”,
SC”,
SD”,
SH”,
SL”,
SM”,
SN”,
SO”,
SS”,
TD”,
TG”,
TN”,
TZ”,
UG”,
US”,
VA”,
YE”,
YT”,
ZA”,
ZM”,
ZW
]
},
“con­ten­tRa­ting”: {},
“pro­jec­tion”: “rect­an­gu­lar”
}
}
],
“pageInfo”: {
“total­Re­sults”: 1,
“result­sPer­Pa­ge”: 1
}
}

Lovely. Thats 93 out of 195 coun­tries in the world whe­re this video is blo­cked, they are:

Andor­ra, United Arab Emi­ra­tes, Afgha­ni­stan, Ango­la, Aus­tria, Aus­tra­lia, Bur­ki­na Faso, Bah­rain, Burun­di, Benin, Bots­wa­na, Cana­da, Demo­cra­tic Repu­blic of the Con­go, Cen­tral Afri­can Repu­blic, Repu­blic of the Con­go, Switz­er­land, Cote d’I­voi­re, Camer­oon, Chi­na, Cape Ver­de, Ger­ma­ny, Dji­bou­ti, Alge­ria, Egypt, Wes­tern Saha­ra, Eri­trea, Spain, Ethio­pia, Faroe Islands, Gabon, United King­dom, Gha­na, Gibral­tar, Green­land, Gui­nea, Equa­to­ri­al Gui­nea, Guinea-Bissau, Ire­land, India, Iraq, Ice­land, Ita­ly, Jor­dan, Kenya, Como­ros, Kuwait, Leba­non, Liech­ten­stein, Libe­ria, Leso­tho, Luxem­bourg, Libya, Moroc­co, Mada­gas­car, Mali, Mau­ri­ta­nia, Mal­ta, Mau­ri­ti­us, Mala­wi, Mozam­bi­que, Nami­bia, Niger, Nige­ria, Nether­lands, Nor­way, New Zea­land, Oman, Pales­ti­ne, Por­tu­gal, Qatar, Reuni­on, Rwan­da, Sau­di Ara­bia, Sey­chel­les, Sudan, Saint Hele­na, Sier­ra Leo­ne, San Mari­no, Sene­gal, Soma­lia, South Sudan, Chad, Togo, Tuni­sia, Tan­za­nia, Ugan­da, United Sta­tes, Vati­can City, Yemen, Mayot­te, South Afri­ca, Zam­bia, Zimbabwe;

[Grok que­ried on per­cen­ta­ge of world GDP: Sum­ming the per­cen­ta­ges of the lis­ted coun­tries (exclu­ding negli­gi­ble ones like Wes­tern Saha­ra and Vati­can City for sim­pli­ci­ty), the total is appro­xi­mate­ly 70.67% [when let­ting it wri­te a .js par­ser for the data it sur­fa­ced] of world GDP. This is domi­na­ted by major eco­no­mies like the United Sta­tes (26.39%), Chi­na (17.24%), Ger­ma­ny (4.21%), India (3.61%), and the United King­dom (3.09%). The remai­ning coun­tries, espe­cial­ly smal­ler ones, con­tri­bu­te mini­mal­ly, with many at 0.01% or less.

Clau­de Son­net esti­ma­tes it more con­ser­va­tively at around 65-70%.]

Woran sie erkennen, dass ihre Antikorruptionsbehörde unabhängig arbeitet

04. August 2025

Genau.

Zuerst nennt sie kei­ne Namen.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 04 um 05 45 24
src: click

Dann wird irgend­ein Han­sel in Trans­kar­par­tien noch nicht aus der Par­tei aus­ge­schlos­sen, man über­legt noch:

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 04 um 05 49 02

Und abschlie­ßend gibt es eine Lage­be­spre­chung unter dem Aus­schluss der Öffent­lich­keit mit dem Präsidenten.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 04 um 05 45 04

NICHT NUR SAUBER, SONDERN REIN!

Ich weiß was sie jetzt sagen…

03. August 2025

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 03 um 11 44 52
src: click

Sie sagen: Nein! Aber doch nicht bei den Qua­li­täts­in­ves­ti­tio­nen mit 10x mul­ti­ple avail­ab­le [in terms of untap­ped pro­duc­ti­vi­ty, tho­se are angel inves­tor num­bers], accord­ing to Rus­tem Umer­ov, Minis­ter of Defen­se of Ukraine!

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 03 um 11 50 50
src: click

Die die­ser auf der qua­li­ta­tiv ein­fach ein­zig­ar­ti­gen, hoch­wer­ti­gen YES con­fe­rence poten­ti­el­len Inves­to­ren in die zu die­sem Zeit­punkt eh nicht bereits gro­tesk hustend/keuchend, jap­sen­den offe­nen Mäu­ler gescho­ben hat!

Was ein Schnäppchen!

Nicht die Qua­li­täts­in­ves­ti­tio­nen von Rus­tem Umer­ov auf der geni­al hoch­wer­ti­gen YES conference!

In die die Euro­päi­sche Uni­on nur fünf Tage spä­ter 35 MILLIARDEN EURO gesteckt hat!

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 03 um 11 57 46
src: click

Sh*t, haben die nen Rech­nungs­hof? Was macht der denn so den gan­zen Tag? Poli­ti­sche Wei­sun­gen entgegennehmen?

Nein, wer­den sie jetzt sagen - NICHT von Rus­tem Umer­ov, dem inte­gren Rus­tem auf der inte­gren YES con­fe­rence, wer­den sie jetzt sagen --

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 03 um 12 01 26
src: click

Und wie Recht sie nicht haben, sie gott­ver­damm­ter Voll­idi­ot, der täg­lich die­se ver­damm­te, unsäg­li­che Pro­pa­gan­da frisst.

Sie…!

Das hat ja nieeeee­mand kom­men sehen kön­nen. Nie­mand hat das kom­men sehen kön­nen! Am aller­we­nigs­ten unser ver­damm­ter zu dumm für alles “sie nann­ten ihn den Youtube-General” Freu­ding der im sel­ben ver­fick­ten Panel geses­sen ist, und nichts mit­be­kom­men hat.

Hier sein inter­ner Mono­log: Lal­all­all­al Lall­all­la Ladi­dei Lal­la, oh - Fra­ge für mich auf englisch!

Über den “die armen Kühe nach der Stau­damm­spren­gung!” David Petrae­us reden wir ein ande­res Mal (Umwelt­schä­den war der größ­te ukrai­ni­sche Tal­king­point, da lagen für Petrae­us Rinds­vie­cher nahe… Und schwups waren sie sein Tal­king­point, Nummer…)

Ich darf der Presse eine Frage beantworten

02. August 2025

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 19 00 05
src: click

Sagen wirs so - nicht, wenn Trump nicht weiß, dass die US so und so stän­dig wel­che für die Zweit­schlag­fä­hig­keit im Ein­satz hat…

Oder ums anders außzu­drü­cken, die US ist mitt­ler­wei­le auf dem Level, dass Bol­ton für Trump Pro­pa­gan­da machen muss, dass der gar­nicht mit einem Erst­schlag dro­hen wollte --

weil er gar kei­ne Ahnung hat­te, dass sie eh für den Zweit­schlag Uboo­te bereits krei­sen haben

Gut, jetzt muss man viel­leicht dazu­sa­gen, dass Trump grad mal zwei erst­schlag­fä­hi­ge Atom-Uboote raus­fährt (!), weil er mit dem depu­ty chair­man of Russia’s Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil auf Truth Social fudet.

Für die Stan­dard­le­ser, das ist eine poli­ti­sche Funk­ti­on mit Nüs­se Entscheidungsfähigkeit.

Daher wird sie auch fürs idio­ma­ti­sche PR messaging zwi­schen den zwei Staa­ten genutzt.

Das Messaging von Med­ve­dev war “Med­ve­dev evo­kes ‘Dead Hand’ in nuclear warning to the US”, was eine Dro­hung mit der rus­si­schen Zweitschlag­fä­hig­keit war.

Was Trump dazu bewo­gen hat erst­schlag­fä­hi­ge Uboo­te rauszuschicken.

Wor­auf Bol­ten mes­sa­gen muss­te, der Prä­si­dent hat geglaubt der ver­tei­digt sich damit, gegen eine Dro­hung der Zweitschlagfähigkeit.

Weil der US Prä­si­dent gesagt hat, er glaubt er ver­tei­digt sich damit, gegen eine Dro­hung der Erstschlagfähigkeit.

Fra­ge: Wie begrün­de­te Trump die Ver­le­gung der Atom-U-Boote?

Ant­wort: Laut Trump han­delt es sich dabei um eine rei­ne Vor­sichts­maß­nah­me. Vor Jour­na­lis­ten sag­te er: “Nun, wir muss­ten das tun”. Med­we­dew habe eine unan­ge­mes­se­ne Dro­hung aus­ge­spro­chen – des­halb müss­ten die USA vor­sich­tig sein. “Ich tue das also aus Grün­den der Sicher­heit für unse­re Bevöl­ke­rung,” mein­te Trump. 

src: click (Der Standard)

Die US woll­te nie eska­lie­ren, bit­te, bit­te, das ist nur - Trump lässt sich auf Truth Social nicht Sis­si nen­nen - ein ganz übles Miss­ver­ständ­nis, der Trump hat geglaubt er ver­tei­digt sich. Also neben der US Ver­tei­di­gung (deter­rence) die stän­dig um Russ­land rumpatroliert…

Komisch, wenn die Pres­se sich die­se Fra­ge stellt, kommt sie zu kei­nem Ergebnis. 

Naja - Nukle­a­ru­boo­te, ein oder zwei… Angriff oder Ver­tei­di­gung… Komm…

War­um soll­te man da als Jour­na­list schon nachrecherchieren.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist so durch…

Und was ich mich vor allem fra­ge, was sagt eigent­lich Ursu­la Plass­nik dazu?

Gut warum in österreichischen Medien berichten, sag ich mir immer…

02. August 2025

12.08 Uhr: Indi­en will wei­ter­hin rus­si­sches Öl kaufen
Einem Zei­tungs­be­richt zufol­ge will Indi­en trotz Zoll­dro­hun­gen von US-Präsident Donald Trump wei­ter rus­si­sches Öl kau­fen. Die “New York Times” berich­tet unter Beru­fung auf indi­sche Regie­rungs­ver­tre­ter, die Regie­rung habe Impor­teu­re nicht zur Dros­se­lung der Ein­fuh­ren ange­wie­sen. Russ­land ist mit einem Anteil von rund 35 Pro­zent der wich­tigs­te Öllie­fe­rant Indiens.

src: click (BR24)

Indi­en will trotz Trumps Ulti­ma­tum offen­bar wei­ter­hin rus­si­sches Öl kau­fen (Spie­gel)

Kann man viel­leicht Armin Wolf inter­view­en, was denn jetzt in 50 Tagen, ich mei­ne 10-12, ich mei­ne 10 ab vor­ges­tern, jetzt eigent­lich pas­sie­ren werde…?

Ich mei­ne, nie­mand hat das vor­aus­se­hen kön­nen, niemand!

Armin Wolf, Gefan­ge­ner des in 50 Tagen Narrativs

Bonus: 35%, ja wis­sen die Inder nicht wie abhän­gig sie sich machen? Wobei UvdL woll­te die Import­men­ge von fos­si­len Ener­gie­trä­gern aus den US ver“dreikommasechs“fachen, also fragt man das glaub ich seit letz­ter Woche nicht mehr.

Gut, sagen sie - aber was würde Ursula Plassnik dazu sagen?

02. August 2025

Nun, soweit ich sie ver­stan­den habe (der Pres­se Mode­ra­tor hat ja nie nachgefragt…) -

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 16 35 24
src: click

soweit ich sie ver­stan­den habe sagt sie aktu­ell - für Wachs­tum in Euro­pa set­ze sie sich jetzt nicht mehr ein, weil da muss ma ja auch mal mehr Soli­da­ri­tät mit afri­ka­ni­schen Staa­ten wal­ten las­sen, und ja - da kann man nichts machen, was die Bevöl­ke­rung will, das ist in der Poli­tik so schwer vor­aus­zu­se­hen, das is halt so. Berufsrisiko.

Ich nehm an sie meint Kli­ma­schutz - und hängt noch sehr an ihrer EFA Posi­ti­on der letz­ten 5 Jah­re, aber es könn­te auch die “Migra­ti­ons­kri­se” sein.

Man weiß es nicht.

Der Mode­ra­tor fragt ja nicht nach.

War­um sie das jetzt sagt. Kei­ne Ahnung. Aber sehen wirs prag­ma­tisch, die Frau wird alt und schreibt ihr Lebens­werk direkt vor der Kame­ra und vor dem Pres­se Journalisten.

Fast so gut wie Olek­san­dra Matviichuk beim Bru­no Krei­sky Forum für inter­na­tio­na­le Dia­log­ver­ei­te­lung. Aus ande­ren Grün­den! Aus ande­ren Gründen.

Die berühmten 73 Halbe

02. August 2025

Noch ne Hal­be, bitte.

Tran­chen mein ich.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 13 20 31
src: click

Und schon hast du genug für die Sockenschublade!

Darf ich da noch mal Bruegel…?

From a macroeco­no­mic per­spec­ti­ve, the num­bers are small enough for Euro­pe to replace the US ful­ly. Sin­ce Febru­a­ry 2022, US mili­ta­ry sup­port to Ukrai­ne has amoun­ted to €64 bil­li­on, while Euro­pe, inclu­ding the United King­dom, sent €62 bil­li­on. In 2024, US mili­ta­ry sup­port amoun­ted to €20 bil­li­on out of a total of €42 bil­li­on. To replace the US, the EU would thus have to spend only ano­t­her 0.12 per­cent of its GDP – a fea­si­ble amount. A more important ques­ti­on is whe­ther Euro­pe could do this without access to the US military-industrial base.

A signi­fi­cant­ly more chal­len­ging sce­n­a­rio for Euro­pe would be an unli­kely peace deal accep­ted by Ukrai­ne. In such a sce­n­a­rio, Rus­sia is likely to con­ti­nue its mili­ta­ry build-up, crea­ting a for­mi­da­ble mili­ta­ry chal­len­ge to all of the EU in a very short peri­od, given cur­rent Rus­si­an pro­duc­tion. The EU and allies inclu­ding the UK and Nor­way would need to acce­le­ra­te their mili­ta­ry build-ups immedia­te­ly and massively.

src: click (Brue­gel)

((64+62)/(1258/365))*2=73.11

Ne hal­be Bil­li­on hier, eine hal­be Bil­li­on da… Mit der Zeit kom­men da schon 73 Tran­chen im Jahr zusam­men!? Da müs­sens dann aber auch ein wenig brav sein, und die prio­ri­siert abfragen!

Also 6 im Monat.

Ein bis zwei pro Woche, … damit die ukrai­ni­schen Behör­den auch was zu tun haben.

Man stel­le sich vor im deutsch­spra­chi­gen Raum könn­te noch irgend­ein Jour­na­list klar denken.

Was der dann an der Stel­le berich­ten würde…

Aber wenn der deutsch­spra­chi­ge Jour­na­lis­mus dann erst mal sei­ne Kriegs­be­richt­erstat­tung reflek­tiert, dann nach dem Krieg - laut Pres­se­club Con­cordia - jahaaa dann.…! Wird alles gut.

When ever­ything is over jour­na­lism will eva­lua­te its performance!

Weiter gehts mit deutschsprachigem Qualitätsjournalismus

02. August 2025

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 10 03 59

In Order of appearance:

Hät­te ein Zug­un­glück ver­hin­dert wer­den kön­nen? Pro­fes­sor an der TU Ber­lin - Über­ra­schung: Nein, man kann nicht alle Zug­stre­cken in Deutsch­land überwachen.

Gefolgt von: Trump fin­det Russ­land wider­wär­tig - sie auch? Nein? Dann wirds aber Zeit. (Und Isra­el toll.)

Dann die Sil­ber und Gold­kauf­vier­tel­stun­de mit dem NTV Bör­sen­ex­per­ten, inkl. Live-Schalte an die Börse.

Etwas spä­ter - was Trump bes­ser nicht sagen darf, pro Isra­el Mili­zen plün­dern Versorgungskonvois

Wei­ter zu Oberst Reis­ner erklärt drei Beu­len in der Ukrai­ne Front.
Jetzt mit neu­er NTV Stra­te­gie - wer braucht schon ein­ge­zeich­ne­te Staats oder Oblastgrenzen.

Oberst Reis­ner erklärt drei Beu­len in der Ukraine-Front:
Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 10 27 34
src: click

[Ach­ja, wenn du NTV bist, wel­ches Bei­spiel­bild nimmst du zur Unter­le­gung des Umstands, dass in die­ser Minu­te Minen­fel­der ange­legt wer­den? Genau, das Video eines Minen­räum­pan­zers… Sonst kommt ja auch nie­mand mit ner Mine in Kontakt.]

Und dann abschlie­ßend “sie war sofort tot” sagt bes­te Freun­din Seil­part­ne­rin Eva.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 10 12 35

Gut, paki­sta­ni­sches News­pa­per, spä­ter zitiert von alpin.de da kann man nichts machen…

Eva was below her on the moun­tain at the time. Des­pi­te being inju­red, Dah­l­mei­er mana­ged to com­mu­ni­ca­te with her part­ner, but Eva was unab­le to reach her.

https://www.dawn.com/news/amp/1927472

Die Ori­gi­nal­quel­le (paki­sta­ni­sches, inter­na­tio­na­les News­pa­per) hat das übri­gens bis heu­te nicht kor­ri­giert, oder zurückgezogen

Ich mag eigent­lich nicht mehr…

Traum­job.

edit: Sie hät­ten den ande­ren Kar­ten­zeich­ner sehen sol­len, den ntv nicht genom­men hat! Wenn ntv beim Kar­ten­zeich­nen noch ein wenig abbaut, hät­te aber auch das Nach­rich­ten­wert, kei­ne Sorge:

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 11 22 25

Ich mein, jetzt haben wir ja auch schon drei­ein­halb Jah­re Krieg. Schwie­rig das auf die Stre­cke zu bekommen.

edit: Ver­dammt, jetzt hab ich die drei Beu­len vergessen!

edit2:

PS: Ich lie­be AI.. 😉 (click)

Jetzt ist es ja ganz unglaublich…

01. August 2025

Die Trump Administration -
Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 01 um 07 57 20
src: click

zahlt kei­ne Research-Artistas in Nie­der­ös­ter­reich mehr…!

https://previous.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/news/200928-SciArt-20.html

Da hat die Pres­se gleich einen Head­liner Arti­kel geschrie­ben, denn so springt man mit Freun­den nicht um.

Da set­zen wir doch gleich mal Kimi K2 Rese­ar­cher dar­auf an.

Wow, a Waun­sinn was Fri­days for Future BOTTOM UP in ihrer Frei­zeit so erreicht haben!


Over the last deca­de (2015-2025), the Inter­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te for App­lied Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (IIASA) has con­duc­ted exten­si­ve inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch addres­sing glo­bal chal­len­ges such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, ener­gy tran­si­ti­ons, water secu­ri­ty, bio­di­ver­si­ty loss, and popu­la­ti­on dyna­mics. This rese­arch is cha­rac­te­ri­zed by a strong sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach, uti­li­zing inte­gra­ted assess­ment models and fos­te­ring inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons. Key out­puts inclu­de influ­en­ti­al flagship reports like “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” (2023), nume­rous annu­al reports detail­ing year­ly achie­ve­ments, tar­ge­ted poli­cy briefs, and a vast array of peer-reviewed aca­de­mic publi­ca­ti­ons. IIASA’s work has signi­fi­cant­ly con­tri­bu­t­ed to glo­bal agen­das like the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agree­ment, impac­ting poli­cy at natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal levels through sci­ence diplo­ma­cy and capa­ci­ty building.

IIASA Research Overview: 2015-2025

1. Strategic Research Directions and Impact

1.1. IIASA’s Evolving Strategy: 2011-2030

The Inter­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te for App­lied Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (IIASA) has demons­tra­ted a dyna­mic and evol­ving rese­arch stra­te­gy, par­ti­cu­lar­ly evi­dent in its plan­ning cycles from 2011 through 2030. A signi­fi­cant shift in approach was high­ligh­ted with the IIASA Rese­arch Plan 2016–2020, which moved away from trea­ting glo­bal chal­len­ges like cli­ma­te chan­ge, popu­la­ti­on growth, and envi­ron­men­tal degra­dati­on as iso­la­ted issu­es. Ins­tead, this plan empha­si­zed their inter­con­nec­ted­ness as ele­ments of com­plex sys­tems, advo­ca­ting for an inte­gra­ted sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach to achie­ve true sus­taina­bi­li­ty . This plan unders­cored the neces­si­ty of lin­king diver­se dyna­mic sys­tems and pla­ced enhan­ced empha­sis on cross-cutting rese­arch, futures initia­ti­ves, and large-scale, inte­gra­ted “nexus” pro­jects. Fur­ther­mo­re, it signal­ed an incre­a­sed intel­lec­tu­al and finan­cial invest­ment into new methods in sys­tems ana­ly­sis, aiming to main­tain IIASA’s lea­ders­hip in deve­lo­ping solu­ti­ons for con­tem­pora­ry and future chal­len­ges . This stra­te­gic direc­tion con­ti­nued and was fur­ther refi­ned in the sub­se­quent rese­arch stra­te­gy covering 2021–2030, which orga­ni­zes IIASA’s rese­arch into six major pro­grams: Advan­cing Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis, Air Qua­li­ty and Green­house Gases, Bio­di­ver­si­ty and Natu­ral Resour­ces, Eco­no­mic Fron­tiers, Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment, and Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties . This struc­tu­re faci­li­ta­tes a focu­sed yet inte­gra­ted approach to tack­ling mul­ti­fa­ce­ted glo­bal pro­blems, ensu­ring that rese­arch efforts are both deep in spe­ci­fic are­as and broad in their sys­temic understanding.

The evo­lu­ti­on of IIASA’s stra­te­gy is also mar­ked by a com­mit­ment to inte­gra­ting diver­se rese­arch are­as and deve­lo­ping inno­va­ti­ve mode­ling frame­works. For instance, the deve­lo­p­ment of the inno­va­ti­ve Inte­gra­ted Bio­s­phe­re Manage­ment mode­ling (iBI­OM) frame­work addres­ses the need for inte­gra­ti­on across dif­fe­rent sec­tors, sus­taina­bi­li­ty dimen­si­ons, and spa­tio­tem­po­ral sca­les . iBI­OM, a modu­lar frame­work that con­so­li­da­tes exis­ting and new­ly deve­lo­ped models, repres­ents a signi­fi­cant advan­ce­ment in eco­sys­tem mode­ling. It is desi­gned to be hos­ted on an open, cloud-based com­pu­ting infra­st­ruc­tu­re, ther­eby enhan­cing glo­bal rese­arch col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and capa­ci­ty buil­ding in sup­port of sus­tainab­le decision-making. This initia­ti­ve reflects a stra­te­gic move towards crea­ting com­pre­hen­si­ve tools that can hand­le the com­ple­xi­ty of real-world pro­blems, such as tho­se addres­sed by the EU Green Deal, which deman­ds maxi­mal poli­cy inte­gra­ti­on and cross-sectoral coor­di­na­ti­on . The focus on “systems-informed decision-making” wit­hin the Advan­cing Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis pro­gram fur­ther illus­tra­tes this stra­te­gic com­mit­ment to pro­vi­ding action­ab­le insights through sophisti­ca­ted ana­ly­ti­cal tools and trans­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch . This con­ti­nuous refi­ne­ment of rese­arch stra­te­gy and metho­do­lo­gy unders­cores IIASA’s adap­ti­ve capa­ci­ty and its dedi­ca­ti­on to addres­sing the evol­ving land­s­cape of glo­bal chal­len­ges through rigo­rous, systems-based sci­ence. The institute’s mis­si­on is to pro­vi­de sci­en­ti­fic gui­d­ance to poli­cy­ma­kers by fin­ding solu­ti­ons to glo­bal pro­blems through app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis, aiming to impro­ve human well­being and pro­tect the envi­ron­ment . Key stra­te­gies for achie­ving impact inclu­de under­ta­king large-scale, multi-year inte­gra­ted pro­jects, con­duc­ting world-class rese­arch, initia­ting explo­ra­to­ry pro­jects, deve­lo­ping new sys­tems ana­ly­sis methods, working in part­ners­hip with poli­cy­ma­kers, and buil­ding glo­bal capa­ci­ty in sys­tems analysis .

1.2. Contributions to Global Agendas: SDGs and Paris Agreement

IIASA’s rese­arch has made sub­stan­ti­al con­tri­bu­ti­ons to glo­bal agen­das, par­ti­cu­lar­ly the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agree­ment. A nota­ble stu­dy by IIASA and the Asi­an Demo­gra­phic Rese­arch Insti­tu­te (ADRI) at Shang­hai Uni­ver­si­ty, publis­hed in the Pro­cee­dings of the Natio­nal Aca­de­my of Sci­en­ces (PNAS), demons­tra­ted that achie­ving the SDGs would lead to a signi­fi­cant reduc­tion in glo­bal popu­la­ti­on growth . The rese­arch pro­jec­ted that suc­cess­ful imple­men­ta­ti­on of the SDGs could result in a glo­bal popu­la­ti­on of bet­ween 8.2 to 8.7 bil­li­on by 2100, a figu­re sub­stan­ti­al­ly lower than other pro­mi­nent pro­jec­tions. This effect is attri­bu­t­ed pri­ma­ri­ly to the impact of achie­ving goals rela­ted to qua­li­ty edu­ca­ti­on (par­ti­cu­lar­ly for fema­les) and uni­ver­sal access to repro­duc­ti­ve health ser­vices, which lead to lower fer­ti­li­ty rates in deve­lo­ping coun­tries . The stu­dy high­ligh­ted that even par­ti­al achie­ve­ment of the­se goals could lead to a con­si­derable decre­a­se in popu­la­ti­on growth, ther­eby also redu­cing vul­nera­bi­li­ty to envi­ron­men­tal chan­ge. This rese­arch pro­vi­des a strong addi­tio­nal ratio­na­le for vigo­rous­ly pur­suing the SDGs, empha­si­zing their inter­con­nec­ted­ness with demo­gra­phic trends and envi­ron­men­tal sus­taina­bi­li­ty . The initia­ti­ve “The World in 2050” (TWI2050), laun­ched in 2015 in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with orga­niz­a­ti­ons like the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Solu­ti­ons Net­work and the Stock­holm Resi­li­en­ce Cent­re, aims to pro­vi­de evidence-based know­ledge to sup­port the SDG poli­cy pro­cess and its imple­men­ta­ti­on, iden­ti­fy­ing six key trans­for­ma­ti­ons cri­ti­cal for sus­tainab­le development .

In the con­text of cli­ma­te chan­ge and the Paris Agree­ment, IIASA’s rese­arch, par­ti­cu­lar­ly through its Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment Pro­gram, has been pivo­tal in ana­ly­zing and tracking natio­nal and glo­bal efforts. For examp­le, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve report by New­Cli­ma­te Insti­tu­te, IIASA, and FTSE Rus­sell tra­cked cli­ma­te miti­ga­ti­on efforts in 30 major emit­ting coun­tries, asses­sing their pro­gress towards mee­ting the Paris Agree­ment tar­gets . The report found that glo­bal emis­si­on trends were far from aligning with the Paris goals, with cur­rent poli­ci­es in the­se 30 eco­no­mies pro­jec­ted to lead to an average annu­al incre­a­se in emis­si­ons, rather than the necessa­ry 7.6% annu­al decre­a­se high­ligh­ted by UNEP in 2019. While some nati­ons show­ed pro­gress, over­all emis­si­ons were expec­ted to remain signi­fi­cant­ly abo­ve 2015 levels by 2030. The report unders­cored the urgent need for more aggres­si­ve poli­cy inter­ven­ti­ons in key sec­tors like ener­gy sup­ply, indus­try, buil­dings, trans­port, agri­cul­tu­re, and fores­try to acce­le­ra­te emis­si­on reduc­tions . Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA’s invol­ve­ment in pro­jects like CD-LINKS, fun­ded by the Euro­pean Union’s Hori­zon 2020 pro­gram, explo­red natio­nal and glo­bal trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­te­gies for cli­ma­te chan­ge and their lin­kages to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment objec­ti­ves, direct­ly sup­por­ting the inte­gra­ted approach requi­red by the Paris Agree­ment and the SDGs . The institute’s models, such as GLOBIOM and G4M, have been instru­men­tal in asses­sing land use, bio­fu­el poli­ci­es, and their impli­ca­ti­ons for cli­ma­te miti­ga­ti­on, sup­por­ting inter­na­tio­nal bodies like ICAO and natio­nal agen­ci­es like the EPA and the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on in deve­lo­ping more sus­tainab­le poli­ci­es . IIASA rese­arch was cen­tral to nego­tia­ti­ons at the Paris cli­ma­te sum­mit (COP21), pro­vi­ding the only stu­dy at the time that expli­ci­tly inves­ti­ga­ted the actions nee­ded to achie­ve a 1.5°C war­ming limit .

1.3. Policy Impact and Science Diplomacy

IIASA’s rese­arch is desi­gned to have a tan­gi­ble impact on poli­cy and decision-making pro­ces­ses glo­bal­ly, regio­nal­ly, and natio­nal­ly. The insti­tu­te achie­ves this by working in part­ners­hip with poli­cy and decision-makers to trans­la­te its rese­arch fin­dings into robust poli­cy opti­ons . A key mecha­nism for dis­se­mi­na­ting rese­arch and fos­te­ring poli­cy dia­lo­gue is through its various publi­ca­ti­ons, inclu­ding poli­cy briefs, impact she­ets, and its flagship reports. For instance, IIASA’s ana­ly­sis has his­to­ri­cal­ly for­med the back­bone of Euro­pean air pol­lu­ti­on poli­cy, and its exper­ti­se is now being app­lied to air pol­lu­ti­on chal­len­ges in other parts of the world . The “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” flagship report, laun­ched at a UN event, unders­cores IIASA’s com­mit­ment to con­tri­bu­ting to the post-2030 glo­bal agen­da and enga­ging with inter­na­tio­nal bodies . The insti­tu­te also hosts and main­tains nume­rous data­ba­ses and models used by sci­en­tists and poli­cy­ma­kers, fur­ther faci­li­ta­ting the app­li­ca­ti­on of its rese­arch . The “Impacts” sec­tion of the IIASA web­site pro­vi­des spe­ci­fic examp­les of how rese­arch has influ­en­ced poli­cy, such as methods for inte­gra­ted manage­ment of food, ener­gy, water, and land resour­ces being fed into natio­nal poli­cy in Ukrai­ne . This direct enga­ge­ment with poli­cy­ma­kers and the pro­vi­si­on of science-based solu­ti­ons are cen­tral to IIASA’s model of sci­ence diplomacy.

Sci­ence diplo­ma­cy is an inte­gral part of IIASA’s mis­si­on, stem­ming from its estab­lish­ment during the Cold War as a coope­ra­ti­ve sci­en­ti­fic ven­ture bet­ween East and West . Today, this trans­la­tes into fos­te­ring con­nec­tions with rese­ar­chers, poli­cy­ma­kers, and busi­ness lea­ders world­wi­de. In 2015 alo­ne, 333 rese­ar­chers from 49 coun­tries worked at IIASA, and 1,815 col­la­bo­ra­tors visi­ted the insti­tu­te, forming a glo­bal net­work of over 3,000 scho­l­ars . The estab­lish­ment of the Sub-Saharan Afri­ca Regio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­on (SSARMO) is a recent examp­le of IIASA’s com­mit­ment to expan­ding its reach and impact through regio­nal part­ners­hips, aiming to build capa­ci­ty and deve­lop inte­gra­ted sys­tems solu­ti­ons for regio­nal sus­taina­bi­li­ty chal­len­ges . The col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween IIASA and Ethio­pia, focu­sing on cli­ma­te chan­ge, food secu­ri­ty, and sus­tainab­le ener­gy, fur­ther illus­tra­tes this com­mit­ment to working with indi­vi­du­al coun­tries to address their spe­ci­fic deve­lo­p­ment goals through sci­ence and inno­va­ti­on . IIASA’s poli­cy briefs and reports, such as “From Visi­on to Action: Co-identifying a Safe Water Ope­ra­ting Space for the Danu­be basin” , are direct out­puts aimed at informing and influ­en­cing poli­cy decisi­ons. The “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” report its­elf is inten­ded to trig­ger dis­cus­sions about a post-2030 Agen­da for Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment, with cri­ti­cal poli­cy messages advo­ca­ting for main­strea­ming sys­tems ana­ly­sis, enhan­cing indi­vi­du­al agen­cy (par­ti­cu­lar­ly women’s empower­ment through edu­ca­ti­on), and streng­t­he­ning collec­ti­ve action and gover­nan­ce for glo­bal com­mons . The insti­tu­te is a mem­ber or obser­ver in 10 major inter­go­vern­men­tal orga­niz­a­ti­ons and estab­lis­hed 18 new coope­ra­ti­on agree­ments in 2023 with enti­ties like UNFPA and various natio­nal ministries .

2. Flagship Reports and Key Publications

2.1. “Systems Analysis for Sustainable Wellbeing” (2023)

In Sep­tem­ber 2023, the Inter­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te for App­lied Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (IIASA) laun­ched its flagship report, tit­led “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being: 50 Years of IIASA Rese­arch, 40 Years After the Brundt­land Com­mis­si­on, Con­tri­bu­ting to the Post-2030 Glo­bal Agen­da” . This com­pre­hen­si­ve report chro­ni­cles the half-century histo­ry of IIASA, estab­lis­hed in 1972 in Laxen­burg, Aus­tria, to address com­mon social, eco­no­mic, and envi­ron­men­tal chal­len­ges during the Cold War era . The report details IIASA’s tran­si­ti­on from its ori­gi­nal role as a coope­ra­ti­ve sci­en­ti­fic ven­ture bet­ween East and West to its cur­rent posi­ti­on as a glo­bal insti­tu­te dedi­ca­ted to explo­ring solu­ti­ons for some of the world’s most intrac­ta­ble pro­blems. The­se inter­con­nec­ted issu­es inclu­de popu­la­ti­on dyna­mics, cli­ma­te chan­ge, bio­di­ver­si­ty loss, and the sus­tainab­le use of land, ener­gy, and water resour­ces . The report was offi­cial­ly laun­ched at a United Nati­ons event during the 78th ses­si­on of the UN Gene­ral Assem­bly, unders­co­ring its rele­van­ce to glo­bal poli­cy dis­cus­sions and the mid-term review of the 2030 Agen­da for Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment . The launch event brought tog­e­ther poli­cy­ma­kers, sci­en­tists, and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from various sec­tors to dis­cuss the report’s fin­dings and the impor­t­ance of advan­cing the 2030 Agenda .

The flagship report is struc­tu­red into six main parts, each sum­ma­ri­zing past and cur­rent IIASA rese­arch high­lights and poin­ting towards future chal­len­ges and solu­ti­ons . The­se sec­tions are:

  1. Sys­tems ana­ly­sis for a chal­len­ged world
  2. Popu­la­ti­on and human capital
  3. Food secu­ri­ty, eco­sys­tems, and biodiversity
  4. Ener­gy, tech­no­lo­gy, and cli­ma­te change
  5. Glo­bal sys­tems ana­ly­sis for under­stan­ding the dri­vers of sus­tainab­le wellbeing
  6. Moving into the future: Three cri­ti­cal poli­cy messages .

The report empha­si­zes IIASA’s key con­tri­bu­ti­ons to sci­ence over the past 50 years, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in ana­ly­zing exis­ting and emer­ging trends and deve­lo­ping enhan­ced sci­en­ti­fic tools to address them . It also high­lights IIASA’s col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve work with dis­tin­guis­hed part­ners world­wi­de to estab­lish the sci­en­ti­fic basis for a suc­cess­ful tran­si­ti­on to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment . The report unders­cores that the ulti­ma­te goal of glo­bal man­da­tes, such as the 2030 Agen­da and its Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs), should be sus­tainab­le well­being for all . The docu­ment ser­ves as a tes­ta­ment to IIASA’s dedi­ca­ti­on to addres­sing glo­bal chal­len­ges and its evo­lu­ti­on into a glo­bal insti­tu­te at the fore­front of sol­ving humanity’s most pres­sing issu­es . The report was edi­ted by Wolf­gang Lutz and Sho­na­li Pach­au­ri, with con­tri­bu­ti­ons from nume­rous IIASA rese­ar­chers and exter­nal review­ers . It is avail­ab­le for down­load from the IIASA web­site and other aca­de­mic plat­forms like Zen­o­do and ResearchGate .

The report cul­mi­na­tes in three cri­ti­cal poli­cy messages desi­gned to sti­mu­la­te dis­cus­sions about a post-2030 Agen­da for Sus­tainab­le Development :

  1. Sub­op­ti­miz­a­ti­on is sub­op­ti­mal: Main­stream a systems-analysis approach into poli­cy­ma­king at all levels to ensu­re that broa­der, longer-term con­si­de­ra­ti­ons are incor­po­ra­ted, avoiding decisi­ons that are opti­mal for one sec­tor but detri­men­tal to others or to long-term sustainability .
  2. Enhan­ce indi­vi­du­al agen­cy: Prio­ri­ti­ze women’s empower­ment through uni­ver­sal fema­le edu­ca­ti­on as a means of pro­mo­ting gen­der equa­li­ty and empower­ment, reco­gni­zing that edu­ca­ted indi­vi­du­als, par­ti­cu­lar­ly women, are key dri­vers of sus­tainab­le development .
  3. Streng­t­hen collec­ti­ve action and glo­bal gover­nan­ce: Harness glo­bal coope­ra­ti­on and repre­sen­ta­ti­on to sup­port the glo­bal com­mons, empha­si­zing the need for robust inter­na­tio­nal insti­tu­ti­ons and col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve efforts to address trans­bounda­ry chal­len­ges like cli­ma­te chan­ge and bio­di­ver­si­ty loss .

The­se poli­cy messages reflect IIASA’s core belief in the power of sys­tems ana­ly­sis, indi­vi­du­al empower­ment, and collec­ti­ve action to navi­ga­te the com­ple­xi­ties of glo­bal sus­taina­bi­li­ty chal­len­ges. The report also ack­now­led­ges the sup­port from IIASA’s Natio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­ons and fun­ding from the Euro­pean Rese­arch Coun­cil for the “Demo­gra­phy of Sus­tainab­le Human Well­being” pro­ject (Empowered­Life­Ye­ars, H2020 741105) .

2.2. Annual Reports (2015-2025)

IIASA’s Annu­al Reports from 2015 to 2024 pro­vi­de a year-by-year over­view of the institute’s rese­arch acti­vi­ties, achie­ve­ments, finan­cial per­for­mance, and col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons. The­se reports high­light IIASA’s ongo­ing com­mit­ment to app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis to address glo­bal chal­len­ges such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, ener­gy secu­ri­ty, food and water secu­ri­ty, popu­la­ti­on aging, and sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment . The reports con­sist­ent­ly empha­si­ze the institute’s role in pro­vi­ding poli­cy­ma­kers with science-based infor­ma­ti­on and opti­ons to deve­lop effec­ti­ve policies.

2015 Annu­al Report :
The year 2015 was descri­bed as “out­stan­ding” for IIASA. Key achie­ve­ments inclu­ded the institute’s rese­arch play­ing signi­fi­cant roles in inter­na­tio­nal agree­ments, the UK beco­m­ing a mem­ber coun­try, the suc­cess­ful hos­ting of the first IIASA Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis con­fe­rence, and the fina­liz­a­ti­on of the new Rese­arch Plan 2016–2020 . IIASA’s rese­arch signi­fi­cant­ly con­tri­bu­t­ed to the dis­cus­sions lea­ding to the for­mu­la­ti­on of the UN Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs), par­ti­cu­lar­ly Goal 7 (Afford­a­ble and Clean Ener­gy) and Goal 13 (Cli­ma­te Action) . IIASA also play­ed a cen­tral role in the Paris cli­ma­te sum­mit nego­tia­ti­ons by pro­vi­ding cru­cial sci­en­ti­fic input, inclu­ding the only stu­dy at the time that expli­ci­tly inves­ti­ga­ted the actions nee­ded to achie­ve a 1.5°C war­ming limit . In 2015, IIASA had 333 rese­ar­chers from 49 coun­tries, hos­ted 1,815 visi­t­ing col­la­bo­ra­tors, and main­tai­ned an acti­ve net­work of over 3,000 scho­l­ars . The insti­tu­te pro­du­ced 562 publi­ca­ti­ons, of which 249 were peer-reviewed jour­nal arti­cles, autho­red in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with over 650 co-authors from 160 insti­tu­ti­ons in 43 coun­tries . The annu­al bud­get for 2015 was €22.1 mil­li­on, with 53% of this fun­ding sourced from pres­ti­gious rese­arch fun­ding agen­ci­es across 23 coun­tries, unders­co­ring the inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and finan­cial inde­pen­dence that cha­rac­te­ri­ze IIASA’s work . The peri­od bet­ween 2010 and 2015 saw an addi­tio­nal €51 mil­li­on in fun­ding from con­tracts, grants, and dona­ti­ons, con­tri­bu­ting to a total fun­ding port­fo­lio of €250 mil­li­on for exter­nal pro­jects invol­ving col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons bet­ween IIASA and its mem­ber countries .

2016 Annu­al Report :
The 2016 Annu­al Report high­ligh­ted IIASA’s con­ti­nued advan­ce­ment in sys­tems ana­ly­sis and its sup­port for poli­cy deve­lo­p­ment world­wi­de . The insti­tu­te embar­ked on its new Rese­arch Plan 2016–2020, gui­ding its rese­arch direc­tion . Key rese­arch con­tri­bu­ti­ons inclu­ded assess­ments of coun­tries’ cli­ma­te pled­ges, which show­ed a signi­fi­cant gap in mee­ting the Paris Agree­ment goals, and pro­vi­ding input for the revi­sed EU Rene­wa­ble Ener­gy Direc­ti­ve . At a natio­nal level, IIASA deve­lo­ped blue­prints for mana­ging air pol­lu­ti­on in mega­ci­ties and pro­vi­ded a sci­en­ti­fic basis for ener­gy plan­ning in Indo­ne­sia . In 2016, 348 rese­ar­chers from 50 coun­tries worked at IIASA, and the insti­tu­te col­la­bo­ra­ted with over 2,229 visi­tors . The report also detail­ed IIASA’s mis­si­on, orga­niz­a­tio­nal struc­tu­re, and its focus on glo­bal pro­blem are­as such as Ener­gy and Cli­ma­te Chan­ge, Food and Water, and Pover­ty and Equi­ty . The inter­ac­ti­ve ver­si­on of the 2016 Annu­al Report is avail­ab­le on the IIASA website .

2017 Annu­al Report :
The 2017 Annu­al Report detail­ed the institute’s finan­cial per­for­mance, noting an annu­al bud­get of €21 mil­li­on, with 58% deri­ved from rese­arch fun­ding agen­ci­es in mem­ber coun­tries across Afri­ca, the Ame­ri­cas, Asia, Euro­pe, and Ocea­nia . This diver­se fun­ding base sup­ports IIASA’s inde­pen­dent rese­arch. Expen­dit­u­re on rese­arch and sci­en­ti­fic ser­vices grew to €17.4 mil­li­on in 2017, reflec­ting a con­ti­nued stra­te­gy of incre­a­sing invest­ment in rese­arch acti­vi­ties that began in 2011 . Bet­ween 2012 and 2017, IIASA secu­red an addi­tio­nal €52 mil­li­on in com­pe­ti­ti­ve fun­ding from con­tracts, grants, and dona­ti­ons, con­tri­bu­ting to a total fun­ding port­fo­lio of €265 mil­li­on for exter­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve pro­jects . The report also men­tio­ned that IIASA had to draw on its finan­cial reser­ves due to expec­ted mem­bers­hip con­tri­bu­ti­ons not mate­ria­li­zing as bud­get­ed, though reser­ves remai­ned at a stra­te­gic level . In 2017, 382 rese­ar­chers from 48 coun­tries worked at IIASA, resul­ting in 611 publi­ca­ti­ons (396 peer-reviewed) .

2018 Annu­al Report :
The 2018 Annu­al Report show­ca­sed sci­en­ti­fic reco­gni­ti­on for IIASA rese­ar­chers, inclu­ding awards and invi­ted lec­tures . For examp­le, Åke Bränn­ström beca­me Head of the Depart­ment of Mathe­ma­tics and Mathe­ma­ti­cal Sta­tis­tics at Umeå Uni­ver­si­ty, Swe­den, and Chris­ti­na Kai­ser recei­ved an ERC con­so­li­da­tor grant . IIASA sci­en­tists also par­ti­ci­pa­ted in signi­fi­cant inter­na­tio­nal con­fe­ren­ces and ser­ved on advi­so­ry boards, such as Dilek Fraisl’s role on the UN Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Solu­ti­ons Net­work (SDSN) The­ma­tic Rese­arch Net­work on Data and Sta­tis­tics (TReNDS) . The report also high­ligh­ted acti­vi­ties like work­shops on soil ero­si­on mode­ling and par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the Con­ven­ti­on on Bio­lo­gi­cal Diver­si­ty . The full Annu­al Report for 2018 pro­vi­des a com­pre­hen­si­ve over­view of the institute’s acti­vi­ties and finan­cials for that year . UK Rese­arch and Innovation’s 2018-2019 Annu­al Report also noted its inter­na­tio­nal sub­scrip­ti­on to IIASA . In 2018, 395 rese­ar­chers from 50 coun­tries worked at IIASA .

2019 Annu­al Report :
In 2019, IIASA sci­en­tists hos­ted or coor­di­na­ted 89 events world­wi­de, focu­sing on capa­ci­ty buil­ding in sys­tems ana­ly­sis . Examp­les inclu­de the CD-LINKS sum­mer school on inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling and a work­shop on demo­gra­phic ana­ly­sis in Thai­land . The insti­tu­te con­ti­nued to address pres­sing glo­bal con­cerns such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, ener­gy secu­ri­ty, popu­la­ti­on aging, and sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment . A for­mal IIASA peop­le stra­te­gy, “Crea­ting a working envi­ron­ment for suc­cess,” was adop­ted by the IIASA Coun­cil to fos­ter an enab­ling envi­ron­ment for rese­ar­chers . Signi­fi­cant IT infra­st­ruc­tu­re upgrades were imple­men­ted, inclu­ding incre­a­sed net­work speeds, expan­ded data sto­rage (to 520 TB), and enhan­ced secu­ri­ty for online sci­en­ti­fic app­li­ca­ti­ons . IIASA also made stri­des in envi­ron­men­tal per­for­mance, working towards the “Kli­ma­bünd­nis Betrieb” eco-label and redu­cing prin­ting by 22% com­pa­red to 2018 . In 2019, 417 rese­ar­chers from 52 coun­tries worked at IIASA . The insti­tu­te also beca­me a core mem­ber of the Food and Land Use (FOLU) Coalition .

2020 Annu­al Report :
The 2020 Annu­al Report detail­ed IIASA’s respon­se to the COVID-19 pan­de­mic, inclu­ding imple­men­ting an inter­nal SARS-CoV-2 action plan and dis­tri­bu­ting safe­ty equip­ment . Des­pi­te the pan­de­mic, most sche­du­led infra­st­ruc­tu­re pro­jects were com­ple­ted, inclu­ding win­dow reno­va­tions and upgrades to the hea­ting sys­tem, expec­ted to redu­ce CO2 emis­si­ons by up to 15% . IIASA con­ti­nued its com­mit­ment to open access, with the DARE (Data and Repo­si­to­ry) data­ba­se pro­vi­ding per­sis­tent access to rese­arch data­sets . A com­pre­hen­si­ve sur­vey of IIASA models and tools was con­duc­ted to inform a new open-access poli­cy for sci­en­ti­fic soft­ware . Out­re­ach efforts expan­ded, with signi­fi­cant growth in social media fol­lo­wers and the launch of the IIASA Con­nect plat­form to build a glo­bal sys­tems ana­lyst com­mu­ni­ty, which attrac­ted over 300 mem­bers in its first six mon­ths . The annu­al bud­get for 2020 was €22.4 mil­li­on, with 50% from mem­ber coun­try fun­ding agen­ci­es . Total inco­me was €22.39 mil­li­on, and total expen­dit­u­re was €22.08 mil­li­on . The report also detail­ed various endow­ment funds, inclu­ding the YSSP Fund and the Women in Sci­ence Fund . This year mar­ked the end of the 2011-2020 stra­te­gic plan and the tran­si­ti­on to a new pro­gram struc­tu­re in 2021 .

2021 Annu­al Report :
The 2021 Annu­al Report high­ligh­ted how IIASA harnes­sed sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, capa­ci­ty buil­ding, col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons, and net­works throughout the year . It out­lined the struc­tures, poli­ci­es, and pro­ce­du­res in place to enhan­ce the rese­arch envi­ron­ment and main­tain IIASA’s posi­ti­on as a lea­ding cen­ter for app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis with poli­cy impact . In 2021, IIASA had 434 rese­ar­chers from 53 coun­tries affi­lia­ted with the insti­tu­te and pro­du­ced 392 peer-reviewed jour­nal arti­cles in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with 732 insti­tu­ti­ons across mem­ber coun­tries . The report is avail­ab­le in an inter­ac­ti­ve ver­si­on on the IIASA web­site . A self-assessment report covering 2021-2024 was also initia­ted, pro­vi­ding a com­pre­hen­si­ve sum­ma­ry of IIASA’s acti­vi­ties and achie­ve­ments fol­lowing a major rest­ruc­tu­ring . The new Rese­arch Plan 2021-24 empha­si­zed a mul­ti­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach to achie­ving sus­taina­bi­li­ty goals, focu­sing on beha­vi­or, equi­ty, jus­ti­ce, and resilience .

2022 Annu­al Report :
The 2022 Annu­al Report show­ca­sed IIASA’s rese­arch and other endea­vors on glo­bal, regio­nal, and natio­nal sca­les, empha­si­zing the effec­ti­ve use of sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, capa­ci­ty buil­ding, col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons, and net­works . It pro­vi­ded an over­view of IIASA’s struc­tures, poli­ci­es, and pro­ces­ses desi­gned to enrich the rese­arch eco­sys­tem and uphold its repu­ta­ti­on as a hub for impact­ful, policy-oriented app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis . The institute’s annu­al bud­get in 2022 was €24.4 mil­li­on, with near­ly half com­ing from Natio­nal and Regio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­ons . Addi­tio­nal fun­ding was sourced from con­tracts, grants, and dona­ti­ons. Total inco­me in 2022 was €24.37 mil­li­on, with 46% from mem­bers­hip con­tri­bu­ti­ons and 53% from con­tracts and grants . Almost 80% of the total spen­ding (€18.3 mil­li­on) was dedi­ca­ted to rese­arch and sci­en­ti­fic ser­vices . The chan­ge in net assets for 2022 was €496,121 . Rese­arch fea­tured inclu­ded sea­weed far­ming, land use and cli­ma­te goals, balan­cing lock­downs and vac­ci­na­ti­ons, pen­si­on reform, nature-based solu­ti­ons, and sup­port for EU 2040 cli­ma­te targets .

2023 Annu­al Report :
The 2023 Annu­al Report was a signi­fi­cant publi­ca­ti­on, coin­ci­ding with the launch of the flagship report “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” . The report detail­ed IIASA’s rese­arch pro­gress in are­as such as sus­tainab­le well­being pathways, advan­ce­ments in sys­tems ana­ly­sis, enhan­cing poli­cy impact, lever­aging the digi­tal revo­lu­ti­on, addres­sing emer­ging issu­es, and pro­mo­ting rese­arch excel­lence . It also cove­r­ed efforts to enhan­ce impact through capa­ci­ty buil­ding, publi­ca­ti­ons and open access, sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, and streng­t­he­ning part­ners­hips . Key achie­ve­ments in 2023 inclu­ded six IIASA co-authored papers being among the top 25 most media-cited cli­ma­te papers (accord­ing to Car­bon Brief) and IIASA rese­arch being cited in over 1,000 poli­cy docu­ments (Over­ton data) . IIASA cli­ma­te experts con­tri­bu­t­ed to poli­cy reports informing Euro­pean cli­ma­te tar­gets for 2040 and pathways to cli­ma­te neu­tra­li­ty by 2050 . The institute’s flagship models, GAINS and GLOBIOM, were app­lied to legis­la­ti­ve pro­po­sals addres­sing glo­bal pro­blems . In sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, IIASA is a mem­ber or obser­ver in 10 major inter­go­vern­men­tal orga­niz­a­ti­ons and estab­lis­hed 18 new coope­ra­ti­on agree­ments in 2023 with enti­ties like UNFPA, the Inter­na­tio­nal Anti-Corruption Aca­de­my, and various natio­nal minis­tries . IIASA repre­sen­ta­ti­ves par­ti­ci­pa­ted in key inter­na­tio­nal forums, inclu­ding the Euro­pean Sci­ence Diplo­ma­cy Con­fe­rence and COP28, whe­re they co-organized seven side events . IIASA also con­tri­bu­t­ed to the G20 pro­cess under India’s pre­si­den­cy, sub­mit­ting four poli­cy papers on the future of mul­ti­la­te­ra­lism, with some recom­men­da­ti­ons reflec­ted in the G20 New Delhi Lea­ders’ Decla­ra­ti­on . The annu­al bud­get for 2023 was near­ly €26 mil­li­on, with appro­xi­mate­ly 40% from mem­ber orga­niz­a­ti­ons and the rest from con­tracts and grants . Total inco­me was €25.92 mil­li­on, with con­tract and grant inco­me incre­a­sing signi­fi­cant­ly from €12.91 mil­li­on in 2022 to €15.08 mil­li­on in 2023 . Rese­arch expen­dit­u­re also incre­a­sed from €15.01 mil­li­on in 2022 to €18.14 mil­li­on in 2023 . Stra­te­gic pro­jects laun­ched inclu­ded fairSTREAM, JustTrans4All, and RESIST .

2024 Annu­al Report (Preli­mi­na­ry Highlights) :
The 2024 Annu­al Report is anti­ci­pa­ted to pro­vi­de a con­cise over­view of IIASA rese­ar­chers’ achie­ve­ments and con­tri­bu­ti­ons over the past year . Preli­mi­na­ry high­lights indi­ca­te that in 2024, IIASA rese­ar­chers deve­lo­ped new models to sup­port resi­li­ent food and cli­ma­te sys­tems and quan­ti­fied the cos­ts of adap­t­ati­on and climate-related impacts . The Bio­di­ver­si­ty and Natu­ral Resour­ces Pro­gram con­ti­nued to address cri­ti­cal chal­len­ges at the nexus of bio­di­ver­si­ty, natu­ral resour­ces, and sus­taina­bi­li­ty through inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch and inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­on . The Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment Pro­gram focu­sed on cut­ting metha­ne emis­si­ons to limit glo­bal war­ming and explo­ring the con­se­quen­ces of cli­ma­te chan­ge . The full Annu­al Report for 2024 is expec­ted to be released in 2025 .

A sum­ma­ry of key metrics from selec­ted annu­al reports is pre­sen­ted below:

Year Rese­ar­chers (Coun­tries) Peer-Reviewed Publi­ca­ti­ons Total Publi­ca­ti­ons Bud­get (Approx.) Key High­lights
2015 333 (49) 249 562 €22.1M Con­tri­bu­ti­ons to SDGs & Paris Agree­ment; Rese­arch Plan 2016-2020; UK membership.
2017 382 (48) 396 611 21M Rest­ruc­tu­ring finan­cial net­works; cli­ma­te tar­gets; YSSP 40th anniversary.
2018 395 (50) - - - Energy/climate poli­cy; natio­nal ener­gy mode­ling; finan­cial sys­tem shocks; biodiversity.
2019 417 (52) - - - OECD part­ners­hip; IPCC con­tri­bu­ti­ons; CD-LINKS pro­ject end; FOLU Coalition.
2020 - - - €22.4M New pro­gram struc­tu­re (from 2021); pro­jects: ALTERNET, QuantMig; COVID-19 response.
2021 434 (53) 392 - - Rese­arch Plan 2021-24 launch; focus on equi­ty, jus­ti­ce, resilience.
2022 - - - €24.4M Sea­weed far­ming; land use & cli­ma­te; lockdowns/vaccinations; pen­si­on reform; NBS; EU 2040 cli­ma­te tar­gets; migration/biodiversity tools.
2023 - - - €25.92M Stra­te­gic pro­jects: fairSTREAM, JustTrans4All, RESIST; PV instal­la­ti­on; Hori­zon Euro­pe projects.

Table 1: Sum­ma­ry of Key Metrics from IIASA Annu­al Reports (2015-2023)

The­se annu­al reports collec­tively illus­tra­te IIASA’s dyna­mic rese­arch port­fo­lio, its glo­bal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons, and its signi­fi­cant con­tri­bu­ti­ons to poli­cy and sci­en­ti­fic under­stan­ding across a wide array of sus­taina­bi­li­ty challenges.

2.3. Policy Briefs and Insights

IIASA actively dis­se­mi­na­tes its rese­arch fin­dings to inform poli­cy through various con­cise for­mats, pro­mi­n­ent­ly fea­turing IIASA Poli­cy Briefs” and “Poli­cy Insights.” The­se publi­ca­ti­ons are desi­gned to pre­sent the institute’s latest rese­arch in an acces­si­ble man­ner for poli­cy­ma­kers, empha­si­zing that the views expres­sed are tho­se of the rese­ar­chers and not necessa­ri­ly of IIASA as an insti­tu­ti­on . A nota­ble examp­le is the poli­cy brief tit­led “Deve­lo­p­ment and cli­ma­te poli­cy syn­er­gies: insights from glo­bal model­ling stu­dies,” autho­red by McCol­lum et al. in 2015 . This brief, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween the Cent­re for Poli­cy Rese­arch (CPR) and IIASA, was part of a lar­ger pro­ject, ‘Toward a Robust Deve­lo­p­ment Focu­sed INDC for India,’ and drew upon several glo­bal mode­ling sce­n­a­rio data­ba­ses, inclu­ding the Glo­bal Ener­gy Assess­ment (GEA), Asi­an Mode­ling Exer­cise (AME), LIMITS, and AMPERE, to eva­lua­te envi­ron­men­tal chan­ge and the impli­ca­ti­ons of alter­na­ti­ve poli­cy respon­ses . The Witt­gen­stein Cent­re, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on invol­ving IIASA, also pro­du­ces a collec­tion of poli­cy briefs and insights, along­side dis­cus­sion papers, whe­re sci­en­tists sum­ma­ri­ze rele­vant demo­gra­phic rese­arch and sug­gest poten­ti­al poli­cy opti­ons . The­se cover a wide array of topics such as genera­tio­nal fair­ness in cli­ma­te chan­ge, depo­pu­la­ti­on trends in Euro­pe, the impact of envi­ron­men­tal fac­tors on migra­ti­on, and the eco­no­mic reco­very from the COVID-19 cri­sis . For instance, an IIASA Poli­cy Brief from April 2020, co-authored with the Aus­tri­an Insti­tu­te of Eco­no­mic Rese­arch, ana­ly­zed the poten­ti­al three-year reco­very peri­od for the Aus­tri­an eco­no­my fol­lowing the COVID-19 cri­sis . Ano­t­her IIASA Poli­cy Brief from Sep­tem­ber 2018 focu­sed on edu­ca­ti­on and the sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment agen­da, while one from April 2018, by Wolf­gang Lutz, high­ligh­ted the impor­t­ance of cogni­ti­ve abi­li­ties over finan­cial means in sur­vi­val con­texts . The­se publi­ca­ti­ons demons­tra­te IIASA’s com­mit­ment to trans­la­ting com­plex rese­arch into action­ab­le poli­cy advice across diver­se and cri­ti­cal glo­bal challenges.

Fur­ther examp­les of IIASA’s policy-relevant out­puts inclu­de the IIASA Poli­cy Brief “Lear­ning from the past: How ener­gy and cli­ma­te poli­ci­es can fos­ter the broa­der sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment agen­da?” which sum­ma­ri­zed fin­dings from the CD-LINKS pro­ject . This pro­ject explo­red natio­nal and glo­bal trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­te­gies for cli­ma­te chan­ge and their lin­kages to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment objec­ti­ves. The brief refe­ren­ced aca­de­mic publi­ca­ti­ons on topics like the socio-economic impacts of rene­wa­ble ener­gy poli­ci­es and risk manage­ment in ener­gy tran­si­ti­ons . The India-IIASA Pro­gram­me has also pro­du­ced poli­cy briefs, such as one on “Ana­ly­zing Forest Car­bon Accounts for Sus­tainab­le Poli­cy Opti­ons with Spe­cial Refe­rence to Live­li­hood Issu­es” . This brief, along with a Spe­cial Issue of the Inter­na­tio­nal Fores­try Review, sum­ma­ri­zed rese­arch on Indian forests, high­ligh­t­ing key issu­es and poli­cy recom­men­da­ti­ons. Ano­t­her IIASA Poli­cy Report (XQ-15-803) tit­led “Deve­lo­p­ment and cli­ma­te poli­cy syn­er­gies: insights from glo­bal model­ling stu­dies” was co-authored by N.D. Rao, D. McCol­lum, N.K. Dubash, and R. Khos­la in 2015 . IIASA rese­ar­chers have also con­duc­ted case stu­dies and publis­hed poli­cy briefs on over­co­m­ing bar­ri­ers to the upt­a­ke of nature-based solu­ti­ons com­pa­red to con­ven­tio­nal infra­st­ruc­tu­re . The Chi­na dash­board on the IIASA web­site men­ti­ons that rese­ar­chers publis­hed two poli­cy briefs informing poli­cy­ma­kers about poli­cy and finan­cing bar­ri­ers limi­t­ing the upt­a­ke of nature-based solu­ti­ons . The­se examp­les unders­core IIASA’s dedi­ca­ti­on to brid­ging the gap bet­ween sci­en­ti­fic rese­arch and poli­cy implementation.

2.4. Academic Publications and Research Output

IIASA’s rese­arch out­put is exten­si­ve­ly docu­men­ted in a varie­ty of aca­de­mic publi­ca­ti­ons, inclu­ding peer-reviewed jour­nals, books, and IIASA-specific report seri­es . The­se publi­ca­ti­ons cover a broad spec­trum of sub­jects rele­vant to glo­bal chal­len­ges, reflec­ting the institute’s inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach. The IIASA Publi­ca­ti­ons Repo­si­to­ry (PURE) ser­ves as the cen­tral record for all publi­ca­ti­ons autho­red by IIASA-affiliated rese­ar­chers . As of Janu­a­ry 2019, 64% of arti­cles publis­hed in 2018 were ful­ly avail­ab­le in PURE, with 339,156 down­loads recor­ded in 2018, a signi­fi­cant incre­a­se from 252,129 in the pre­vious year . This demons­tra­tes the reach and impact of IIASA’s open access poli­cy, which requi­res aut­hors to depo­sit their peer-reviewed rese­arch arti­cles in PURE to ensu­re free acces­si­bi­li­ty wit­hin a year of publi­ca­ti­on . IIASA also has publi­shing agree­ments with major publis­hers like Sprin­ger, Wiley, Tay­lor and Fran­cis, and MDPI, which faci­li­ta­te open access publi­shing, often with dis­counts on arti­cle pro­ces­sing char­ges . The PURE repo­si­to­ry con­tains a wide array of publi­ca­ti­ons, inclu­ding jour­nal arti­cles, books, working papers, and rese­arch reports, covering diver­se topics such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, ener­gy, popu­la­ti­on, and eco­sys­tems . For examp­le, recent ent­ries in PURE inclu­de publi­ca­ti­ons on map­ping ine­qua­li­ties in the health of older adults, deve­lo­ping a safe ope­ra­ting space for water resour­ces in the Danu­be basin, and glo­bal forest manage­ment data .

The sheer volu­me and diver­si­ty of the­se publi­ca­ti­ons unders­core IIASA’s role as a lea­ding pro­du­cer of sys­tems ana­ly­sis rese­arch. For instance, rese­arch on informing India’s ener­gy and cli­ma­te deba­te has resul­ted in publi­ca­ti­ons such as “Informing India’s ener­gy and cli­ma­te deba­te: poli­cy les­sons from model­ling stu­dies” (Dubash et al., 2015), an IIASA Poli­cy Report “Deve­lo­p­ment and cli­ma­te poli­cy syn­er­gies: insights from glo­bal model­ling stu­dies” (Rao et al., 2015), and an arti­cle in App­lied Ener­gy tit­led “Sus­tainab­le Ener­gy Secu­ri­ty for India: An assess­ment of ener­gy demand sub-system” (Naru­la et al., 2016) . The “Decent Living Ener­gy” pro­ject, with a case stu­dy in India, pro­du­ced signi­fi­cant publi­ca­ti­ons inclu­ding “Human deve­lo­p­ment in a climate-constrained world: What the past says about the future” (Lamb & Rao, 2015) in Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Chan­ge and “Cli­ma­te impacts of pover­ty era­di­ca­ti­on” (Rao et al., 2014) in Natu­re Cli­ma­te Chan­ge . Air pol­lu­ti­on rese­arch in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with The Ener­gy and Resour­ces Insti­tu­te (TERI), New Delhi, has led to publi­ca­ti­ons like “Impli­ca­ti­ons of ener­gy tra­jec­to­ries from the World Ener­gy Out­look 2015 for India’s air pol­lu­ti­on” (Cofa­la et al., 2015) and “Emis­si­on inven­to­ry of non-methane vola­ti­le orga­nic com­pounds from anthro­po­ge­nic sources in India” (Shar­ma et al., 2015) in Atmo­s­phe­ric Envi­ron­ment . Fur­ther­mo­re, stu­dies on ener­gy access in India have been publis­hed in high-impact jour­nals such as Natu­re Ener­gy (“Poli­cy trade-offs bet­ween cli­ma­te miti­ga­ti­on and clean cook-stove access in South Asia” by Came­ron et al., 2016) and Envi­ron­men­tal Rese­arch Let­ters (“Kero­se­ne sub­si­dies for house­hold ligh­t­ing in India: what are the impacts?” by Lam et al., 2016) . IIASA’s publi­ca­ti­on types also inclu­de “IIASA Inte­rim Reports” for preli­mi­na­ry results, “IIASA Reprints” for arti­cles publis­hed else­whe­re, and “IIASA Rese­arch Reports” for dis­se­mi­na­ting peer-reviewed rese­arch to a wide inter­na­tio­nal audi­ence . The institute’s com­mit­ment to scho­l­ar­ly com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on is also evi­dent in its “Opti­ons Maga­zi­ne,” which pres­ents IIASA and its rese­arch to a non-specialist audi­ence, and news­let­ters like “PopNet” and “PIN­points” . The Bio­di­ver­si­ty and Natu­ral Resour­ces (BNR) Pro­gram alo­ne publis­hed 450 peer-reviewed papers bet­ween 2021 and 2024, with 393 inde­xed in Scopus, inclu­ding 68 papers in Sci­ence, Natu­re, and PNAS, gar­ne­ring 8,544 citations .

3. Core Research Programs and Projects (2015-2025)

3.1. Energy, Climate, and Environment

IIASA has been deeply invol­ved in rese­arch at the inter­sec­tion of ener­gy, cli­ma­te, and envi­ron­men­tal poli­cy, par­ti­cu­lar­ly focu­sing on inte­gra­ted assess­ment and mode­ling to inform sus­tainab­le pathways. A signi­fi­cant initia­ti­ve is the CD-LINKS pro­ject (Lin­king Cli­ma­te and Deve­lo­p­ment Poli­ci­es — Lever­aging Inter­na­tio­nal Net­works and Know­ledge Sharing), led by the IIASA Ener­gy Pro­gram . This €5.5 mil­li­on pro­ject, invol­ving 18 inter­na­tio­nal part­ners, aims to deve­lop pathways that illus­tra­te how cli­ma­te chan­ge miti­ga­ti­on can align with sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment objec­ti­ves, iden­ti­fy­ing syn­er­gies and trade-offs. A key out­put is the deve­lo­p­ment of spe­ci­fic road­maps for most G20 coun­tries, pro­vi­ding poli­cy­ma­kers with con­cre­te advice on mea­su­res nee­ded to meet long-term cli­ma­te goals, espe­cial­ly in the con­text of rat­che­ting up Natio­nal­ly Deter­mi­ned Con­tri­bu­ti­ons (NDCs) under the Paris Agree­ment . The pro­ject also seeks to high­light best prac­ti­ces whe­re poli­ci­es are con­sis­tent with both cli­ma­te and broa­der sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment goals . Ano­t­her major pro­ject, IS-WEL (Inte­gra­ted Solu­ti­ons for Water, Ener­gy, and Land), con­duc­ted in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Faci­li­ty of the World Bank, focu­ses on deve­lo­ping stra­te­gies for the inte­gra­ted, sus­tainab­le manage­ment of food, ener­gy, water, and eco­sys­tems, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in regi­ons hea­vi­ly impac­ted by cli­ma­te varia­bi­li­ty . This invol­ves lin­king tra­di­tio­nal­ly sepa­ra­ted resour­ce manage­ment models to ana­ly­ze poten­ti­al syn­er­gies and trade-offs bet­ween manage­ment opti­ons . IIASA’s GAINS (Green­house gas - Air pol­lu­ti­on Inter­ac­tions and Syn­er­gies) model is fre­quent­ly employ­ed in the­se efforts, for instance, in asses­sing the impli­ca­ti­ons of ener­gy tra­jec­to­ries from the World Ener­gy Out­look 2015 for India’s air pol­lu­ti­on and in eva­lua­ting GHG miti­ga­ti­on poten­ti­al for Chi­na and India . The insti­tu­te also explo­res the socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty in model app­li­ca­ti­ons, exami­ning how chan­ging urba­niz­a­ti­on and inco­me dis­tri­bu­ti­on influ­ence con­sump­ti­on pat­terns (food, ener­gy) and asso­cia­ted envi­ron­men­tal pres­su­res, as well as how envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es affect dif­fe­rent socio-economic groups and over­all ine­qua­li­ties . Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA rese­ar­chers are deve­lo­ping new approa­ches to repre­sent bre­akthrough tech­no­lo­gies for hard-to-abate sec­tors like che­mi­cals, cement, and steel, cru­cial for decar­bo­niz­a­ti­on while main­tai­ning eco­no­mic com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and natio­nal secu­ri­ty . The focus on sub­na­tio­nal cli­ma­te action is also pro­mi­nent, downs­ca­ling glo­bal sce­n­a­ri­os to sta­te and regio­nal levels to pro­vi­de more tar­ge­ted poli­cy advice . The MESS­AGEix model, deve­lo­ped at IIASA, is an indis­pensable tool for sci­en­ti­fic poli­cy advice in cli­ma­te action, with its sce­n­a­ri­os regu­lar­ly incor­po­ra­ted into IPCC reports and ana­ly­ses for the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on . The Low Ener­gy Demand (LED) stu­dy, an explo­ra­to­ry sce­n­a­rio, show­ed how trans­for­ma­ti­ve chan­ges on the ener­gy end-use side can signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce ener­gy demand and help achie­ve the 1.5°C target .

3.2. Population and Just Societies

IIASA’s rese­arch on popu­la­ti­on and just socie­ties del­ves into the com­plex inter­play bet­ween demo­gra­phic trends, human capi­tal, and sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, with a strong empha­sis on equi­ty and poli­cy rele­van­ce. A key area of inves­ti­ga­ti­on is socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty and its impli­ca­ti­ons for con­sump­ti­on pat­terns, envi­ron­men­tal pres­su­res, and the dis­tri­bu­tio­nal impacts of envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es . This rese­arch aims to under­stand how chan­ging pat­terns in urba­niz­a­ti­on and inco­me dis­tri­bu­ti­on influ­ence human con­sump­ti­on (e.g., food, ener­gy) and the asso­cia­ted pres­su­res on the envi­ron­ment and human well-being (e.g., clean air). It also seeks to ana­ly­ze how envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es affect dif­fe­rent socio-economic groups and over­all ine­qua­li­ties and social jus­ti­ce . For examp­le, IIASA rese­ar­chers have com­ple­ted popu­la­ti­on pro­jec­tions to 2100 for India, dis­ag­gre­ga­ted by age, sex, and edu­ca­tio­nal attain­ment for rural and urban regi­ons of 35 Sta­tes and Uni­on Ter­ri­to­ries. The­se detail­ed pro­jec­tions are inten­ded for use in IIASA models rela­ted to ener­gy, food, and air pol­lu­ti­on to explo­re how bet­ter accoun­ting for house­hold socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty impro­ves pre­dic­tions of glo­bal envi­ron­men­tal chan­ge and human well-being, as well as the design of rela­ted poli­ci­es . The “Decent Living Ener­gy” pro­ject, with a case stu­dy focu­sing on India, ana­ly­zes how much ener­gy is nee­ded to pro­vi­de decent living stan­dards for all and the sub­se­quent impact on cli­ma­te chan­ge . This rese­arch is cru­cial for under­stan­ding the ener­gy requi­re­ments for achie­ving glo­bal equi­ty and pover­ty era­di­ca­ti­on. The Witt­gen­stein Cent­re, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on invol­ving IIASA, pro­du­ces poli­cy briefs on various demo­gra­phic issu­es, such as the impact of the 2015 refu­gee cri­sis on social cohe­si­on in Euro­pe, the inte­gra­ti­on poten­ti­al of refu­gees in Aus­tria, and vul­nera­bi­li­ty in times of fami­ly diver­si­ty . The­se briefs often pro­vi­de poli­cy opti­ons based on rigo­rous demo­gra­phic rese­arch, high­ligh­t­ing IIASA’s com­mit­ment to trans­la­ting sci­en­ti­fic fin­dings into action­ab­le insights for crea­ting more just and equi­ta­ble socie­ties. The focus on edu­ca­ti­on, par­ti­cu­lar­ly fema­le edu­ca­ti­on, as a key dri­ver of human deve­lo­p­ment and a deter­mi­nant of demo­gra­phic trends is also a recur­ring the­me in IIASA’s work in this domain . The World Popu­la­ti­on Pro­gram (POP), now Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties (POPJUS), has been instru­men­tal in expan­ding demo­gra­phic methods, nota­b­ly pro­du­cing the “human core” of the Shared Socio­eco­no­mic Pathways (SSPs) .

3.3. Water Security

Water secu­ri­ty is a cri­ti­cal area of rese­arch at IIASA, addres­sing the incre­a­sing pres­su­res on glo­bal water resour­ces due to cli­ma­te chan­ge, popu­la­ti­on growth, and com­pe­ting deman­ds from various sec­tors. The IS-WEL pro­ject (Inte­gra­ted Solu­ti­ons for Water, Ener­gy, and Land) is a flagship initia­ti­ve in this domain, aiming to deve­lop stra­te­gies for the inte­gra­ted and sus­tainab­le manage­ment of food, ener­gy, water, and eco­sys­tems . This pro­ject, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Faci­li­ty of the World Bank, invol­ves high­ly inte­gra­ted rese­arch across IIASA’s Ener­gy, Tran­si­ti­ons to New Tech­no­lo­gies, Water, and Eco­sys­tems Ser­vices and Manage­ment Pro­grams. A core com­po­nent of IS-WEL is lin­king tra­di­tio­nal­ly sepa­ra­ted resour­ce manage­ment models of water, ener­gy, and land use to enab­le rigo­rous ana­ly­sis of poten­ti­al syn­er­gies and trade-offs bet­ween dif­fe­rent manage­ment opti­ons . This inte­gra­ted approach is essen­ti­al for iden­ti­fy­ing robust solu­ti­ons that can address com­plex, inter­con­nec­ted chal­len­ges. Ano­t­her signi­fi­cant pro­ject is SOS-Water (Stay­ing Wit­hin the Safe Ope­ra­ting Space for Water), fun­ded by Hori­zo­nEU . This initia­ti­ve is pionee­ring a science-policy frame­work that brid­ges pla­ne­ta­ry bounda­ries thin­king with basin-scale decision-making. It focu­ses on deve­lo­ping methods and real-world case stu­dies to mana­ge water scar­ci­ty, pol­lu­ti­on, and cli­ma­te extre­mes, aiming to ensu­re sus­tainab­le water manage­ment wit­hin safe eco­lo­gi­cal limits . The Water Futures and Solu­ti­ons Initia­ti­ve, ano­t­her key effort, hel­ps iden­ti­fy water poli­ci­es that work con­sist­ent­ly across dif­fe­rent sca­les and sec­tors by pro­du­cing stakeholder-informed assess­ments that employ multi-model ensem­bles of socio­eco­no­mic and hydro­lo­gi­cal models . The­se pro­jects unders­core IIASA’s com­mit­ment to pro­vi­ding science-based solu­ti­ons for glo­bal water chal­len­ges, empha­si­zing inte­gra­ted assess­ment, sta­ke­hol­der enga­ge­ment, and the deve­lo­p­ment of prac­ti­cal poli­cy tools. The rese­arch often invol­ves ana­ly­zing the impacts of cli­ma­te varia­bi­li­ty and chan­ge on water resour­ces and deve­lo­ping adap­t­ati­on stra­te­gies to ensu­re water secu­ri­ty for various users and eco­sys­tems. Recent out­puts inclu­de a poli­cy report “A Blue­print for Resi­li­en­ce: Char­ting the Cour­se for Water Secu­ri­ty in Euro­pe and Cen­tral Asia” and rese­arch on co-creating a safe water ope­ra­ting space for the Danu­be basin .

3.4. Biodiversity and Natural Resources

IIASA’s rese­arch on bio­di­ver­si­ty and natu­ral resour­ces focu­ses on under­stan­ding the com­plex dyna­mics of eco­sys­tems, the ser­vices they pro­vi­de, and the sus­tainab­le manage­ment of the­se resour­ces in the face of glo­bal chan­ge. The IS-WEL pro­ject (Inte­gra­ted Solu­ti­ons for Water, Ener­gy, and Land) expli­ci­tly inclu­des eco­sys­tems as a key com­po­nent, aiming for their inte­gra­ted and sus­tainab­le manage­ment along­side food, ener­gy, and water . This high­lights the reco­gni­ti­on of eco­sys­tems as fun­da­men­tal to human well-being and eco­no­mic acti­vi­ty. In the con­text of India, IIASA has col­la­bo­ra­ted on pro­jects ana­ly­zing forest car­bon accounts for sus­tainab­le poli­cy opti­ons, with a spe­cial refe­rence to live­li­hood issu­es . This rese­arch, con­duc­ted with the Indian Insti­tu­te of Forest Manage­ment (IIFM), aimed to ana­ly­ze exis­ting fores­try and land use poli­ci­es, deve­lop site-specific India Forest Car­bon Models (for Sikkim and Mad­hya Pra­desh), and assess the fea­si­bi­li­ty of sui­ta­ble finan­cial mecha­nisms for the fores­try sec­tor in India . The stu­dy con­nec­ted net forest car­bon stock to the live­li­hood and socio-economic aspects of forest-dependent com­mu­nities, deve­lo­ped car­bon maps for car­bon sequestra­ti­on, and pro­vi­ded inter­ven­ti­ons for sus­tainab­le forest manage­ment that con­si­ders live­li­hood opti­ons . Ano­t­her pro­ject, “Eco­no­mics of Con­ser­ving Agro-biodiversity and Eco­sys­tem Manage­ment: A Stu­dy In Indian Agro-climatic Sub-Zones,” con­duc­ted with the Insti­tu­te for Social and Eco­no­mic Chan­ge (ISEC), Ban­ga­lo­re, aimed to under­stand tra­di­tio­nal crops, chan­ges in crop­ping sys­tems, and the impact of the­se chan­ges on eco­sys­tem ser­vices . This stu­dy focu­sed on the extent and dis­tri­bu­ti­on of agro-biodiversity, its eco­lo­gi­cal and eco­no­mic effi­ci­en­cy, and the social cos­ts of its loss, with the goal of asses­sing poli­cy opti­ons to pro­mo­te agro-biodiversity con­ser­va­ti­on and plan adap­t­ati­on mea­su­res for cli­ma­te chan­ge vul­nera­bi­li­ty . The­se examp­les demons­tra­te IIASA’s sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach to bio­di­ver­si­ty and natu­ral resour­ce manage­ment, inte­gra­ting eco­lo­gi­cal, eco­no­mic, and social dimen­si­ons to inform poli­cy and pro­mo­te sus­taina­bi­li­ty. The rese­arch often invol­ves deve­lo­ping models and decision-support sys­tems to assess the impacts of dif­fe­rent manage­ment stra­te­gies and poli­cy inter­ven­ti­ons on bio­di­ver­si­ty and eco­sys­tem ser­vices. A key out­put is the “Glo­bal forest manage­ment data for 2015 at a 100m reso­lu­ti­on,” a data­set and pro­to­ty­pe map pro­du­ced as part of the Geo-Wiki project .

3.5. Advanced Systems Analysis

The Advan­ced Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (ASA) Pro­gram at IIASA is dedi­ca­ted to deve­lo­ping, tes­ting, and making avail­ab­le new quan­ti­ta­ti­ve and qua­li­ta­ti­ve methods from fiel­ds such as mathe­ma­tics, sta­tis­tics, ope­ra­ti­ons rese­arch, and manage­ment sci­ence. The­se methods are app­lied to address com­plex pro­blems ari­sing in the poli­cy ana­ly­sis of socio-environmental sys­tems . The program’s acti­vi­ties aim to enhan­ce IIASA’s capa­ci­ty to con­duct rese­arch that impro­ves human and socie­tal well-being and envi­ron­men­tal qua­li­ty by tack­ling pro­blems that can­not be addres­sed by exis­ting tools or by enab­ling more effi­ci­ent problem-solving . One of the main rese­arch fiel­ds wit­hin ASA is par­ti­ci­pa­to­ry gover­nan­ce, inno­va­ti­on poli­cy, tech­no­lo­gy trans­fer, and compromise-oriented poli­cy solu­ti­ons . The Geo-Wiki pro­ject, which pro­du­ced glo­bal forest manage­ment data, is asso­cia­ted with the Advan­cing Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (ASA) pro­gram, spe­ci­fi­cal­ly under the Explo­ra­to­ry Mode­ling of Human-natural Sys­tems (EM) and Novel Data Eco­sys­tems for Sus­taina­bi­li­ty (NODES) rese­arch groups . This indi­ca­tes the program’s role in deve­lo­ping inno­va­ti­ve data collec­tion and ana­ly­sis tools. The ASA program’s mis­si­on is cru­cial for pro­vi­ding the metho­do­lo­gi­cal back­bone for much of IIASA’s inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch, ensu­ring that the sys­tems ana­ly­sis approa­ches used are cutting-edge and robust. The deve­lo­p­ment of new metho­do­lo­gies and tools for inte­gra­ted sys­tems mode­ling is also high­ligh­ted in the OECD publi­ca­ti­on “Sys­temic Thin­king for Poli­cy Making,” to which IIASA rese­ar­chers con­tri­bu­t­ed . Key rese­arch are­as wit­hin ASA inclu­de explo­ra­to­ry mode­ling of human-natural sys­tems (EM), novel data eco­sys­tems for sus­taina­bi­li­ty (NODES), coope­ra­ti­on and trans­for­ma­ti­ve gover­nan­ce (CAT), and sys­temic risk and resi­li­en­ce (SYRR) . The pro­gram also con­tri­bu­t­ed to deve­lo­ping Slovenia’s Food-Based Die­ta­ry Gui­de­li­nes using sys­tems ana­ly­sis methods .

3.6. Risk and Resilience

IIASA’s rese­arch on risk and resi­li­en­ce addres­ses a wide array of glo­bal chal­len­ges, from natu­ral dis­as­ters and cli­ma­te chan­ge impacts to tech­no­lo­gi­cal and eco­lo­gi­cal tran­si­ti­ons. The Risk, Poli­cy and Vul­nera­bi­li­ty (RPV) Pro­gram has been a cen­tral hub for this work, stron­gly focu­sing on pro­vi­ding sci­en­ti­fic insight for the dis­as­ter risk manage­ment deba­te over the last deca­de . The RPV Pro­gram aims to trans­form how socie­ties mana­ge risks asso­cia­ted with eco­no­mic, eco­lo­gi­cal, and social sys­tems under glo­bal chan­ge by exami­ning envi­ron­men­tal and socio-economic risks and poli­cy opti­ons across mul­ti­ple sca­les. This invol­ves app­ly­ing advan­ced methods for asses­sing and ana­ly­zing risks and uncer­tain­ties to impro­ve poli­cy out­co­mes on glo­bal chan­ge issu­es like extre­me events, eco­no­mic deve­lo­p­ment, and envi­ron­men­tal degra­dati­on . IIASA has a long histo­ry of pro­vi­ding policy-relevant ana­ly­ses for dis­as­ter risk manage­ment in the public sec­tor using tools like the Cata­stro­phe Simu­la­ti­on (CATSIM) model. The use of CATSIM for macroeco­no­mic and fis­cal risk assess­ment has been influ­en­ti­al in the adop­ti­on of risk manage­ment poli­ci­es by several deve­lo­ping coun­tries and in shaping glo­bal dis­cus­sions on dis­as­ter risk manage­ment . For examp­le, IIASA, in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the United Nati­ons Office for Dis­as­ter Risk Reduc­tion (UNISDR), con­duc­ted a risk assess­ment of 160 coun­tries for the Glo­bal Risk Assess­ment (GAR 15) in 2015 . The rese­arch also empha­si­zes the need to move bey­ond pure­ly efficiency-oriented tools like Cost-Benefit Ana­ly­sis (CBA) to incor­po­ra­te mul­ti­ple objec­ti­ves such as equi­ty, dis­tri­bu­tio­nal issu­es, co-benefits, robust­ness, and public accep­ta­bi­li­ty. This signi­fies a shift from ‘risk to resi­li­en­ce’ thin­king, urging poli­cy­ma­kers and rese­ar­chers to con­si­der the cri­ti­cal lin­kages bet­ween deve­lo­p­ment and risk . IIASA has also been invol­ved in capacity-building work­shops for poli­cy­ma­kers on the eco­no­mic assess­ment of dis­as­ter risk in various coun­tries, inclu­ding Tur­key, Colom­bia, India, Mexi­co, the Phil­ip­pi­nes, Mada­gas­car, the Carib­be­an, and Cam­bo­dia . This mul­ti­fa­ce­ted approach unders­cores IIASA’s com­mit­ment to enhan­cing socie­tal resi­li­en­ce through rigo­rous sys­tems ana­ly­sis and poli­cy enga­ge­ment. Rese­arch has also explo­red the impacts of risk per­cep­ti­ons on decision-making in major ear­th­qua­kes and frame­works for mana­ging Na-Tech (Natu­ral Hazard-Technological) risks .

4. Cross-Cutting Themes and Interdisciplinary Research

4.1. Systems Analysis Approach

The sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach is the foun­da­tio­nal metho­do­lo­gy under­pin­ning all rese­arch at IIASA. The institute’s mis­si­on expli­ci­tly sta­tes its com­mit­ment to fin­ding solu­ti­ons to glo­bal pro­blems “through app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis” to impro­ve human well­being and pro­tect the envi­ron­ment . This approach is essen­ti­al for tack­ling com­plex, inter­con­nec­ted issu­es that span mul­ti­ple disci­pli­nes and sca­les. The IIASA Rese­arch Plan 2016-2020 details how the insti­tu­te pro­vi­des a “holistic, sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach” . This invol­ves deve­lo­ping new methods in sys­tems approa­ches, not only in rese­arch but also in how that rese­arch is deli­ve­r­ed to poli­cy­ma­kers and sta­ke­hol­ders . The “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” flagship report fur­ther empha­si­zes this, with its very tit­le and con­tent struc­tu­red around sys­tems thin­king to address glo­bal chal­len­ges . The Advan­ced Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (ASA) Pro­gram spe­ci­fi­cal­ly focu­ses on advan­cing the­se metho­do­lo­gies . IIASA’s work on inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling, sce­n­a­rio ana­ly­sis, and the manage­ment of inter­con­nec­ted resour­ces like food, ener­gy, water, and land all exem­pli­fy the prac­ti­cal app­li­ca­ti­on of sys­tems ana­ly­sis . This approach allows IIASA to iden­ti­fy leverage points, under­stand feed­back loo­ps, and assess trade-offs, which is cri­ti­cal for deve­lo­ping effec­ti­ve and sus­tainab­le poli­cy solu­ti­ons. The OECD publi­ca­ti­on “Sys­temic Thin­king for Poli­cy Making,” fea­turing con­tri­bu­ti­ons from IIASA rese­ar­chers, del­ves into the poten­ti­al of sys­tems ana­ly­sis for addres­sing 21st-century glo­bal poli­cy chal­len­ges, inclu­ding metho­do­lo­gies and tools for inte­gra­ted sys­tems mode­ling . The institute’s stra­te­gy for 2021-2030 con­ti­nues to build on this foun­da­ti­on, empha­si­zing the inte­gra­ti­on of new exper­ti­se and metho­do­lo­gies, inclu­ding advan­ced tech­no­lo­gies like arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence and machi­ne lear­ning, to aug­ment its sophisti­ca­ted sys­tems ana­ly­sis toolkit .

4.2. Integrated Assessment Modeling

Inte­gra­ted Assess­ment Mode­ling (IAM) is a key metho­do­lo­gi­cal pil­lar of IIASA’s rese­arch, par­ti­cu­lar­ly wit­hin its Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment (ECE) Pro­gram. IAMs are used to ana­ly­ze the com­plex inter­ac­tions bet­ween human and natu­ral sys­tems, such as the inter­play bet­ween socio-economic deve­lo­p­ment, ener­gy sys­tems, land use, and cli­ma­te chan­ge. IIASA hosts and main­tains a lar­ge num­ber of sce­n­a­rio ensem­bles and data­ba­ses that are fun­da­men­tal to the IAM com­mu­ni­ty and various rese­arch pro­jects . The­se inclu­de the AR6 Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer for the IPCC, the IAMC 1.5°C Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer, the CD-LINKS Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer, and the SSP Data­ba­se, among others . The­se tools faci­li­ta­te model com­pa­ri­son, the dis­se­mi­na­ti­on of rese­arch out­put, and the adop­ti­on of FAIR princi­ples for open sci­ence . The India-IIASA Pro­gram­me, for examp­le, uti­li­zes IIASA models (GAINS) to exami­ne air pol­lutant emis­si­ons and their impacts resul­ting from ener­gy sce­n­a­ri­os . The rese­arch on “Decent Living Ener­gy” also invol­ves mode­ling to ana­ly­ze ener­gy needs for decent living stan­dards and the sub­se­quent cli­ma­te impact . The MESS­AGEix inte­gra­ted assess­ment model, deve­lo­ped at IIASA, is regu­lar­ly incor­po­ra­ted into key inter­na­tio­nal reports, inclu­ding tho­se by the IPCC and the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on . The Ger­man Envi­ron­ment Agen­cy (UBA), for instance, is buil­ding inter­nal capa­ci­ties for using and fur­ther deve­lo­ping the MESS­AGEix model for cli­ma­te action sce­n­a­ri­os . This demons­tra­tes the direct poli­cy rele­van­ce and trans­fer of IIASA’s tools and exper­ti­se to natio­nal agen­ci­es. The deve­lo­p­ment of new metho­do­lo­gies and tools for inte­gra­ted sys­tems mode­ling is also high­ligh­ted in the OECD publi­ca­ti­on “Sys­temic Thin­king for Poli­cy Making,” to which IIASA rese­ar­chers contributed .

4.3. Sustainable Development Pathways

A cen­tral the­me in IIASA’s rese­arch is the explo­ra­ti­on and deve­lo­p­ment of sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment pathways. This invol­ves ana­ly­zing how dif­fe­rent poli­cy choices and socie­tal trans­for­ma­ti­ons can lead to out­co­mes that meet the needs of the pre­sent without com­pro­mi­sing the abi­li­ty of future genera­ti­ons to meet their own needs. The institute’s work on the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs) is a prime examp­le, with rese­arch focu­sing on how to achie­ve the­se 17 inter­con­nec­ted goals in an inte­gra­ted man­ner . The “The World in 2050” (TWI2050) initia­ti­ve, co-launched by IIASA, aims to pro­vi­de evidence-based know­ledge to sup­port the SDG poli­cy pro­cess, iden­ti­fy­ing six key trans­for­ma­ti­ons cri­ti­cal for sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment: human capa­ci­ty and demo­gra­phy, con­sump­ti­on and pro­duc­tion, decar­bo­niz­a­ti­on and ener­gy, food, bio­s­phe­re and water, smart cities, and the digi­tal revo­lu­ti­on . This work empha­si­zes maxi­mi­zing syn­er­gies and mini­mi­zing trade-offs bet­ween dif­fe­rent SDGs. IIASA’s rese­arch also con­tri­bu­tes to under­stan­ding the demo­gra­phic dimen­si­ons of sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, such as the impact of achie­ving SDGs rela­ted to edu­ca­ti­on and repro­duc­ti­ve health on glo­bal popu­la­ti­on growth . The deve­lo­p­ment of Shared Socio­eco­no­mic Pathways (SSPs), to which IIASA’s World Popu­la­ti­on Pro­gram (now Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties) signi­fi­cant­ly con­tri­bu­t­ed by pro­vi­ding the “human core” (popu­la­ti­on pro­jec­tions by age, sex, and edu­ca­ti­on), offers a frame­work for explo­ring dif­fe­rent future deve­lo­p­ment tra­jec­to­ries and their impli­ca­ti­ons for cli­ma­te chan­ge and other sus­taina­bi­li­ty chal­len­ges . The­se pathways are cru­cial for inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling and for deve­lo­ping robust stra­te­gies that are resi­li­ent to various future uncer­tain­ties. The ulti­ma­te aim, as high­ligh­ted in IIASA’s 2023 flagship report, is to achie­ve sus­tainab­le well­being for all .

4.4. Equity and Justice in Sustainability Transitions

IIASA’s rese­arch incre­a­singly empha­si­zes the cri­ti­cal impor­t­ance of equi­ty and jus­ti­ce in sus­taina­bi­li­ty tran­si­ti­ons. This invol­ves ana­ly­zing how dif­fe­rent socie­tal groups are affec­ted by envi­ron­men­tal chan­ges and poli­cy inter­ven­ti­ons, and ensu­ring that the bene­fits and bur­dens of the­se tran­si­ti­ons are dis­tri­bu­t­ed fair­ly. The institute’s work on socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty exami­nes how fac­tors like inco­me dis­tri­bu­ti­on and urba­niz­a­ti­on influ­ence con­sump­ti­on pat­terns and envi­ron­men­tal pres­su­res, and how envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es, in turn, impact dif­fe­rent socio-economic groups and over­all ine­qua­li­ties . For examp­le, the “Decent Living Ener­gy” pro­ject inves­ti­ga­tes the ener­gy requi­red to pro­vi­de decent living stan­dards for all, inher­ent­ly lin­king to issu­es of glo­bal equi­ty and pover­ty era­di­ca­ti­on . The Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties (POPJUS) pro­gram focu­ses on under­stan­ding demo­gra­phic struc­tures and their inter­ac­tions with social and eco­no­mic envi­ron­ments, with a strong empha­sis on human capi­tal deve­lo­p­ment and its impli­ca­ti­ons for equi­ty . The 2023 flagship report, “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being,” expli­ci­tly calls for enhan­cing indi­vi­du­al agen­cy, par­ti­cu­lar­ly through women’s empower­ment and uni­ver­sal edu­ca­ti­on, as a key poli­cy mes­sa­ge for a post-2030 agen­da . This high­lights the reco­gni­ti­on that empowe­ring indi­vi­du­als and addres­sing ine­qua­li­ties are fun­da­men­tal to achie­ving sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment. Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA’s rese­arch explo­res the dis­tri­bu­tio­nal impacts of cli­ma­te poli­ci­es and the con­cept of a “just tran­si­ti­on” to a low-carbon eco­no­my, ensu­ring that the shift away from fos­sil fuels does not dis­pro­por­tio­na­te­ly harm vul­nerable com­mu­nities or workers in carbon-intensive indus­tries. The focus on equi­ty and jus­ti­ce is inte­gral to IIASA’s sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach, ensu­ring that solu­ti­ons are not only envi­ron­ment­al­ly sound but also social­ly inclu­si­ve and fair.

5. Collaborations and Partnerships

5.1. Engagement with National Member Organizations

IIASA’s enga­ge­ment with its Natio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­ons (NMOs) is a cor­ner­stone of its ope­ra­tio­nal model and rese­arch impact. The­se orga­niz­a­ti­ons, repre­sen­ting coun­tries from around the world, pro­vi­de cru­cial finan­cial sup­port and help shape the institute’s rese­arch agen­da to address natio­nal and glo­bal prio­ri­ties. The annu­al reports con­sist­ent­ly high­light the signi­fi­cant por­ti­on of IIASA’s bud­get deri­ved from con­tri­bu­ti­ons by NMOs. For instance, in 2015, 53% of IIASA’s €22.1 mil­li­on bud­get came from rese­arch fun­ding agen­ci­es in 23 mem­ber coun­tries . This diver­se fun­ding base under­pins IIASA’s inde­pen­dence and its abi­li­ty to under­ta­ke impar­ti­al, sci­en­ti­fi­cal­ly rigo­rous rese­arch. The list of con­tri­bu­ting agen­ci­es in 2015 span­ned a wide ran­ge of nati­ons, inclu­ding Aus­tra­lia (CSIRO), Aus­tria (OEAW), Bra­zil (CAPES), Chi­na (NSFC), Egypt (Minis­try of Finan­ce), Fin­land (Aca­de­my of Fin­land), Ger­ma­ny (BMBF), India (TIFAC), Indo­ne­sia (Minis­try of For­eign Affairs), Japan (Minis­try of the Envi­ron­ment), South Korea (NRF), Malay­sia (Minis­try of Sci­ence, Tech­no­lo­gy and Inno­va­ti­on), Mexi­co (CONACYT, INEGI), the Nether­lands (NWO), Nor­way (RCN), Paki­stan (Plan­ning Com­mis­si­on), Rus­sia (RAS), South Afri­ca (NRF), Swe­den (FORMAS), Ukrai­ne (Ukrai­ni­an Aca­de­my of Sci­en­ces), the UK (ESRC, EPSRC, NERC), the USA (NSF), and Viet­nam (VAST) . This inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­on is fun­da­men­tal to IIASA’s mis­si­on. The UK’s decisi­on to rejoin IIASA in 2015, after a peri­od of non-membership, was influ­en­ced by the argu­ment that IIASA pro­du­ces high-quality sci­en­ti­fic work, builds sys­tems ana­ly­sis capa­ci­ty (espe­cial­ly in inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling), and ser­ves as a valu­able chan­nel for sci­ence diplo­ma­cy . Howe­ver, chal­len­ges remain in ensu­ring that NMOs can effec­tively influ­ence the rese­arch agen­da and that end-users of IIASA’s rese­arch are ade­qua­te­ly con­nec­ted to the Insti­tu­te. Reports sug­gest that NMOs should work tog­e­ther to dri­ve fur­ther reforms, inclu­ding estab­li­shing mecha­nisms for mea­ning­ful end-user influ­ence on the rese­arch agenda .

5.2. International Collaborations (e.g., UNPIK)

IIASA actively fos­ters inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons with a wide array of insti­tu­ti­ons, inclu­ding United Nati­ons agen­ci­es, other rese­arch insti­tu­tes, uni­ver­si­ties, and non-governmental orga­niz­a­ti­ons. The­se part­ners­hips are essen­ti­al for lever­aging diver­se exper­ti­se, acces­sing glo­bal data, and ensu­ring the broad impact of its rese­arch. A pro­mi­nent examp­le is IIASA’s col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the United Nati­ons Envi­ron­ment Pro­gram­me (UNEP) on the annu­al Emis­si­on Gap Reports, whe­re IIASA’s MESS­AGEix model sce­n­a­ri­os are regu­lar­ly incor­po­ra­ted . IIASA also works clo­se­ly with the Inter­go­vern­men­tal Panel on Cli­ma­te Chan­ge (IPCC), hos­ting and con­tri­bu­ting to major sce­n­a­rio data­ba­ses like the AR6 Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer and the IAMC 1.5°C Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer . The insti­tu­te is a mem­ber or obser­ver in 10 major inter­go­vern­men­tal orga­niz­a­ti­ons . Col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with other lea­ding rese­arch insti­tu­ti­ons, such as the Pots­dam Insti­tu­te for Cli­ma­te Impact Rese­arch (PIK), is also signi­fi­cant. For examp­le, IIASA sci­en­tists, in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with PIK, have con­tri­bu­t­ed to rese­arch on sus­tainab­le life­styles, green-tech inno­va­ti­on, and government-led trans­for­ma­ti­on pathways to achie­ve the SDGs and the Paris Agree­ment . The CD-LINKS pro­ject, which explo­red natio­nal and glo­bal trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­te­gies for cli­ma­te chan­ge and their lin­kages to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, invol­ved 18 inter­na­tio­nal part­ners . Simi­lar­ly, the IS-WEL pro­ject, focu­sing on inte­gra­ted solu­ti­ons for water, ener­gy, and land, was con­duc­ted in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Faci­li­ty of the World Bank . The­se col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons extend IIASA’s reach and enhan­ce the rele­van­ce and app­li­ca­bi­li­ty of its rese­arch fin­dings to glo­bal poli­cy chal­len­ges. In 2023 alo­ne, IIASA estab­lis­hed 18 new coope­ra­ti­on agree­ments with enti­ties like the UN Popu­la­ti­on Fund (UNFPA), the Inter­na­tio­nal Anti-Corruption Aca­de­my, and various natio­nal ministries .

5.3. Capacity Building and Early Career Development

Capa­ci­ty buil­ding and ear­ly care­er deve­lo­p­ment are inte­gral com­pon­ents of IIASA’s mis­si­on to advan­ce sys­tems ana­ly­sis glo­bal­ly. The insti­tu­te runs several pro­grams aimed at nur­tu­ring the next genera­ti­on of sci­en­tists and enhan­cing the skills of rese­ar­chers and poli­cy­ma­kers from around the world. The flagship pro­gram in this area is the Young Sci­en­tists Sum­mer Pro­gram (YSSP), which cele­bra­ted its 40th anni­ver­s­a­ry in 2017 . Each sum­mer, the YSSP brings talen­ted doc­to­ral stu­dents from diver­se coun­tries and disci­pli­nes to IIASA to work on their own rese­arch pro­jects under the gui­d­ance of IIASA sci­en­tists. This pro­gram pro­vi­des a uni­que oppor­tu­ni­ty for young rese­ar­chers to enga­ge with cutting-edge sys­tems ana­ly­sis metho­do­lo­gies and build inter­na­tio­nal net­works. In 2019, IIASA sci­en­tists hos­ted or coor­di­na­ted 89 events world­wi­de, many of which focu­sed on capa­ci­ty buil­ding in sys­tems ana­ly­sis, such as the CD-LINKS sum­mer school on inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling and work­shops on demo­gra­phic ana­ly­sis . The IIASA Con­nect plat­form, laun­ched in 2020, aims to build a glo­bal sys­tems ana­lyst com­mu­ni­ty and attrac­ted over 300 mem­bers in its first six mon­ths, fur­ther faci­li­ta­ting know­ledge sharing and col­la­bo­ra­ti­on . The institute’s com­mit­ment to open access, with its publi­ca­ti­ons repo­si­to­ry (PURE) and open-access poli­cy for sci­en­ti­fic soft­ware, also con­tri­bu­tes to capa­ci­ty buil­ding by making rese­arch fin­dings and tools wide­ly avail­ab­le . Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA’s col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons often invol­ve trai­ning com­pon­ents, such as the Tro­pi­cal Futures Initia­ti­ve which hel­ped train local mode­lers in Bra­zil to use IIASA’s GLOBIOM land-use model . The­se initia­ti­ves ensu­re that the skills and know­ledge in sys­tems ana­ly­sis are dis­se­mi­na­ted glo­bal­ly, empowe­ring more coun­tries and insti­tu­ti­ons to address com­plex sus­taina­bi­li­ty challenges.

edit: Ich woll­te hier noch als Kon­text das Grün­dungs­da­tum von Fri­days for Future rein­stel­len - aber…

*Gacker!*

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 01 um 21 12 21

Soll ich jetzt Lügen­pres­se schrei­en, oder auf die KI schimp­fen? 😉 Die rich­ti­ge Ant­wort (Poli­ti­co) [Kon­text: click (Welt­wo­che)] schi­cken sie bit­te auf einer Post­kar­te an das ZDF, Post­fach 4040 55100 Mainz, …

edit: A litt­le fur­ther rese­arch into the Welt­wo­che arti­cle: This is Stuart Scott, the media net­work “We don’t have time” board­mem­ber that gave Thun­berg access to the UN con­fe­rence in Kato­wice (her first appearence at the UN).

Here seen, rocking his Spooky2:

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 08 58 05
src: click

Here a you­tube influ­en­cer rocking the same Spooky2 elec­tro­de sti­cky pad, tal­king with the inven­tor of the device no less:
Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 09 19 06
src: click

Appar­ent­ly the upper arm tri­ceps mus­cle works just as well as the back of your hand.

Won­der­ful.

Whats a Spooky2 you ask? Well… Dont.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 09 04 21

Also if you real­ly are into ana­ly­zing well working SEO, com­pa­re goog­le search results for Spooky2 vs. Spooky2 medical.

When in doubt, trust - eehhhh

29. Juli 2025

CSIS!

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 10 55 07
src: click

No, wait - Open Data­set gene­ra­ted with Gene­ral Staff of the Armed For­ces of Ukrai­ne data, cited by USA Today and, and … CSIS?

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 10 58 10
src: click

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 10 56 09
src: click

Well… Sh*t.

edit: Mys­te­ry sol­ved. CSIS counts “goal not reached” as destroyed.

edit: For tho­se of you that are more into modern art (super­so­nic mis­si­les only):

Ed519ec2 ad69 4d94 b8a0 52ab50296084

edit2: Shahed inter­cep­ti­ons (AI wro­te the par­ser, but data inte­gri­ty seems fine com­pa­red to the (wee­kly data based) dash­board avail­ab­le on kagg­le):

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 14 27 43

Sep­tem­ber 2024 is ama­zing - you get from the tigh­test cur­ve fit func­tion direct­ly into “sud­den­ly half of shaheds dont reach tar­get” without ANY impact to shaheeds that hit rate…

During a 2.5x ramp up from the russians.

Thats pre­cisi­on engineering.

edit3: Uff… “Vla­di­mir STOP” was end of April 2025. He didnt stop.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 14 41 27

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 15 15 14

(When Ukrai­ne talks about “1000 shaheds a day” capability…

Bildschirmfoto 2025 07 29 um 15 19 35

Noti­ce, the­re is no cor­re­la­ti­on to shahed hit rate… - eehhhh)