Finde den Fehler

01. Februar 2025

Bildschirmfoto 2025 02 01 um 13 07 07

src: click

Lisa. How can your self­i­mage be so much that of a jour­na­list - yet you suck so much at the intel­li­gence thing. How?

Well - Die Pres­se doesnt mind, and pays her a full sala­ry. Thats a win for Diversity.

edit: Für die Idio­ten unter mei­nen Lesern:

I want my matrix mul­ti­pli­ca­ti­on math done by a women!”

I want my rein­for­ce­ment lear­ning gig­wor­kers in india at least half fema­le, and half Dalits!”

I want initi­al prompts to be engi­nee­red, more like the AMS engi­nee­red them!” see: click

I want at least 51% of the trai­ning data to be diver­se literature.”

I want diver­se peop­le to wri­te at least an addi­tio­nal half of whats in all lite­ra­tu­re, vide­os pro­du­ced, maga­zi­nes prin­ted, and on the inter­net, but they have to be qua­li­fied, so I want to test them first. No jokers app­ly. Oh, and I need at least 100 diver­se van Gogh types.”

Also, I need a PR per­son, to fix the public per­cep­ti­on of this: click” (Mes­sing with weights.)

Plea­se for the sake of the argu­ment, someo­ne fetch all femi­nist and diver­se clas­si­fied lite­ra­tu­re, and then make sure its 60% of the trai­ning data, then fill up the rest with gene­ral know­ledge wri­tings, and spin up a foun­da­ti­on model for an LLM. Train it with Deep­seek R1 671b q4 as a judge. Make sure you call it “Diver­se Lisa”, and mail api access to Lisa Schöttel.

Can you do me that favor?

I mean -- this lear­ning oppor­tu­ni­ty would bene­fit ever­yo­ne, not just the diver­se com­mu­ni­ty - so it ought to be much easier to gene­ra­te the good­will (and fun­ding) around it so some one spins it up, right?

(Its not as if you had to con­vin­ce an angel inves­tor for that… Hard­ware clus­ter access for a week maybe…)

edit: Several niche expert LLMs, one of which is a diver­si­ty expert. Then pull them tog­e­ther as a “gene­ral” model. Pro­blem. The bub­ble is not tap­ped into for most requests.

edit2: Meso level issue: Diver­si­ty experts told the ent­i­re­ty of socie­ty to tap into Diver­si­ty for a 3% pro­duc­ti­vi­ty incre­a­se. So they sent away the STEM Cracks from chi­na - from wes­tern eli­te uni­ver­si­ties to make a more diver­se quota.

Now chi­na just incre­a­sed LLM effi­ci­en­cy (gaged by pri­ce, becau­se o3 is not open source) by 27x. Rough­ly. And made the model more or less open source. (Not the trai­ning data.)

Now every KI com­pa­ny (that inves­ted in NVi­dia Cuda cores) in the world is like: FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCK the diver­si­ty team. (As in its not just data and com­pu­te you nee­ded. Algo deve­lo­p­ment was up the­re as well.)

Espe­cial­ly their angel investors.

So is every social media com­pa­ny in the world.

The­re is a fun litt­le overlap.

edit: Bet­ter dis­cus­sion about the topic:

The quality of ukrainian leadership

31. Januar 2025

- is immense. I mean, was immense.

Immense, I tell you.

Almost bor­de­ring on unparalleled.

Also gre­at news for inde­pen­dent Ukrai­ni­an media, which US fun­ding just stop­ped. “It should be fun­ded by ukrai­ni­an sta­te budget.”

Immense, what a qua­li­ty lea­der! Such ukrai­ni­an, such brain! Only Selen­skyj could be more intel­li­gent of all the peop­le in Ukrai­nes lea­ders­hip cadre.

Also five points of what Ukrai­ne can not give up -- promp­t­ing the mode­ra­tor to ask in return “but thats total vic­to­ry” -- very expert­ly recal­led from memo­ry. Much expert. Supre­me memory.

We should all be thank­ful, every day, that NATO fol­lows the­se types of leaders.

Full capture is near!

31. Januar 2025

Gre­at news!

When Orban did his sur­pri­se trip to 

- Ukrai­ne
(- Belarus)
- Russia
- China

the EU flai­led him for that.

Now look at what Lex Fri­d­man is doing/planning to do in the near future:

- Ukrai­ne (tal­king to Selenskyj)
- Rus­sia (tal­king to Putin)
- India (tbd)
- Chi­na (tbd)

Which is gre­at, becau­se he will relay all his con­ver­sa­tio­nal fin­dings with world lea­ders, and their poli­ti­cal aides to Joe Rogan wit­hin the mon­th - ensu­ring that the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on will not stray from their elec­tion pro­mi­ses to end this war.

Ah - the good old full cap­tu­re of your oppon­ents narratives… 😉

So - is the Trump Admi­nis­tra­ti­on still con­vin­cing Trump, that neo­go­tia­ti­ons with Putin sad­ly fai­led, becau­se Putin wan­ted too much, and so he has to con­ti­nue this war, or.…

Cant wait for tho­se interviews. 🙂

Yes you say - but what impact can Joe Rogan have on Trumps decisi­on making? Boy have I got news for you… 😉

Main­stream media can­ce­ling Lex Fri­d­man in three, two, one, …

Have I missed something?

31. Januar 2025

Bildschirmfoto 2025 01 31 um 20 32 05

New Voice of Ukrai­ne article:
https://english.nv.ua/nation/finnish-president-ukraine-ceasefire-possible-within-six-months-50486032.html

EADai­ly is a rus­si­an publi­ca­ti­on, but it is refe­ren­cing this Ukrain­s­ka Prav­da Report:
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/01/27/7495459/

Back­ground: Alex­an­der Stubb was the stu­pi­dest of stu­pid Ukrai­ne hawks in the past two and a half years. As in -- never stray­ed from the public euro­pean line.

What chan­ged?

The wea­ther?

edit: This does reflect what Micha­el Kof­man has repor­ted in decem­ber, that cur­r­ent­ly it loo­ks like that the west has just pospo­ned the risk of ukrai­ni­an front­li­ne des­in­te­gra­ti­on by six mon­ths. But his stick was -- “if we dont do some­thing to chan­ge that”.

Buda­novs repor­ted quo­te four days ago pro­c­lai­med -- in gene­ral. Which is why nego­tia­ti­ons would be needed.

edit: Also - the The Inde­pen­dent news arti­cle in bet­ween the two others is fac­tual­ly wrong of cour­se: see: click (Look for a Putin quo­te ques­tio­ned by a rus­si­an repor­ter on that sub­ject specifically.)

edit2: Die Welt is some­what on the ball:

edit3: Das ZDF bring­ts ein­fach im Ticker der unter der Aus­lands­kor­re­spon­den­tin durchs Bild scrollt… Auch ne Mög­lich­keit… edit: Ama­zing, sie spre­chens bei 28 min in sogar an.

Following Selenskyj trade logic - Episode 354

28. Januar 2025

Selen­skyj much lear­ned from inten­si­ve three hour Trump Uni­ver­si­ty Sum­mer course.

New strong, effec­ti­ve pro­pa­gan­da message:

We gifted Atom­bombs away for war.”

Selens­kij: „Wir haben Atom­waf­fen für den Krieg verschenkt“

src: click (Die Presse)

Selen­skyj lear­ned tra­de basics:

Pha­se one:

I give you ato­mic wea­pons > You give me worth­less secu­ri­ty guarantees

Pha­se two:

Give us more wea­pon, so we can push rus­sia out of Don­bas, and reta­ke cri­mea. > Its working! [Mer­kel: Minsk 2 was just con­cep­tua­li­zed, so we gai­ned more time to arm up Ukrai­ne.] Stein­mei­er For­mu­la is so unfair!

Pha­se three:

28 years later: Rea­li­sa­ti­on phase:

Gua­ran­tees were worth­less > Argu­men­ta­ti­on: becau­se Rus­sia [hence­forth known in Andry Yer­mak Tweets as “the ter­ro­rist”] atta­cked us even more. (Full sca­le attack against Ukraine.)

Not our fault.

Pha­se four:

Estab­li­shing the reasoning:

Worth­less secu­ri­ty gua­ran­tees are the rea­son we are now at war.

Not our fault.

Pha­se five:

Give us secu­ri­ty gua­ran­tees, it will much help us win the war.

Easy.

Pha­se six:

Rea­li­sa­ti­on Pha­se after loo­king at self gene­ra­ted reasoning:

We gifted Atom­bombs for war.

Pha­se seven:

We gifted Atom­bombs for war!

You give us NATO now, for atom­bombs we tra­ded in 1994 (befo­re the Putin speech in 2008), becau­se it would have been a more just trade.”

Trump can make this deal faster!”

Trump kann das beschleunigen“

Rück­bli­ckend wäre es bes­ser gewe­sen, hät­te die Ukrai­ne damals die Sicher­heits­ga­ran­tien von der Nato erhal­ten. „Wenn ich also Atom­waf­fen ein­tau­schen wür­de, wür­de ich sie gegen etwas sehr Star­kes ein­tau­schen, etwas, das wirk­lich jeden Angrei­fer auf­hal­ten kann, trotz sei­ner Grö­ße, sei­nes Ter­ri­to­ri­ums, sei­ner Armee und so wei­ter - und das ist eine star­ke Armee und der Sicher­heits­block Nato“, sag­te Selenskij.

src: click (Die Presse)

The Art of the deal, am I right?

Which ger­man spea­king news paper is with me?

What other factors?