And I’m quoting the former prime minister of Ukraine Arsenij Jazenjuk in this video here - the guy who can thank Victoria Nuland for his political life and career - because what else is there? Zero charisma, idiot to the brims, party soldier -- unable to win any public elections… Oh sorry - I was quoting him, right:
“Look, here is the thing, when I participated in NATO public forum, which was held in DC in Washington, I was very clear and open saying, to our western friends, that look guys, you have to change the rules of engagement, you have to lift all those restrictions. This is the easiest and the closest way how to end this war, and not just to end, but to win this war. This is the way how the democracy can win this war against tyrant and dictatorship regime of Vladimir Putin”.
Great news all over, Friendespräsident Selensky finally wants a war.
But let me get this straight first.
So this is a puppet being lied to by liars, lying to liars and the public, about a shift in conditions that would preserve the political position from lying Selenskyj, while Narendra Modi is in Kiev trying to promote peace talks, and is being represented by another liar (from the Presidential Office of Ukraine) as having stated, that territorial integrity of Ukraine has to be upheld, so the war has to continue. Because total war (no limitations) is the quickest way to peace - really.
This is it guys! Great and glorious offensive in Kursk which captured 80% conscripts showed the world, that Ukraine should be able to attack anything in russia - because Kursk invasion CLEARLY was defensive in nature, an not at all entirely against international law (völkerrechtswidrig).
We are so close to winning, the US and western allies just have to lift all the restrictions they placed before (something that to this day is the position of the german CDU btw, bless their souls), and that is our best chance for the survival of democracy!
Says some liar. Victoria Nuland handpicked to be prime minister once. On tape.
Which is of course what shows the world, that Ukraine is ready to become a member of the EU.
How many lies deep are we by now? Thats at least four of five, that I’ve counted…
Also I cant stand that fucking idiot, that sockpuppet, that no good liar, and gladhander - that of course the Queen of US foreign policy, may she prosper at Columbia University, propped up as the previous last hope for a prospering democracy. What a fucking asshole. Him not her. Shes just out of a job for now. For that sadly not at all Oscar worthy performance in this god ridden, fucking mockery of a videointerview with a “journalistic outlet”.
Oh, and “to win” Ukrainians are now striking russian power stations in Kursk. Of course. SAMEFUCKINGVIDEO.
edit2: Also Kursk now confirmed most population dense area in the world. Ukraine captured only 20*30 km (confirmed by independent military analysts) but alread has confirmed 100 settlements captured within that area. As Oleksandr Syrskyj has announced today. (Same video.) All without having one humanitarian corridor established, of course!
Also - as we dont just believe but actually do the legwork, we take the “not in your wildest dreams” map of the NYT from 5 days ago, we overlay it onto google maps with a 5km resolution and we count.
Russian NGO expert using the word recruits. DW Moderator using the word conscripts.
DW Moderator asking NGO expert “if that also includes conscripts”, the answer: Yes of course, after they’ve signed the contract, they can be deployed there. After having 4 months of military training, and military specialization. ASINTHENTHEYARENTCONSCRIPTSANYMORE, but you might still call them recruits - which the NGO expert then precedes calling them.…
Hey, no one said russia wasnt manipulating them into signing enlistment contracts afterwards (they obviously are), but just that they arent sending conscripts into active war zones.
Well, now that DW has significantly blurred the line again, to make everybody believe, that russia is sending conscripts - and put more propaganda out than journalism --- everything is hunky dory again. Right?
Still a further comment on the grey zone here -- if russian parents cant correspond with their children during the time conscripts are manipulated into signing contracts, this is a problem. Aside from manipulation being a problem in itself. (But then which army at war or not doesnt use coercion tactics…)
The NGO says that they at least know of four companies (x250 recruits) of recruits being sent to Kursk, but those numbers dont rectify the accusation that russia is sending conscripts.
In Moscow (one of the named four territories sending companies, in the video) alone 3900 conscripts were drafted in the fall draft of 2023. If from those 250 are sent to Kursk, thats 6.5%.
Thats not conscripts - thats the idiots [and or poor people] who want to fight, or sign up for war.
The conscription quota set for Moscow is low compared to other regions, but recruitment officials still have difficulty meeting it. In the fall of 2001, only about 3 percent of all conscripts were drafted from Moscow, whereas young men of draft age in Russia’s largest city make up almost 6 percent of the total number of young men of draft age in Russia.29
Shit, fuck, german speaking media cant report that!
PS: Dont sign!
Watch the video to get the name of the NGO that will help you stay out of the war.
Oh, and 80% of the prisoners that Ukraine took in Kursk turned out to have been conscripts (see first video, even though till this day, the Wikipedia entry about the Kursk offensive will not mention that, but all kinds of other professional regiments that Ukraine has attacked…). But those were deployed in russia, in territorries that no one thought were being under the risk of being attacked, until Ukraine did its suprise offensive…
Sorry offensive, defensive operations, as good ukrainian friends of France 24 are calling them…
edit: Hui NTV bestätigts, nur mehr als ein Monat danach!
- Wechselseitige Feuergefechte mit Artillerie in Städten und aus Städten heraus, die noch nicht evakuiert wurden.
- 39 Städte und Dörfer zu besetzen, ohne sich um eine Evakuierung der Zivilisten gedanken zu machen (“jetzt überlege man schon, also so in Woche 2, 3… - humanitäre Korridore zu errichten” [NEIN! Ah eh schon!])
- Kulturstätten und Denkmäler zu zerbomben, zu schänden, Statuen abzumontieren - die in vorherigen Berichterstattungen aus Sudscha noch gestanden haben…
Es ist erstaunlich was heutzutage alles nicht völkerrechtswidrig ist. WENNDUNURDIEUSUNDDIEDEUTSCHSPRACHIGENMEDIENAUFDEINERSEITEHAST.
Gut unsere Medien müssen das wieder nicht berichten, die müssen nur ausgebombte, brennende Häuser in Imax Größe hinter den Nachrichtensprechern im Hauptabend zeigen, und dazu sagen, das alles sei völkerrechtskonform, denn die Ukraine verteidige sich ja in Kursk, … (Scheiss auf die Vergehen die dadurch nicht gedeckt sind… Über die müssen deutschsprachige Medien nie berichten…)
Davon, dass die Ukrainer vor den Augen des Journalisten versucht haben Informationskampagnen in Sudscha zu fahren mal ganz abgesehen, aber die sind völkerrechtlich zumindest nicht verboten…
Komm, wer macht sich schon die Mühe das Völkerrecht zu lesen, oder auf Experten zu hören, die einen Verstoß nicht für unmöglich halten…
Das hat in unseren Medien nichts zu suchen. Schleichen soll er sich der Professor, der nicht das schreibt, was auf Facebook jeder Deutsche und Österreicher hören will. Nicht?
Diese Gesellschaft ist das absolut grotesk und abartigst Allerletzte.
Cant listen to that audio quality with proper headphones, all you hear is gating, compression artefacts and a fucking cut up mid section.
So as for the content of the video, I dont know yet - cant get over that blue T-Shirt wearing PR victims audio setup.
Here is how you get a better one: You kick that DJI crap into the dumpster and buy a Rode Wireless GOII or Pro, or anything that doesnt sound like crap really (Lavelier clones, wired). Or you at least turn the low cut filter on the DJI off - to not sound like utter crap:
Explaination and audio samples:
Fuck, now I have to listen to that crap sound quality for another 21 Minutes…
Idiot.
edit: Content wise, its fine. Not much new stuff, but a proper summarization.
that Holger Stark, Deputiy Editor-In-Chief of Die Zeit gave to Democracy now. [A man whose esprit an joy has left him years ago judging by his public performance on alternative US television. I mean could those eyes of a severly broken and closed up personality, hiding behind professional formalism, lie? I had to find out.]
Moderator: I wanna go to president Biden. In February of 2022 he holds a news conference - a joint one with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Biden brings up the future of the Nordstream Pipeline. [Clip is being played.]
Biden: “If Russia invades uh that means tanks or troops crossing the uh the the border of Ukraine again, then uh there will be uh we, there will be no longer a Nordsteam 2. We we will bring an end to it.
Journalist: “What do, what, how would you, how will you do that exactly - since the project and control of the project is within Germany’s control?
Biden: “We will uh I promise you we’ll be able to do it.”
Moderator: “We promise you we’ll be able to do it” - your response [Holger Stark]. Holger Stark “Well you can read this in two ways uh you can read this uh in a threat of military action, but also you can read it in a a sense of a political action, diplomatic pressure and I mean we all remember those days, starting with the Trump Administration by the way uh where the US uh government um clearly wanted the Germans to stop with that project to stop nordstream as a pipeline because that pipeline bypassed Ukraine um uh it made Ukraine dispensable um it was a direct connection between Russia and Germany, it was a direct trade of gas between the two countries and it started with in the Trump Administration that they executed a lot of power um diplomatic pressure on on Germany, um so did the Biden Administration in the beginning - but also have in mind Amy, that um later on um President Biden released the sanctions pressure against Germany he cut some kind of political deal with the German government especially with a German chancellor Olaf Schultz - those two guys got along really well and um I read it the way that Biden said when it comes to the worst when Russia is indeed in invading Ukraine, we will make sure with our German partners that this gas transport is no longer existing so it’s not a threat of military action in my in my opinion but a threat to use any diplomatic uh means to stop that…
Well thats the head of Die Zeits Investigative unit, so -- lets factcheck this believe a little, right?
I mean aside from the common knowledge fact, that germany didnt stop the gas flow, russia did. At first.
Enter US-Ukraine Security Dialogue 2021 - Day 1:
starting at 2hours 30 min in with great Ukrainian Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Oleksander Lytvynenko [or as the Focus would put that - Ukrainians Spy chief. Back then of course he was just another fledgling upstart and gladhander in all things “I so wonderful, great event, I believe more support is needed” trying to piggybag off US policy (describing his role in that panel, if you dont believe it, watch it.)], as well as Stephen Blank (Senior Fellow at FPRI’s Eurasia Program) -- you know this FPRI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASlS-jBWWGA (0 deaths through drone attacks from Kursk in Sumy in the past 3 months, statistically - 1 a year.)
Also compair and contrast with:
Moderator feeds the expert the ukrainian propaganda line.
King’s College London expert tells him: “Well, there are a couple of military aims, its probably not so much the creation of a buffer zone.”
that should suffice as a primer, but back to the US-Ukraine Security Dialogue 2021 - Day 1…
Here are some mentions of Nordstream in said US-Ukrainian Security Dialogue:
Ben Hodges at 2:50:00 in:
I do believe that Berlin is the only capital that can influence uh kremlin behavior and unfortunately they have been reluctant to do it. I was appalled like many of you when president Steinmeier, the president of the german federal republic, made this comment about Nordstream 2, that like well - you have to understand you know we’re responsible for the death of millions of russians and uh you know there’s a history here - I couldn’t believe he, I can believe it but i was appalled that he said it and of course it actually was millions of ukrainians, not millions of russians uh that that died, uh during the second world war uh and and so the whole narrative that comes from berlin is is uh unsatisfactory and this is where the united states has got to put pressure on berlin, to put pressure on the kremlin, the french - I’m sorry, uh our oldest ally for the united states but they would sell ukraine and georgia in a minute if it meant improved relationship for them uh with the kremlin and so this is where if the Biden administration is serious about ukrainian sovereignty uh as a priority and if by the administration is serious about working with allies and about working with the european union, then uh there should be so much pressure on paris and [thereby - because Paris was named first] berlin to do more to uh otherwise we won’t be able to do this.
Stephen Blank at 03:09:40 in:
The panelists have identified really where we need to go forward we need to have defense industry reform. The ukrainian defense strategy process needs to be further reformed, put on a NATO standard in practice, not just in rhetoric the united states and europe need to continue to support ukraine and we need to put pressure on our european allies to do so. And I think one way we can do this is to hit, is totake out Nordstrem 2. I’m appalled that they seem to be in an effort to uh allow Nordstream 2 to get by, because it’s great it will offend the germans, quite frankly I’m not upset about offending the germans uh - Mr. Steinmeier showed that too many people in germany have no real understanding of where german interest lies and I think that needs to be brought home to them that you can’t lie in bed with the russians then expect that things are going to get better in europe. This is just an end around so the german business can make a lot of profit, but it gives germany also downstream distribution - eh russia, downstream distribution rights in germany and in central europe - and it undermines ukraine in many different ways. So to conclude my remarks we have just heard very distinguished and knowledgeable speakers tell us what the agenda needs to be, a reform in energy, defense industry, defense planning, usaid to uh ukraine, ukrainian political reform, pressure on europe to support ukraine and u.s diplomatic involvement in a big way in current efforts to find peace in ukraine. I don’t think minsk is going to be salvageable, i think we need something beyond minsk, but it’s not going to happen until this administration weighs in and I think that’s what needs to come next. Thank you.
Nuland:
Berliner Zeitung vom 31.01.2023 Bezug nehmend auf:
Sevim Dagdelen, Linke-Abgeordnete und Mitglied der Parlamentarischen Versammlung der Nato, fordert von der Bundesregierung mehr Aktivität bei der Aufklärung der Anschläge auf die Nord-Stream-Pipelines. Dagdelen sagte der Berliner Zeitung: „Die Bundesregierung muss dringend ihren Willen zur Aufklärung über die Urheberschaft für diesen beispiellosen Angriff auf die deutsche Energiesouveränität unter Beweis stellen und vorantreiben sowie gegenüber Parlament und Öffentlichkeit Rechenschaft über den Stand der Ermittlungen ablegen. Das bisherige Zuwarten Berlins kommt einer Vereitelung der Strafverfolgung gleich.“ Hintergrund der Forderung ist eine Aussage von Victoria Nuland, Unterstaatssekretärin der US-Regierung. Nuland hatte vergangene Woche bei einer Anhörung im US-Kongress zum Anschlag gesagt: „Senator Cruz, genau wie Sie bin ich, und ich denke, auch die Regierung, sehr erfreut zu wissen, dass Nord Stream 2 jetzt, wie Sie gerne sagen, ein Stück Metall auf dem Meeresgrund ist.“
Cruz hatte Nuland gefragt, ob die von ihm vor dem russischen Angriff vorgeschlagenen Sanktionen gegen Nord Stream 2 den russischen Angriff auf die Ukraine verhindert hätten. Dies hätten ihm im Januar 2022 sowohl der ukrainische Präsident Wolodymyr Selenskyj als auch die polnische Regierung damals signalisiert. Nuland sagte, sie glaube, dass das frühzeitige Aus für Nord Stream 2 „Putin nicht gestoppt“ hätte: „Ich glaube nicht, dass wir diesen Krieg verhindert hätten, wenn die Europäer schneller bei Nord Stream 2 tätig geworden wären – obwohl auch ich mir das gewünscht hätte.“ Es sei aber wichtig gewesen, dass „mit dem Tag, da der Krieg begann, die Deutschen die Pipeline gestoppt“ hätten. Dagdelen zu der Aussage: „Die offene Freude der US-Unterstaatssekretärin Nuland über die Terrorattacke ist entlarvend.“
Former foreign minister and now EU lawmaker Radosław Sikorski has caused controversy after posting a tweet many perceived accused the US of sabotaging the Nord Stream pipeline.
Sikorski was foreign minister from 2007 to 2014 and, as an MEP, is now part the EPP group in the European Parliament.
The controversial tweet includes a photo of gas coming out of the damaged Nord Stream pipeline, accompanied by the words “Thank You, USA”.
The tweet has attracted party-wide criticism, including from Sikorski’s colleagues from the Civic Platform (PO). The tweet was also criticised by the ruling Law and Justice (PiS).
“You cannot make such hypotheses, especially when you are a serious politician, a person about whom the public has no doubt that he has some knowledge,” PO lawmaker Borys Budka said on broadcaster Radio Plus. Sikorski “should think more about what he writes,” he added.
So nowhere in all of this could one see “the special relationship Biden had with Chancellor Scholz” that “allowed them to achieve this through political means”.
Instead, pretty much every person in this whole affair, asserted, that Germany must be pressured, by also putting pressure on France, and EU institutions to make them move, and the people very much concerned with matters of US-Ukrainian Security relationships openly talked about the destruction of the pipeline, and that this might be needed to make germany move - at all -- one of which openly did so in a 2021 (Biden Administration) panel together with the later Spy Chief of Ukraine.
But the head of the investigative team at german newspaper Die Zeit thinks, the Biden statement was all a play to get nordstream removed via diplomatic means (political pressure) -- even when at that moment Bides eyes lit up like a fucking christmas tree (“We will uh I promise you we’ll be able to do it.”), which you know is your normal bodily response when referring to “diplomatic, political pressure campaigns”, made possible, by the incredibly great relationship Scholz had developed with Biden.
I’m not saying more here, just that Holger Stark, Deputiy Editor-In-Chief of Die Zeit IS A FUCKINGOPUTRAGEOUSLIAR.
Beyond that - nothing is provable, so far. Well except for the “German formality error that Poland stated, caused them to not be able to take action on arresting the main subject this far, when he was still in Poland of course” - which if you put it together with Sweden and Denmark stopping investigations on Nordstream altogether, because of reasons that never became public -- spell oh so much - proactive pandering to a nation who might not want you to look into this… While at the same time risking your relationship with germany - you know, as you do as fellow members of the European Union. But it was that special kind of relationship, that Biden developed to Chancellor Olaf Scholz, that made all of this possible of course.
Just listen to your german investigative units, you know - the ones at “Die Zeit”, that worked together with The Washington Post to bring you the latest developments.
You know, while the next polish leader (this time the prime minister) reacts in an unconventional way…
Polish leader urges Nord Stream patrons to ‘keep quiet’ as pipeline mystery returns to spotlight
Poland’s prime minister has reacted to reports that revived speculation about who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in 2022
WARSAW, Poland — Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk on Saturday reacted to reports that revived questions about who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in 2022, saying the initiators of the gas pipeline project should “apologize and keep quiet.” That comment came after one of his deputies denied a claim that Warsaw was partly responsible for its damage.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that Ukrainian authorities were responsible for blowing up the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in September 2022, a dramatic act of sabotage that cut Germany off from a key source of energy and worsened an energy crisis in Europe.
Germany was a partner with Russia in the pipeline project. Poland has long said its own security interests have been harmed by Nord Stream.
“To all the initiators and patrons of Nord Stream 1 and 2. The only thing you should do today about it is apologise and keep quiet,” Tusk wrote on the social media portal X Saturday.
Well you know, it was that SPECIAL bound, that SPECIALRELATIONSHIP that Biden had developed with Chancellor Olaf Scholz, that made this all possible that made possible to put this all into place as a political, and not a covert military action.
Vertrauen sie einfach den deutschsprachigen Qualitätsmedien.
Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies um die Nutzungserfahrung für seine Besucher zu verbessern. Bitte informiere dich bei Gelegenheit darüber wie sich Cookies auf deine Privatsphäre im Web auswirken.
