First question. Is russia really the only danger in the black sea?
Answer given by the panel. Yes.
Explanation: Because it is an encirclement strategy. Aka everyone in the region against russia.
Explanation given by the panel: Yes, because Putin is the new Hitler, and when I talked to Merkel she said to me Putin thought like Alexaner the Great, no he thinks like Nikolas the Great, listen to his war speech he mentioned him in there, and when I was in russia in 2015, everyone told me - we are the perfect slaves, but when I was in Ukraine, they aleready told me, we are fighting for our freedom!
[Btw, if you have a “are they really all that dumb” moment right about now, no. They are dumber. Just watch the video.]
Second question: Is the black sea really that important for russia. Warm water port and all that.
Answer given by Alina Frolova, Former Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine on the panel: Yes, economically and for the projection of military power the black sea ports are extremely important for russia. 40% of their exports and a serious percentage of their imports go through the black sea.
CORRECT! THE CANDIDATE GETS 1000 POINTS AND A FREE WASHING MASHINE! IF SOMEONE WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO RELAY THAT TO WERNER FASSLABEND OVER THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SO HELPFUL! You know to all the diplomacy students in Austria, who learned from Herr Fasslabend, that Sevastopol wasnt at all important to Russia, and that they could just as easily run their economy through Murmansk in the nordic circle (ok, close to the nordic circle).
They couldnt - which really was kind of the main point Zbigniew Brzeziński made in the Grand Chessboard, but who needed to read Brzeziński when they were serving in the austrian foreign service, am I right? Right?
So just as a tale of warning, if ever somone in the vicinity of the Brookings Institution and Fiona Hills position there should come to read this little blog entry. This is what you do to society. Flood it with a bunch of “I know how Putin thinks he thinks like 5 tsars I saw in his office in 2015, when Fiona for the last time was part of a Valdai Discussion Club meeting” crap, implant that thought in people who are too dumb even to relay that correctly and then have to pull out their “Hitler in the black sea” comparisons when they have public panel appearances. In their first answer on a GLOBSEC panel.
Make sure no one registers, that this is all a “get russia out of the black sea” conflict at heart (see Herfried Münkler: https://harlekin.me/allgemein/spaete-erkenntnis/ ) - and then have Alina Frolova, Former Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine blow that all up by actually spelling out loud how important its black sea ports historically have been, and still are for russias economy and power projection.
You know, the ones Ukraine insisted Russia had to gift them (!!!!!!!! Venice Commision, see below) with all the military ships docked there, and the ones built there for free as part of “compensation negotiations”.
Before this “unprovoked war” broke out. You know - Ukraine, which wanted nothing more than to join NATO with all its heart, so Victoria Nuland could finally fulfill americas goals in the black sea. (Which the british representative in the Panel will describe to you word for word, just listen to him.)
But dont you worry, the first comment in the GLOBSEC panel about “Bolstering Black Sea Security” (Is russia really the only threat in the black sea. Yes! Says the panel.) will be, that Putin is like Hitler, and not like the Tsar Merkel compared him to, but the other Tsar, that had empirialistic ambitions!
While Herfried Münkler already stated, that russia probably started the war at least partly - to be able to secure (projecting years into the future, when its demographic wouldnt allow for military actions anymore) its influence in the black sea.
Now -- are all political proponents that are featured, by the fucking propagandistic dipshits that produce your media reality -- really that dumb?
No, they are dumber, watch this video.
This is GLOBSEC.
This is the US security industry.
God forbid I once thought the Alpbach panels where intellectually lacking and all about putting people on stage to have their egos stroked.
This is literally the Brookings institution writing the memes into the minds of state representatives which are idiots, and think that adding Hitler to the mix, in the first response they ever produce on an industry panel - would make a better episteme out of it.
Well, he said Hitler, so it must be true…!
This is what the Brookings Institution does to society.
Nevermind that you still need personal connections to get fucking Werner Fasslabend to lie to his public relations students for one and a half years, because that old fucking fool, could be made to believe that Sevastopol wasnt important for russias africa missions.
But for all this year long outrageos bullshit and propaganda -- the US didnt think about briefing Alina Frolova, Former Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine on the official propaganda position, so now she just enters the “encircling russia in the black sea” panel, and anwers truthfully. Because shes amongst friends.
Cant make this stuff up. Its insanity in motion.
First speaker gives you the full propaganda loaddown with Tsars and Hitler. Second speaker tells you the full truth, because she was never briefed, that she should downplay the importance of Sevastopol by US foreign policy “experts” targeting western media outlets.
FUUUUUUUUUUCK.
Wie kann man diese Gesellschaft eigentlich noch verarschen?
Achja --
Unprovoked!
Gut die Schwarzmeerhäfen wären bei einem Nato Beitritt der Ukraine für Russland weg gewesen, aber ich mein was sind schon 40% der russischen Exporte und ihre gesamte Power Projection into the Mediterenian and Africa for russia…
Nein, also dass ihnen die Nuland das wegnehmen wollte, war ja nie im Leben eine Provokation! Ich weiss garnicht warum Putin die Krim nehmen musste!
Gut, jetzt sagt die Alina Frolova, Former Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine sie weiß es, es war, weil Sevastopol so wichtig für Russland war, und der Münkler sagts auch -
aber das müssen die deutschsprachigen Medien ja deswegen nicht der Öffentlichkeit erklären.
Nein, bitte - der Krieg war unprovoziert, auch wenn die Ukraine zu beginn mit US Javelins die russischen Separatisten aus dem Donbas weggeschossen und damit die militärische Lage gedreht hat. Die die Ukraine extra dafür angefragt hat die Lage im Donbas zu drehen (Gamechanger gegen die “Separatisten”). Auch wenn die Javelins zu dem Zeitpunkt nicht freigegeben waren. Genutzt haben sie sie schon. Was die Wasserversorgung (irregation) zur Krim gefährdet hätte, wenn die Ukrainer den Donbas genommen hätten. Was Russland aus der gesamten Ukraine gedrängt hätte (2 Mio. Menschen ohne Wasserversorgung die zornig auf Russland sind) (was bis heute das Kriegsziel der Ukraine ist -- siehe Verhandlungsverlauf in Bürgenstock, siehe Alina Frolova, Former Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine in diesem Panel). Was das politische Ziel von Nuland war. (Ukraine zur NATO in seiner tatsächlichen Bedeutung). Aber eine Provokation haben wir ja alle immer noch nirgendwo entdeckt.
Also wo denn?
Wer denn?
Die Venice Commision der europäischen Union?
Unprovoked!
edit: Sorry - the british represntative on the Panel had to also provide the input, that Putin is also emulating Stalin of course. Please note that down as well.
So thats Hitler, not Alexander the Great, but Nikolas the Great and Stalin. This will be part of the history test of your child.
Also Tobias Ellwood, Security and Defence Consultant, Ellwood Communications - the british representative, also knows, that this is not just about the black sea, this is about Putin “pushing further”, because: “you all played Risk, and the green part is alsways hard to defend, so you attack”.
Thank you, no further proof needed, I think!
This also will be on the history test of your child, believe me.
