harlekin.me

Isra­el hat drei Söh­ne und drei Enkel des höchs­ten Hamas Reprä­sen­tan­ten getö­tet. Wäh­rend des Isla­mi­schen Fests des Fas­ten­bre­chens. Wäh­rend die Hamas den Waf­fen­still­stands­de­al prü­fen woll­te der auf kei­ne ihrer For­de­run­gen ein­ge­gan­gen ist.

Sie sehen in dem Video Jour­na­lis­ten denen die west­li­chen Wer­te bei den Ohren rausquellen.

Und jetzt der Gag, ver­su­chen sie das mal in deutsch­spra­chi­gen Medi­en zu fin­den. Good luck! Wobei nun… hum hehm, die Bild hats gebracht - sonst halt keiner!

Auf wei­te­re 33.300 Tote!

Fuck me…

edit: Die ARD hat die Bericht­erstat­tung nur einen Tag spä­ter dann doch frei­ge­ge­ben. Hur­ra! Die Welt acht Stun­den nach der ARD eben­falls. Damit da nicht nur die Bild allei­ne steht.

tel­ling the pro­pa­gan­dist, plea­se sir, may I plea­se have ano­t­her made up pro­pa­gan­da factoid?

But just for the record, Mark Galeot­ti doesnt belie­ve, that Putin is a cra­zed tsar, hell­bent on impe­ria­lism - which is about the only pro­pa­gan­da sto­ry he doesnt milk.

But the most fuck­ing important inter­ac­tion in this exchan­ge is, that he qua­li­fies anyo­ne that might think that the­re was a US regime chan­ge ope­ra­ti­on under­way in Ukrai­ne in 2014 as a frea­king con­spi­ra­cy theo­rist, that has con­su­med too much rus­si­an propaganda.

Gre­at - then how do you exp­lain this part:

- McCain on sta­ge at the Maidan.
- Nuland han­ding out frea­king coo­kies at the Maidan.
- Nuland being caught on a wire­tap by rus­sia DECIDING the next lea­der of the Ukrai­ni­an government. (Fuck the EU.)
(Whe­re the only fuck­ing rebut­tal the wes­tern world has come up with was “well, they advi­sed the Ukrai­ni­ans on who would be co-lead of the government at the time, not the inte­rim pre­si­dent!” YEAH, BUT THEY STILL CHOSE HIM. IN A PHONECALL. WHERE NULAND TOOK THE PICK.)
- Then you get the new government in power via a mili­ta­ry coup using ukrai­ni­an right sec­tor battlegroups.
- Then you chan­ge Ukrai­nes con­sti­tu­ti­on WITHOUT A CONSTITUTIONAL MAJORITY (COUP! COUP! COUP!)
- Then Jef­frey Sachs gets invi­ted by that very inte­rim lead to Ukrai­ne as an eco­no­mic advi­ser, is being wal­ked around Kiew by the US government finan­ced NGO “Natio­nal Endow­ment for Demo­cra­cy” being told, we paid for this aspect of Ukrai­ni­an resis­tance, we paid for that aspect of Ukrai­ni­an resis­tance… (see pre­vious link)? Then Sachs breaks (“Dont tell me this stuff!”) get­ting the flip­ping noti­on, that they were exp­lai­ning a regime chan­ge ope­ra­ti­on to him. Accord­ing to him (see pre­vious link.)
- The “Natio­nal Endow­ment for Demo­cra­cy” then taking off their “pro­jects fun­ded in Ukrai­ne” sec­tion off their web­site, ON THE DAY AFTER RUSSIA STARTED THE INVASION?! (src: click)
- Fio­na Hill later invi­t­ing Mikhail Zygar to an Event of the “Natio­nal Endow­ment for Demo­cra­cy”, after that fuck­ing rus­si­an expat vlog­ger was used as a public ves­sel into the rus­si­an expat com­mu­ni­ty and brie­fed (in all mat­ters of truthTM) by (in chro­no­lo­gi­cal order) Anne App­le­baum (YES con­fern­ce mode­ra­tor and employee), Timo­thy Sny­der (YES con­fern­ce lead spea­ker and employee) (thats Rus­sia needs to be split into four regi­ons says Timo­thy Sny­der, Timo­thy Sny­der), Fio­na Hill, the peop­le at the Natio­nal Endow­ment for Demo­cra­cy, and only about two FUCKING MONTHS later, Mikhail Zygar beco­mes a non­re­si­dent seni­or fel­low at the Atlan­tic Council’s Eura­sia Center?

Yeah, how do you exp­lain that?

Let me guess, con­spi­ra­cy theory?

Aha. Shit.

And the­re I thought I was just fol­lowing the throughline…

So, once more - how do you exp­lain that? Ans­wer: You dont. As the fuck­ing fourth Pro­pa­gan­dist for the cur­rent US admi­nis­tra­ti­on on all things Ukrai­ne (the other three have been named in this blog post alrea­dy), you just label all of that a “con­spi­ra­cy theo­ry - that not many rus­si­ans belie­ve, or even know”. A com­ple­te coo coo one.

Yeah, so coo coo, that stu­dents in Yale ask the podi­um in deba­tes about “that CIA regime chan­ge operation”:

Com­plet­ly coo coo folks. Poor brain­wa­s­hed histo­ry stu­dents at Yale!

Learn the offi­cial by-line already!

At around 28 minu­tes in you see the Krei­sky forums mode­ra­tor expe­ri­en­cing doubt for the very first time. “So that means that, modern hybrid war­fa­re, and non line­ar war­fa­re, and asy­m­etric war­fa­re, and geo­po­li­ti­cal gue­ril­la war­fa­re - which is some­thing I real­ly like from you is all the same?” “Yes I think so!”

After about the 20th idio­tic made up tale of app­lied Krem­linolo­gy in a row. (Mark Galeot­ti knows how Putin thinks you know, just like Fio­na Hill knew befo­re him (in the same capa­ci­ty, as a public US pro­pa­gan­dist), you know. Of cour­se the two con­tra­dict them­sel­ves, but they still know that they know how Putin thinks in this way or the other, even if the man has never said such a thing and they both are con­tra­dic­ting each other.)

Two of the most influ­en­cial rus­sia his­to­ri­ans of our time! One of which has a fai­ble for nume­ro­lo­gy. And sin­ce then was taken off the public deba­te cir­cle, repla­ced by… Mark Galeotti!

Thats pro­pa­gan­da net­works for you. Thats the peop­le jour­na­lism cur­r­ent­ly loves to fea­ture in this coun­try the­se days…

Yeah, fuck this.

And fuck the poor kil­led pilot, that kil­led his copi­lot, and ano­t­her mem­ber of his crew befo­re defec­ting first. Some­thing, some­thing gangs­ter, in spain! (Thats a Galeot­ti, btw.)

“Wenn der inter­na­tio­na­le Gerichts­hof eine Fest­stel­lung tref­fen wür­de, dass Isra­el inter­na­tio­na­les huma­ni­tä­res Recht gebro­chen habe, hät­te Isra­el dage­gen kei­ne recht­li­che Rekurs­mög­lich­keit. Die For­de­rung einer sol­chen Fest­stel­lung durch den IGH von Sei­ten Nica­ra­gu­as wider­spricht daher Fun­da­men­tal­prin­zi­pi­en der inter­na­tio­na­len Rechtsprechung”.

“Erfol­ge eine Fest­stel­lung durch den IGH nicht, wel­che das IGH in der aktu­el­le Lage nicht befä­hig sei zu tref­fen, gel­te wei­ter­hin - es gab kei­ne Fest­stel­lung dass Isra­el inter­na­tio­na­les huma­ni­tä­res Recht bricht. Man­gels einer sol­chen lega­len Fest­stel­lung, kann Deutsch­land auch kei­ne Rechts­prin­zi­pi­en inter­na­tio­na­len huma­ni­tä­ren Rechts gebro­chen haben, als es Waf­fen an Isra­el, in ein Kriegs­ge­biet gelie­fert hat. Sie­he case Law Koso­vo, wo das IGH after the fact fest­ge­stellt hat, dass es kei­ne Völ­ker­rechts­ver­stö­ße gege­ben habe.”

Erkennt­nis: Hen­ne Ei Argu­men­ta­tio­nen wer­den nur dann rich­tig gut bezahlt, wenn sie sie in einer Kadenz von gelang­weil­ter hal­ber nor­ma­ler Sprech­ge­schwin­dig­keit vor­tra­gen, und dabei eine gepu­der­te Perü­cke tragen.

Mar­tha Rad­datz: I want to show you a time­li­ne Admi­ral Kir­by [ser­ving as White House Natio­nal Secu­ri­ty Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons Advi­sor sin­ce 2024] and won­der why things might chan­ge this time.

Novem­ber 6 - death tol­len Gaza pas­ses 10,000
Novem­ber 10th - Secreta­ry Blin­ken: Far too many Pales­ti­ni­ans have been killed
Decem­ber 12th - Biden says Isra­el is losing sup­port to indiscri­mi­na­te bombing
Decem­ber 22nd - Death toll in Gaza pas­ses 20,000
Febru­a­ry 8th - Pre­si­dent Biden calls a respon­se in Gaza over the top
Febru­a­ry 29th - Death toll in Gaza pas­ses 30,000
March 2nd - Vice Pre­si­dent Har­ris said the­re must be an immedia­te cease­fire for at least the next 6 week
April 1st - IDF strike kills seven World Cen­tral Kit­chen Aid workers

So why do you think anything will change?

John Kir­by: I’m glad you brought that time­li­ne up becau­se it shows the degree, the gro­wing Degree of frus­tra­ti­on that we’­ve had with the way the­se ope­ra­ti­ons are being pro­se­cu­t­ed and the way that uh the Israe­lis are acting on the ground in terms of Civi­li­an casu­al­ties - so it we have been incre­a­singly frus­tra­ted and again that was a core mes­sa­ge that the pre­si­dent deli­ve­r­ed to prime minis­ter Net­an­ya­hu in their pho­ne call this week, this past week that if they’­ve got to do more, they’­ve got to make chan­ges now. The Prime Minis­ter assu­red the pre­si­dent, that he would do that we’­ve seen some announ­ce­ments in tho­se ear­ly hours, that’s wel­co­me, we got to see more, we’­ve got to see it over time and the Israe­li media is repor­ting this morning that the IDF with­drew ground tro­ops from Sou­thern Gaza um they’­ve been figh­t­ing the­re in Khan Yunes for four months!

Mar­tha Rad­datz: What what does that tell you?

John Kir­by: Well it does­n’t, it’s hard to know exact­ly what that tells us right now, this was just an announ­ce­ment that they made. I’d cer­tain­ly let them speak to their ope­ra­ti­ons uh as we under­stand it uh and through their public announ­ce­ments, it is real­ly just about rest and refit for the­se tro­ops that have been on the ground for four mon­ths and not necessa­ri­ly that we can tell indi­ca­ti­ve of some com­ing new ope­ra­ti­on for the­se tro­ops they’­ve been on the ground for four mon­ths, uh the the word we’­re get­ting is they’­re tired they need to be refit and and and…

Mar­tha Rad­datz: Just one final ques­ti­on there’s there’s such a dra­ma­tic dis­agree­ment bet­ween what the Israe­lis say and what they say in Gaza about what is hap­pe­ning on the ground obvious­ly we’­ve seen some video of that - why has­n’t the US insis­ted on more on the ground accoun­ta­bi­li­ty? Why aren’t we, and I’m not say­ing in a com­bat posi­ti­on, on the ground accoun­ting for this our­sel­ves to make sure the rules of law are followed?

John Kir­by: The president’s been very clear, we’­re not going to have uh us boots on the ground in Gaza figh­t­ing in that war or invol­ved in that con­flict what we will do is make sure that they have the tools and capa­bi­li­ties they need to defend them­sel­ves and what we will also do and the pre­si­dent made this clear is hold Isra­el accoun­ta­ble for the way in which they’­re con­duc­ting the­se ope­ra­ti­ons. [The ques­ti­on was why, remember?]

Es gibt aber natür­lich auch wie­der gute Nachrichten:

Netan­ja­hu: „Die­ser Sieg erfor­dert den Ein­marsch in Rafah“

Die­ser Sieg, wird kein leich­ter sein, die­ser Sieg wird stei­nig und schwer, die­ser Sieg für den mar­schi­ern wir in Rafah ein, die­ser Sieg beinhal­tet kei­ne Zwei-Staaten-Lösung mehr. Die­ser Sieg, wird gegen Hamas sein, die­ser Sieg bedenkt nur den Right sec­tor, Sir. Vor die­sem Sieg, muss­ten wir noch 2000 Hekt­ar im West Jor­dan­land neh­men, dar­auf ach­tet doch eh nie­mand mehr.

Die­ser Sieg, war Ver­tei­di­gung, stei­nig und leer.

Israel’s lar­gest land sei­zu­re sin­ce Oslo Accords deals fresh blow to Pales­ti­ni­an statehood

Isra­el decla­red 800 hec­ta­res of land in the West Bank as pro­per­ty of the sta­te on Fri­day [22.03.2024], a move that will faci­li­ta­te use of the ground for sett­le­ment con­struc­tion. The area covers lar­ge swaths of the Jor­dan Val­ley, a vital regi­on for a future Pales­ti­ni­an sta­te, and is the lar­gest pie­ce of land to be sei­zed by Isra­el sin­ce the ear­ly 1990s.

src: click

Die­ser Sieg, für den warn zwei ame­ri­ka­ni­sche Flug­zeug­trä­ger not­wen­dig, die da mal dane­ben stan­den und nie Boots on the ground lie­fern wollten.

Says Selen­skyj:

08.04.2024 Ukrai­ni­an Pre­si­dent Volo­dym­yr Zelen­skyy said that Ukrai­ne is con­si­de­ring dif­fe­rent opti­ons, but would agree to credit terms for finan­cing mili­ta­ry assi­s­tance from the United States.

“As for Ame­ri­can assi­s­tance: it is cri­ti­cal in any case. Unfor­tu­n­a­te­ly, we are a litt­le hos­ta­ge to this situa­ti­on. Unfor­tu­n­a­te­ly, the issue of Ukrai­ne, name­ly the issue of Russia’s war against Ukrai­ne, has today beco­me a domestic poli­ti­cal issue of the United Sta­tes. Alt­hough this is the secu­ri­ty of the who­le world and I don’t under­stand pre­cise­ly this imma­tu­re approach [on the part of the United Sta­tes],” Zelen­skyy said in an inter­view shown on Satur­day during the telethon.

So, accord­ing to him, “ever­yo­ne under­stands that Rus­sia was coun­ting on an incre­a­se in the num­ber of con­flicts in the world, becau­se ever­yo­ne under­stands that the­re is only one pro­duc­tion capa­ci­ty. And the­re is only one volu­me of wea­pons. And if the­re are a lot of con­flicts, then the­se wea­pons, this help will share. That is, ins­tead of deci­ding to incre­a­se pro­duc­tion and do exact­ly that, and this is a chal­len­ge, the issue is being resol­ved in princip­le of finan­cial assi­s­tance, the abi­li­ty to finan­ce this incre­a­se. That is, ano­t­her link has been added, ano­t­her chal­len­ge. The­re was one - only pro­duc­tion, but now more money for this pro­duc­tion… Howe­ver, I belie­ve, I work, I hope that rea­son will still pre­vail and we will recei­ve appro­pria­te help,” the pre­si­dent said.

Ans­we­ring the ques­ti­on whe­ther Ukrai­ne would agree to help from the United Sta­tes on credit, Zelen­skyy noted that many dif­fe­rent opti­ons are now being con­si­de­red. “You know, the­re was a sena­tor recent­ly, and he asked: ‘Will you agree to loan money?’ I asked: ‘What are the opti­ons?’ ‘Well,’ he says, ‘well, if, for examp­le, they tell you that credit money or you won’t recei­ve [help]. I say: ‘Why are the­se opti­ons if the­re is no choice?’ ” Zelen­skyy said.

“Let’s be frank: we will agree to any opti­on. I’ll tell you more - if today they offe­red Ukrai­ne: to give a packa­ge on credit today or for free in a year, then we would say: only today. The­re is no choice here. Our choice is one - to sur­vi­ve and win. We are try­ing to do this in dif­fe­rent ways. This is about credit. The important thing is: the fas­ter, the bet­ter,” he added.

src: click (interfax.com.ua)

Ah, its good old Selen­skyj Thin­king time again! I for one only take my news from accredi­ted heroes ruling sta­tes in a - oh I give up.

Here is Selen­sky­js out: “Howe­ver, I belie­ve, I work, I hope that rea­son will still pre­vail and we will recei­ve appro­pria­te help.”