- against Maersheimer? Seven historians views against Mearsheimers.
One of which has just published a book about Nato enlargement, has media training, smiles at the mention of now there having been a war thats broken out, twice - because of an underpinning notion, that her book will sell well (or maybe because she values the praise so much) - and then overenunciates reactions for the camera, because she had Zoom training as well, oh and did I mention the filler laughs?
Sorry dont know a thing about the reasoning in the video yet, I presume it is excellent, when the Hoover Institute carried in seven people to speak on the topic, and this is only part one of an ongoing debate in a new ongoing series.
The introduction statement is, that Mearsheimer is fake news though. Know your audience.
edit: Oh sorry, reached the content part. Mearsheimers thesis is not true because of monocausality. So by that logic, Nato expansion doesnt matter proportionally to how many other reasons you can come up with, right?
