harlekin.me

Viel­leicht auch ganz passend:

Bevor sich die Pro­pa­gan­da Tan­te selbst erhängt, die wer­den auch zum demi­ning gebraucht. Sind bes­ser als alle bis­he­ri­gen Ansätze.

Props for dig­ging that one up… Vicini­ty of Chat­ham House, If I’m not wrong… (I might) So in a euro­pean gremium.

edit: Oh no - pri­va­te inter­view with the eco­no­mist and I belie­ve a ukrai­ni­an news out­let. My bad. Still loo­king for the initi­al source.

edit:

Peop­le in the interview:

Zan­ny Min­ton Beddoes,
Arka­dy Ost­rovs­ky (also Economist),
Volo­dym­yr Selenskyj

Date of publi­ca­ti­on - alle­ged­ly March 2022, as of this face­book posting:

https://www.facebook.com/uudised/videos/trump-ei-ole-ukrainat-reetnud-reetmine-toimus-juba-2022-aasta-m%C3%A4rtsis-kui-usa-ja/2093869511444006/

edit: Grok found the initi­al source wit­hin seconds:

https://www.economist.com/europe/2022/03/27/volodymyr-zelensky-in-his-own-words

TE: And what about the Ger­mans? The­re was a sud­den shift after the inva­si­on and Ger­man for­eign poli­cy appeared to chan­ge very quick­ly. Are they worried about doing more?

VZ: They are try­ing to be balan­ced. They have a long rela­ti­ons­hip with Rus­sia and they are loo­king at the situa­ti­on through the prism of the eco­no­my. They help out at times. I think they are try­ing to adjust to the situa­ti­on as it deve­lo­ps. They are also loo­king at how the situa­ti­on affects their own coun­try. They can help, if the­re is pres­su­re on them domesti­cal­ly to do so, and they can stop when they see what they have done is suf­fi­ci­ent. I think Ger­ma­ny is more prag­ma­tic than anyo­ne else with regards to the situa­ti­on among tho­se coun­tries which can real­ly help. It’s not always about us, what we need and what the world needs. I think the Ger­mans are making a mista­ke today. I think they make mista­kes often. I think the lega­cy of Germany’s rela­ti­ons with Rus­sia shows this.

Ever­yo­ne has varied inte­rests. The­re are tho­se in the West who don’t mind a long war becau­se it would mean exhaus­ting Rus­sia, even if this means the demi­se of Ukrai­ne and comes at the cost of Ukrai­ni­an lives. This is defi­ni­te­ly in the inte­rests of some coun­tries. For other coun­tries, it would be bet­ter if the war ended quick­ly, becau­se Russia’s mar­ket is a big one that their eco­no­mies are suf­fe­ring as a result of the war. They would like to see Rus­sia keep cer­tain mar­kets. Other, tru­ly wealt­hy coun­tries, reco­gni­ze Nazism in Rus­sia and defi­ni­te­ly want Ukrai­ne to be vic­to­rious. And the­re are still other coun­tries, smal­ler coun­tries, which sup­port us com­ple­te­ly, but they are more libe­ral sta­tes and con­cer­ned with huma­ni­ta­ri­an issu­es. They want the war to end quick­ly at any cost, becau­se they think peop­le come first. And then the­re is the cate­go­ry of coun­tries wan­ting the war to end quick­ly in any way pos­si­ble becau­se they can be con­si­de­red as “the offices of the Rus­si­an Fede­ra­ti­on in Europe.”

TE: What cate­go­ry would you put Bri­tain in?

VZ: Bri­tain is defi­ni­te­ly on our side. It is not per­forming a balan­cing act. Bri­tain sees no alter­na­ti­ve for the way out of the situa­ti­on. Bri­tain wants Ukrai­ne to win and Rus­sia to lose, but I’m not rea­dy to say whe­ther Bri­tain wants the war to drag on or not.

src: click

Wait, whaaaat?

Flo­ri­da Film, ich hau mich weg, …

src: click

Was täten wir, wenn wir den Huren­drecks­stan­dard nicht hätten?

Hier noch mal die Pro­blem­ana­ly­se beim Coum­bia Law review:

[…] auch wenn das Colum­bia Law Review dar­legt, dass das was Selen­skyj im Moment macht um kei­ne Wah­len abhal­ten zu müs­sen, kom­plett ille­gal ist - ein kom­plet­ter Rechts­bruch gel­ten­den inter­na­tio­na­len Rechts:

https://harlekin.me/allgemein/die-juristische-rechtfertigung-der-ukraine-keine-wahlen-abhalten-zu-muessen/

Was haben wir das in Euro­pa rauf und run­ter debattiert, …

Tag­täg­lich haben unse­re deutsch­spra­chi­gen Qua­li­täts­me­di­en dar­über gesprochen.

edit: Mit voll­stän­di­ger Zufrie­den­heit und frei von Sor­ge neh­me ich zur Kennt­nis, dass ein Pres­se­spre­cher der Regierung, …

13.00 Uhr: Bun­des­re­gie­rung - Selen­skyj “legi­ti­mes Staatsoberhaupt”

Der ukrai­ni­sche Prä­si­dent Wolo­dym­yr Selen­skyj ist nach Auf­fas­sung der Bun­des­re­gie­rung “gewähl­tes und legi­ti­mes Staats­ober­haupt” sei­nes Lan­des. Das beton­te ein Regie­rungs­spre­cher in Berlin. 

src: click

Gut, der hat­te sicher einen guten Rechts­auf­fas­sungs­be­ra­ter. Den Besten!

- das Öster­reich, Irland und Mal­ta aktu­ell in der EU im Hin­blick auf den Ukrai­ne Krieg anwenden.

https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000299940/ursula-plassnik-ueber-zerstoerer-trump-eu-armee-und-putin

Aber das macht ja nichts. Der ORF ja auch nicht. Der Stan­dard nicht. Und mein Euro­päi­sie­rungs­pro­fes­sor hat­te es auch nicht mehr auf dem Schirm.

Vie­len Dank Frau ehe­ma­li­ge, … - kann man da nur sagen.