So you know, when you make sure you dont believe in propaganda, you make sure to listen to the trusted experts like “four stone statues of russian czars in his office, I’ve seen them! - what Putin really thinks is a combination of what those czars did!” Fiona Hill. Who will answer very distinctly all questions on “what does Putin really think” with her theories derived from having sat next to the man once. No, she really does. Thats what she does. Almost exclusively by now.
Great addition though, because his name “Vladimir, Valadimirowitch” now has a special meaning to what he thinks as well, because its two times Vladimir!
Isnt that something! Also she has a history degree! Dont you see! And she mounts an argument, why history must be continued to be taught in school! (Had someone asked to take it away?). Because two times Vlad equals he is taking us back to the tenth century, because Vladimir grand prince of Kiew was the ahm…
DONT YOU SEE! WHY DONT YOU SEE IT!
Quick, give me Johannes Rauscher, to shout at our government and the opposition (SPÖ) to listen exclusively to experts like Fiona Hill, and “its Neocolonialism” Timothy Snyder again… BECAUSE THEY ARE THE OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED EXPERTS FOR THE COMMON MAJOR NARRATIVE THESE DAYS.
See, Fiona Hill mentions Snyder as well - he must be the best possible source here!
Diese Gesellschaft ist das Allerletzte.
Here is a hot take. As a child of a mentally ill person, could you please take people having mental breakdowns, while reading other peoples minds and motives out of their doubling first names, off of the stage, and not present them as experts of what society at large should believe in?
Please. Please. I beg of you. Please.
Diese Gesellschaft ist das Allerletzte.
(Audio on the video gets better after about 10 minutes.)
edit: This is UTTERLY sick:
Fiona Hill again, this time more coherent:
The point she is making is utterly sickening though. Currently we are in the process of making “rifts, breaks in the strategy of the opponent possible”, so we are creating a mess, and have to be on the look out which of the parts that result from it, we can react on to move the entire process into a more preferable direction.
So die for the potential to become an inflection point. Suffer for the potential to become an inflection point. Ruin hopes and dreams in society, for the potential of becoming and inflection point. And keep your high spirits up, so you can still disseminate the story of you personally having helped a ukrainian family. It is the operationalization of “we want more war of attrition” which is the US militaries prefered outcome in itself.
The non military angle on that is in that speech. She spells it out. She actually makes the argument for it.
Why its so sickening. Because you can be FUCKING assured, that no European government wanted this as the operationalized outcome for the next few years.
And when you touch upon her time horizons, there seemingly are no limit. Just prolong. The opening will reveal itself.
On the regime change angle, which she also promotes openly - it s the “its easiest to wait for internal pressures in the russian power elite to take effect” narrative - which effect, we dont know, she is hoping alongside Fukuyama, for a better world. And now die a little more.
So to her credit, if I were the person, that the US government had decided on to rationalize that strategy - I’d go “two first names are Vladimir!” crazy as well. Oh, an he built a statue of Vladimir! So did Maximilian in Vienna. Probably. Are we now at the mind reading from Statures that have been built point of advanced civilization, or…
Fuck this.
