Gut warum in österreichischen Medien berichten, sag ich mir immer…

02. August 2025

12.08 Uhr: Indi­en will wei­ter­hin rus­si­sches Öl kaufen
Einem Zei­tungs­be­richt zufol­ge will Indi­en trotz Zoll­dro­hun­gen von US-Präsident Donald Trump wei­ter rus­si­sches Öl kau­fen. Die “New York Times” berich­tet unter Beru­fung auf indi­sche Regie­rungs­ver­tre­ter, die Regie­rung habe Impor­teu­re nicht zur Dros­se­lung der Ein­fuh­ren ange­wie­sen. Russ­land ist mit einem Anteil von rund 35 Pro­zent der wich­tigs­te Öllie­fe­rant Indiens.

src: click (BR24)

Indi­en will trotz Trumps Ulti­ma­tum offen­bar wei­ter­hin rus­si­sches Öl kau­fen (Spie­gel)

Kann man viel­leicht Armin Wolf inter­view­en, was denn jetzt in 50 Tagen, ich mei­ne 10-12, ich mei­ne 10 ab vor­ges­tern, jetzt eigent­lich pas­sie­ren werde…?

Ich mei­ne, nie­mand hat das vor­aus­se­hen kön­nen, niemand!

Armin Wolf, Gefan­ge­ner des in 50 Tagen Narrativs

Bonus: 35%, ja wis­sen die Inder nicht wie abhän­gig sie sich machen? Wobei UvdL woll­te die Import­men­ge von fos­si­len Ener­gie­trä­gern aus den US ver“dreikommasechs“fachen, also fragt man das glaub ich seit letz­ter Woche nicht mehr.

Gut, sagen sie - aber was würde Ursula Plassnik dazu sagen?

02. August 2025

Nun, soweit ich sie ver­stan­den habe (der Pres­se Mode­ra­tor hat ja nie nachgefragt…) -

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 16 35 24
src: click

soweit ich sie ver­stan­den habe sagt sie aktu­ell - für Wachs­tum in Euro­pa set­ze sie sich jetzt nicht mehr ein, weil da muss ma ja auch mal mehr Soli­da­ri­tät mit afri­ka­ni­schen Staa­ten wal­ten las­sen, und ja - da kann man nichts machen, was die Bevöl­ke­rung will, das ist in der Poli­tik so schwer vor­aus­zu­se­hen, das is halt so. Berufsrisiko.

Ich nehm an sie meint Kli­ma­schutz - und hängt noch sehr an ihrer EFA Posi­ti­on der letz­ten 5 Jah­re, aber es könn­te auch die “Migra­ti­ons­kri­se” sein.

Man weiß es nicht.

Der Mode­ra­tor fragt ja nicht nach.

War­um sie das jetzt sagt. Kei­ne Ahnung. Aber sehen wirs prag­ma­tisch, die Frau wird alt und schreibt ihr Lebens­werk direkt vor der Kame­ra und vor dem Pres­se Journalisten.

Fast so gut wie Olek­san­dra Matviichuk beim Bru­no Krei­sky Forum für inter­na­tio­na­le Dia­log­ver­ei­te­lung. Aus ande­ren Grün­den! Aus ande­ren Gründen.

Die berühmten 73 Halbe

02. August 2025

Noch ne Hal­be, bitte.

Tran­chen mein ich.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 13 20 31
src: click

Und schon hast du genug für die Sockenschublade!

Darf ich da noch mal Bruegel…?

From a macroeco­no­mic per­spec­ti­ve, the num­bers are small enough for Euro­pe to replace the US ful­ly. Sin­ce Febru­a­ry 2022, US mili­ta­ry sup­port to Ukrai­ne has amoun­ted to €64 bil­li­on, while Euro­pe, inclu­ding the United King­dom, sent €62 bil­li­on. In 2024, US mili­ta­ry sup­port amoun­ted to €20 bil­li­on out of a total of €42 bil­li­on. To replace the US, the EU would thus have to spend only ano­t­her 0.12 per­cent of its GDP – a fea­si­ble amount. A more important ques­ti­on is whe­ther Euro­pe could do this without access to the US military-industrial base.

A signi­fi­cant­ly more chal­len­ging sce­n­a­rio for Euro­pe would be an unli­kely peace deal accep­ted by Ukrai­ne. In such a sce­n­a­rio, Rus­sia is likely to con­ti­nue its mili­ta­ry build-up, crea­ting a for­mi­da­ble mili­ta­ry chal­len­ge to all of the EU in a very short peri­od, given cur­rent Rus­si­an pro­duc­tion. The EU and allies inclu­ding the UK and Nor­way would need to acce­le­ra­te their mili­ta­ry build-ups immedia­te­ly and massively.

src: click (Brue­gel)

((64+62)/(1258/365))*2=73.11

Ne hal­be Bil­li­on hier, eine hal­be Bil­li­on da… Mit der Zeit kom­men da schon 73 Tran­chen im Jahr zusam­men!? Da müs­sens dann aber auch ein wenig brav sein, und die prio­ri­siert abfragen!

Also 6 im Monat.

Ein bis zwei pro Woche, … damit die ukrai­ni­schen Behör­den auch was zu tun haben.

Man stel­le sich vor im deutsch­spra­chi­gen Raum könn­te noch irgend­ein Jour­na­list klar denken.

Was der dann an der Stel­le berich­ten würde…

Aber wenn der deutsch­spra­chi­ge Jour­na­lis­mus dann erst mal sei­ne Kriegs­be­richt­erstat­tung reflek­tiert, dann nach dem Krieg - laut Pres­se­club Con­cordia - jahaaa dann.…! Wird alles gut.

When ever­ything is over jour­na­lism will eva­lua­te its performance!

Weiter gehts mit deutschsprachigem Qualitätsjournalismus

02. August 2025

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 10 03 59

In Order of appearance:

Hät­te ein Zug­un­glück ver­hin­dert wer­den kön­nen? Pro­fes­sor an der TU Ber­lin - Über­ra­schung: Nein, man kann nicht alle Zug­stre­cken in Deutsch­land überwachen.

Gefolgt von: Trump fin­det Russ­land wider­wär­tig - sie auch? Nein? Dann wirds aber Zeit. (Und Isra­el toll.)

Dann die Sil­ber und Gold­kauf­vier­tel­stun­de mit dem NTV Bör­sen­ex­per­ten, inkl. Live-Schalte an die Börse.

Etwas spä­ter - was Trump bes­ser nicht sagen darf, pro Isra­el Mili­zen plün­dern Versorgungskonvois

Wei­ter zu Oberst Reis­ner erklärt drei Beu­len in der Ukrai­ne Front.
Jetzt mit neu­er NTV Stra­te­gie - wer braucht schon ein­ge­zeich­ne­te Staats oder Oblastgrenzen.

Oberst Reis­ner erklärt drei Beu­len in der Ukraine-Front:
Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 10 27 34
src: click

[Ach­ja, wenn du NTV bist, wel­ches Bei­spiel­bild nimmst du zur Unter­le­gung des Umstands, dass in die­ser Minu­te Minen­fel­der ange­legt wer­den? Genau, das Video eines Minen­räum­pan­zers… Sonst kommt ja auch nie­mand mit ner Mine in Kontakt.]

Und dann abschlie­ßend “sie war sofort tot” sagt bes­te Freun­din Seil­part­ne­rin Eva.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 10 12 35

Gut, paki­sta­ni­sches News­pa­per, spä­ter zitiert von alpin.de da kann man nichts machen…

Eva was below her on the moun­tain at the time. Des­pi­te being inju­red, Dah­l­mei­er mana­ged to com­mu­ni­ca­te with her part­ner, but Eva was unab­le to reach her.

https://www.dawn.com/news/amp/1927472

Die Ori­gi­nal­quel­le (paki­sta­ni­sches, inter­na­tio­na­les News­pa­per) hat das übri­gens bis heu­te nicht kor­ri­giert, oder zurückgezogen

Ich mag eigent­lich nicht mehr…

Traum­job.

edit: Sie hät­ten den ande­ren Kar­ten­zeich­ner sehen sol­len, den ntv nicht genom­men hat! Wenn ntv beim Kar­ten­zeich­nen noch ein wenig abbaut, hät­te aber auch das Nach­rich­ten­wert, kei­ne Sorge:

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 11 22 25

Ich mein, jetzt haben wir ja auch schon drei­ein­halb Jah­re Krieg. Schwie­rig das auf die Stre­cke zu bekommen.

edit: Ver­dammt, jetzt hab ich die drei Beu­len vergessen!

edit2:

PS: Ich lie­be AI.. 😉 (click)

Jetzt ist es ja ganz unglaublich…

01. August 2025

Die Trump Administration -
Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 01 um 07 57 20
src: click

zahlt kei­ne Research-Artistas in Nie­der­ös­ter­reich mehr…!

https://previous.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/news/200928-SciArt-20.html

Da hat die Pres­se gleich einen Head­liner Arti­kel geschrie­ben, denn so springt man mit Freun­den nicht um.

Da set­zen wir doch gleich mal Kimi K2 Rese­ar­cher dar­auf an.

Wow, a Waun­sinn was Fri­days for Future BOTTOM UP in ihrer Frei­zeit so erreicht haben!


Over the last deca­de (2015-2025), the Inter­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te for App­lied Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (IIASA) has con­duc­ted exten­si­ve inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch addres­sing glo­bal chal­len­ges such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, ener­gy tran­si­ti­ons, water secu­ri­ty, bio­di­ver­si­ty loss, and popu­la­ti­on dyna­mics. This rese­arch is cha­rac­te­ri­zed by a strong sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach, uti­li­zing inte­gra­ted assess­ment models and fos­te­ring inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons. Key out­puts inclu­de influ­en­ti­al flagship reports like “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” (2023), nume­rous annu­al reports detail­ing year­ly achie­ve­ments, tar­ge­ted poli­cy briefs, and a vast array of peer-reviewed aca­de­mic publi­ca­ti­ons. IIASA’s work has signi­fi­cant­ly con­tri­bu­t­ed to glo­bal agen­das like the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agree­ment, impac­ting poli­cy at natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal levels through sci­ence diplo­ma­cy and capa­ci­ty building.

IIASA Research Overview: 2015-2025

1. Strategic Research Directions and Impact

1.1. IIASA’s Evolving Strategy: 2011-2030

The Inter­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te for App­lied Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (IIASA) has demons­tra­ted a dyna­mic and evol­ving rese­arch stra­te­gy, par­ti­cu­lar­ly evi­dent in its plan­ning cycles from 2011 through 2030. A signi­fi­cant shift in approach was high­ligh­ted with the IIASA Rese­arch Plan 2016–2020, which moved away from trea­ting glo­bal chal­len­ges like cli­ma­te chan­ge, popu­la­ti­on growth, and envi­ron­men­tal degra­dati­on as iso­la­ted issu­es. Ins­tead, this plan empha­si­zed their inter­con­nec­ted­ness as ele­ments of com­plex sys­tems, advo­ca­ting for an inte­gra­ted sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach to achie­ve true sus­taina­bi­li­ty . This plan unders­cored the neces­si­ty of lin­king diver­se dyna­mic sys­tems and pla­ced enhan­ced empha­sis on cross-cutting rese­arch, futures initia­ti­ves, and large-scale, inte­gra­ted “nexus” pro­jects. Fur­ther­mo­re, it signal­ed an incre­a­sed intel­lec­tu­al and finan­cial invest­ment into new methods in sys­tems ana­ly­sis, aiming to main­tain IIASA’s lea­ders­hip in deve­lo­ping solu­ti­ons for con­tem­pora­ry and future chal­len­ges . This stra­te­gic direc­tion con­ti­nued and was fur­ther refi­ned in the sub­se­quent rese­arch stra­te­gy covering 2021–2030, which orga­ni­zes IIASA’s rese­arch into six major pro­grams: Advan­cing Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis, Air Qua­li­ty and Green­house Gases, Bio­di­ver­si­ty and Natu­ral Resour­ces, Eco­no­mic Fron­tiers, Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment, and Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties . This struc­tu­re faci­li­ta­tes a focu­sed yet inte­gra­ted approach to tack­ling mul­ti­fa­ce­ted glo­bal pro­blems, ensu­ring that rese­arch efforts are both deep in spe­ci­fic are­as and broad in their sys­temic understanding.

The evo­lu­ti­on of IIASA’s stra­te­gy is also mar­ked by a com­mit­ment to inte­gra­ting diver­se rese­arch are­as and deve­lo­ping inno­va­ti­ve mode­ling frame­works. For instance, the deve­lo­p­ment of the inno­va­ti­ve Inte­gra­ted Bio­s­phe­re Manage­ment mode­ling (iBI­OM) frame­work addres­ses the need for inte­gra­ti­on across dif­fe­rent sec­tors, sus­taina­bi­li­ty dimen­si­ons, and spa­tio­tem­po­ral sca­les . iBI­OM, a modu­lar frame­work that con­so­li­da­tes exis­ting and new­ly deve­lo­ped models, repres­ents a signi­fi­cant advan­ce­ment in eco­sys­tem mode­ling. It is desi­gned to be hos­ted on an open, cloud-based com­pu­ting infra­st­ruc­tu­re, ther­eby enhan­cing glo­bal rese­arch col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and capa­ci­ty buil­ding in sup­port of sus­tainab­le decision-making. This initia­ti­ve reflects a stra­te­gic move towards crea­ting com­pre­hen­si­ve tools that can hand­le the com­ple­xi­ty of real-world pro­blems, such as tho­se addres­sed by the EU Green Deal, which deman­ds maxi­mal poli­cy inte­gra­ti­on and cross-sectoral coor­di­na­ti­on . The focus on “systems-informed decision-making” wit­hin the Advan­cing Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis pro­gram fur­ther illus­tra­tes this stra­te­gic com­mit­ment to pro­vi­ding action­ab­le insights through sophisti­ca­ted ana­ly­ti­cal tools and trans­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch . This con­ti­nuous refi­ne­ment of rese­arch stra­te­gy and metho­do­lo­gy unders­cores IIASA’s adap­ti­ve capa­ci­ty and its dedi­ca­ti­on to addres­sing the evol­ving land­s­cape of glo­bal chal­len­ges through rigo­rous, systems-based sci­ence. The institute’s mis­si­on is to pro­vi­de sci­en­ti­fic gui­d­ance to poli­cy­ma­kers by fin­ding solu­ti­ons to glo­bal pro­blems through app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis, aiming to impro­ve human well­being and pro­tect the envi­ron­ment . Key stra­te­gies for achie­ving impact inclu­de under­ta­king large-scale, multi-year inte­gra­ted pro­jects, con­duc­ting world-class rese­arch, initia­ting explo­ra­to­ry pro­jects, deve­lo­ping new sys­tems ana­ly­sis methods, working in part­ners­hip with poli­cy­ma­kers, and buil­ding glo­bal capa­ci­ty in sys­tems analysis .

1.2. Contributions to Global Agendas: SDGs and Paris Agreement

IIASA’s rese­arch has made sub­stan­ti­al con­tri­bu­ti­ons to glo­bal agen­das, par­ti­cu­lar­ly the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agree­ment. A nota­ble stu­dy by IIASA and the Asi­an Demo­gra­phic Rese­arch Insti­tu­te (ADRI) at Shang­hai Uni­ver­si­ty, publis­hed in the Pro­cee­dings of the Natio­nal Aca­de­my of Sci­en­ces (PNAS), demons­tra­ted that achie­ving the SDGs would lead to a signi­fi­cant reduc­tion in glo­bal popu­la­ti­on growth . The rese­arch pro­jec­ted that suc­cess­ful imple­men­ta­ti­on of the SDGs could result in a glo­bal popu­la­ti­on of bet­ween 8.2 to 8.7 bil­li­on by 2100, a figu­re sub­stan­ti­al­ly lower than other pro­mi­nent pro­jec­tions. This effect is attri­bu­t­ed pri­ma­ri­ly to the impact of achie­ving goals rela­ted to qua­li­ty edu­ca­ti­on (par­ti­cu­lar­ly for fema­les) and uni­ver­sal access to repro­duc­ti­ve health ser­vices, which lead to lower fer­ti­li­ty rates in deve­lo­ping coun­tries . The stu­dy high­ligh­ted that even par­ti­al achie­ve­ment of the­se goals could lead to a con­si­derable decre­a­se in popu­la­ti­on growth, ther­eby also redu­cing vul­nera­bi­li­ty to envi­ron­men­tal chan­ge. This rese­arch pro­vi­des a strong addi­tio­nal ratio­na­le for vigo­rous­ly pur­suing the SDGs, empha­si­zing their inter­con­nec­ted­ness with demo­gra­phic trends and envi­ron­men­tal sus­taina­bi­li­ty . The initia­ti­ve “The World in 2050” (TWI2050), laun­ched in 2015 in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with orga­niz­a­ti­ons like the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Solu­ti­ons Net­work and the Stock­holm Resi­li­en­ce Cent­re, aims to pro­vi­de evidence-based know­ledge to sup­port the SDG poli­cy pro­cess and its imple­men­ta­ti­on, iden­ti­fy­ing six key trans­for­ma­ti­ons cri­ti­cal for sus­tainab­le development .

In the con­text of cli­ma­te chan­ge and the Paris Agree­ment, IIASA’s rese­arch, par­ti­cu­lar­ly through its Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment Pro­gram, has been pivo­tal in ana­ly­zing and tracking natio­nal and glo­bal efforts. For examp­le, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve report by New­Cli­ma­te Insti­tu­te, IIASA, and FTSE Rus­sell tra­cked cli­ma­te miti­ga­ti­on efforts in 30 major emit­ting coun­tries, asses­sing their pro­gress towards mee­ting the Paris Agree­ment tar­gets . The report found that glo­bal emis­si­on trends were far from aligning with the Paris goals, with cur­rent poli­ci­es in the­se 30 eco­no­mies pro­jec­ted to lead to an average annu­al incre­a­se in emis­si­ons, rather than the necessa­ry 7.6% annu­al decre­a­se high­ligh­ted by UNEP in 2019. While some nati­ons show­ed pro­gress, over­all emis­si­ons were expec­ted to remain signi­fi­cant­ly abo­ve 2015 levels by 2030. The report unders­cored the urgent need for more aggres­si­ve poli­cy inter­ven­ti­ons in key sec­tors like ener­gy sup­ply, indus­try, buil­dings, trans­port, agri­cul­tu­re, and fores­try to acce­le­ra­te emis­si­on reduc­tions . Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA’s invol­ve­ment in pro­jects like CD-LINKS, fun­ded by the Euro­pean Union’s Hori­zon 2020 pro­gram, explo­red natio­nal and glo­bal trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­te­gies for cli­ma­te chan­ge and their lin­kages to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment objec­ti­ves, direct­ly sup­por­ting the inte­gra­ted approach requi­red by the Paris Agree­ment and the SDGs . The institute’s models, such as GLOBIOM and G4M, have been instru­men­tal in asses­sing land use, bio­fu­el poli­ci­es, and their impli­ca­ti­ons for cli­ma­te miti­ga­ti­on, sup­por­ting inter­na­tio­nal bodies like ICAO and natio­nal agen­ci­es like the EPA and the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on in deve­lo­ping more sus­tainab­le poli­ci­es . IIASA rese­arch was cen­tral to nego­tia­ti­ons at the Paris cli­ma­te sum­mit (COP21), pro­vi­ding the only stu­dy at the time that expli­ci­tly inves­ti­ga­ted the actions nee­ded to achie­ve a 1.5°C war­ming limit .

1.3. Policy Impact and Science Diplomacy

IIASA’s rese­arch is desi­gned to have a tan­gi­ble impact on poli­cy and decision-making pro­ces­ses glo­bal­ly, regio­nal­ly, and natio­nal­ly. The insti­tu­te achie­ves this by working in part­ners­hip with poli­cy and decision-makers to trans­la­te its rese­arch fin­dings into robust poli­cy opti­ons . A key mecha­nism for dis­se­mi­na­ting rese­arch and fos­te­ring poli­cy dia­lo­gue is through its various publi­ca­ti­ons, inclu­ding poli­cy briefs, impact she­ets, and its flagship reports. For instance, IIASA’s ana­ly­sis has his­to­ri­cal­ly for­med the back­bone of Euro­pean air pol­lu­ti­on poli­cy, and its exper­ti­se is now being app­lied to air pol­lu­ti­on chal­len­ges in other parts of the world . The “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” flagship report, laun­ched at a UN event, unders­cores IIASA’s com­mit­ment to con­tri­bu­ting to the post-2030 glo­bal agen­da and enga­ging with inter­na­tio­nal bodies . The insti­tu­te also hosts and main­tains nume­rous data­ba­ses and models used by sci­en­tists and poli­cy­ma­kers, fur­ther faci­li­ta­ting the app­li­ca­ti­on of its rese­arch . The “Impacts” sec­tion of the IIASA web­site pro­vi­des spe­ci­fic examp­les of how rese­arch has influ­en­ced poli­cy, such as methods for inte­gra­ted manage­ment of food, ener­gy, water, and land resour­ces being fed into natio­nal poli­cy in Ukrai­ne . This direct enga­ge­ment with poli­cy­ma­kers and the pro­vi­si­on of science-based solu­ti­ons are cen­tral to IIASA’s model of sci­ence diplomacy.

Sci­ence diplo­ma­cy is an inte­gral part of IIASA’s mis­si­on, stem­ming from its estab­lish­ment during the Cold War as a coope­ra­ti­ve sci­en­ti­fic ven­ture bet­ween East and West . Today, this trans­la­tes into fos­te­ring con­nec­tions with rese­ar­chers, poli­cy­ma­kers, and busi­ness lea­ders world­wi­de. In 2015 alo­ne, 333 rese­ar­chers from 49 coun­tries worked at IIASA, and 1,815 col­la­bo­ra­tors visi­ted the insti­tu­te, forming a glo­bal net­work of over 3,000 scho­l­ars . The estab­lish­ment of the Sub-Saharan Afri­ca Regio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­on (SSARMO) is a recent examp­le of IIASA’s com­mit­ment to expan­ding its reach and impact through regio­nal part­ners­hips, aiming to build capa­ci­ty and deve­lop inte­gra­ted sys­tems solu­ti­ons for regio­nal sus­taina­bi­li­ty chal­len­ges . The col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween IIASA and Ethio­pia, focu­sing on cli­ma­te chan­ge, food secu­ri­ty, and sus­tainab­le ener­gy, fur­ther illus­tra­tes this com­mit­ment to working with indi­vi­du­al coun­tries to address their spe­ci­fic deve­lo­p­ment goals through sci­ence and inno­va­ti­on . IIASA’s poli­cy briefs and reports, such as “From Visi­on to Action: Co-identifying a Safe Water Ope­ra­ting Space for the Danu­be basin” , are direct out­puts aimed at informing and influ­en­cing poli­cy decisi­ons. The “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” report its­elf is inten­ded to trig­ger dis­cus­sions about a post-2030 Agen­da for Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment, with cri­ti­cal poli­cy messages advo­ca­ting for main­strea­ming sys­tems ana­ly­sis, enhan­cing indi­vi­du­al agen­cy (par­ti­cu­lar­ly women’s empower­ment through edu­ca­ti­on), and streng­t­he­ning collec­ti­ve action and gover­nan­ce for glo­bal com­mons . The insti­tu­te is a mem­ber or obser­ver in 10 major inter­go­vern­men­tal orga­niz­a­ti­ons and estab­lis­hed 18 new coope­ra­ti­on agree­ments in 2023 with enti­ties like UNFPA and various natio­nal ministries .

2. Flagship Reports and Key Publications

2.1. “Systems Analysis for Sustainable Wellbeing” (2023)

In Sep­tem­ber 2023, the Inter­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te for App­lied Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (IIASA) laun­ched its flagship report, tit­led “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being: 50 Years of IIASA Rese­arch, 40 Years After the Brundt­land Com­mis­si­on, Con­tri­bu­ting to the Post-2030 Glo­bal Agen­da” . This com­pre­hen­si­ve report chro­ni­cles the half-century histo­ry of IIASA, estab­lis­hed in 1972 in Laxen­burg, Aus­tria, to address com­mon social, eco­no­mic, and envi­ron­men­tal chal­len­ges during the Cold War era . The report details IIASA’s tran­si­ti­on from its ori­gi­nal role as a coope­ra­ti­ve sci­en­ti­fic ven­ture bet­ween East and West to its cur­rent posi­ti­on as a glo­bal insti­tu­te dedi­ca­ted to explo­ring solu­ti­ons for some of the world’s most intrac­ta­ble pro­blems. The­se inter­con­nec­ted issu­es inclu­de popu­la­ti­on dyna­mics, cli­ma­te chan­ge, bio­di­ver­si­ty loss, and the sus­tainab­le use of land, ener­gy, and water resour­ces . The report was offi­cial­ly laun­ched at a United Nati­ons event during the 78th ses­si­on of the UN Gene­ral Assem­bly, unders­co­ring its rele­van­ce to glo­bal poli­cy dis­cus­sions and the mid-term review of the 2030 Agen­da for Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment . The launch event brought tog­e­ther poli­cy­ma­kers, sci­en­tists, and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from various sec­tors to dis­cuss the report’s fin­dings and the impor­t­ance of advan­cing the 2030 Agenda .

The flagship report is struc­tu­red into six main parts, each sum­ma­ri­zing past and cur­rent IIASA rese­arch high­lights and poin­ting towards future chal­len­ges and solu­ti­ons . The­se sec­tions are:

  1. Sys­tems ana­ly­sis for a chal­len­ged world
  2. Popu­la­ti­on and human capital
  3. Food secu­ri­ty, eco­sys­tems, and biodiversity
  4. Ener­gy, tech­no­lo­gy, and cli­ma­te change
  5. Glo­bal sys­tems ana­ly­sis for under­stan­ding the dri­vers of sus­tainab­le wellbeing
  6. Moving into the future: Three cri­ti­cal poli­cy messages .

The report empha­si­zes IIASA’s key con­tri­bu­ti­ons to sci­ence over the past 50 years, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in ana­ly­zing exis­ting and emer­ging trends and deve­lo­ping enhan­ced sci­en­ti­fic tools to address them . It also high­lights IIASA’s col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve work with dis­tin­guis­hed part­ners world­wi­de to estab­lish the sci­en­ti­fic basis for a suc­cess­ful tran­si­ti­on to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment . The report unders­cores that the ulti­ma­te goal of glo­bal man­da­tes, such as the 2030 Agen­da and its Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs), should be sus­tainab­le well­being for all . The docu­ment ser­ves as a tes­ta­ment to IIASA’s dedi­ca­ti­on to addres­sing glo­bal chal­len­ges and its evo­lu­ti­on into a glo­bal insti­tu­te at the fore­front of sol­ving humanity’s most pres­sing issu­es . The report was edi­ted by Wolf­gang Lutz and Sho­na­li Pach­au­ri, with con­tri­bu­ti­ons from nume­rous IIASA rese­ar­chers and exter­nal review­ers . It is avail­ab­le for down­load from the IIASA web­site and other aca­de­mic plat­forms like Zen­o­do and ResearchGate .

The report cul­mi­na­tes in three cri­ti­cal poli­cy messages desi­gned to sti­mu­la­te dis­cus­sions about a post-2030 Agen­da for Sus­tainab­le Development :

  1. Sub­op­ti­miz­a­ti­on is sub­op­ti­mal: Main­stream a systems-analysis approach into poli­cy­ma­king at all levels to ensu­re that broa­der, longer-term con­si­de­ra­ti­ons are incor­po­ra­ted, avoiding decisi­ons that are opti­mal for one sec­tor but detri­men­tal to others or to long-term sustainability .
  2. Enhan­ce indi­vi­du­al agen­cy: Prio­ri­ti­ze women’s empower­ment through uni­ver­sal fema­le edu­ca­ti­on as a means of pro­mo­ting gen­der equa­li­ty and empower­ment, reco­gni­zing that edu­ca­ted indi­vi­du­als, par­ti­cu­lar­ly women, are key dri­vers of sus­tainab­le development .
  3. Streng­t­hen collec­ti­ve action and glo­bal gover­nan­ce: Harness glo­bal coope­ra­ti­on and repre­sen­ta­ti­on to sup­port the glo­bal com­mons, empha­si­zing the need for robust inter­na­tio­nal insti­tu­ti­ons and col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve efforts to address trans­bounda­ry chal­len­ges like cli­ma­te chan­ge and bio­di­ver­si­ty loss .

The­se poli­cy messages reflect IIASA’s core belief in the power of sys­tems ana­ly­sis, indi­vi­du­al empower­ment, and collec­ti­ve action to navi­ga­te the com­ple­xi­ties of glo­bal sus­taina­bi­li­ty chal­len­ges. The report also ack­now­led­ges the sup­port from IIASA’s Natio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­ons and fun­ding from the Euro­pean Rese­arch Coun­cil for the “Demo­gra­phy of Sus­tainab­le Human Well­being” pro­ject (Empowered­Life­Ye­ars, H2020 741105) .

2.2. Annual Reports (2015-2025)

IIASA’s Annu­al Reports from 2015 to 2024 pro­vi­de a year-by-year over­view of the institute’s rese­arch acti­vi­ties, achie­ve­ments, finan­cial per­for­mance, and col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons. The­se reports high­light IIASA’s ongo­ing com­mit­ment to app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis to address glo­bal chal­len­ges such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, ener­gy secu­ri­ty, food and water secu­ri­ty, popu­la­ti­on aging, and sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment . The reports con­sist­ent­ly empha­si­ze the institute’s role in pro­vi­ding poli­cy­ma­kers with science-based infor­ma­ti­on and opti­ons to deve­lop effec­ti­ve policies.

2015 Annu­al Report :
The year 2015 was descri­bed as “out­stan­ding” for IIASA. Key achie­ve­ments inclu­ded the institute’s rese­arch play­ing signi­fi­cant roles in inter­na­tio­nal agree­ments, the UK beco­m­ing a mem­ber coun­try, the suc­cess­ful hos­ting of the first IIASA Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis con­fe­rence, and the fina­liz­a­ti­on of the new Rese­arch Plan 2016–2020 . IIASA’s rese­arch signi­fi­cant­ly con­tri­bu­t­ed to the dis­cus­sions lea­ding to the for­mu­la­ti­on of the UN Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs), par­ti­cu­lar­ly Goal 7 (Afford­a­ble and Clean Ener­gy) and Goal 13 (Cli­ma­te Action) . IIASA also play­ed a cen­tral role in the Paris cli­ma­te sum­mit nego­tia­ti­ons by pro­vi­ding cru­cial sci­en­ti­fic input, inclu­ding the only stu­dy at the time that expli­ci­tly inves­ti­ga­ted the actions nee­ded to achie­ve a 1.5°C war­ming limit . In 2015, IIASA had 333 rese­ar­chers from 49 coun­tries, hos­ted 1,815 visi­t­ing col­la­bo­ra­tors, and main­tai­ned an acti­ve net­work of over 3,000 scho­l­ars . The insti­tu­te pro­du­ced 562 publi­ca­ti­ons, of which 249 were peer-reviewed jour­nal arti­cles, autho­red in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with over 650 co-authors from 160 insti­tu­ti­ons in 43 coun­tries . The annu­al bud­get for 2015 was €22.1 mil­li­on, with 53% of this fun­ding sourced from pres­ti­gious rese­arch fun­ding agen­ci­es across 23 coun­tries, unders­co­ring the inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and finan­cial inde­pen­dence that cha­rac­te­ri­ze IIASA’s work . The peri­od bet­ween 2010 and 2015 saw an addi­tio­nal €51 mil­li­on in fun­ding from con­tracts, grants, and dona­ti­ons, con­tri­bu­ting to a total fun­ding port­fo­lio of €250 mil­li­on for exter­nal pro­jects invol­ving col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons bet­ween IIASA and its mem­ber countries .

2016 Annu­al Report :
The 2016 Annu­al Report high­ligh­ted IIASA’s con­ti­nued advan­ce­ment in sys­tems ana­ly­sis and its sup­port for poli­cy deve­lo­p­ment world­wi­de . The insti­tu­te embar­ked on its new Rese­arch Plan 2016–2020, gui­ding its rese­arch direc­tion . Key rese­arch con­tri­bu­ti­ons inclu­ded assess­ments of coun­tries’ cli­ma­te pled­ges, which show­ed a signi­fi­cant gap in mee­ting the Paris Agree­ment goals, and pro­vi­ding input for the revi­sed EU Rene­wa­ble Ener­gy Direc­ti­ve . At a natio­nal level, IIASA deve­lo­ped blue­prints for mana­ging air pol­lu­ti­on in mega­ci­ties and pro­vi­ded a sci­en­ti­fic basis for ener­gy plan­ning in Indo­ne­sia . In 2016, 348 rese­ar­chers from 50 coun­tries worked at IIASA, and the insti­tu­te col­la­bo­ra­ted with over 2,229 visi­tors . The report also detail­ed IIASA’s mis­si­on, orga­niz­a­tio­nal struc­tu­re, and its focus on glo­bal pro­blem are­as such as Ener­gy and Cli­ma­te Chan­ge, Food and Water, and Pover­ty and Equi­ty . The inter­ac­ti­ve ver­si­on of the 2016 Annu­al Report is avail­ab­le on the IIASA website .

2017 Annu­al Report :
The 2017 Annu­al Report detail­ed the institute’s finan­cial per­for­mance, noting an annu­al bud­get of €21 mil­li­on, with 58% deri­ved from rese­arch fun­ding agen­ci­es in mem­ber coun­tries across Afri­ca, the Ame­ri­cas, Asia, Euro­pe, and Ocea­nia . This diver­se fun­ding base sup­ports IIASA’s inde­pen­dent rese­arch. Expen­dit­u­re on rese­arch and sci­en­ti­fic ser­vices grew to €17.4 mil­li­on in 2017, reflec­ting a con­ti­nued stra­te­gy of incre­a­sing invest­ment in rese­arch acti­vi­ties that began in 2011 . Bet­ween 2012 and 2017, IIASA secu­red an addi­tio­nal €52 mil­li­on in com­pe­ti­ti­ve fun­ding from con­tracts, grants, and dona­ti­ons, con­tri­bu­ting to a total fun­ding port­fo­lio of €265 mil­li­on for exter­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve pro­jects . The report also men­tio­ned that IIASA had to draw on its finan­cial reser­ves due to expec­ted mem­bers­hip con­tri­bu­ti­ons not mate­ria­li­zing as bud­get­ed, though reser­ves remai­ned at a stra­te­gic level . In 2017, 382 rese­ar­chers from 48 coun­tries worked at IIASA, resul­ting in 611 publi­ca­ti­ons (396 peer-reviewed) .

2018 Annu­al Report :
The 2018 Annu­al Report show­ca­sed sci­en­ti­fic reco­gni­ti­on for IIASA rese­ar­chers, inclu­ding awards and invi­ted lec­tures . For examp­le, Åke Bränn­ström beca­me Head of the Depart­ment of Mathe­ma­tics and Mathe­ma­ti­cal Sta­tis­tics at Umeå Uni­ver­si­ty, Swe­den, and Chris­ti­na Kai­ser recei­ved an ERC con­so­li­da­tor grant . IIASA sci­en­tists also par­ti­ci­pa­ted in signi­fi­cant inter­na­tio­nal con­fe­ren­ces and ser­ved on advi­so­ry boards, such as Dilek Fraisl’s role on the UN Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Solu­ti­ons Net­work (SDSN) The­ma­tic Rese­arch Net­work on Data and Sta­tis­tics (TReNDS) . The report also high­ligh­ted acti­vi­ties like work­shops on soil ero­si­on mode­ling and par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the Con­ven­ti­on on Bio­lo­gi­cal Diver­si­ty . The full Annu­al Report for 2018 pro­vi­des a com­pre­hen­si­ve over­view of the institute’s acti­vi­ties and finan­cials for that year . UK Rese­arch and Innovation’s 2018-2019 Annu­al Report also noted its inter­na­tio­nal sub­scrip­ti­on to IIASA . In 2018, 395 rese­ar­chers from 50 coun­tries worked at IIASA .

2019 Annu­al Report :
In 2019, IIASA sci­en­tists hos­ted or coor­di­na­ted 89 events world­wi­de, focu­sing on capa­ci­ty buil­ding in sys­tems ana­ly­sis . Examp­les inclu­de the CD-LINKS sum­mer school on inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling and a work­shop on demo­gra­phic ana­ly­sis in Thai­land . The insti­tu­te con­ti­nued to address pres­sing glo­bal con­cerns such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, ener­gy secu­ri­ty, popu­la­ti­on aging, and sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment . A for­mal IIASA peop­le stra­te­gy, “Crea­ting a working envi­ron­ment for suc­cess,” was adop­ted by the IIASA Coun­cil to fos­ter an enab­ling envi­ron­ment for rese­ar­chers . Signi­fi­cant IT infra­st­ruc­tu­re upgrades were imple­men­ted, inclu­ding incre­a­sed net­work speeds, expan­ded data sto­rage (to 520 TB), and enhan­ced secu­ri­ty for online sci­en­ti­fic app­li­ca­ti­ons . IIASA also made stri­des in envi­ron­men­tal per­for­mance, working towards the “Kli­ma­bünd­nis Betrieb” eco-label and redu­cing prin­ting by 22% com­pa­red to 2018 . In 2019, 417 rese­ar­chers from 52 coun­tries worked at IIASA . The insti­tu­te also beca­me a core mem­ber of the Food and Land Use (FOLU) Coalition .

2020 Annu­al Report :
The 2020 Annu­al Report detail­ed IIASA’s respon­se to the COVID-19 pan­de­mic, inclu­ding imple­men­ting an inter­nal SARS-CoV-2 action plan and dis­tri­bu­ting safe­ty equip­ment . Des­pi­te the pan­de­mic, most sche­du­led infra­st­ruc­tu­re pro­jects were com­ple­ted, inclu­ding win­dow reno­va­tions and upgrades to the hea­ting sys­tem, expec­ted to redu­ce CO2 emis­si­ons by up to 15% . IIASA con­ti­nued its com­mit­ment to open access, with the DARE (Data and Repo­si­to­ry) data­ba­se pro­vi­ding per­sis­tent access to rese­arch data­sets . A com­pre­hen­si­ve sur­vey of IIASA models and tools was con­duc­ted to inform a new open-access poli­cy for sci­en­ti­fic soft­ware . Out­re­ach efforts expan­ded, with signi­fi­cant growth in social media fol­lo­wers and the launch of the IIASA Con­nect plat­form to build a glo­bal sys­tems ana­lyst com­mu­ni­ty, which attrac­ted over 300 mem­bers in its first six mon­ths . The annu­al bud­get for 2020 was €22.4 mil­li­on, with 50% from mem­ber coun­try fun­ding agen­ci­es . Total inco­me was €22.39 mil­li­on, and total expen­dit­u­re was €22.08 mil­li­on . The report also detail­ed various endow­ment funds, inclu­ding the YSSP Fund and the Women in Sci­ence Fund . This year mar­ked the end of the 2011-2020 stra­te­gic plan and the tran­si­ti­on to a new pro­gram struc­tu­re in 2021 .

2021 Annu­al Report :
The 2021 Annu­al Report high­ligh­ted how IIASA harnes­sed sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, capa­ci­ty buil­ding, col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons, and net­works throughout the year . It out­lined the struc­tures, poli­ci­es, and pro­ce­du­res in place to enhan­ce the rese­arch envi­ron­ment and main­tain IIASA’s posi­ti­on as a lea­ding cen­ter for app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis with poli­cy impact . In 2021, IIASA had 434 rese­ar­chers from 53 coun­tries affi­lia­ted with the insti­tu­te and pro­du­ced 392 peer-reviewed jour­nal arti­cles in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with 732 insti­tu­ti­ons across mem­ber coun­tries . The report is avail­ab­le in an inter­ac­ti­ve ver­si­on on the IIASA web­site . A self-assessment report covering 2021-2024 was also initia­ted, pro­vi­ding a com­pre­hen­si­ve sum­ma­ry of IIASA’s acti­vi­ties and achie­ve­ments fol­lowing a major rest­ruc­tu­ring . The new Rese­arch Plan 2021-24 empha­si­zed a mul­ti­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach to achie­ving sus­taina­bi­li­ty goals, focu­sing on beha­vi­or, equi­ty, jus­ti­ce, and resilience .

2022 Annu­al Report :
The 2022 Annu­al Report show­ca­sed IIASA’s rese­arch and other endea­vors on glo­bal, regio­nal, and natio­nal sca­les, empha­si­zing the effec­ti­ve use of sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, capa­ci­ty buil­ding, col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons, and net­works . It pro­vi­ded an over­view of IIASA’s struc­tures, poli­ci­es, and pro­ces­ses desi­gned to enrich the rese­arch eco­sys­tem and uphold its repu­ta­ti­on as a hub for impact­ful, policy-oriented app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis . The institute’s annu­al bud­get in 2022 was €24.4 mil­li­on, with near­ly half com­ing from Natio­nal and Regio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­ons . Addi­tio­nal fun­ding was sourced from con­tracts, grants, and dona­ti­ons. Total inco­me in 2022 was €24.37 mil­li­on, with 46% from mem­bers­hip con­tri­bu­ti­ons and 53% from con­tracts and grants . Almost 80% of the total spen­ding (€18.3 mil­li­on) was dedi­ca­ted to rese­arch and sci­en­ti­fic ser­vices . The chan­ge in net assets for 2022 was €496,121 . Rese­arch fea­tured inclu­ded sea­weed far­ming, land use and cli­ma­te goals, balan­cing lock­downs and vac­ci­na­ti­ons, pen­si­on reform, nature-based solu­ti­ons, and sup­port for EU 2040 cli­ma­te targets .

2023 Annu­al Report :
The 2023 Annu­al Report was a signi­fi­cant publi­ca­ti­on, coin­ci­ding with the launch of the flagship report “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” . The report detail­ed IIASA’s rese­arch pro­gress in are­as such as sus­tainab­le well­being pathways, advan­ce­ments in sys­tems ana­ly­sis, enhan­cing poli­cy impact, lever­aging the digi­tal revo­lu­ti­on, addres­sing emer­ging issu­es, and pro­mo­ting rese­arch excel­lence . It also cove­r­ed efforts to enhan­ce impact through capa­ci­ty buil­ding, publi­ca­ti­ons and open access, sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, and streng­t­he­ning part­ners­hips . Key achie­ve­ments in 2023 inclu­ded six IIASA co-authored papers being among the top 25 most media-cited cli­ma­te papers (accord­ing to Car­bon Brief) and IIASA rese­arch being cited in over 1,000 poli­cy docu­ments (Over­ton data) . IIASA cli­ma­te experts con­tri­bu­t­ed to poli­cy reports informing Euro­pean cli­ma­te tar­gets for 2040 and pathways to cli­ma­te neu­tra­li­ty by 2050 . The institute’s flagship models, GAINS and GLOBIOM, were app­lied to legis­la­ti­ve pro­po­sals addres­sing glo­bal pro­blems . In sci­ence diplo­ma­cy, IIASA is a mem­ber or obser­ver in 10 major inter­go­vern­men­tal orga­niz­a­ti­ons and estab­lis­hed 18 new coope­ra­ti­on agree­ments in 2023 with enti­ties like UNFPA, the Inter­na­tio­nal Anti-Corruption Aca­de­my, and various natio­nal minis­tries . IIASA repre­sen­ta­ti­ves par­ti­ci­pa­ted in key inter­na­tio­nal forums, inclu­ding the Euro­pean Sci­ence Diplo­ma­cy Con­fe­rence and COP28, whe­re they co-organized seven side events . IIASA also con­tri­bu­t­ed to the G20 pro­cess under India’s pre­si­den­cy, sub­mit­ting four poli­cy papers on the future of mul­ti­la­te­ra­lism, with some recom­men­da­ti­ons reflec­ted in the G20 New Delhi Lea­ders’ Decla­ra­ti­on . The annu­al bud­get for 2023 was near­ly €26 mil­li­on, with appro­xi­mate­ly 40% from mem­ber orga­niz­a­ti­ons and the rest from con­tracts and grants . Total inco­me was €25.92 mil­li­on, with con­tract and grant inco­me incre­a­sing signi­fi­cant­ly from €12.91 mil­li­on in 2022 to €15.08 mil­li­on in 2023 . Rese­arch expen­dit­u­re also incre­a­sed from €15.01 mil­li­on in 2022 to €18.14 mil­li­on in 2023 . Stra­te­gic pro­jects laun­ched inclu­ded fairSTREAM, JustTrans4All, and RESIST .

2024 Annu­al Report (Preli­mi­na­ry Highlights) :
The 2024 Annu­al Report is anti­ci­pa­ted to pro­vi­de a con­cise over­view of IIASA rese­ar­chers’ achie­ve­ments and con­tri­bu­ti­ons over the past year . Preli­mi­na­ry high­lights indi­ca­te that in 2024, IIASA rese­ar­chers deve­lo­ped new models to sup­port resi­li­ent food and cli­ma­te sys­tems and quan­ti­fied the cos­ts of adap­t­ati­on and climate-related impacts . The Bio­di­ver­si­ty and Natu­ral Resour­ces Pro­gram con­ti­nued to address cri­ti­cal chal­len­ges at the nexus of bio­di­ver­si­ty, natu­ral resour­ces, and sus­taina­bi­li­ty through inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch and inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­on . The Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment Pro­gram focu­sed on cut­ting metha­ne emis­si­ons to limit glo­bal war­ming and explo­ring the con­se­quen­ces of cli­ma­te chan­ge . The full Annu­al Report for 2024 is expec­ted to be released in 2025 .

A sum­ma­ry of key metrics from selec­ted annu­al reports is pre­sen­ted below:

Year Rese­ar­chers (Coun­tries) Peer-Reviewed Publi­ca­ti­ons Total Publi­ca­ti­ons Bud­get (Approx.) Key High­lights
2015 333 (49) 249 562 €22.1M Con­tri­bu­ti­ons to SDGs & Paris Agree­ment; Rese­arch Plan 2016-2020; UK membership.
2017 382 (48) 396 611 21M Rest­ruc­tu­ring finan­cial net­works; cli­ma­te tar­gets; YSSP 40th anniversary.
2018 395 (50) - - - Energy/climate poli­cy; natio­nal ener­gy mode­ling; finan­cial sys­tem shocks; biodiversity.
2019 417 (52) - - - OECD part­ners­hip; IPCC con­tri­bu­ti­ons; CD-LINKS pro­ject end; FOLU Coalition.
2020 - - - €22.4M New pro­gram struc­tu­re (from 2021); pro­jects: ALTERNET, QuantMig; COVID-19 response.
2021 434 (53) 392 - - Rese­arch Plan 2021-24 launch; focus on equi­ty, jus­ti­ce, resilience.
2022 - - - €24.4M Sea­weed far­ming; land use & cli­ma­te; lockdowns/vaccinations; pen­si­on reform; NBS; EU 2040 cli­ma­te tar­gets; migration/biodiversity tools.
2023 - - - €25.92M Stra­te­gic pro­jects: fairSTREAM, JustTrans4All, RESIST; PV instal­la­ti­on; Hori­zon Euro­pe projects.

Table 1: Sum­ma­ry of Key Metrics from IIASA Annu­al Reports (2015-2023)

The­se annu­al reports collec­tively illus­tra­te IIASA’s dyna­mic rese­arch port­fo­lio, its glo­bal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons, and its signi­fi­cant con­tri­bu­ti­ons to poli­cy and sci­en­ti­fic under­stan­ding across a wide array of sus­taina­bi­li­ty challenges.

2.3. Policy Briefs and Insights

IIASA actively dis­se­mi­na­tes its rese­arch fin­dings to inform poli­cy through various con­cise for­mats, pro­mi­n­ent­ly fea­turing IIASA Poli­cy Briefs” and “Poli­cy Insights.” The­se publi­ca­ti­ons are desi­gned to pre­sent the institute’s latest rese­arch in an acces­si­ble man­ner for poli­cy­ma­kers, empha­si­zing that the views expres­sed are tho­se of the rese­ar­chers and not necessa­ri­ly of IIASA as an insti­tu­ti­on . A nota­ble examp­le is the poli­cy brief tit­led “Deve­lo­p­ment and cli­ma­te poli­cy syn­er­gies: insights from glo­bal model­ling stu­dies,” autho­red by McCol­lum et al. in 2015 . This brief, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween the Cent­re for Poli­cy Rese­arch (CPR) and IIASA, was part of a lar­ger pro­ject, ‘Toward a Robust Deve­lo­p­ment Focu­sed INDC for India,’ and drew upon several glo­bal mode­ling sce­n­a­rio data­ba­ses, inclu­ding the Glo­bal Ener­gy Assess­ment (GEA), Asi­an Mode­ling Exer­cise (AME), LIMITS, and AMPERE, to eva­lua­te envi­ron­men­tal chan­ge and the impli­ca­ti­ons of alter­na­ti­ve poli­cy respon­ses . The Witt­gen­stein Cent­re, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on invol­ving IIASA, also pro­du­ces a collec­tion of poli­cy briefs and insights, along­side dis­cus­sion papers, whe­re sci­en­tists sum­ma­ri­ze rele­vant demo­gra­phic rese­arch and sug­gest poten­ti­al poli­cy opti­ons . The­se cover a wide array of topics such as genera­tio­nal fair­ness in cli­ma­te chan­ge, depo­pu­la­ti­on trends in Euro­pe, the impact of envi­ron­men­tal fac­tors on migra­ti­on, and the eco­no­mic reco­very from the COVID-19 cri­sis . For instance, an IIASA Poli­cy Brief from April 2020, co-authored with the Aus­tri­an Insti­tu­te of Eco­no­mic Rese­arch, ana­ly­zed the poten­ti­al three-year reco­very peri­od for the Aus­tri­an eco­no­my fol­lowing the COVID-19 cri­sis . Ano­t­her IIASA Poli­cy Brief from Sep­tem­ber 2018 focu­sed on edu­ca­ti­on and the sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment agen­da, while one from April 2018, by Wolf­gang Lutz, high­ligh­ted the impor­t­ance of cogni­ti­ve abi­li­ties over finan­cial means in sur­vi­val con­texts . The­se publi­ca­ti­ons demons­tra­te IIASA’s com­mit­ment to trans­la­ting com­plex rese­arch into action­ab­le poli­cy advice across diver­se and cri­ti­cal glo­bal challenges.

Fur­ther examp­les of IIASA’s policy-relevant out­puts inclu­de the IIASA Poli­cy Brief “Lear­ning from the past: How ener­gy and cli­ma­te poli­ci­es can fos­ter the broa­der sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment agen­da?” which sum­ma­ri­zed fin­dings from the CD-LINKS pro­ject . This pro­ject explo­red natio­nal and glo­bal trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­te­gies for cli­ma­te chan­ge and their lin­kages to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment objec­ti­ves. The brief refe­ren­ced aca­de­mic publi­ca­ti­ons on topics like the socio-economic impacts of rene­wa­ble ener­gy poli­ci­es and risk manage­ment in ener­gy tran­si­ti­ons . The India-IIASA Pro­gram­me has also pro­du­ced poli­cy briefs, such as one on “Ana­ly­zing Forest Car­bon Accounts for Sus­tainab­le Poli­cy Opti­ons with Spe­cial Refe­rence to Live­li­hood Issu­es” . This brief, along with a Spe­cial Issue of the Inter­na­tio­nal Fores­try Review, sum­ma­ri­zed rese­arch on Indian forests, high­ligh­t­ing key issu­es and poli­cy recom­men­da­ti­ons. Ano­t­her IIASA Poli­cy Report (XQ-15-803) tit­led “Deve­lo­p­ment and cli­ma­te poli­cy syn­er­gies: insights from glo­bal model­ling stu­dies” was co-authored by N.D. Rao, D. McCol­lum, N.K. Dubash, and R. Khos­la in 2015 . IIASA rese­ar­chers have also con­duc­ted case stu­dies and publis­hed poli­cy briefs on over­co­m­ing bar­ri­ers to the upt­a­ke of nature-based solu­ti­ons com­pa­red to con­ven­tio­nal infra­st­ruc­tu­re . The Chi­na dash­board on the IIASA web­site men­ti­ons that rese­ar­chers publis­hed two poli­cy briefs informing poli­cy­ma­kers about poli­cy and finan­cing bar­ri­ers limi­t­ing the upt­a­ke of nature-based solu­ti­ons . The­se examp­les unders­core IIASA’s dedi­ca­ti­on to brid­ging the gap bet­ween sci­en­ti­fic rese­arch and poli­cy implementation.

2.4. Academic Publications and Research Output

IIASA’s rese­arch out­put is exten­si­ve­ly docu­men­ted in a varie­ty of aca­de­mic publi­ca­ti­ons, inclu­ding peer-reviewed jour­nals, books, and IIASA-specific report seri­es . The­se publi­ca­ti­ons cover a broad spec­trum of sub­jects rele­vant to glo­bal chal­len­ges, reflec­ting the institute’s inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach. The IIASA Publi­ca­ti­ons Repo­si­to­ry (PURE) ser­ves as the cen­tral record for all publi­ca­ti­ons autho­red by IIASA-affiliated rese­ar­chers . As of Janu­a­ry 2019, 64% of arti­cles publis­hed in 2018 were ful­ly avail­ab­le in PURE, with 339,156 down­loads recor­ded in 2018, a signi­fi­cant incre­a­se from 252,129 in the pre­vious year . This demons­tra­tes the reach and impact of IIASA’s open access poli­cy, which requi­res aut­hors to depo­sit their peer-reviewed rese­arch arti­cles in PURE to ensu­re free acces­si­bi­li­ty wit­hin a year of publi­ca­ti­on . IIASA also has publi­shing agree­ments with major publis­hers like Sprin­ger, Wiley, Tay­lor and Fran­cis, and MDPI, which faci­li­ta­te open access publi­shing, often with dis­counts on arti­cle pro­ces­sing char­ges . The PURE repo­si­to­ry con­tains a wide array of publi­ca­ti­ons, inclu­ding jour­nal arti­cles, books, working papers, and rese­arch reports, covering diver­se topics such as cli­ma­te chan­ge, ener­gy, popu­la­ti­on, and eco­sys­tems . For examp­le, recent ent­ries in PURE inclu­de publi­ca­ti­ons on map­ping ine­qua­li­ties in the health of older adults, deve­lo­ping a safe ope­ra­ting space for water resour­ces in the Danu­be basin, and glo­bal forest manage­ment data .

The sheer volu­me and diver­si­ty of the­se publi­ca­ti­ons unders­core IIASA’s role as a lea­ding pro­du­cer of sys­tems ana­ly­sis rese­arch. For instance, rese­arch on informing India’s ener­gy and cli­ma­te deba­te has resul­ted in publi­ca­ti­ons such as “Informing India’s ener­gy and cli­ma­te deba­te: poli­cy les­sons from model­ling stu­dies” (Dubash et al., 2015), an IIASA Poli­cy Report “Deve­lo­p­ment and cli­ma­te poli­cy syn­er­gies: insights from glo­bal model­ling stu­dies” (Rao et al., 2015), and an arti­cle in App­lied Ener­gy tit­led “Sus­tainab­le Ener­gy Secu­ri­ty for India: An assess­ment of ener­gy demand sub-system” (Naru­la et al., 2016) . The “Decent Living Ener­gy” pro­ject, with a case stu­dy in India, pro­du­ced signi­fi­cant publi­ca­ti­ons inclu­ding “Human deve­lo­p­ment in a climate-constrained world: What the past says about the future” (Lamb & Rao, 2015) in Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Chan­ge and “Cli­ma­te impacts of pover­ty era­di­ca­ti­on” (Rao et al., 2014) in Natu­re Cli­ma­te Chan­ge . Air pol­lu­ti­on rese­arch in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with The Ener­gy and Resour­ces Insti­tu­te (TERI), New Delhi, has led to publi­ca­ti­ons like “Impli­ca­ti­ons of ener­gy tra­jec­to­ries from the World Ener­gy Out­look 2015 for India’s air pol­lu­ti­on” (Cofa­la et al., 2015) and “Emis­si­on inven­to­ry of non-methane vola­ti­le orga­nic com­pounds from anthro­po­ge­nic sources in India” (Shar­ma et al., 2015) in Atmo­s­phe­ric Envi­ron­ment . Fur­ther­mo­re, stu­dies on ener­gy access in India have been publis­hed in high-impact jour­nals such as Natu­re Ener­gy (“Poli­cy trade-offs bet­ween cli­ma­te miti­ga­ti­on and clean cook-stove access in South Asia” by Came­ron et al., 2016) and Envi­ron­men­tal Rese­arch Let­ters (“Kero­se­ne sub­si­dies for house­hold ligh­t­ing in India: what are the impacts?” by Lam et al., 2016) . IIASA’s publi­ca­ti­on types also inclu­de “IIASA Inte­rim Reports” for preli­mi­na­ry results, “IIASA Reprints” for arti­cles publis­hed else­whe­re, and “IIASA Rese­arch Reports” for dis­se­mi­na­ting peer-reviewed rese­arch to a wide inter­na­tio­nal audi­ence . The institute’s com­mit­ment to scho­l­ar­ly com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on is also evi­dent in its “Opti­ons Maga­zi­ne,” which pres­ents IIASA and its rese­arch to a non-specialist audi­ence, and news­let­ters like “PopNet” and “PIN­points” . The Bio­di­ver­si­ty and Natu­ral Resour­ces (BNR) Pro­gram alo­ne publis­hed 450 peer-reviewed papers bet­ween 2021 and 2024, with 393 inde­xed in Scopus, inclu­ding 68 papers in Sci­ence, Natu­re, and PNAS, gar­ne­ring 8,544 citations .

3. Core Research Programs and Projects (2015-2025)

3.1. Energy, Climate, and Environment

IIASA has been deeply invol­ved in rese­arch at the inter­sec­tion of ener­gy, cli­ma­te, and envi­ron­men­tal poli­cy, par­ti­cu­lar­ly focu­sing on inte­gra­ted assess­ment and mode­ling to inform sus­tainab­le pathways. A signi­fi­cant initia­ti­ve is the CD-LINKS pro­ject (Lin­king Cli­ma­te and Deve­lo­p­ment Poli­ci­es — Lever­aging Inter­na­tio­nal Net­works and Know­ledge Sharing), led by the IIASA Ener­gy Pro­gram . This €5.5 mil­li­on pro­ject, invol­ving 18 inter­na­tio­nal part­ners, aims to deve­lop pathways that illus­tra­te how cli­ma­te chan­ge miti­ga­ti­on can align with sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment objec­ti­ves, iden­ti­fy­ing syn­er­gies and trade-offs. A key out­put is the deve­lo­p­ment of spe­ci­fic road­maps for most G20 coun­tries, pro­vi­ding poli­cy­ma­kers with con­cre­te advice on mea­su­res nee­ded to meet long-term cli­ma­te goals, espe­cial­ly in the con­text of rat­che­ting up Natio­nal­ly Deter­mi­ned Con­tri­bu­ti­ons (NDCs) under the Paris Agree­ment . The pro­ject also seeks to high­light best prac­ti­ces whe­re poli­ci­es are con­sis­tent with both cli­ma­te and broa­der sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment goals . Ano­t­her major pro­ject, IS-WEL (Inte­gra­ted Solu­ti­ons for Water, Ener­gy, and Land), con­duc­ted in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Faci­li­ty of the World Bank, focu­ses on deve­lo­ping stra­te­gies for the inte­gra­ted, sus­tainab­le manage­ment of food, ener­gy, water, and eco­sys­tems, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in regi­ons hea­vi­ly impac­ted by cli­ma­te varia­bi­li­ty . This invol­ves lin­king tra­di­tio­nal­ly sepa­ra­ted resour­ce manage­ment models to ana­ly­ze poten­ti­al syn­er­gies and trade-offs bet­ween manage­ment opti­ons . IIASA’s GAINS (Green­house gas - Air pol­lu­ti­on Inter­ac­tions and Syn­er­gies) model is fre­quent­ly employ­ed in the­se efforts, for instance, in asses­sing the impli­ca­ti­ons of ener­gy tra­jec­to­ries from the World Ener­gy Out­look 2015 for India’s air pol­lu­ti­on and in eva­lua­ting GHG miti­ga­ti­on poten­ti­al for Chi­na and India . The insti­tu­te also explo­res the socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty in model app­li­ca­ti­ons, exami­ning how chan­ging urba­niz­a­ti­on and inco­me dis­tri­bu­ti­on influ­ence con­sump­ti­on pat­terns (food, ener­gy) and asso­cia­ted envi­ron­men­tal pres­su­res, as well as how envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es affect dif­fe­rent socio-economic groups and over­all ine­qua­li­ties . Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA rese­ar­chers are deve­lo­ping new approa­ches to repre­sent bre­akthrough tech­no­lo­gies for hard-to-abate sec­tors like che­mi­cals, cement, and steel, cru­cial for decar­bo­niz­a­ti­on while main­tai­ning eco­no­mic com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and natio­nal secu­ri­ty . The focus on sub­na­tio­nal cli­ma­te action is also pro­mi­nent, downs­ca­ling glo­bal sce­n­a­ri­os to sta­te and regio­nal levels to pro­vi­de more tar­ge­ted poli­cy advice . The MESS­AGEix model, deve­lo­ped at IIASA, is an indis­pensable tool for sci­en­ti­fic poli­cy advice in cli­ma­te action, with its sce­n­a­ri­os regu­lar­ly incor­po­ra­ted into IPCC reports and ana­ly­ses for the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on . The Low Ener­gy Demand (LED) stu­dy, an explo­ra­to­ry sce­n­a­rio, show­ed how trans­for­ma­ti­ve chan­ges on the ener­gy end-use side can signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce ener­gy demand and help achie­ve the 1.5°C target .

3.2. Population and Just Societies

IIASA’s rese­arch on popu­la­ti­on and just socie­ties del­ves into the com­plex inter­play bet­ween demo­gra­phic trends, human capi­tal, and sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, with a strong empha­sis on equi­ty and poli­cy rele­van­ce. A key area of inves­ti­ga­ti­on is socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty and its impli­ca­ti­ons for con­sump­ti­on pat­terns, envi­ron­men­tal pres­su­res, and the dis­tri­bu­tio­nal impacts of envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es . This rese­arch aims to under­stand how chan­ging pat­terns in urba­niz­a­ti­on and inco­me dis­tri­bu­ti­on influ­ence human con­sump­ti­on (e.g., food, ener­gy) and the asso­cia­ted pres­su­res on the envi­ron­ment and human well-being (e.g., clean air). It also seeks to ana­ly­ze how envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es affect dif­fe­rent socio-economic groups and over­all ine­qua­li­ties and social jus­ti­ce . For examp­le, IIASA rese­ar­chers have com­ple­ted popu­la­ti­on pro­jec­tions to 2100 for India, dis­ag­gre­ga­ted by age, sex, and edu­ca­tio­nal attain­ment for rural and urban regi­ons of 35 Sta­tes and Uni­on Ter­ri­to­ries. The­se detail­ed pro­jec­tions are inten­ded for use in IIASA models rela­ted to ener­gy, food, and air pol­lu­ti­on to explo­re how bet­ter accoun­ting for house­hold socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty impro­ves pre­dic­tions of glo­bal envi­ron­men­tal chan­ge and human well-being, as well as the design of rela­ted poli­ci­es . The “Decent Living Ener­gy” pro­ject, with a case stu­dy focu­sing on India, ana­ly­zes how much ener­gy is nee­ded to pro­vi­de decent living stan­dards for all and the sub­se­quent impact on cli­ma­te chan­ge . This rese­arch is cru­cial for under­stan­ding the ener­gy requi­re­ments for achie­ving glo­bal equi­ty and pover­ty era­di­ca­ti­on. The Witt­gen­stein Cent­re, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on invol­ving IIASA, pro­du­ces poli­cy briefs on various demo­gra­phic issu­es, such as the impact of the 2015 refu­gee cri­sis on social cohe­si­on in Euro­pe, the inte­gra­ti­on poten­ti­al of refu­gees in Aus­tria, and vul­nera­bi­li­ty in times of fami­ly diver­si­ty . The­se briefs often pro­vi­de poli­cy opti­ons based on rigo­rous demo­gra­phic rese­arch, high­ligh­t­ing IIASA’s com­mit­ment to trans­la­ting sci­en­ti­fic fin­dings into action­ab­le insights for crea­ting more just and equi­ta­ble socie­ties. The focus on edu­ca­ti­on, par­ti­cu­lar­ly fema­le edu­ca­ti­on, as a key dri­ver of human deve­lo­p­ment and a deter­mi­nant of demo­gra­phic trends is also a recur­ring the­me in IIASA’s work in this domain . The World Popu­la­ti­on Pro­gram (POP), now Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties (POPJUS), has been instru­men­tal in expan­ding demo­gra­phic methods, nota­b­ly pro­du­cing the “human core” of the Shared Socio­eco­no­mic Pathways (SSPs) .

3.3. Water Security

Water secu­ri­ty is a cri­ti­cal area of rese­arch at IIASA, addres­sing the incre­a­sing pres­su­res on glo­bal water resour­ces due to cli­ma­te chan­ge, popu­la­ti­on growth, and com­pe­ting deman­ds from various sec­tors. The IS-WEL pro­ject (Inte­gra­ted Solu­ti­ons for Water, Ener­gy, and Land) is a flagship initia­ti­ve in this domain, aiming to deve­lop stra­te­gies for the inte­gra­ted and sus­tainab­le manage­ment of food, ener­gy, water, and eco­sys­tems . This pro­ject, a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Faci­li­ty of the World Bank, invol­ves high­ly inte­gra­ted rese­arch across IIASA’s Ener­gy, Tran­si­ti­ons to New Tech­no­lo­gies, Water, and Eco­sys­tems Ser­vices and Manage­ment Pro­grams. A core com­po­nent of IS-WEL is lin­king tra­di­tio­nal­ly sepa­ra­ted resour­ce manage­ment models of water, ener­gy, and land use to enab­le rigo­rous ana­ly­sis of poten­ti­al syn­er­gies and trade-offs bet­ween dif­fe­rent manage­ment opti­ons . This inte­gra­ted approach is essen­ti­al for iden­ti­fy­ing robust solu­ti­ons that can address com­plex, inter­con­nec­ted chal­len­ges. Ano­t­her signi­fi­cant pro­ject is SOS-Water (Stay­ing Wit­hin the Safe Ope­ra­ting Space for Water), fun­ded by Hori­zo­nEU . This initia­ti­ve is pionee­ring a science-policy frame­work that brid­ges pla­ne­ta­ry bounda­ries thin­king with basin-scale decision-making. It focu­ses on deve­lo­ping methods and real-world case stu­dies to mana­ge water scar­ci­ty, pol­lu­ti­on, and cli­ma­te extre­mes, aiming to ensu­re sus­tainab­le water manage­ment wit­hin safe eco­lo­gi­cal limits . The Water Futures and Solu­ti­ons Initia­ti­ve, ano­t­her key effort, hel­ps iden­ti­fy water poli­ci­es that work con­sist­ent­ly across dif­fe­rent sca­les and sec­tors by pro­du­cing stakeholder-informed assess­ments that employ multi-model ensem­bles of socio­eco­no­mic and hydro­lo­gi­cal models . The­se pro­jects unders­core IIASA’s com­mit­ment to pro­vi­ding science-based solu­ti­ons for glo­bal water chal­len­ges, empha­si­zing inte­gra­ted assess­ment, sta­ke­hol­der enga­ge­ment, and the deve­lo­p­ment of prac­ti­cal poli­cy tools. The rese­arch often invol­ves ana­ly­zing the impacts of cli­ma­te varia­bi­li­ty and chan­ge on water resour­ces and deve­lo­ping adap­t­ati­on stra­te­gies to ensu­re water secu­ri­ty for various users and eco­sys­tems. Recent out­puts inclu­de a poli­cy report “A Blue­print for Resi­li­en­ce: Char­ting the Cour­se for Water Secu­ri­ty in Euro­pe and Cen­tral Asia” and rese­arch on co-creating a safe water ope­ra­ting space for the Danu­be basin .

3.4. Biodiversity and Natural Resources

IIASA’s rese­arch on bio­di­ver­si­ty and natu­ral resour­ces focu­ses on under­stan­ding the com­plex dyna­mics of eco­sys­tems, the ser­vices they pro­vi­de, and the sus­tainab­le manage­ment of the­se resour­ces in the face of glo­bal chan­ge. The IS-WEL pro­ject (Inte­gra­ted Solu­ti­ons for Water, Ener­gy, and Land) expli­ci­tly inclu­des eco­sys­tems as a key com­po­nent, aiming for their inte­gra­ted and sus­tainab­le manage­ment along­side food, ener­gy, and water . This high­lights the reco­gni­ti­on of eco­sys­tems as fun­da­men­tal to human well-being and eco­no­mic acti­vi­ty. In the con­text of India, IIASA has col­la­bo­ra­ted on pro­jects ana­ly­zing forest car­bon accounts for sus­tainab­le poli­cy opti­ons, with a spe­cial refe­rence to live­li­hood issu­es . This rese­arch, con­duc­ted with the Indian Insti­tu­te of Forest Manage­ment (IIFM), aimed to ana­ly­ze exis­ting fores­try and land use poli­ci­es, deve­lop site-specific India Forest Car­bon Models (for Sikkim and Mad­hya Pra­desh), and assess the fea­si­bi­li­ty of sui­ta­ble finan­cial mecha­nisms for the fores­try sec­tor in India . The stu­dy con­nec­ted net forest car­bon stock to the live­li­hood and socio-economic aspects of forest-dependent com­mu­nities, deve­lo­ped car­bon maps for car­bon sequestra­ti­on, and pro­vi­ded inter­ven­ti­ons for sus­tainab­le forest manage­ment that con­si­ders live­li­hood opti­ons . Ano­t­her pro­ject, “Eco­no­mics of Con­ser­ving Agro-biodiversity and Eco­sys­tem Manage­ment: A Stu­dy In Indian Agro-climatic Sub-Zones,” con­duc­ted with the Insti­tu­te for Social and Eco­no­mic Chan­ge (ISEC), Ban­ga­lo­re, aimed to under­stand tra­di­tio­nal crops, chan­ges in crop­ping sys­tems, and the impact of the­se chan­ges on eco­sys­tem ser­vices . This stu­dy focu­sed on the extent and dis­tri­bu­ti­on of agro-biodiversity, its eco­lo­gi­cal and eco­no­mic effi­ci­en­cy, and the social cos­ts of its loss, with the goal of asses­sing poli­cy opti­ons to pro­mo­te agro-biodiversity con­ser­va­ti­on and plan adap­t­ati­on mea­su­res for cli­ma­te chan­ge vul­nera­bi­li­ty . The­se examp­les demons­tra­te IIASA’s sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach to bio­di­ver­si­ty and natu­ral resour­ce manage­ment, inte­gra­ting eco­lo­gi­cal, eco­no­mic, and social dimen­si­ons to inform poli­cy and pro­mo­te sus­taina­bi­li­ty. The rese­arch often invol­ves deve­lo­ping models and decision-support sys­tems to assess the impacts of dif­fe­rent manage­ment stra­te­gies and poli­cy inter­ven­ti­ons on bio­di­ver­si­ty and eco­sys­tem ser­vices. A key out­put is the “Glo­bal forest manage­ment data for 2015 at a 100m reso­lu­ti­on,” a data­set and pro­to­ty­pe map pro­du­ced as part of the Geo-Wiki project .

3.5. Advanced Systems Analysis

The Advan­ced Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (ASA) Pro­gram at IIASA is dedi­ca­ted to deve­lo­ping, tes­ting, and making avail­ab­le new quan­ti­ta­ti­ve and qua­li­ta­ti­ve methods from fiel­ds such as mathe­ma­tics, sta­tis­tics, ope­ra­ti­ons rese­arch, and manage­ment sci­ence. The­se methods are app­lied to address com­plex pro­blems ari­sing in the poli­cy ana­ly­sis of socio-environmental sys­tems . The program’s acti­vi­ties aim to enhan­ce IIASA’s capa­ci­ty to con­duct rese­arch that impro­ves human and socie­tal well-being and envi­ron­men­tal qua­li­ty by tack­ling pro­blems that can­not be addres­sed by exis­ting tools or by enab­ling more effi­ci­ent problem-solving . One of the main rese­arch fiel­ds wit­hin ASA is par­ti­ci­pa­to­ry gover­nan­ce, inno­va­ti­on poli­cy, tech­no­lo­gy trans­fer, and compromise-oriented poli­cy solu­ti­ons . The Geo-Wiki pro­ject, which pro­du­ced glo­bal forest manage­ment data, is asso­cia­ted with the Advan­cing Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (ASA) pro­gram, spe­ci­fi­cal­ly under the Explo­ra­to­ry Mode­ling of Human-natural Sys­tems (EM) and Novel Data Eco­sys­tems for Sus­taina­bi­li­ty (NODES) rese­arch groups . This indi­ca­tes the program’s role in deve­lo­ping inno­va­ti­ve data collec­tion and ana­ly­sis tools. The ASA program’s mis­si­on is cru­cial for pro­vi­ding the metho­do­lo­gi­cal back­bone for much of IIASA’s inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry rese­arch, ensu­ring that the sys­tems ana­ly­sis approa­ches used are cutting-edge and robust. The deve­lo­p­ment of new metho­do­lo­gies and tools for inte­gra­ted sys­tems mode­ling is also high­ligh­ted in the OECD publi­ca­ti­on “Sys­temic Thin­king for Poli­cy Making,” to which IIASA rese­ar­chers con­tri­bu­t­ed . Key rese­arch are­as wit­hin ASA inclu­de explo­ra­to­ry mode­ling of human-natural sys­tems (EM), novel data eco­sys­tems for sus­taina­bi­li­ty (NODES), coope­ra­ti­on and trans­for­ma­ti­ve gover­nan­ce (CAT), and sys­temic risk and resi­li­en­ce (SYRR) . The pro­gram also con­tri­bu­t­ed to deve­lo­ping Slovenia’s Food-Based Die­ta­ry Gui­de­li­nes using sys­tems ana­ly­sis methods .

3.6. Risk and Resilience

IIASA’s rese­arch on risk and resi­li­en­ce addres­ses a wide array of glo­bal chal­len­ges, from natu­ral dis­as­ters and cli­ma­te chan­ge impacts to tech­no­lo­gi­cal and eco­lo­gi­cal tran­si­ti­ons. The Risk, Poli­cy and Vul­nera­bi­li­ty (RPV) Pro­gram has been a cen­tral hub for this work, stron­gly focu­sing on pro­vi­ding sci­en­ti­fic insight for the dis­as­ter risk manage­ment deba­te over the last deca­de . The RPV Pro­gram aims to trans­form how socie­ties mana­ge risks asso­cia­ted with eco­no­mic, eco­lo­gi­cal, and social sys­tems under glo­bal chan­ge by exami­ning envi­ron­men­tal and socio-economic risks and poli­cy opti­ons across mul­ti­ple sca­les. This invol­ves app­ly­ing advan­ced methods for asses­sing and ana­ly­zing risks and uncer­tain­ties to impro­ve poli­cy out­co­mes on glo­bal chan­ge issu­es like extre­me events, eco­no­mic deve­lo­p­ment, and envi­ron­men­tal degra­dati­on . IIASA has a long histo­ry of pro­vi­ding policy-relevant ana­ly­ses for dis­as­ter risk manage­ment in the public sec­tor using tools like the Cata­stro­phe Simu­la­ti­on (CATSIM) model. The use of CATSIM for macroeco­no­mic and fis­cal risk assess­ment has been influ­en­ti­al in the adop­ti­on of risk manage­ment poli­ci­es by several deve­lo­ping coun­tries and in shaping glo­bal dis­cus­sions on dis­as­ter risk manage­ment . For examp­le, IIASA, in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the United Nati­ons Office for Dis­as­ter Risk Reduc­tion (UNISDR), con­duc­ted a risk assess­ment of 160 coun­tries for the Glo­bal Risk Assess­ment (GAR 15) in 2015 . The rese­arch also empha­si­zes the need to move bey­ond pure­ly efficiency-oriented tools like Cost-Benefit Ana­ly­sis (CBA) to incor­po­ra­te mul­ti­ple objec­ti­ves such as equi­ty, dis­tri­bu­tio­nal issu­es, co-benefits, robust­ness, and public accep­ta­bi­li­ty. This signi­fies a shift from ‘risk to resi­li­en­ce’ thin­king, urging poli­cy­ma­kers and rese­ar­chers to con­si­der the cri­ti­cal lin­kages bet­ween deve­lo­p­ment and risk . IIASA has also been invol­ved in capacity-building work­shops for poli­cy­ma­kers on the eco­no­mic assess­ment of dis­as­ter risk in various coun­tries, inclu­ding Tur­key, Colom­bia, India, Mexi­co, the Phil­ip­pi­nes, Mada­gas­car, the Carib­be­an, and Cam­bo­dia . This mul­ti­fa­ce­ted approach unders­cores IIASA’s com­mit­ment to enhan­cing socie­tal resi­li­en­ce through rigo­rous sys­tems ana­ly­sis and poli­cy enga­ge­ment. Rese­arch has also explo­red the impacts of risk per­cep­ti­ons on decision-making in major ear­th­qua­kes and frame­works for mana­ging Na-Tech (Natu­ral Hazard-Technological) risks .

4. Cross-Cutting Themes and Interdisciplinary Research

4.1. Systems Analysis Approach

The sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach is the foun­da­tio­nal metho­do­lo­gy under­pin­ning all rese­arch at IIASA. The institute’s mis­si­on expli­ci­tly sta­tes its com­mit­ment to fin­ding solu­ti­ons to glo­bal pro­blems “through app­lied sys­tems ana­ly­sis” to impro­ve human well­being and pro­tect the envi­ron­ment . This approach is essen­ti­al for tack­ling com­plex, inter­con­nec­ted issu­es that span mul­ti­ple disci­pli­nes and sca­les. The IIASA Rese­arch Plan 2016-2020 details how the insti­tu­te pro­vi­des a “holistic, sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach” . This invol­ves deve­lo­ping new methods in sys­tems approa­ches, not only in rese­arch but also in how that rese­arch is deli­ve­r­ed to poli­cy­ma­kers and sta­ke­hol­ders . The “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being” flagship report fur­ther empha­si­zes this, with its very tit­le and con­tent struc­tu­red around sys­tems thin­king to address glo­bal chal­len­ges . The Advan­ced Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis (ASA) Pro­gram spe­ci­fi­cal­ly focu­ses on advan­cing the­se metho­do­lo­gies . IIASA’s work on inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling, sce­n­a­rio ana­ly­sis, and the manage­ment of inter­con­nec­ted resour­ces like food, ener­gy, water, and land all exem­pli­fy the prac­ti­cal app­li­ca­ti­on of sys­tems ana­ly­sis . This approach allows IIASA to iden­ti­fy leverage points, under­stand feed­back loo­ps, and assess trade-offs, which is cri­ti­cal for deve­lo­ping effec­ti­ve and sus­tainab­le poli­cy solu­ti­ons. The OECD publi­ca­ti­on “Sys­temic Thin­king for Poli­cy Making,” fea­turing con­tri­bu­ti­ons from IIASA rese­ar­chers, del­ves into the poten­ti­al of sys­tems ana­ly­sis for addres­sing 21st-century glo­bal poli­cy chal­len­ges, inclu­ding metho­do­lo­gies and tools for inte­gra­ted sys­tems mode­ling . The institute’s stra­te­gy for 2021-2030 con­ti­nues to build on this foun­da­ti­on, empha­si­zing the inte­gra­ti­on of new exper­ti­se and metho­do­lo­gies, inclu­ding advan­ced tech­no­lo­gies like arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence and machi­ne lear­ning, to aug­ment its sophisti­ca­ted sys­tems ana­ly­sis toolkit .

4.2. Integrated Assessment Modeling

Inte­gra­ted Assess­ment Mode­ling (IAM) is a key metho­do­lo­gi­cal pil­lar of IIASA’s rese­arch, par­ti­cu­lar­ly wit­hin its Ener­gy, Cli­ma­te, and Envi­ron­ment (ECE) Pro­gram. IAMs are used to ana­ly­ze the com­plex inter­ac­tions bet­ween human and natu­ral sys­tems, such as the inter­play bet­ween socio-economic deve­lo­p­ment, ener­gy sys­tems, land use, and cli­ma­te chan­ge. IIASA hosts and main­tains a lar­ge num­ber of sce­n­a­rio ensem­bles and data­ba­ses that are fun­da­men­tal to the IAM com­mu­ni­ty and various rese­arch pro­jects . The­se inclu­de the AR6 Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer for the IPCC, the IAMC 1.5°C Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer, the CD-LINKS Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer, and the SSP Data­ba­se, among others . The­se tools faci­li­ta­te model com­pa­ri­son, the dis­se­mi­na­ti­on of rese­arch out­put, and the adop­ti­on of FAIR princi­ples for open sci­ence . The India-IIASA Pro­gram­me, for examp­le, uti­li­zes IIASA models (GAINS) to exami­ne air pol­lutant emis­si­ons and their impacts resul­ting from ener­gy sce­n­a­ri­os . The rese­arch on “Decent Living Ener­gy” also invol­ves mode­ling to ana­ly­ze ener­gy needs for decent living stan­dards and the sub­se­quent cli­ma­te impact . The MESS­AGEix inte­gra­ted assess­ment model, deve­lo­ped at IIASA, is regu­lar­ly incor­po­ra­ted into key inter­na­tio­nal reports, inclu­ding tho­se by the IPCC and the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on . The Ger­man Envi­ron­ment Agen­cy (UBA), for instance, is buil­ding inter­nal capa­ci­ties for using and fur­ther deve­lo­ping the MESS­AGEix model for cli­ma­te action sce­n­a­ri­os . This demons­tra­tes the direct poli­cy rele­van­ce and trans­fer of IIASA’s tools and exper­ti­se to natio­nal agen­ci­es. The deve­lo­p­ment of new metho­do­lo­gies and tools for inte­gra­ted sys­tems mode­ling is also high­ligh­ted in the OECD publi­ca­ti­on “Sys­temic Thin­king for Poli­cy Making,” to which IIASA rese­ar­chers contributed .

4.3. Sustainable Development Pathways

A cen­tral the­me in IIASA’s rese­arch is the explo­ra­ti­on and deve­lo­p­ment of sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment pathways. This invol­ves ana­ly­zing how dif­fe­rent poli­cy choices and socie­tal trans­for­ma­ti­ons can lead to out­co­mes that meet the needs of the pre­sent without com­pro­mi­sing the abi­li­ty of future genera­ti­ons to meet their own needs. The institute’s work on the Sus­tainab­le Deve­lo­p­ment Goals (SDGs) is a prime examp­le, with rese­arch focu­sing on how to achie­ve the­se 17 inter­con­nec­ted goals in an inte­gra­ted man­ner . The “The World in 2050” (TWI2050) initia­ti­ve, co-launched by IIASA, aims to pro­vi­de evidence-based know­ledge to sup­port the SDG poli­cy pro­cess, iden­ti­fy­ing six key trans­for­ma­ti­ons cri­ti­cal for sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment: human capa­ci­ty and demo­gra­phy, con­sump­ti­on and pro­duc­tion, decar­bo­niz­a­ti­on and ener­gy, food, bio­s­phe­re and water, smart cities, and the digi­tal revo­lu­ti­on . This work empha­si­zes maxi­mi­zing syn­er­gies and mini­mi­zing trade-offs bet­ween dif­fe­rent SDGs. IIASA’s rese­arch also con­tri­bu­tes to under­stan­ding the demo­gra­phic dimen­si­ons of sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, such as the impact of achie­ving SDGs rela­ted to edu­ca­ti­on and repro­duc­ti­ve health on glo­bal popu­la­ti­on growth . The deve­lo­p­ment of Shared Socio­eco­no­mic Pathways (SSPs), to which IIASA’s World Popu­la­ti­on Pro­gram (now Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties) signi­fi­cant­ly con­tri­bu­t­ed by pro­vi­ding the “human core” (popu­la­ti­on pro­jec­tions by age, sex, and edu­ca­ti­on), offers a frame­work for explo­ring dif­fe­rent future deve­lo­p­ment tra­jec­to­ries and their impli­ca­ti­ons for cli­ma­te chan­ge and other sus­taina­bi­li­ty chal­len­ges . The­se pathways are cru­cial for inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling and for deve­lo­ping robust stra­te­gies that are resi­li­ent to various future uncer­tain­ties. The ulti­ma­te aim, as high­ligh­ted in IIASA’s 2023 flagship report, is to achie­ve sus­tainab­le well­being for all .

4.4. Equity and Justice in Sustainability Transitions

IIASA’s rese­arch incre­a­singly empha­si­zes the cri­ti­cal impor­t­ance of equi­ty and jus­ti­ce in sus­taina­bi­li­ty tran­si­ti­ons. This invol­ves ana­ly­zing how dif­fe­rent socie­tal groups are affec­ted by envi­ron­men­tal chan­ges and poli­cy inter­ven­ti­ons, and ensu­ring that the bene­fits and bur­dens of the­se tran­si­ti­ons are dis­tri­bu­t­ed fair­ly. The institute’s work on socio-economic hete­ro­gen­ei­ty exami­nes how fac­tors like inco­me dis­tri­bu­ti­on and urba­niz­a­ti­on influ­ence con­sump­ti­on pat­terns and envi­ron­men­tal pres­su­res, and how envi­ron­men­tal poli­ci­es, in turn, impact dif­fe­rent socio-economic groups and over­all ine­qua­li­ties . For examp­le, the “Decent Living Ener­gy” pro­ject inves­ti­ga­tes the ener­gy requi­red to pro­vi­de decent living stan­dards for all, inher­ent­ly lin­king to issu­es of glo­bal equi­ty and pover­ty era­di­ca­ti­on . The Popu­la­ti­on and Just Socie­ties (POPJUS) pro­gram focu­ses on under­stan­ding demo­gra­phic struc­tures and their inter­ac­tions with social and eco­no­mic envi­ron­ments, with a strong empha­sis on human capi­tal deve­lo­p­ment and its impli­ca­ti­ons for equi­ty . The 2023 flagship report, “Sys­tems Ana­ly­sis for Sus­tainab­le Well­being,” expli­ci­tly calls for enhan­cing indi­vi­du­al agen­cy, par­ti­cu­lar­ly through women’s empower­ment and uni­ver­sal edu­ca­ti­on, as a key poli­cy mes­sa­ge for a post-2030 agen­da . This high­lights the reco­gni­ti­on that empowe­ring indi­vi­du­als and addres­sing ine­qua­li­ties are fun­da­men­tal to achie­ving sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment. Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA’s rese­arch explo­res the dis­tri­bu­tio­nal impacts of cli­ma­te poli­ci­es and the con­cept of a “just tran­si­ti­on” to a low-carbon eco­no­my, ensu­ring that the shift away from fos­sil fuels does not dis­pro­por­tio­na­te­ly harm vul­nerable com­mu­nities or workers in carbon-intensive indus­tries. The focus on equi­ty and jus­ti­ce is inte­gral to IIASA’s sys­tems ana­ly­sis approach, ensu­ring that solu­ti­ons are not only envi­ron­ment­al­ly sound but also social­ly inclu­si­ve and fair.

5. Collaborations and Partnerships

5.1. Engagement with National Member Organizations

IIASA’s enga­ge­ment with its Natio­nal Mem­ber Orga­niz­a­ti­ons (NMOs) is a cor­ner­stone of its ope­ra­tio­nal model and rese­arch impact. The­se orga­niz­a­ti­ons, repre­sen­ting coun­tries from around the world, pro­vi­de cru­cial finan­cial sup­port and help shape the institute’s rese­arch agen­da to address natio­nal and glo­bal prio­ri­ties. The annu­al reports con­sist­ent­ly high­light the signi­fi­cant por­ti­on of IIASA’s bud­get deri­ved from con­tri­bu­ti­ons by NMOs. For instance, in 2015, 53% of IIASA’s €22.1 mil­li­on bud­get came from rese­arch fun­ding agen­ci­es in 23 mem­ber coun­tries . This diver­se fun­ding base under­pins IIASA’s inde­pen­dence and its abi­li­ty to under­ta­ke impar­ti­al, sci­en­ti­fi­cal­ly rigo­rous rese­arch. The list of con­tri­bu­ting agen­ci­es in 2015 span­ned a wide ran­ge of nati­ons, inclu­ding Aus­tra­lia (CSIRO), Aus­tria (OEAW), Bra­zil (CAPES), Chi­na (NSFC), Egypt (Minis­try of Finan­ce), Fin­land (Aca­de­my of Fin­land), Ger­ma­ny (BMBF), India (TIFAC), Indo­ne­sia (Minis­try of For­eign Affairs), Japan (Minis­try of the Envi­ron­ment), South Korea (NRF), Malay­sia (Minis­try of Sci­ence, Tech­no­lo­gy and Inno­va­ti­on), Mexi­co (CONACYT, INEGI), the Nether­lands (NWO), Nor­way (RCN), Paki­stan (Plan­ning Com­mis­si­on), Rus­sia (RAS), South Afri­ca (NRF), Swe­den (FORMAS), Ukrai­ne (Ukrai­ni­an Aca­de­my of Sci­en­ces), the UK (ESRC, EPSRC, NERC), the USA (NSF), and Viet­nam (VAST) . This inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­on is fun­da­men­tal to IIASA’s mis­si­on. The UK’s decisi­on to rejoin IIASA in 2015, after a peri­od of non-membership, was influ­en­ced by the argu­ment that IIASA pro­du­ces high-quality sci­en­ti­fic work, builds sys­tems ana­ly­sis capa­ci­ty (espe­cial­ly in inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling), and ser­ves as a valu­able chan­nel for sci­ence diplo­ma­cy . Howe­ver, chal­len­ges remain in ensu­ring that NMOs can effec­tively influ­ence the rese­arch agen­da and that end-users of IIASA’s rese­arch are ade­qua­te­ly con­nec­ted to the Insti­tu­te. Reports sug­gest that NMOs should work tog­e­ther to dri­ve fur­ther reforms, inclu­ding estab­li­shing mecha­nisms for mea­ning­ful end-user influ­ence on the rese­arch agenda .

5.2. International Collaborations (e.g., UNPIK)

IIASA actively fos­ters inter­na­tio­nal col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons with a wide array of insti­tu­ti­ons, inclu­ding United Nati­ons agen­ci­es, other rese­arch insti­tu­tes, uni­ver­si­ties, and non-governmental orga­niz­a­ti­ons. The­se part­ners­hips are essen­ti­al for lever­aging diver­se exper­ti­se, acces­sing glo­bal data, and ensu­ring the broad impact of its rese­arch. A pro­mi­nent examp­le is IIASA’s col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the United Nati­ons Envi­ron­ment Pro­gram­me (UNEP) on the annu­al Emis­si­on Gap Reports, whe­re IIASA’s MESS­AGEix model sce­n­a­ri­os are regu­lar­ly incor­po­ra­ted . IIASA also works clo­se­ly with the Inter­go­vern­men­tal Panel on Cli­ma­te Chan­ge (IPCC), hos­ting and con­tri­bu­ting to major sce­n­a­rio data­ba­ses like the AR6 Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer and the IAMC 1.5°C Sce­n­a­rio Explo­rer . The insti­tu­te is a mem­ber or obser­ver in 10 major inter­go­vern­men­tal orga­niz­a­ti­ons . Col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with other lea­ding rese­arch insti­tu­ti­ons, such as the Pots­dam Insti­tu­te for Cli­ma­te Impact Rese­arch (PIK), is also signi­fi­cant. For examp­le, IIASA sci­en­tists, in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with PIK, have con­tri­bu­t­ed to rese­arch on sus­tainab­le life­styles, green-tech inno­va­ti­on, and government-led trans­for­ma­ti­on pathways to achie­ve the SDGs and the Paris Agree­ment . The CD-LINKS pro­ject, which explo­red natio­nal and glo­bal trans­for­ma­ti­on stra­te­gies for cli­ma­te chan­ge and their lin­kages to sus­tainab­le deve­lo­p­ment, invol­ved 18 inter­na­tio­nal part­ners . Simi­lar­ly, the IS-WEL pro­ject, focu­sing on inte­gra­ted solu­ti­ons for water, ener­gy, and land, was con­duc­ted in col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the Glo­bal Envi­ron­men­tal Faci­li­ty of the World Bank . The­se col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons extend IIASA’s reach and enhan­ce the rele­van­ce and app­li­ca­bi­li­ty of its rese­arch fin­dings to glo­bal poli­cy chal­len­ges. In 2023 alo­ne, IIASA estab­lis­hed 18 new coope­ra­ti­on agree­ments with enti­ties like the UN Popu­la­ti­on Fund (UNFPA), the Inter­na­tio­nal Anti-Corruption Aca­de­my, and various natio­nal ministries .

5.3. Capacity Building and Early Career Development

Capa­ci­ty buil­ding and ear­ly care­er deve­lo­p­ment are inte­gral com­pon­ents of IIASA’s mis­si­on to advan­ce sys­tems ana­ly­sis glo­bal­ly. The insti­tu­te runs several pro­grams aimed at nur­tu­ring the next genera­ti­on of sci­en­tists and enhan­cing the skills of rese­ar­chers and poli­cy­ma­kers from around the world. The flagship pro­gram in this area is the Young Sci­en­tists Sum­mer Pro­gram (YSSP), which cele­bra­ted its 40th anni­ver­s­a­ry in 2017 . Each sum­mer, the YSSP brings talen­ted doc­to­ral stu­dents from diver­se coun­tries and disci­pli­nes to IIASA to work on their own rese­arch pro­jects under the gui­d­ance of IIASA sci­en­tists. This pro­gram pro­vi­des a uni­que oppor­tu­ni­ty for young rese­ar­chers to enga­ge with cutting-edge sys­tems ana­ly­sis metho­do­lo­gies and build inter­na­tio­nal net­works. In 2019, IIASA sci­en­tists hos­ted or coor­di­na­ted 89 events world­wi­de, many of which focu­sed on capa­ci­ty buil­ding in sys­tems ana­ly­sis, such as the CD-LINKS sum­mer school on inte­gra­ted assess­ment mode­ling and work­shops on demo­gra­phic ana­ly­sis . The IIASA Con­nect plat­form, laun­ched in 2020, aims to build a glo­bal sys­tems ana­lyst com­mu­ni­ty and attrac­ted over 300 mem­bers in its first six mon­ths, fur­ther faci­li­ta­ting know­ledge sharing and col­la­bo­ra­ti­on . The institute’s com­mit­ment to open access, with its publi­ca­ti­ons repo­si­to­ry (PURE) and open-access poli­cy for sci­en­ti­fic soft­ware, also con­tri­bu­tes to capa­ci­ty buil­ding by making rese­arch fin­dings and tools wide­ly avail­ab­le . Fur­ther­mo­re, IIASA’s col­la­bo­ra­ti­ons often invol­ve trai­ning com­pon­ents, such as the Tro­pi­cal Futures Initia­ti­ve which hel­ped train local mode­lers in Bra­zil to use IIASA’s GLOBIOM land-use model . The­se initia­ti­ves ensu­re that the skills and know­ledge in sys­tems ana­ly­sis are dis­se­mi­na­ted glo­bal­ly, empowe­ring more coun­tries and insti­tu­ti­ons to address com­plex sus­taina­bi­li­ty challenges.

edit: Ich woll­te hier noch als Kon­text das Grün­dungs­da­tum von Fri­days for Future rein­stel­len - aber…

*Gacker!*

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 01 um 21 12 21

Soll ich jetzt Lügen­pres­se schrei­en, oder auf die KI schimp­fen? 😉 Die rich­ti­ge Ant­wort (Poli­ti­co) [Kon­text: click (Welt­wo­che)] schi­cken sie bit­te auf einer Post­kar­te an das ZDF, Post­fach 4040 55100 Mainz, …

edit: A litt­le fur­ther rese­arch into the Welt­wo­che arti­cle: This is Stuart Scott, the media net­work “We don’t have time” board­mem­ber that gave Thun­berg access to the UN con­fe­rence in Kato­wice (her first appearence at the UN).

Here seen, rocking his Spooky2:

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 08 58 05
src: click

Here a you­tube influ­en­cer rocking the same Spooky2 elec­tro­de sti­cky pad, tal­king with the inven­tor of the device no less:
Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 09 19 06
src: click

Appar­ent­ly the upper arm tri­ceps mus­cle works just as well as the back of your hand.

Won­der­ful.

Whats a Spooky2 you ask? Well… Dont.

Bildschirmfoto 2025 08 02 um 09 04 21

Also if you real­ly are into ana­ly­zing well working SEO, com­pa­re goog­le search results for Spooky2 vs. Spooky2 medical.