Die US-Regierung will der Ukraine umstrittene Streumunition liefern und verteidigt sich gegen Kritik an diesem Schritt. “Es ist eine schwierige Entscheidung. Es ist eine Entscheidung, die wir aufgeschoben haben. Es ist eine Entscheidung, die einen wirklich harten Blick auf den potenziellen Schaden für die Zivilbevölkerung erforderte”, sagte der nationale Sicherheitsberater von US-Präsident Joe Biden, Jake Sullivan, am Freitag im Weißen Haus.
Die Streumunition ist Teil eines neuen Militärhilfe-Pakets in Höhe von 800 Millionen US-Dollar (rund 729 Millionen Euro). Das Pentagon betonte, man werde der Ukraine nur Streumunition mit niedriger Blindgängerrate liefern. Kiew habe außerdem zugesichert, die Geschosse nicht in dicht besiedelten städtischen Gebieten einzusetzen und festzuhalten, wo die Munition zum Einsatz komme. Weitere Details zum Zeitplan und der exakten Menge der Lieferung wollte das Pentagon nicht preisgeben.
Die Bereitstellung solle aber so erfolgen, dass sie für die bereits angelaufene ukrainische Gegenoffensive relevant sei. Die USA haben nach eigenen Angaben Hunderttausende der Geschosse auf Lager.
Vielleicht auch noch mehr Anti-Personen Minen, ja?
Human Rights Watch reports new evidence of Ukrainian use of banned landmines. WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters) - Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on Friday that it uncovered new evidence of the indiscriminate use by Ukrainian forces of banned anti-personnel landmines against Russian troops who invaded Ukraine in 2022.
Damit setzen jetzt beide Seiten im konventionellen Bereich alles ein was geht.
Jetzt kann endlich wieder schön weiter gestorben werden.
Die angebliche geringe Blindgänger Rate bezieht sich übrigens auf Granaten die beim Aufprall nicht explodieren und später zum Sicherheitsrisiko werden. Was ist denn da so eine “geringe Blindgänger Rate” wie angesprochen? Der MDR weiß mehr: click Och - eh nur 1 Prozent oder so. Dh pro abgesetzer Ladung eine oder zwei… Gut aber, dass die US noch 100.000e davon auf Lager haben.
Trotzdem aber keine Angst, Baerbock hilft.
Propaganda hat aber immer noch niemand entdeckt.
Wie sagt nochmal die Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik dazu?
Was meint eigentlich Yanis Varoufakis dazu? Also nicht unbedingt weil wir den so toll finden, sondern weil in Griechenland ein anderes öffentliches Narrativ unterwegs ist, das öffentliche Kritik an irgendeinem Aspekt des Krieges gerade noch (oder überhaupt erst) erlaubt.
Räusper:
Varoufakis: The one thing that you can actually point out as simultaneously significant and pathetic - is that he [Macron] chose to bring Ursula von der Leyen with him to Beijing to tell two different stories:
One by Ursula,
One by Emmanuel,
to the Chinese and to the world media.
That was a catastrophe.
If you bring the president of the EU Commission with you the idea is to have a common position.
But it is impossible to have a common position, because Ursula von der Leyen is a stand-in, a representative of, a clone of Stoltenberg, the General Secretary of NATO.
They say the same thing.
It’s the same script.
It’s like one mind, one mouth.
Now, Macron doesn’t have this view. Macron challenges the idea that Russia must be defeated and Moscow must be taken [lets hope he is just referring to regimechange…], and that will be the only just end to the war in Ukraine.
He doesn’t believe that.
He’s not allowed to say it anymore but he doesn’t believe it.
Soetwas fällt einem Thomas Mayer natürlich nicht auf - was einem Thomas Mayer aber anstattdessen auffällt ist, dass wenn jetzt Stoltenberg verlängert wird, ja auch von der Leyen verlängert werden muss - WEGENDERANHALTENDENKONTINUITÄT.
Shit, fuck. Eh nicht ideologisch verbrämt lieber Herr Journalist? Journalismus, also schreiben was Sache ist, nicht wahr, Herr Mayer?
Diese Gesellschaft ist das absolut abartigst, grotesk Allerletzte.
Der Öffentlichkeit ist ja auch viel mehr geholfen, wenn sie exakt die selben Statements sowohl von von der Leyen, als auch von Stoltenberg hört.
Propaganda hat aber immer noch niemand entdeckt.
edit: Wie gut war eigentlich der Job von von der Leyen im Ukraine Krieg?!
Von der Leyen hat nur 50 Tage gebraucht um die Selenskyj Positionen erstmals wortwörtlich zu übernehmen. Nach dem ersten Mal gings dann aber GOTTSEIDANK auch viel schneller.
Mit Professoren, die einer Öffentlichkeit erklären wollen, dass das Ost-/West-Gefälle der Ukraine eigentlich eine Erfindung ist, da es ja bei der Abstimmung zum EU Assoziierungsabkommen auch eine Mehrheit dafür im Osten gab.
Seht ihr, alles in Ordnung! Leute die Ost-/West- Gefälle sagen sind ganz böse Putin-Versteher.
Da sollten wir bei uns im Sprachgebrauch besser proaktiv maßregeln! Also mindestens auf social media!
Sagt die Professorin! Und Phoenix featured das in einem freundlichen Interview ohne Widerspruch, ich mein warum auch nicht?
Was sagt eigentlich die OECD dazu?
Oh…
The previous OECD Territorial Review of Ukraine (OECD, 2014b), completed just before the Euromaidan events and the eruption of a separatist conflict in the east of the country, concluded that Ukraine was both administratively and fiscally over-centralised. It argued that a more decentralised form of territorial governance was essential to making strength of the country’s size and diversity and to overcoming the much-discussed east-west divide, which was reflected not only in its politics but also in the structure and performance of regional economies. This report updates and extends that analysis. It argues that the geopolitical and economic shocks of recent years have had asymmetric impacts, both sectorally and geographically. To a great extent, they seem to have accelerated a number of trends that emerged in the years following the global financial crisis of 2009. The structural shifts that began after the financial crisis present new opportunities for some regions, especially in the west of the country, but daunting new challenges for others, particularly in the east, where the consequences of armed conflict have exacerbated an already difficult structural adjustment. The asymmetric nature of these shocks across Ukraine’s regions points to the need for a differentiated policy response and thus reinforces the case for more decentralised governance. However, it also underscores the importance – and difficulty – of getting decentralisation right, given the problematic institutional, political and economic environment in which it is being implemented.
Diese Gesellschaft ist und bleibt das absolut abartigst, grotesk Allerletzte.
Zusatz: Der “Bürgerkrieg im Osten der Ukraine”, war ein, aber nicht der bestimmende Faktor, der für den Investmentstau verantwortlich war - der Hauptfaktor sei, zu viel Zentralisierung von Entscheidungsmacht in Kiew. Sagt die OECD. Achja, und die Weltbank.
Aber die Professorin weiß das natürlich, das war ganz anders, weil eigentlich existierte ja die homogene Ukraine, die wir heute natürlich nur alle falsch und noch zu sehr in der Rückansicht betrachten. Den East-West devide in der Ukraine den gabs ja garnicht.
Wird wieder mal Zeit für einen Karlspreis würde ich sagen. Professoren können den eh problemlos entgegennehmen, oder? Und für einen Journalismus Preis fürs rein garnicht Nachhaken und fürs tolle booking!
Wenn ich an Lücken und Leerstellen in der Ukraineberichterstattung denke lande ich ja auch sofort bei “es wird zu unrecht so getan, als sei der Osten der Ukraine pro russisch”.
Erwähnt das Thema nicht Selenskyj jede Woche, weil er ja noch kurz den Osten befreien muss? Ja, schon, aber zu wenig, und nicht schnell genug! Wo die Professorin wohl die Idee mit der Lücke in der Debatte herhat…
Im Elfenbeinturm auf dem Weg ins Bad den Kopf gestoßen?
Und da klingelte zufälliger Weise auch schon das Telefon, und Phoenix war mit einer Interviewanfrage zur Stelle?
Diese Gesellschaft ist das absolut grotesk, abartigst Allerletzte.
Die Verpflichtung auf Lebenszeit hat die Frau Professor aber schon, oder? Oder arbeitet sie bei Phoenix grad fleißig dran? Tenure Party!
Weil wozu was wissen, wenn einfach die Ideologie passt?!
Fragt der Moderator: Sehr geehrte Frau Professor, hat sich vielleicht in unserer westlichen Wahrnehmung etwas verändert, also seit Janukowitsch.
“Ja, aber vielleicht nicht genug, was ich damit sagen wollte ist…”
Ja, dass du hast ein moralisierendes Stanzerl drauf hast vermutlich, von dem du nicht abweichen kannst und willst, und deshalb deflektest du jetzt jede Frage mit “ihr habt aber gesellschaftlich nicht genug getan, und wart außerdem zu langsam!”, also selbst die Fragen, die du eigentlich beantworten können solltest. Also inhaltlich.
Jetzt ist die Dame aber nur Professorin, also Politikwissenschaftlerin (Prof. Gwendolyn Sasse) und ein neues Buch über die Ukraine unter dem Titel “Der Krieg gegen die Ukraine” hat sie auch draußen. Was wir da wohl Interessantes drin lesen werden…
Oh, dass wir alle noch immer den spiegelnden kolonialen Blick drauf hätten, als Gesellschaften.
Na wenn das erst die OECD hört.…
Danke Frau Professor!
Propaganda hat aber immer noch niemand entdeckt, in dieser verfickten, drecks, scheiss, Hurengesellschaft.
Treffen sich ein Vertreter des German Marshall Funds of the United States, drei (!?) von einer Soros Privatstiftung unterstützte pro ukrainische NGOs und ein Board Member einer ukrainischen Stiftung -- der aber gleichzeitig natürlich auch Co-founder and President der Ukrainian-Austrian Association ist - vor einem wohlwollenden Moderator -
nein - Moment der wohlwollende Moderator ist ja auch der Co-founder and President, Ukrainian-Austrian Association selbst -- also alles andere wäre ja auch Freunderlwirtschaft und so garnicht sexy/koscher…
Also treffen sich die in der diplomatischen Akademie Wien, um einen Hit nach dem anderen rauszuhauen.
Co-founder and President, Ukrainian-Austrian Association: “Thank you very much Yana maybe I should mention, that the ERSTE foundation is so clearly pro Ukraine -- eehh ahhh, that, eh, you have done, uuuuh, quite a few important projects in the past and I do hope that you will continue that…” addressed at Yana Barinova (European Policies and Ukrainian Relations, ERSTE Foundation; former Kyiv City Councillor for Culture)
Ideologie-Check BESTANDEN!
Was er uns darüber hinaus mit der Aussage mitteilen wollte? Ich hab keine Ahnung.
Co-founder and President, Ukrainian-Austrian Association: “I may just tell you and the audience, that there is a project, even in Austria, in Vienna - by the presidential office of Ukraine, to show the exhibition [of] Russian war crimes in Ukraine, at the University of Vienna. I [myself] have [had (die Besten der Besten)] the privilege to have innitiated such a project in austria, but the presidential office [of Ukraine] had to decide to prioritize this exhibition to go to New York, because they are fighting for every vote at the general assembly of the United Nations.”
Des ist jetzt aber keine Propaganda, oder? Des ist jetzt einfach eine informative Kunstausstellung mit dokumentarischem Charakter, die da auf Anleitung des presidential office of the Ukraine mal einfach ganz schnell von Wien nach New York musste, oder?
Des ist ja fast so toll wie die Kunstausstellungen die sonst nur die Viktor Pinchuck Foundation zustande bringt!
Yana Barinova (European Policies and Ukrainian Relations, ERSTE Foundation; former Kyiv City Councillor for Culture): “NGOs inside of themselves [sic!] they can shift their priorities, if they can be flexible, they can switch in between being a MEDIA [outlet], into [sic! to] learning how to document war crimes.” [Very flexible of those NGOs, I might add, of course all guarded and driven around by the ukrainian patrol police, I recon.]
WAIT! NGOs can both be media outlets and state accredited organs that document warcrimes? Thats amazing! Just dont forget to enter on you next job form, the usual ngojournaliststateaccreditedwarcrimeexpertandanalyst and if ever - someone asks you what that means, just tell them you were flexible.
Co-founder and President, Ukrainian-Austrian Association: “The media are playing a pivotal role in countering the russian narrative - which is everywhere. And thats not only a question of money, which is pluggend into the system subversively. This is the result of a strategy over maybe 10, 15, 20 years, when Putin came to power. So - some criticism, Ukraine in many aspects until some years ago was sleeping and did not counter the russian things, talking about culture! [Wait for it, waaaaiiiit for it!] Yeah? That russia is doing a cultural initiative, in order to spread the narrative, etc - so cultural ambassadors of russia, this was not countered by Ukraine for many years, they were just silent, its not only a question of money. And only with the Ukrainian Institute it started (TELLMEMORE!1!). And that has been maybe five, six, seven years ago, before that there was nothing.”
Nothing? Well thats probably because media is so important, but not nearly as important as the Ukrainian Institute, right? (*cough cough*)
Yana Barinova (European Policies and Ukrainian Relations, ERSTE Foundation; former Kyiv City Councillor for Culture): “Before that (The Ukrainian Institute I recon?) it was actually more fashionable to be a Russian pluralistic writer, than actually acknowledge that you are coming from a village in the northern part of Ukraine. [WRONGNARRATIVE, WRONGNARRATIVE!]
Iryna Khomiak Programme Manager, German Marshall Fund, Berlin): I observed this uh also talking with colleagues from other European foundations. First year it was the year of direct aid, urgent needs a direct aid on the borders but now we see that I hope the war will end rather sooner than later, but still it continues so what the strategy of European philanthropy should be -- what uh what we can Undertake and I think that the main thing it’s not to do for Ukraine but to do with Ukraine because definitely we don’t want to be passive recipient of of funds we want to be co-creator of uh important impactful uh programs so I identify a capacity building initiatives as the top priority uh for the next several years - why because we say restart Ukraine rebuild Ukraine bringing Ukraine European integration, but this is just words behind each of those words there are people and their capacities and their knowledge and their expertise what they can and well they can’t so I think the best thing what we can do to prepare people for such enormous undertaking as rebuild Ukraine to equip with knowledge to equip with networks to to equip with the best practices and this in a way means decolonization of European philanthropy what they mean it means that you help in order to leave at a certain point you help to grow the Ukrainian third sector you help Ukrainian ngos to strengthen its own capacity, because many big International foundations missions come to Ukraine and what happens they head hunt best minds of course uh many people choose working for international organizations, it’s prestigious it’s it’s security it’s good salary and then when mission of this organization finished and this organization leave the Ukraine it’s again tabularasa because there is no internal infrastructure that can continue to work so uh I would call all those partners who are open and keen to to help Ukraine to to do with Ukraine and to help to strenghten its own capacity and for each project to find implementing partners in Ukraine it’s absolutely another tactic how you cooperate with Ukraine from other side it’s a big homework for Ukrainian ngos because you should be transparent you should be accountable and you should know how to accompany international organization in their mission in Ukraine because to receive the grant it’s one thing but to report on this grant to measure deliverables and then to build long-term sustainable strategy it’s also different type of skill that require strategic planning visioning compliance with lots of international programs documents strategies and agendas.
Wait, this is not a grass root movement at all? This is all astroturfed by what “International foundations”?
Who do what “Philantropy”?
Because Philantropy is so hard, because - and I quote: “Because to receive the grant it’s one thing but to report on this grant to measure deliverables and then to build long-term sustainable strategy it’s also different type of skill that require strategic planning visioning compliance with lots of international programs documents strategies and agendas.”?
You know, for all the PHILANTROPY grants you received, right? [WRONGNARRATIVE, WRONGNARRATIVE!]
Iryna Khomiak Programme Manager, German Marshall Fund, Berlin): “Following the the needs of of the Civil Society on the ground we decided to emphasize and sort of reinforce the support um the um full-scale Invasion um to a certain extent um shifted the the Paradigm of uh of donor Civil Society relations so to say because at some point the donors community started responding to the needs of the Civil Society on the ground instead of dictating or shaping the Narrative per se, since the last late last March beginning of April last year we already supported around 200 projects inside of the country as I said on as local levels as possible because that’s where the resilience is taking place that’s where the recovery is taking place I’m not undermining or neglecting the role of the state level ngos and um and initiatives I’m just trying to focus on what I’ve been working with and also to sort of bring up this perspective.”
Oh, nothing, I - Iryna Khomiak Programme Manager, German Marshall Fund, Berlin, am just stating that the international donor community is shaping the narrative of ukrainian state level NGOs - which arent representative of the ukrainian people - thats all.
You know, because like the Erste Foundation representative before was saying, we dont have any ground level initiatives right now - at all, its all international NGOs working in the Ukraine, then leaving the country and leaving back, what was it again?! Ah, yes - tabularasa. Nothing. Absolutely nothing at all.
Let me get this straight, but when Jeffrey Sachs states the following:
It was a coup, of course. It was an unconstitutional seizure of power when very violent groups, well armed, stormed the government buildings in February, 2014. [Protesters, angered by Yanukovych’s rejection of a trade agreement with the European Union, were killed by security forces after trying to occupy parts of Kyiv; afterward, Yanukovych was isolated politically and fled to Russia with the assistance of the Kremlin. I asked Sachs over e-mail for a source for his claim about the role played by the U.S. He responded, “It is public knowledge that the National Endowment for Democracy and US NGOs spent heavily in Ukraine to support the Maidan. I have first-hand knowledge of that spending.” The N.E.D. told The New Yorker that it provides funding to civil-society groups but “does not provide funding to support protests.”]
Und kurze Mitteilung an das Arschlochwichserschwein von meiner ehemaligen Psychotherapeutin, wenn ich ihr in Monat drei des Krieges erzähle, WIE der German Marshallfund of the United States, die deutsche Haltung gegenüber dem Krieg kritisiert, und der gleichzeitig die einzige Quelle ist, von der ich Hintergrundinformationen über die “Zeitenwenderede” bekomme (so unwichtige Details wie, die Ränge wurden voll besetzt, damit das Klatschen besser wirkt, und vor der Rede kannten den Inhalt weniger als ein dutzend Personen), weil der german Marshall Fund of the United States darüber debrieft wird, aber die europäische Öffentlichkeit halt nicht -- dann das nächste Mal vielleicht mehr als einfach nur eine abwertende Handgeste von sich geben.
Nur so ein Gedanke.
Achja, und mir zuerst sagen, dass ich ihr erklären solle wie österreichische Aussenpolitik läuft - wegen dem Motivationsfaktor - und mich dafür dann aus der Betreuung treten, wenn ich es nicht mehr ertrage?
Ja, ja? Jederzeit!
Applause - for a job well done. Mögest du auch deine anderen 120 Patienten so perfekt betreuen, wie mich.
Scheiße, noch kein Dopaminpush, weil man wieder einem geholfen hat - und schon ein halbes Jahr vorbei?! Na dann ab zum nächsten Kandidaten!
Diese Gesellschaft ist das absolut grotesk Allerletzte.
Propaganda, hat aber wie immer noch niemand entdeckt.
edit: Please doubleckeck, maybe I’ve mixed up Yana and Iryna when attributing the quotes above. The moderator clearly called one person Yana, but their online photos look quite different. I’ve kept the names the moderator uses when referring to them.
edit2: Hilfreicher Kontext via fefe:
[l] Angst vor der Soros Foundation? Weil die immer Revolutionen anzettelt? Keine Sorge!
Der alte Mann hat die Stiftung seinem Sohn Alex übergeben, und der will erstmal 40% des Personals feuern. Außerdem:
>Alexander Soros also said that under his leadership, he planned to focus the foundation more on US domestic politics.
How long will it take for every person on that panel to realize, that all they’ve been reproducing over one and a half hours is ukrainian propaganda?
One lifetime? Two lifetimes?
It’s such a bliss seeing all those over 60 year old diplomats rediscovering genuinely ukrainian talkingpoints all by themselves (and a little help from their ukrainian friends) and then managing to convince themselves, that thats actually what they are thinking as well, because of a rational deliberation processes they’ve engaged in.
Then of course you also need an almost 60 year old “former journalist” to motivate the audience to clap, because why not what else would they do? Produce actual journalism?
Lets go through this, while we have the time to do so, why not?
Whats the russian win condition in a war of attrition?
Keeping the ukrainian economy in a dysfunctional state for as long as possible, so the ukrainians who have fled don’t return for another two to three years.
Children get integrated into the western educational system, returning to ukraine seems like a worse and worse idea for the actual people who have fled, over time, and the reunification process therefore reverses and more people (the men) actually flee the Ukraine at the end of the process, rather than reimmigrate.
To counteract that, Ukraine HASTO start the rebuilding process while the war is still ongoing.
To attract investors, they now have proposed, and started to implement a flat tax of sub 20%.
But to also attract half of the country, and coincidentally the younger more educated half, they now have to invest massively in new infrastructure projects - and film PR spots of the kindergardens they will construct, to have any messaging for the not so well off classes at all.
There are still no new plans on how to diversify the energy infrastructure, because you cant at scale (if they invest in solar right now, it takes Russia about 4 months to delete half that investment - considering how long it took Russia in the past to do so, in the Ukraine, last year).
Private investment in theory is possible, because Ukraine opted to 10x their grain export business as a way of futureproofing their landowners bankrolls, as soon as it had open borders to do so, so the investment in most of their industries still remained outstanding.
So now the infrastructure reconstruction push is currently put into place, where they also negotiated meetings with private investors, who will shortly visit the Ukraine by train to consider how they can help in rebuilding the (energy) infrastructure.
So if you are russia, you look at those trains. You look at the four stops those congregations make in the next two to three months, and then those projects become your primary targets for disillusioning the western investor class.
Those and the new steelplants of course that the Ukraine plans to build in western regions of the country.
And then you wait. And destroy the energy infrastructure.
And as long as you can keep up disrupting the new Ukrainian economy, wanting a sense of safety will win out over the fear of being drafted, and the want to thrive in an economy, with half the people, who now has implemented a flat tax, but oh so high growth potential, if russian rockets dont hit.
And after about ten years, you have also lost the next generation of expats, in an aging country - with a flat tax, whose energy infrastructure once in a while might still be targeted by russia, and which still needs a victory - because, well neutrality was off the table after Butscha of course…
I mean what could go wrong? Everyone on the panel is very optimistic!
Because its the strength of the over 60 year old austrian diplomats on this panel to identify for themselves, that “thinking that this all ends on day 0 when the war is over” is wrong argumentatively, and it can all be over once businesses just change their risk assessment procedures to see all the great growth potential of a country at war, with a flat tax.
So far - thats 8 billion USD worth of private sector investment after the London investment conference, right?
So whats the next speaker in Vienna selling, following that unique strategic investment plan?
A human centered rebuilding of their infrastructure. In a country where the median age has now just increased by four years, with a flat tax, and a PR push that they will be building more kindergardens soon, so the population should not be afraid to get more children, or even think about leaving the country…
Because this all ends, as soon as we in the west invest, and Putin starts to realize, that we will integrate the Ukraine into the EU no matter what it takes, and that Russia has already lost!
Ok, so what if Russia manages to destroy the first foreign investment push and demonstratively so?
Another 50 billion for infrastructure rebuilding before the second one?
This all ends when the war is frozen, and not one day earlier.
And if that takes too long, say goodbye to your next generation.
Or do you want to establish that good “revisit ukraine, to see your dad suffering from PTSD curled up in the corner of the room, we will have all that flat tax money to help him tough it out!” massaging first? Probably not.
But thats not as positive, as panel II on Ukrainian Statehood made it sound… How come?
Because I’m underestimating the motivational power of repeated propaganda messaging?
Now clap for the new ukrainian slogan: Please dear population and investors, return to a warzone. Our country is so big, you will hardly notice it.
Or was it - come to Ukraine, as a country at war, we have very low wages, and our median pension is just 100 USD a month. Dear Expats, please return to our country, for ample growth potential!
Also we would like to talk with your companies risk assessment department, if you dont mind.
[United Nations Development Programme] Uncovering the reality of Ukraine’s decimated energy infrastructure
A new countrywide energy assessment confirms damages exceeding $10 billion, with Ukraine’s capacity to produce electricity reduced by 61 percent. But with no let-up on attacks on energy networks, where does Ukraine go from here?
The majority of households reported that the work of their household members had been affected since the start of the full-scale invasion, primarily due to job loss, salary cuts, and reduced working hours.
Most households reported a decrease in income, with IDPs and returnees being particularly vulnerable in this respect. There has been a decrease in access to paid work, as well as an increase in reliance upon humanitarian and government assistance, alongside support from friends and relatives (including remittances) as primary sources of income. The majority of households reported engaging in economically driven coping strategies to meet essential needs, such as spending savings, acquiring additional work, and reducing health expenditure in order to meet other essential needs. Households reported that they could continue engaging in taking on additional work, but could not continue spending savings, reducing essential health expenditures, or taking on debt. Geographically, the impact of the war on livelihoods has been felt most greatly in the Southeastern macro-region.
Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies um die Nutzungserfahrung für seine Besucher zu verbessern. Bitte informiere dich bei Gelegenheit darüber wie sich Cookies auf deine Privatsphäre im Web auswirken.
