Autorenarchiv

Guy with ukrainian Airforce T-Shirt buys shitty mic, leaving it on default settings to become podcaster

22. August 2024

what a you­tube hero! (250 Eur Mic that is.)

Cant lis­ten to that audio qua­li­ty with pro­per head­pho­nes, all you hear is gating, com­pres­si­on arte­facts and a fuck­ing cut up mid section.

So as for the con­tent of the video, I dont know yet - cant get over that blue T-Shirt wea­ring PR vic­tims audio setup.

Here is how you get a bet­ter one: You kick that DJI crap into the dumps­ter and buy a Rode Wire­less GO II or Pro, or anything that doesnt sound like crap real­ly (Lave­lier clo­nes, wired). Or you at least turn the low cut fil­ter on the DJI off - to not sound like utter crap:

Bildschirmfoto 2024 08 22 um 10 37 15

Exp­lai­na­ti­on and audio samples:

Fuck, now I have to lis­ten to that crap sound qua­li­ty for ano­t­her 21 Minutes…

Idi­ot.

edit: Con­tent wise, its fine. Not much new stuff, but a pro­per summarization.

Just checking on the journalistic performance around Nordstream - because of an interview

22. August 2024

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx_JzIKPDDc

that Hol­ger Stark, Depu­tiy Editor-In-Chief of Die Zeit gave to Demo­cra­cy now. [A man who­se esprit an joy has left him years ago jud­ging by his public per­for­mance on alter­na­ti­ve US tele­vi­si­on. I mean could tho­se eyes of a sever­ly bro­ken and clo­sed up per­so­na­li­ty, hiding behind pro­fes­sio­nal for­ma­lism, lie? I had to find out.]

Mode­ra­tor: I wan­na go to pre­si­dent Biden. In Febru­a­ry of 2022 he holds a news con­fe­rence - a joint one with Ger­man Chan­cellor Olaf Scholz and Biden brings up the future of the Nord­stream Pipe­line. [Clip is being played.] 

Biden: “If Rus­sia inva­des uh that means tanks or tro­ops cros­sing the uh the the bor­der of Ukrai­ne again, then uh the­re will be uh we, the­re will be no lon­ger a Nords­team 2. We we will bring an end to it. 

Jour­na­list: “What do, what, how would you, how will you do that exact­ly - sin­ce the pro­ject and con­trol of the pro­ject is wit­hin Germany’s control? 

Biden: “We will uh I pro­mi­se you we’ll be able to do it.” 

Mode­ra­tor: “We pro­mi­se you we’ll be able to do it” - your respon­se [Hol­ger Stark]. Hol­ger Stark “Well you can read this in two ways uh you can read this uh in a thre­at of mili­ta­ry action, but also you can read it in a a sen­se of a poli­ti­cal action, diplo­ma­tic pres­su­re and I mean we all remem­ber tho­se days, star­ting with the Trump Admi­nis­tra­ti­on by the way uh whe­re the US uh government um clear­ly wan­ted the Ger­mans to stop with that pro­ject to stop nord­stream as a pipe­line becau­se that pipe­line bypas­sed Ukrai­ne um uh it made Ukrai­ne dis­pensable um it was a direct con­nec­tion bet­ween Rus­sia and Ger­ma­ny, it was a direct tra­de of gas bet­ween the two coun­tries and it star­ted with in the Trump Admi­nis­tra­ti­on that they exe­cu­t­ed a lot of power um diplo­ma­tic pres­su­re on on Ger­ma­ny, um so did the Biden Admi­nis­tra­ti­on in the begin­ning - but also have in mind Amy, that um later on um Pre­si­dent Biden released the sanc­tions pres­su­re against Ger­ma­ny he cut some kind of poli­ti­cal deal with the Ger­man government espe­cial­ly with a Ger­man chan­cellor Olaf Schultz - tho­se two guys got along real­ly well and um I read it the way that Biden said when it comes to the worst when Rus­sia is inde­ed in inva­ding Ukrai­ne, we will make sure with our Ger­man part­ners that this gas trans­port is no lon­ger exis­ting so it’s not a thre­at of mili­ta­ry action in my in my opi­ni­on but a thre­at to use any diplo­ma­tic uh means to stop that…

Well thats the head of Die Zeits Inves­ti­ga­ti­ve unit, so -- lets fact­check this belie­ve a litt­le, right?

I mean asi­de from the com­mon know­ledge fact, that ger­ma­ny didnt stop the gas flow, rus­sia did. At first.

Enter US-Ukraine Secu­ri­ty Dia­lo­gue 2021 - Day 1:

star­ting at 2hours 30 min in with gre­at Ukrai­ni­an Secreta­ry of the Natio­nal Secu­ri­ty and Defen­se Coun­cil of Ukrai­ne Olek­san­der Lyt­vy­nen­ko [or as the Focus would put that - Ukrai­ni­ans Spy chief. Back then of cour­se he was just ano­t­her fledgling upstart and glad­han­der in all things “I so won­der­ful, gre­at event, I belie­ve more sup­port is nee­ded” try­ing to pig­gy­bag off US poli­cy (describ­ing his role in that panel, if you dont belie­ve it, watch it.)], as well as Ste­phen Blank (Seni­or Fel­low at FPRI’s Eura­sia Pro­gram) -- you know this FPRI:

Bildschirmfoto 2024 08 22 um 08 02 05
src: click
(FPRI, we always source our images from The Office of the Pre­si­dent of Ukrai­ne, if we can… Espe­cial­ly when they have not­hing to do with the topic we use them to illus­tra­te for… (actual­ly they have to do with the oppo­si­te (inter­nal Pro­pa­gan­da) (src: Ukrin­form, who else…))

- and grea­test US Pro­pa­gan­dist in this War of all of them Ben Hodges.

If you dont know Ben Hodges:

Para­de­jour­na­lis­mus

and

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASlS-jBWWGA (0 deaths through dro­ne attacks from Kursk in Sumy in the past 3 mon­ths, sta­tis­ti­cal­ly - 1 a year.)

Also com­pair and con­trast with:

Mode­ra­tor feeds the expert the ukrai­ni­an pro­pa­gan­da line.

King’s Col­le­ge Lon­don expert tells him: “Well, the­re are a cou­p­le of mili­ta­ry aims, its pro­bab­ly not so much the crea­ti­on of a buf­fer zone.”

src: click

that should suf­fice as a pri­mer, but back to the US-Ukraine Secu­ri­ty Dia­lo­gue 2021 - Day 1…

Here are some men­ti­ons of Nord­stream in said US-Ukrainian Secu­ri­ty Dialogue:

Ben Hod­ges at 2:50:00 in:

I do belie­ve that Ber­lin is the only capi­tal that can influ­ence uh krem­lin beha­vi­or and unfor­tu­n­a­te­ly they have been reluc­tant to do it. I was appal­led like many of you when pre­si­dent Stein­mei­er, the pre­si­dent of the ger­man federal repu­blic, made this com­ment about Nord­stream 2, that like well - you have to under­stand you know we’­re respon­si­ble for the death of mil­li­ons of rus­si­ans and uh you know there’s a histo­ry here - I could­n’t belie­ve he, I can belie­ve it but i was appal­led that he said it and of cour­se it actual­ly was mil­li­ons of ukrai­ni­ans, not mil­li­ons of rus­si­ans uh that that died, uh during the second world war uh and and so the who­le nar­ra­ti­ve that comes from ber­lin is is uh unsa­tis­fac­to­ry and this is whe­re the united sta­tes has got to put pres­su­re on ber­lin, to put pres­su­re on the krem­lin, the french - I’m sor­ry, uh our oldest ally for the united sta­tes but they would sell ukrai­ne and geor­gia in a minu­te if it meant impro­ved rela­ti­ons­hip for them uh with the krem­lin and so this is whe­re if the Biden admi­nis­tra­ti­on is serious about ukrai­ni­an sov­er­eig­n­ty uh as a prio­ri­ty and if by the admi­nis­tra­ti­on is serious about working with allies and about working with the euro­pean uni­on, then uh the­re should be so much pres­su­re on paris and [ther­eby - becau­se Paris was named first] ber­lin to do more to uh other­wi­se we won’t be able to do this.

Ste­phen Blank at 03:09:40 in:

The panelists have iden­ti­fied real­ly whe­re we need to go for­ward we need to have defen­se indus­try reform. The ukrai­ni­an defen­se stra­te­gy pro­cess needs to be fur­ther refor­med, put on a NATO stan­dard in prac­ti­ce, not just in rhe­to­ric the united sta­tes and euro­pe need to con­ti­nue to sup­port ukrai­ne and we need to put pres­su­re on our euro­pean allies to do so. And I think one way we can do this is to hit, is to take out Nord­strem 2. I’m appal­led that they seem to be in an effort to uh allow Nord­stream 2 to get by, becau­se it’s gre­at it will offend the ger­mans, qui­te frank­ly I’m not upset about offen­ding the ger­mans uh - Mr. Stein­mei­er show­ed that too many peop­le in ger­ma­ny have no real under­stan­ding of whe­re ger­man inte­rest lies and I think that needs to be brought home to them that you can’t lie in bed with the rus­si­ans then expect that things are going to get bet­ter in euro­pe. This is just an end around so the ger­man busi­ness can make a lot of pro­fit, but it gives ger­ma­ny also down­stream dis­tri­bu­ti­on - eh rus­sia, down­stream dis­tri­bu­ti­on rights in ger­ma­ny and in cen­tral euro­pe - and it under­mi­nes ukrai­ne in many dif­fe­rent ways. So to con­clu­de my remarks we have just heard very dis­tin­guis­hed and know­led­ge­ab­le spea­kers tell us what the agen­da needs to be, a reform in ener­gy, defen­se indus­try, defen­se plan­ning, usaid to uh ukrai­ne, ukrai­ni­an poli­ti­cal reform, pres­su­re on euro­pe to sup­port ukrai­ne and u.s diplo­ma­tic invol­ve­ment in a big way in cur­rent efforts to find peace in ukrai­ne. I don’t think minsk is going to be sal­va­ge­ab­le, i think we need some­thing bey­ond minsk, but it’s not going to hap­pen until this admi­nis­tra­ti­on weighs in and I think that’s what needs to come next. Thank you.

Nuland:

Ber­li­ner Zei­tung vom 31.01.2023 Bezug neh­mend auf:

Sevim Dagde­len, Linke-Abgeordnete und Mit­glied der Par­la­men­ta­ri­schen Ver­samm­lung der Nato, for­dert von der Bun­des­re­gie­rung mehr Akti­vi­tät bei der Auf­klä­rung der Anschlä­ge auf die Nord-Stream-Pipelines. Dagde­len sag­te der Ber­li­ner Zei­tung: „Die Bun­des­re­gie­rung muss drin­gend ihren Wil­len zur Auf­klä­rung über die Urhe­ber­schaft für die­sen bei­spiel­lo­sen Angriff auf die deut­sche Ener­gie­sou­ve­rä­ni­tät unter Beweis stel­len und vor­an­trei­ben sowie gegen­über Par­la­ment und Öffent­lich­keit Rechen­schaft über den Stand der Ermitt­lun­gen able­gen. Das bis­he­ri­ge Zuwar­ten Ber­lins kommt einer Ver­ei­te­lung der Straf­ver­fol­gung gleich.“ Hin­ter­grund der For­de­rung ist eine Aus­sa­ge von Vic­to­ria Nuland, Unter­staats­se­kre­tä­rin der US-Regierung. Nuland hat­te ver­gan­ge­ne Woche bei einer Anhö­rung im US-Kongress zum Anschlag gesagt: „Sena­tor Cruz, genau wie Sie bin ich, und ich den­ke, auch die Regie­rung, sehr erfreut zu wis­sen, dass Nord Stream 2 jetzt, wie Sie ger­ne sagen, ein Stück Metall auf dem Mee­res­grund ist.“

Cruz hat­te Nuland gefragt, ob die von ihm vor dem rus­si­schen Angriff vor­ge­schla­ge­nen Sank­tio­nen gegen Nord Stream 2 den rus­si­schen Angriff auf die Ukrai­ne ver­hin­dert hät­ten. Dies hät­ten ihm im Janu­ar 2022 sowohl der ukrai­ni­sche Prä­si­dent Wolo­dym­yr Selen­skyj als auch die pol­ni­sche Regie­rung damals signa­li­siert. Nuland sag­te, sie glau­be, dass das früh­zei­ti­ge Aus für Nord Stream 2 „Putin nicht gestoppt“ hät­te: „Ich glau­be nicht, dass wir die­sen Krieg ver­hin­dert hät­ten, wenn die Euro­pä­er schnel­ler bei Nord Stream 2 tätig gewor­den wären – obwohl auch ich mir das gewünscht hät­te.“ Es sei aber wich­tig gewe­sen, dass „mit dem Tag, da der Krieg begann, die Deut­schen die Pipe­line gestoppt“ hät­ten. Dagde­len zu der Aus­sa­ge: „Die offe­ne Freu­de der US-Unterstaatssekretärin Nuland über die Ter­ror­at­ta­cke ist entlarvend.“

src: click

Sikor­ski Tweet:

For­mer for­eign minis­ter and now EU law­ma­ker Radosław Sikor­ski has cau­sed con­tro­ver­sy after pos­ting a tweet many per­cei­ved accu­sed the US of sabo­ta­ging the Nord Stream pipeline.

Sikor­ski was for­eign minis­ter from 2007 to 2014 and, as an MEP, is now part the EPP group in the Euro­pean Parliament.

The con­tro­ver­si­al tweet inclu­des a pho­to of gas com­ing out of the dama­ged Nord Stream pipe­line, accom­pa­nied by the words “Thank You, USA”.

The tweet has attrac­ted party-wide cri­ti­cism, inclu­ding from Sikorski’s col­leagues from the Civic Plat­form (PO). The tweet was also cri­ti­cis­ed by the ruling Law and Jus­ti­ce (PiS).

You can­not make such hypo­the­ses, espe­cial­ly when you are a serious poli­ti­ci­an, a per­son about whom the public has no doubt that he has some know­ledge,” PO law­ma­ker Borys Bud­ka said on broad­cas­ter Radio Plus. Sikor­ski “should think more about what he wri­tes,” he added.

src: click

So nowhe­re in all of this could one see “the spe­cial rela­ti­ons­hip Biden had with Chan­cellor Scholz” that “allo­wed them to achie­ve this through poli­ti­cal means”.

Ins­tead, pret­ty much every per­son in this who­le affair, asser­ted, that Ger­ma­ny must be pres­su­red, by also put­ting pres­su­re on Fran­ce, and EU insti­tu­ti­ons to make them move, and the peop­le very much con­cer­ned with mat­ters of US-Ukrainian Secu­ri­ty rela­ti­ons­hips open­ly tal­ked about the dest­ruc­tion of the pipe­line, and that this might be nee­ded to make ger­ma­ny move - at all -- one of which open­ly did so in a 2021 (Biden Admi­nis­tra­ti­on) panel tog­e­ther with the later Spy Chief of Ukraine.

But the head of the inves­ti­ga­ti­ve team at ger­man news­pa­per Die Zeit thinks, the Biden state­ment was all a play to get nord­stream remo­ved via diplo­ma­tic means (poli­ti­cal pres­su­re) -- even when at that moment Bides eyes lit up like a fuck­ing christ­mas tree (“We will uh I pro­mi­se you we’ll be able to do it.”), which you know is your nor­mal bodi­ly respon­se when refer­ring to “diplo­ma­tic, poli­ti­cal pres­su­re cam­pai­gns”, made pos­si­ble, by the incredi­b­ly gre­at rela­ti­ons­hip Scholz had deve­lo­ped with Biden.

I’m not say­ing more here, just that Hol­ger Stark, Depu­tiy Editor-In-Chief of Die Zeit IS A FUCKING OPUTRAGEOUS LIAR.

Bey­ond that - not­hing is prova­ble, so far. Well except for the “Ger­man for­ma­li­ty error that Poland sta­ted, cau­sed them to not be able to take action on arres­ting the main sub­ject this far, when he was still in Poland of cour­se” - which if you put it tog­e­ther with Swe­den and Den­mark stop­ping inves­ti­ga­ti­ons on Nord­stream altog­e­ther, becau­se of rea­sons that never beca­me public -- spell oh so much - proac­ti­ve pan­de­ring to a nati­on who might not want you to look into this… While at the same time ris­king your rela­ti­ons­hip with ger­ma­ny - you know, as you do as fel­low mem­bers of the Euro­pean Uni­on. But it was that spe­cial kind of rela­ti­ons­hip, that Biden deve­lo­ped to Chan­cellor Olaf Scholz, that made all of this pos­si­ble of course.

Just lis­ten to your ger­man inves­ti­ga­ti­ve units, you know - the ones at “Die Zeit”, that worked tog­e­ther with The Washing­ton Post to bring you the latest developments.

You know, while the next polish lea­der (this time the prime minis­ter) reacts in an uncon­ven­tio­nal way…

Polish lea­der urges Nord Stream patrons to ‘keep quiet’ as pipe­line mys­te­ry returns to spotlight

Poland’s prime minis­ter has reac­ted to reports that revi­ved spe­cu­la­ti­on about who blew up the Nord Stream pipe­lines in 2022

WARSAW, Poland — Polish Prime Minis­ter Donald Tusk on Satur­day reac­ted to reports that revi­ved ques­ti­ons about who blew up the Nord Stream pipe­lines in 2022, say­ing the initia­tors of the gas pipe­line pro­ject should “apo­lo­gi­ze and keep quiet.” That com­ment came after one of his depu­ties denied a claim that War­saw was part­ly respon­si­ble for its damage.

The Wall Street Jour­nal repor­ted on Thurs­day that Ukrai­ni­an aut­ho­ri­ties were respon­si­ble for blowing up the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipe­lines in Sep­tem­ber 2022, a dra­ma­tic act of sabo­ta­ge that cut Ger­ma­ny off from a key source of ener­gy and worsened an ener­gy cri­sis in Europe.

Ger­ma­ny was a part­ner with Rus­sia in the pipe­line pro­ject. Poland has long said its own secu­ri­ty inte­rests have been har­med by Nord Stream.

To all the initia­tors and patrons of Nord Stream 1 and 2. The only thing you should do today about it is apo­lo­gi­se and keep quiet,” Tusk wro­te on the social media por­tal X Saturday.

src: click

Well you know, it was that SPECIAL bound, that SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP that Biden had deve­lo­ped with Chan­cellor Olaf Scholz, that made this all pos­si­ble that made pos­si­ble to put this all into place as a poli­ti­cal, and not a covert mili­ta­ry action.

Ver­trau­en sie ein­fach den deutsch­spra­chi­gen Qualitätsmedien.

Scheiss Huren Dreckssäue der deutschsprachigen Huren-Drecksmedien.

20. August 2024

Die Pres­se, wer sonst…

Die rus­si­sche Armee schickt bewusst jun­ge Wehr­dienst­leis­ten­de ins Kampf­ge­biet bei Kursk. Die­se sei­en „ver­pflich­tet, das Vater­land zu ver­tei­di­gen“, heißt es im Ver­tei­di­gungs­mi­nis­te­ri­um. Müt­ter der Rekru­ten schla­gen Alarm.

src: click

Com­pa­re and con­trast to:

CNN: Die Ukrai­ner haben Grund­wehr­die­ner angegriffen:

Putin pro­mi­sed poor­ly trai­ned con­scripts wouldn’t be sent to war. Now the front line has come to them

[…]

Messages shared in Rus­si­an Tele­gram chan­nels and other social media over the past few days have reve­a­led how unpre­pa­red Moscow was for this kind of attack, inclu­ding the fact that its mili­ta­ry had left poor­ly trai­ned con­scripts in char­ge of defen­ding the bor­der with Ukrai­ne – the coun­try Rus­sia has been waging war on for more than 10 years.

When the bor­der was atta­cked at 3 a.m. by tanks, the­re were only con­scripts defen­ding them­sel­ves,” said one such mes­sa­ge shared on Tele­gram by a woman who said she was a mother of a con­script sol­dier in Kursk, the bor­der regi­on that Ukrai­ni­an tro­ops cros­sed into last week.

They didn’t see a sin­gle sol­dier, not a sin­gle con­tract sol­dier — they didn’t see anyo­ne at all. My son cal­led later and said, ‘Mom, we’re in shock;,” the woman, iden­ti­fied only as Olga, said.

CNN has asked Russia’s defen­se minis­try for com­ment, but has not recei­ved an answer.

The deploy­ment of con­scripts is a thor­ny issue in Russia.

src: click

Washing­ton Post: Die Ukrai­ne hat Grund­wehr­die­ner angegriffen.

Most, though, have been sta­tio­ned along Russia’s expan­si­ve Wes­tern bor­der to patch up per­son­nel shor­ta­ges and with the expec­ta­ti­on they would never face an attack. Insi­de Ukrai­ne, Rus­sia has reli­ed on a hapha­zard for­ce made up of con­victs, mer­ce­n­a­ries, mobi­li­zed and con­tract sol­di­ers to bear the brunt of the war, with the sta­te con­ti­nuous­ly incre­a­sing their salaries.

But when Ukrai­ne laun­ched a sur­pri­se incur­si­on into Kursk last week, the­se young, untrai­ned con­scripts from cities, towns and vil­la­ges across Rus­sia found them­sel­ves on the new front line — and unpre­pa­red to defend it. The men in the Ukrai­ni­an pri­son came from as far away as the nor­thwes­tern port city of St. Peters­burg and a rural vil­la­ge in Pen­za, sou­the­ast of Moscow.

We did not want to fight in any way,” said Niko­lai, 22, who is from the city of Chelya­binsk, some 1,200 miles east of Moscow. “We were pro­mi­sed that we would not take part in hos­ti­li­ties at all. But some­thing went wrong.”

[…]

Niko­lai and fel­low pri­so­ner Ser­gey, 19, said Ukrai­ne atta­cked their mili­ta­ry head­quar­ters on Aug. 6 and their com­man­ders left without giving inst­ruc­tions on what to do next. Fea­ring they would be kil­led if they stay­ed, the young men wal­ked for three days through forests and swamps and “slept on the cold ground,” Niko­lai said. While sear­ching for safe­ty, they came across a group of vehi­cles deco­ra­ted with tri­an­gles — a sym­bol Ukrai­ne has pain­ted or taped on all its vehi­cles cros­sing into Rus­sia in recent days. “I was try­ing to remem­ber whe­ther the tri­ang­le was our iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on sign or not,” Niko­lai said. Soon they were surrounded.

Ukrai­ni­an sol­di­ers grab­bed them by the scruff of the neck, he said, che­cked them for wea­pons and then gave them food, water and ciga­ret­tes. “They came, chat­ted, told their sto­ries, lis­tened to ours,” he said. Then they tied their hands and cove­r­ed their eyes and sent them over the bor­der into Ukraine.

Kirill, 20, who was wea­ring a Star Wars T-shirt, said his radio was swit­ched off when the Ukrai­ni­an incur­si­on began and he mis­sed messages cal­ling for tro­ops to evacua­te. He hid at his trench posi­ti­on but was soon sur­roun­ded by Ukrai­ni­an forces.

At first, I was sca­red, I was very much sur­pri­sed. Then they told me, ‘Sur­ren­der and you will live,’” he recal­led. He sur­ren­de­red immedia­te­ly, and they tied his hands and cove­r­ed his eyes, then put him in an armo­red vehi­cle and dro­ve away. When they stop­ped dri­ving, a Ukrai­ni­an sol­dier offe­red to let him call his mom, who works at a gro­ce­ry store in Rus­sia, he said.

src: click

Media­zo­na: Die Ukrai­ne hat Grund­wehr­die­ner angegriffen:

Rus­si­an con­scripts are guar­ding the bor­der in the Kursk regi­on and other lesser-known sec­tors of the Russian-Ukrainian bor­der. When Ukrai­ni­an for­ces laun­ched an offen­si­ve, the­se young draf­tees sud­den­ly found them­sel­ves in the heat of battle.

src: click

Media­zo­na:

Vla­di­mir Putin claims con­scripts aren’t figh­t­ing in the war, but they go mis­sing in Kursk regi­on in dro­ves. Media­zo­na inter­views their relatives

src: click

Aber eben, Die Presse:

Putin schickt Rekru­ten als Nach­schub in den Krieg in Kursk! Das Minis­te­ri­um sagt, das sei ok. Der ver­heizt die! Ups, ja - und den Teil, dass die Ukrai­ner die ange­grif­fen haben, als sie glor­reich ihre Moral geboos­tet haben haben wir in den Öster­rei­chi­schen Medi­en sich­her­heits­hal­ber gleich weggelassen?

Die rus­si­sche Armee schickt bewusst jun­ge Wehr­dienst­leis­ten­de ins Kampf­ge­biet bei Kursk. Die­se sei­en „ver­pflich­tet, das Vater­land zu ver­tei­di­gen“, heißt es im Ver­tei­di­gungs­mi­nis­te­ri­um. Müt­ter der Rekru­ten schla­gen Alarm.

src: click

Quel­le? Dei­ne Mut­ter? Ver­linkt ist kei­ne. Was nicht bedeu­tet, dass es nicht auch pas­siert ist -- aber ich fin­de weder Regi­ments­be­zeich­ng­nun­gen, noch einen Report, der besagt, dass der Nach­schub (der spät ein­ge­trof­fen ist) eben­falls aus Grund­wehr­die­nern bestand nur wage assert­ments, die US Diens­te wür­den das promoten.

Und man weiss ja, wenn DIE US DIENSTE mal wie­der die Ukrai­ne sau­ber schrei­ben, dann ist dar­an alles Sauber.

Also wenn die PR bis jetzt nicht EINEN Rekru­ten inter­viewt hat der erst als Nach­schub, nach dem ukrai­ni­schen Angriff auf Russ­land in die Regi­on geschickt wur­de, dann hakts wohl gewaltig.

SCHEISS VERFICKTE DRECKSPRESSE (öster­rei­chi­sches Qualitätszeitungsformat).

Wich­ser.

edit: Quel­le gefun­den auf die sich DiePresse.com bezieht:

Par­ents told about the forth­co­m­ing trans­fer of con­scripts to Kursk regi­on immedia­te­ly after their oath of office

The con­scripts of the 80th Moto­ri­sed Rif­le Divi­si­on, who took the oath on 3 August, are being pre­pa­red for trans­fer from the Mur­mansk Regi­on to the Kursk Regi­on, whe­re hos­ti­li­ties have been going on sin­ce 6 August. Their rela­ti­ves began to spread appeals in social net­works deman­ding not to send their child­ren to the bor­der. Several mothers of con­scripts infor­med ‘Agen­cy’ about it at once.

Details. Par­ents publish posts in their accounts deman­ding not to send their child­ren to Kursk regi­on. They report that con­scripts got to the ser­vice only on 6-7 July, on 3 August they took the oath - then they were infor­med about the dis­patch. ‘Now in the mili­ta­ry unit is pre­pa­ring con­scripts to go on a trip to the Kursk regi­on. Kursk bat­tali­ons have been crea­ted. This infor­ma­ti­on was con­fir­med to us by the com­mand at the swearing-in on 3 August. The­re are hos­ti­li­ties in Kursk regi­on and the­re is a thre­at to the lives of our sons. The com­mand does not adhe­re to Vla­di­mir Putin’s state­ment of 13 June 2023 - not to send con­script sol­di­ers to the com­bat zone,’ the mes­sa­ge reads.

▪️‘Agen­cy’ con­ta­c­ted two mothers of con­scripts who con­fir­med the rele­van­ce of this infor­ma­ti­on. One of them told ‘Agen­cy’ that she was at her son’s swearing-in on 3 August, when it beca­me known that they had been sent to Kursk regi­on. Jud­ging by her page in social net­works, her son ended up in the army right after school.

▪️Другая mum told ‘Agen­cy’ that rela­ti­ves of con­scripts have alrea­dy united in one chat room to pre­vent them from being sent to Kursk regi­on - it has several dozen mem­bers and is con­stant­ly gro­wing. ‘We are all worried that child­ren are going to be sent to Kursk,’ she said.

▪️Издание ‘Bewa­re the News’ notes that the par­ents have also crea­ted a peti­ti­on to the pre­si­dent and writ­ten a state­ment to the mili­ta­ry prosecutor’s office.

▪️‘The Agen­cy’ was con­fir­med the fact of par­ents’ appeal and in one of the orga­ni­sa­ti­ons dealing with legal assi­s­tance to Rus­si­an sol­di­ers (for secu­ri­ty rea­sons “The Agen­cy” does not name the inter­lo­cu­tor). Accord­ing to the organisation’s infor­ma­ti­on, con­scripts ‘from dif­fe­rent regi­ons’ are being pre­pa­red to be sent to the Kursk region.

Context.Conscripts have been at the bor­der in Kursk regi­on sin­ce the begin­ning of the Ukrai­ni­an offensive.‘Now in the mili­ta­ry unit is pre­pa­ring con­scripts to go on a trip to the Kursk region.

▪️Несмотря the offen­si­ve, Rus­si­an aut­ho­ri­ties did not trans­fer the con­scripts remai­ning in the regi­on to the rear, decla­ring them a com­bat unit, several mothers told ‘Agen­cy’.

Trans­la­ted with DeepL.com (free version)

src: click
via: click

Kei­ner von denen ist bis jetzt noch dort, kei­ner von denen wur­de bis jetzt von den Ukrai­nern fest­ge­nom­men, aber über die die seit Beginn dort waren, und die die Ukrai­ne ange­grif­fen hat, über die muss man ja als diepresse.com nicht berich­ten. Die deutsch­spra­chi­ge Medi­en­land­schaft ist soet­was von das gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte…

edit: Ver­fick­te, ver­wichs­te Drecksschweine.

Das Twit­ter pos­ting ver­linkt auf ein Tele­gramm­pos­ting, das bezieht sich auf ein Pos­ting eines Eltern­teils das nur als Bild ver­linkt wird.

Hab den Inhalt mal OCRed und von deepl.com über­set­zen lassen:

PLEASE REPOST AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE

CONSCRIPTS ARE SENT TO KURSK REGION^ HELP SAVE OUR GUYS!!!!

We are par­ents and wives of con­scripts ser­ving in 80 Moto­ri­sed Rif­le Divi­si­on (infan­try), mili­ta­ry unit 34 667.

- н

Our child­ren have been in the unit sin­ce 6-7 July 2024.

Now the mili­ta­ry unit is pre­pa­ring con­scripts for a trip to the Kursk regi­on Kursk bat­tali­ons have been crea­ted. This infor­ma­ti­on was con­fir­med to us by the com­mand at the swearing-in on 03 August 2024g To talk to the hig­her com­mand of the unit was not pos­si­ble, they refu­se to com­mu­ni­ca­te with par­ents. Pho­nes are hid­den and par­ents are not given.

In order to send ser­vice­men per­forming mili­ta­ry ser­vice under con­scrip­ti­on (inclu­ding as part of a mili­ta­ry unit) to ful­fil tasks in armed con­flicts (to par­ti­ci­pa­te in com­bat ope­ra­ti­ons), several con­di­ti­ons must be met, which are spe­ci­fied in Arti­cle 2 of the Regu­la­ti­ons on the Pro­ce­du­re of Mili­ta­ry Service:

- com­ple­ti­on of their mili­ta­ry ser­vice for at least four months

- after trai­ning in mili­ta­ry specialities.

None of the con­di­ti­ons are ful­fil­led by the com­mand of mili­ta­ry unit 34667-n Con­scripts will be sent in August-September 2024t, which is less than four months

And this mili­ta­ry unit is not a trai­ning unit, so con­scripts can­not get a mili­ta­ry spe­cia­li­ty in it.

In the Kursk regi­on the­re are hos­ti­li­ties and the­re is a thre­at to the lives of our sons The com­mand does not adhe­re to the state­ment of V. Putin from 13 06.2023 - not to send con­script sol­di­ers to the com­bat zone.

We ask not to allow sen­ding our child­ren to the Kursk regi­on The­se are not bor­der guards, the­se are infan­try They should not be on the bor­der Espe­cial­ly not having ser­ved 4 mon­ths and not having recei­ved a mili­ta­ry speciality.

src: click

OH, dass die nach Kurk gehen, wur­de den Eltern und Rus­si­an inde­pen­dent media out­let Agenstvo(re-launched Proekt) bei der Ange­lo­bungs­ze­re­mo­nie am 03. August mitgeteilt?

ALSO DREI TAGE VOR DEM UKRAINIGSCHEN ANGRIFF?

On 6 August 2024, during the ongo­ing Russo-Ukrainian War, the Ukrai­ni­an Armed For­ces laun­ched an incur­si­on into Russia’s Kursk Oblast and clas­hed with the Rus­si­an Armed For­ces and Rus­si­an bor­der guard.[34][35][36] [AND A FUCKING SHITTON OF CONSCRIPTS!]

src: click

Klar dreht das DiePresse.com jetzt so hin als ob Russ­land die jetzt als Ver­stär­kung an die Front schi­cken würde!

Nein, die wur­den in den Regio­nen sta­tio­niert in denen Russ­land garan­tiert nie­mals ange­grif­fen hät­te. Aber die Ukrai­ner hat ein­fach Grund­wehr­die­ner sehr ger­ne ein­kas­siert. Und ist des­we­gen mit Lie­be und Freu­de und zur Stär­kung der Ukrai­ni­schen Moral in Russ­land einmarschiert.

Das blen­den wir aus, und aus ner Mel­dung dass die noch am 03. August nach Kursk soll­ten machen wir “Putin schickt Rekrui­ten an die Front gegen die Ukraine!”.

Das ist deutsch­spra­chi­ger Jour­na­lis­mus. HURENWICHSER.

DRECKSMEDIEN.

Ein herz­li­ches FUCK YOU auch an die US Diens­te die das jetzt anders hindrehen.

Die Quel­le auf die sich diepresse.com bezieht wür­de von mir über eine Goog­le­su­che nach den Begrif­fen Mut­ter von Grund­wehr­die­ner in Mur­mansk aus­fin­dig gemacht. Ist ja nicht so als ob die ver­fick­te scheiss ver­hur­te DRECKSdiePRESSE.com ihre Quel­len ver­lin­ken würde.

Das braucht sie ja nicht - auch wenn sie wie heu­te dadurch lügt, dass wie­der NIEMAND, auch nur nen FUCKING DRECK, nach­re­cher­hiert hät­te. Brau­chen wir ja nicht. DiePresse.com hat ja in Öster­reich die Deutungshohheit!

Well I’ll be darned.…

20. August 2024

Mode­ra­tor feeds the expert the ukrai­ni­an pro­pa­gan­da line.

King’s Col­le­ge Lon­don expert tells him: “Well, the­re are a cou­p­le of mili­ta­ry aims, its pro­bab­ly not so much the crea­ti­on of a buf­fer zone.”

Dass ich das noch erle­ben darf! Auf mei­ne alten Tage…

Ich bin ganz gerührt. *sniff*

Reisner Interview ist soeben bei NTV online gegangen

19. August 2024

https://www.n-tv.de/politik/Die-Kursk-Offensive-ist-ein-Hochrisikospiel-der-Ukraine-article25168189.html

Es wur­de auch ein Inter­view in Video Form geführt, aber von NTV so stark gekürzt, dass es sinn­los ist das zu konsumieren.

Great! Nato can now intervene in all wars!

19. August 2024

Kie­se­wet­ter has found the logic loophole!

As soon as Nato gives wea­pons to [other coun­try], wea­pons beco­me wea­pons of [other coun­try], so this is suf­fi­ci­ent to con­form with inter­na­tio­nal law (for Germany)!

So lets use an examp­le here.

Say, the US is pro­vi­ding all the mass bom­bing infra­st­ruc­tu­re, ammu­ni­ti­on and launch capa­bi­li­ty for Isra­el to des­troy 80% for the gaza strip, this through the act of “gif­ting tho­se wea­pons to isra­el” beco­mes “ent­i­re­ly suf­fi­ci­ent to have tho­se wea­pon ship­ments con­form with inter­na­tio­nal law”.

Ah final­ly someo­ne that can exp­lain to the ger­man peop­le rea­li­ty in an easy an clear man­ner (again).

Of cour­se this was the second per­son that ger­man media in its ent­i­re­ty cho­se to inter­view on the ques­ti­on, if the ukrai­ni­an attack on rus­sia should be con­si­de­red con­forming with inter­na­tio­nal law.

Hey - you cant see anything wrong with that, becau­se if you do you will lose your job as a jour­na­list and be ost­ra­ci­zed by ger­man spea­king society.

Deplat­forming dis­sen­ting voices is such a gre­at cul­tu­ral tool of the Wertewesten…

Becau­se peop­le mani­pu­la­te epis­te­mes like the gos­pel in church, and then sim­ply through repea­ting them over and over again in your media out­lets at prime­time, they beco­me the de fac­to truth to the majo­ri­ty of people.

You just need a Kie­se­wet­ter, and then shout down every human being more intel­li­gent than he is, whe­re­ver you see them.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut abgrund­tief und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Wel­che Werte?

Hump­ta, Hump­ta tröt, Bier und Blas­mu­sik? Mia san mir, und de ondan mög ma net?

Kie­se­wet­ter mei­ne Damen und Herrn. Kom­ple­xer als das darf es wirk­lich nicht mehr werden.

Putin coun­ter on this inter­view (becau­se of what Putin, will think, thinks, will do, feels, will think we think, and didnt expect) hit right about 15 on this inter­view I think -- I’m not bra­ve enough to watch it again to count.

First part, second part

19. August 2024

First Part:

DW try­ing to push the pro­pa­gan­da line into the public with the grace and pert­ness of a pres­su­re washer.

Second Part:

Secu­ri­ty Ana­lyst with his own firm try­ing to stay poli­te, while not agre­eing with any point the DW pro­pa­gan­dists have made, so others might still use his consultancy.

Defi­lee: Mode­ra­tor not catching in the least whats going on here.

Gut, dass DW ja nie die Pro­pa­gan­da ent­deckt dies selbst mit aller Kraft in die Öffent­lich­keit presst.

edit:

Same issue complex - 

CNN Repor­ter for once in her life gets the wor­d­ing right.

Head Mode­ra­tor: “Volo­dym­yr Zelen­sky, mean­while, con­firms that the goal of Kiev’s mili­ta­ry incur­si­on into Kursk, now near­ly two weeks old, is to pre­vent Rus­si­an cross-border attacks by crea­ting a buf­fer zone. It comes as Ukrai­ne atta­cked stra­te­gic brid­ges in the Rus­si­an bor­der regi­on. [Hor­ray ground vehi­cles now have issu­es clo­sing in! Final­ly! No rus­si­an ground inva­si­on into Sumy!]

CNN’s Clai­re Sebas­ti­an, joi­ning me now live in Lon­don with more.

Clai­re, I mean, the attack on the brid­ges is clear­ly meant to dis­rupt, you know, the rus­si­an sup­ply lines. How big of an impact could this have on the eas­tern front lines, whe­re Rus­sia is advancing?”

Emma Clai­re: “That’s real­ly not clear yet. [Thats value wes­tern jour­na­lism speek for “cur­r­ent­ly, none at all”. The the one par­ti­al rail line lea­ding to Char­kiev is not­hing that Rus­sia espe­cial­ly needs. And the­re is no other stra­te­gic impact whatsoever.]

Ama­ra, I think more immedia­te­ly, the attack on tho­se brid­ges could help rein­for­ce this who­le idea of a buf­fer zone. Right? Stop Rus­sia from brin­ging in more rein­for­ce­ments and more equip­ment into the part of the Kursk regi­on that Ukrai­ne now has estab­lis­hed a foot­hold [in]. The­re, I think in terms of the Eas­tern Front is clear that Moscow con­ti­nues to devo­te a lot of ener­gy to this.

It has rede­ploy­ed some for­ces, we know, based on various reports from, pla­ces like Cri­mea, perhaps even Kali­nin­grad, up to Char­kiev. But it is not it is much less wil­ling to rede­ploy for­ces away from Donezk to, to defend Kursk.

And that is becau­se they con­ti­nue, as you say, to inch for­ward. We know that there’s fier­ce figh­t­ing in several vil­la­ges, to the east of Cha­rietsk, which is a small town, but still strategic.

And in the big­ger mili­ta­ry strong­hold of Bokrovsk, which is still was held by Ukrai­ne, they are now evacua­ting civi­li­ans with some degree of urgen­cy, for­ci­b­ly evacua­ting fami­lies with child­ren, essen­ti­al­ly say­ing that the Rus­si­ans are far too clo­se for comfort.

So a very important not only mili­ta­ry hub but sort of trans­port inter­sec­tion lea­ding to other, mili­ta­ry strongholds.

So that would be a major loss for Ukraine.

So I think the mes­sa­ge Rus­sia is sen­ding that is that even though this has hap­pen­ed, their ter­ri­to­ry has been inva­ded in Kursk. They are not giving up on their goals in Ukraine.”

CNN Head Mode­ra­tor: “And it’s remar­kab­le. Yes. Two weeks in that. We’­re tal­king still tal­king about Ukrai­ni­an held ter­ri­to­ry insi­de Rus­sia! Do we have any indi­ca­ti­on from Ukrai­ne? How much far­t­her, how much lon­ger it will go into Russia?”

Emma Clai­re: So I think what is clear at this point, some almost two weeks in, is that the pace of the first week whe­re the ele­ment of sur­pri­se was still the­re, Rus­sia was still at sort of sho­cked by the who­le thing. That has defi­ni­te­ly slo­wed. We’­re not see­ing the kind of light­ning advan­ce that we saw at the begin­ning. They are still, accord­ing to the Ukrai­ni­ans, edging for­ward in some are­as, one about 30km to the north of the town of Sud­scha, which was whe­re the initi­al ass­ault was focu­sed, a town that they now claim to ful­ly hold.

And what we’­re also see­ing, of cour­se, is this consolidation.

They’­ve ope­ned a mili­ta­ry office in such, the brid­ges speak to that as well. The, the explo­si­ons on on tho­se two brid­ges that we’­ve now, con­fir­med it’s all about sort of buil­ding up their for­ces and their con­trol in their, in the ter­ri­to­ries they cur­r­ent­ly hold, becau­se, of cour­se, they con­ti­nue to main­tain that this is defen­si­ve. And they need to stop Rus­sia from using the regi­on to fire back into Ukraine.”

Head mode­ra­tor: “Emma Clai­re Sebas­ti­an repor­ting for us the­re from Lon­don. Thank you very much.”

So Emma Clai­re will pro­bab­ly lose her job for that kind of imper­ti­nence. Doub­ting the offi­cial ukrai­ni­an pro­pa­gan­da line and hin­ting at this being not the actu­al rea­son - will lose you your job in this business.

As we all know the job of a repor­ter is to say yes to the ques­ti­ons put to her by the head mode­ra­tor in all aspects of Ukrai­ni­an offi­cial rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­ons for actions in this war.

Oh, so ein Zufall, die Ukraine wusste ja mal wieder von nichts…

18. August 2024

War doch nur eine der ers­ten Erfolgs­mel­dun­gen der Ukrai­ne, dass man sich jetzt durch den Angriff auf Russ­land die “Aus­tausch­kas­se” an Sol­da­ten wie­der auf­bes­se­re. Hurra.

Also welch ein Glück, der “Raid” der Ukrai­ner rein in das am wenigs­ten ver­tei­dig­te Gebiet an der ukrai­ni­schen Gren­ze, traf in Kursk auf *trom­mel­wir­bel bit­te* RUSSISCHE GRUNDWEHRDIENER, die gar­nicht an der Gren­ze ste­hen hät­ten dürfen!

src:

MEINE GÜTE, SO EIN ZUFALL!

Und vor denen muss­te die Ukrai­ne Sumy schüt­zen und brauch­te dazu trotz null Droh­nen Toten in den letz­ten 3 Mona­ten in der Regi­on, und den gesamt vier Kriegs­to­ten die auf liveuamap.com in den let­zen drei Mona­ten ver­merkt sind -- unbe­dingt noch eine 40km lan­ge Buf­fer­zo­ne, bei ner Grenz­län­ge in Sumy von 185km… Denn auf der ande­ren Sei­te stan­den ja - rus­si­sche Grundwehrdiener.

(Ohne zuvor eine Eva­ku­ie­rung der eige­nen Bevöl­ke­rung im Grenz­be­reich ein­ge­lei­tet zu haben, die begann ja erst am Tag 4 und beinhal­te­te dann nur die ers­ten 10km Tie­fe, denn hät­te man 20km gewählt hät­te man ja das SICHERE SUMY STADT eva­ku­ie­ren müs­sen, in das ges­tern noch die gan­zen Omis aus der Grenz­nä­he gebracht wor­den sind. Und der ARD Kor­re­spon­dent auf Erlebnisreise.)

Und in die­ser Puf­fer­zo­ne pas­siert auch im Moment gera­de über­haupt nichts -- die Grenz­re­gi­on zu Kursk wird aktu­ell nicht ein­mal bewacht. Denn - *Trom­mel­wir­bel bit­te* die Ukrai­ne hat mal kurz eine Nach­rich­ten­sper­re aus­ge­ru­fen, die der CNN Kor­re­spon­dent hier (sowie die Repor­ter der NZZ) über­gan­gen hat um (unter ukrai­ni­scher Füh­rung) kom­plet­te Städ­te zu zei­gen in denen es kei­ne mili­tä­ri­sche Prä­senz abseits von Sol­da­ten in Zivil, und ukrai­ni­schen Sol­da­ten in Klein­wa­ren­ge­schäf­ten beim Ein­kau­fen gab:

Gut, sind jetzt nicht unbe­dingt die bes­ten Bil­der, wenn sie da Grund­wehr­die­ner raus­fah­ren. Lie­ber nur von hin­ten zei­gen, sie wis­sen schon, auf einem Toyo­ta Pick­up wäh­rend der Fahrt, oder mit Papier vorm Gesicht, mit Kle­be­band rund um den Kopf festgeklebt…

Also - Wäh­rend die Ukrai­ne ihr kom­plett ruhi­ges Sumy von fuck­ing Grund­wehr­die­nern durch nen immer noch völ­ker­rechts­wid­ri­gen Angriff (sor­ry, ich kann das das huma­ni­tä­re Völ­ker­recht lesen, ich kann nach­re­cher­chie­ren, wie vie­le Leu­te im letz­ten Halb­jahr in Sumy unge­kom­men sind ich brauch die Pro­pa­gan­da Line nicht, die jetzt bereits Lars Kling­beil wie­der­ho­len muss…) und eine grö­ße­re Buf­fer­zo­ne durch einen Angriff schüt­zen woll­te, wäh­rend es die eige­ne Bevöl­ke­rung am Tag vier des Ein­marschs aus einer 10km Grenz­z­oh­ne nach Sumy Stadt eva­ku­iert (20km vor der Gren­ze) von wo aus die Ukrai­ne den Angriff auf Russ­land GESTARTET HAT, und die ein­zi­ge Stadt im Grenz­ge­biet mit mehr als 2000 Ein­woh­nern pro km2 -- klar, brin­gen sie da die Eva­ku­ier­ten hin und dazu noch kurz davor ne Nach­rich­ten­sper­re aus­ru­fen muss­te, um dann in Grenz­nä­he in den Tagen dar­auf genau gar­nichts zu tun - und immer noch alles dar­an zu set­zen den Angriff aus­zu­wei­ten, also wäh­rend­des­sen, schafft es die NZZ zu berich­ten, dass --

DIE KÄMPFE BRUTAL HART WÄREN!

Über­schrift NZZ.

Bru­tal hart.

Moment was war noch­mal deren Quelle?

Oh - Das Boas­ting eines fuck­ing ukrai­ni­schen Sol­da­ten (Ich drück mir ja die Dau­men, dass der in Deutsch­land aus­ge­bil­det wor­den ist!), der gegen Grund­wehr­die­ner kämpft…

Dmi­tro hat sei­nem Kame­ra­den einen Ener­gy­drink mit­ge­bracht. Sie gehö­ren zu einer Ein­heit von Funk­auf­klä­rern. «Bru­tal schwie­rig» sei­en die Kämp­fe. «Die Rus­sen schies­sen mit Rake­ten und Droh­nen auf uns.» Kürz­lich zer­stör­ten sie den Last­wa­gen, der ihnen das Essen brin­gen soll­te. «Zwei Tage lang sas­sen wir hung­rig in unse­rer Stel­lung. Aber wir haben es ihnen hart gegeben.»

src: click

Ja -- war­um hat die Ukrai­ne Sumy bloß ange­grif­fen??!?!? Die wer­den ja sicher nur gewusst haben, dass Kursk schwach ver­tei­digt wird, aber nicht WER DORT RUSSLAND VERTEIDIGT!

Sicher. Das wird ihnen die US sicher nicht gesagt haben, als sie ihnen das Sat­teli­ten­über­wa­chungs­mat­te­ri­al in Echt­zeit über­mit­telt haben…

Aber so ein guter Zufall auch, dass das jetzt für die Rus­si­sche Mili­tär­füh­rung wirk­lich ein ech­tes PR Pro­blem ist, da Grund­wehr­die­ner an der Gren­ze nicht sta­tio­niert sein hät­ten dürfen…

Oh, WAR DAS DIE ZWEITE PR LINE, WESSHALBS SO GUT GEKLAPPT HAT, ALSO KURSK, dass Putin dadurch öffent­lich unter Druck käme?!

Komisch… Wo doch der NTV Kor­re­spon­dent berich­tet, dass das den Rus­sen (bis auf den Ver­trie­be­nen) recht kom­plett egal ist

Hmm, woher wuss­te die Ukrai­ne denn so genau, dass das für Russ­land ein Pro­pa­gan­da Desas­ter wer­den wür­de? Wuss­ten die etwa, aus wel­cher Regi­on die­se Grund­wehr­die­ner waren? Näm­lich nicht aus den ent­le­ge­nen Tei­len Ingu­sche­ti­ens und Kaukasiens?

Nein, also so tief wür­de die Ukrai­ne sicher nie sin­ken. Dass sie des­halb Russ­land angreift!

Dass das Grund­wehr­die­ner sind, das haben ihnen die US sicher­lich nicht gesagt, als sie ihnen die Live Sat­teli­ten­bil­der intra­ve­nös ins Nasen­loch appli­ziert haben…

Das war ein­fach eine kom­plett freu­di­ge Überraschung!

Gut - jetzt erst mal Nach­rich­ten­sper­re ver­hän­gen und alle Rät­seln las­sen, was wohl der Sinn die­ser unglaub­lich mul­ti­fa­cet­ten­rei­chen Offen­si­ve war!

Land beset­zen. Ein­gra­ben. Hal­ten. Grund­wehr­die­ner ein­sa­cken. Erleb­nis­srei­se für die in Deutsch­land auf deut­schem Gerät aus­ge­bil­de­ten neu­en Sol­da­ten, Moral stär­ken … Sumy, sichern - ach­so ja … nein, das noch nicht so … ne Puf­fer­zo­ne solls ja nur wer­den, damits auch völ­ker­rechts­kon­form war. Und dabei regie­rungs­in­tern noch schön viel dar­über Schwa­feln, dass das jetzt ein Raid sei:

Sie wis­sen schon - eine - as good friends in Ukrai­ne would put it:

Ukrai­ne is sta­ging “Offen­si­ve Defen­si­ve Operation!”

Aber unse­re Deutsch­spra­chi­gen Medi­en sind ja wie­der­mal unfä­hig dar­aus ein kon­gru­en­tes Bild zu malen.

Fahr in die Au mit mir Marie, lass uns dort ein paar Grund­wehr­die­ner holen! Die tausch ma dann gegen eige­ne Sol­da­ten aus -- ja ist Mit­te Sep­tem­ber denn schon Weih­nach­ten, sor­ry Ras­pu­tiza, wäh­rend der Russ­land das Land nicht zurück­er­obern kann?!

Und wie sehr das Putin bla­mie­ren wird!!

Wirk­lich?

So - jetzt mal so als jemand der Krisen-PR im Stu­di­um hat­te, Putin hat alles rich­tig gemacht -- das größ­te Pro­blem aber noch vor sich.

Klei­nes Geld­ge­schenk an die ver­trie­be­nen (100 Euro) als Ges­te, den Vor­fall run­ter­ge­spielt. Prio­ri­tär und hart aus der Ent­fer­nung reagiert, aber nichts wesent­li­ches dort hin­ver­la­gert (die Ukrai­ne ist mitt­ler­wei­le mit 15.000 Mann drin). Zuge­si­chert, dass man es wei­ter prio­ri­tär behan­deln wür­de. Weit­räu­mig eva­ku­iert, und es dann auf “dar­um küm­mern wir uns, wenn wir sonst nichts zu tun haben” Prio­ri­sie­rung gesetzt, wäh­rend er trotz­dem genü­gend Gerät hin­ver­setzt um die schnel­len Expe­di­ti­ons­vor­stö­ße der Ukrai­ne sehr ver­lust­reich zu gestal­ten. Denn alles ande­re wäre falsch und wür­de in Russ­land das Augen­merk dar­auf rich­ten, war­um hier Grund­wehr­die­ner an der Front gestan­den haben.

Die­se gesell­schaft­li­che Dis­kus­si­on wäre in Russ­land der GAU. Und sie wird noch nicht geführt, dh - die kommt noch auf Putin zu… Und mit raus­re­den oder Schuld dele­gie­ren ist da nichts -- denn dass da nur ver­se­hent­lich Grund­wehr­die­ner an der Front gestan­den haben, glaubt nicht mal das rus­si­sche Volk sei­ner Führung.

edit: Kor­rek­tur:

The initi­al for­ce in the Kursk area was FSB Bor­der Tro­ops, Akhmat figh­ters from Chech­nya, and local ground for­ces units taken from the Moscow or Lenin­grad mili­ta­ry districts. Now, they have brought in addi­tio­nal for­ces sub­or­di­na­te from the Lenin­grad and Moscow mili­ta­ry districts — some of them are con­scripts,” said Dara Mas­si­cot, a seni­or fel­low at the Car­ne­gie Endow­ment for Inter­na­tio­nal Peace.

src: click

Laut FT kamen die Grund­wehr­die­ner erst als Verstärkung.

edit2: GEIL, DIE FT LÜGT!

Moscow Times (head­quar­te­red in Ams­ter­dam, seit dem rus­si­schen media Crack­down (wiki)), ver­weist dies­be­züg­lich auf ein wei­te­res “unab­hän­gi­ges rus­sisch­spra­chi­ges online Por­tal [gegrün­det in Euro­pa]” -- das fol­gen­des berichtet:

On August 6, during the bre­akthrough of the Ukrai­ni­an mili­ta­ry into the ter­ri­to­ry of the Kursk regi­on, more than 100 con­scripts ended up on the bor­der, accord­ing to Vorstka’s inter­lo­cu­tors. “Verst­ka” mana­ged to talk with sol­di­ers who came under fire and spent several days in the forests. Accord­ing to them, “ever­yo­ne knew” that the Ukrai­ni­an Armed For­ces were pre­pa­ring to attack, but the­re were no inst­ruc­tions from the com­mand in this regard.

In order not to miss new texts from “Lay­out”, sub­scri­be to our tele­gram channel

How con­scripts ended up at the border
Dozens of con­scripts who ended up in the Kursk regi­on ser­ved in Klint­sy, Bryansk regi­on - in mili­ta­ry units 12721 and 91704. From the­re, at least sin­ce May, they began to be sent to the bor­der with Ukraine.

[…]

Alex­an­der, a con­script from St. Peters­burg, with whom Vorst­ka mana­ged to talk, says the same thing. “Yes, ever­ything was fine, we went to the out­fits, several sup­port workers, whe­re we took turns for 2–3 days,” he says. — This is Rub­ansh­chi­na, Gon­cha­rov­ka, towards the bor­der. At that time the­re were more than 150 con­scripts in the area. But the­re were both con­tract sol­di­ers and bor­der guards from the FSB. We all rota­ted con­stant­ly. [ ] It’s easier the­re, there’s no stu­pid army jer­king off.”

[…]

Two of Vorstka’s inter­lo­cu­tors claim that the­re could have been more than 100 con­scripts on the bor­der by the time the figh­t­ing began. The vol­un­teer who pre­pa­red lun­ches for the sol­di­ers said that in are­as near Sudzha the­re were 15 posi­ti­ons, and each of them inclu­ded conscripts.

src: click via: click

Boah BEINHART. ENORM. Klar dass da die Ukrai­ne Kursk angrei­fen mussten.

Glo­ry, Glo­ry to Ukrai­ne - for ass­aul­ting and cap­tu­ring 18 year olds!

Bildschirmfoto 2024 08 18 um 20 54 07
src: click

Bildschirmfoto 2024 08 18 um 20 56 13
src: click

Das war ja so gut für die Moral der Ukrainer!

Sla­va and fuck­ing Sla­va your Sla­va you fuck­ing assholes.

Von denen Russ­land dann noch mehr an die Front schickt? Wobei - laut FT, die hat schon mal die die schon dort waren weg­ge­schrie­ben. Braucht ja nie­mand zu wissen…

Back­ground zur Hauptquelle:

Bildschirmfoto 2024 08 18 um 21 02 05
src: click (goog­le translated)

Kol­ta con­ti­nues the pro­ject “Jour­na­lism: Revi­si­on” with a con­ver­sa­ti­on that Kse­nia Luchen­ko has with the editor-in-chief of “Verst­ka” Lola Taga­e­va. “Verst­ka” appeared only a year ago and beca­me the flagship of new media working abroad. How did this happen?

— You deci­ded to launch a new media out­let when the war star­ted. That is, you were still in shock, not­hing was clear, the world was col­lap­sing, edi­to­ri­al offices were evacua­ted to Istan­bul, Bish­kek and whe­re­ver — and then Lola came along and laun­ched a new Russian-language media out­let in Euro­pe. How did that even hap­pen? And why did you need it at that moment?

— A year later I’m alrea­dy thin­king: God, why did I sign up for all this? Not a day goes by that I don’t think: I could have lived peacefully.

In fact, the sto­ry was like this. I had alrea­dy had a break from jour­na­lism for several years, I moved to Pra­gue and worked on gen­der pro­jects. I pro­mo­ted the Moscow Fem­Fest fes­ti­val , around which we came up with various pro­grams, trai­nings, edu­ca­tio­nal sto­ries. And then we laun­ched Moscow Male­Fest about men in the modern world, about modern mas­cu­lini­ty, about Rus­si­an men. If we trans­la­te from aca­de­mic lan­guage into ordi­na­ry lan­guage, we figu­red out how atti­tu­des and gen­der socia­liz­a­ti­on affect the qua­li­ty of life.

I worked in poli­ti­cal jour­na­lism for many years, as an edi­tor, editor-in-chief in Rus­si­an inde­pen­dent media, and I bur­ned out, I felt hopeless. When we star­ted doing gen­der edu­ca­ti­on, I clear­ly unders­tood what my effect was. The topic of domestic vio­lence beca­me main­stream, I felt my small, but belon­ging to the fact that it was no lon­ger taboo. It was important for me to feel that what I was doing was use­ful. By the begin­ning of 2022, we had many com­mer­cial pro­jects, we con­duc­ted trai­nings for lar­ge com­pa­nies for a thousand peop­le. And what I was doing in poli­ti­cal jour­na­lism, as it see­med to me, was no lon­ger use­ful, it was just end­less chro­ni­cles of the apocalypse.

But after Febru­a­ry 24, I didn’t under­stand how all this could con­ti­nue, how I would con­ti­nue to earn money and work only on gen­der pro­jects. I saw how some media out­lets, whe­re I once worked, were clo­sing, relo­ca­ting, and reas­semb­ling — Nova­ya Gaze­ta, Dozhd (reco­gni­zed as a for­eign agent in the Rus­si­an Fede­ra­ti­on. — Ed. ). And others were incre­a­singly self-censoring, like RBC. I saw the dest­ruc­tion of the media befo­re my eyes.

At the same time, as a rea­der, I had a lot of ques­ti­ons, and I didn’t under­stand whe­re I could get ans­wers. This is not a com­p­laint about jour­na­lism. It was des­troy­ed, con­trol­led, per­se­cu­t­ed, impr­i­son­ed, they did ever­ything, jour­na­lists emi­gra­ted en masse.

src: click

Made my day

18. August 2024

[l] Lacher des Tages: Hey, wenn du schnell, drin­gend einen Exper­ten für Cyber­si­cher­heit, Daten­schutz und Geo­po­li­tik bräuch­test… an wen hät­test du da zuerst gedacht?

Doch künf­tig arbei­tet Oettin­ger für den chi­ne­si­schen Mode-Versender Shein. „Ich habe ein Man­dat als frei­er Bera­ter – eng begrenzt auf Cyber­si­cher­heit, Daten­schutz und Geo­po­li­tik“, sag­te Oettin­ger WELT.

Na das passt ja mal wie­der wie Arsch auf Eimer! (Dan­ke, Philipp)

src: click

Omi lebt jetzt in Sumy (Stadt)!

17. August 2024

Hur­ra!

Omi -

wur­de jetzt von Dör­fern in der Grenz­re­gi­on um Sumy nach Sumy Stadt evakuiert.

Der ARD Kor­re­spon­dent fin­dets auch super toll, dass die jetzt alle in Sumy sind!

WHAT?!

Gut insti­tu­tio­nel­le Unfä­hig­keit von Behör­den kennt man nicht nur aus der Ukrai­ne - aber wie zur FUCKINGING HÖLLE, bekommst du den ARD Kor­re­spon­den­ten dazu sich dar­über zu freuen?!

Also den ARD Kor­re­spon­den­ten der in der SELBEN VERFICKTEN Schal­te anmerkt -- ja, also vom Krieg bekommt man hier schon viel mit, man hört dau­ernd Ein­schlä­ge von Bom­ben und so..!

Aber die ukrai­ni­sche Ver­wal­tung weiß: DIE TECHNIK SCHÜTZT UNS… Und Demo­gra­phie und Sta­tis­tik sind uns wirk­lich kom­plett egal!

Also.

Grenz­re­gi­on Sumy. (185km Gren­ze und dann ein 40 km Streifen)

Sind fol­gen­de grö­ße­re Städ­te und Dörfer:

Swes­sa: 6800 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Hlu­chiw: 33000 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Putywl: 15000 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Buryn: 8800 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Borosch­ba: 7000 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Bilo­pill­ja: 18000 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Krasno­pill­ja: 8000 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)
Sumy: 264000 Ein­woh­ner (in guten Zeiten)

Bedeu­tet 96.600 Ein­woh­ner im Umland, und 264.000 Ein­woh­ner in Sumy.

Sumy Stadt Flä­che: 95 km²

Sumy Umland Flä­che: 185km (Gren­ze) * 40 km (Grenz­strei­fen): 7400 km² Fläche.

Sumy Stadt Ein­woh­ner pro Flä­che alt: 2780 Ew pro km2
Sumy Umland Ein­woh­ner pro Flä­che alt: 13 Ew pro km2

Jetzt eva­ku­iert die Ukrai­ne ein Drit­tel der Ein­woh­ner des Umlands nach Sumy rein:

Sumy Stadt Ein­woh­ner pro Flä­che neu: 3120 Ew pro km2
Sumy Umland Ein­woh­ner pro Flä­che neu: 9 Ew pro km2

Hey GEIL! Moment, was ver­sucht Russ­land gera­de wie­der zu neh­men? Oh so nen Blob vor Sumy Stadt…

Bildschirmfoto 2024 08 16 um 14 42 25
src: click

Und hey was hat die Ukrai­ne gera­de gemacht? Mehr mensch­li­che Schutz­schil­de genommen?

Aber kei­ne Angst, DIE TECHNIK WIRD SIE SCHÜTZEN!

DER ARD Kor­re­spon­det FREUT SICH SCHON SO!

Auch wenn er täg­lich meh­re­re Ein­schlä­ge und Bom­ben hört, weil die sind hier ja irgend­wie ganz in der Nähe, und irgend­wie ist das auch wirk­lich Ter­ror für die Zivilbevölkerung…

So - und dann noch etwas Grin­sen, und noch etwas davon schwa­feln, dass die ARD doch eh immer alles sau­ber berich­tet hät­te (sel­ber Beitrag!).

Gott­sei­dank ist Omi jetzt in Sumy!

Oder wie ich gelernt hab mir kei­ne Sor­gen zu machen, und ein­fach den Qua­li­täts­me­di­en zu vertrauen.

Gut die Omi war auf dem ein­sa­men Bau­ern­hof aus dem sie die ukrai­ni­schen Sol­da­ten raus­ge­zerrt haben aber auch wirk­lich nicht mehr sicher…

Oder die Ukrai­ne hat­te kei­ne Sol­da­ten mehr um die Grund­ver­sor­gung in den länd­li­chen Regio­nen sicher­zu­stel­len, und die Sol­da­ten woll­ten eigent­lich auch nicht mehr soweit fah­ren, da haben sie ein­fach alle nach Sumy gebracht!

Glän­zen­de Idee! Der ARD Kor­re­spon­dent freut sich auch wirk­lich sehr!

Ein­mal im Leben so dumm sein, wie der durch­schnitt­li­che Deut­sche, ach könnt ichs nur noch erleben…

Super - der Qua­li­täts­jour­na­lis­mus hier wie­der, wirklich:

Hier noch ne zwei­te Omi die nicht gehen wollte:

edit: Mich beschleicht so eine Ahnung, dass Omi gera­de wegen ein paar Minen gehen muss­te, also Minen die Ukrai­ne in den nächs­ten 6 Mona­ten noch streu­en wird müssen…

Die Ukrai­ne hat aktu­ell näm­lich nur einen Strei­fen von 10km Brei­te eva­ku­iert (nicht 40km um Leu­te von Artil­le­rie­feu­er zu schüt­zen), und - ehm.… 10 km brauchst du für drei­fach gestaf­fel­te Ver­tei­di­gungs­an­la­gen… Die sie ja eher nicht in Russ­land bau­en wol­len wer­den. Über 185km Länge…

Wir sehens ja dann spä­ter eh in den Karten.