Haben wir da vielleicht noch gutes Kompromat rumliegen mit dem sich Deutschland selbst belasten könnte?
Aber natürlich.
Die Russen haben da wieder mal wen abgehört…
Die deutsche Luftwaffe wurde abgehört, sie wollen die Krim-Brücke mit Raketen angreifen + überlegen, wie man Deutschland in den Krieg involvieren kann, ohne dabei aufzufliegen. Deutschland will und wird einen Weltkrieg auslösen. Zum fucking dritten mal. pic.twitter.com/UBvaUNK2HG
…wenn man aktuell aufgrund der Nawalny Geschichte Assange nicht “in seinen mehr oder minder gesicherten Tot in einer geschlossenen Anstalt” in den US ausliefern kann.
Nun, man verschiebt den Schiedsspruch der Anhörung beim letzten möglichen Termin vor der Auslieferung Assanges.
Dann sind dann nicht mehr so viele Leute vorm Gericht, und auch nicht mehr so viele EU Abgeordnete, und vielleicht auch nicht mehr die UN-Sonderberichterstatterin für Folter, …
Achja, und im Gerichtsaal nebenan in dem die Verhandlung vor Journalisten live übertragen werden sollte, fällt dann natürlich die Mikrophonübertragung aus, da kann man leider nichts machen.
Ich meine - wer kennt das nicht…
“Ein Datum für die Verkündigung der Entscheidung ob die Berufung zugelassen wird, wurde nicht genannt.”
Naja, man hat ja noch Jahre Zeit fürs in der Schwebe halten…
edit: Es gibt aber natürlich auch wieder gute Nachrichten:
G20-Treffen gescheitert – Keine Einigung auf gemeinsame Abschlusserklärung
Die Finanzminister und Notenbankchefs konnten sich nicht auf gemeinsame Ziele einigen. Stattdessen sollte es nur eine Zusammenfassung der Gespräche geben
The good thing about Piers Morgan is, he is entirely void of any critical thought, so he always ends up acting as a sponge for any propaganda narrative that ever crept up out there - so this is a showpiece on how to become a star journalist - by working entirely off of US propaganda scripting.
Here are all the questions Morgan asks during his recent Mearsheimer interview:
“Explain to me the state of the world right now, how worried should we be?”
Answer: I think pretty worried. [Great way to start an interview on youtube, holds the viewers attention and everything!]
“I want to ask you about two of your positions, and correct me if they’re not your positions, but I think I’m right in saying that you draw a distinction between the merits of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and as opposed to China’s potential Invasion and takeover of Taiwan. In the case of one you think america should intervene, but in the case of Ukraine you don’t think America should be gettin involved, what is the ideological difference here, for those who are watching from the sidelines.”
Answer: There is no ideological difference, it is a difference in relative importance to challenging the US role as the worlds hegemon. China is a great power rivaling the US, Russia not so much.
“If you take your interpretation of Putins motivation [Nato enlargement], I mean I would take issue with that, because I think Is a former KGB guy who never thought the Soviet Union should be broken up, he would love to restore it as much as he could, he sees himself as a Kind of modern day Zar, I think he has an extraordinary disregard for human life, I think he’s become a sort of mafia boss, running a gangster country, and I think he just took his opportunity to illegally invade a sovereign democratic country whether he likes it or not, that’s what Ukraine is, and if the West allows him to get away with this, I would not be remotely confident that he would not want to then stomp his way through into other countries, so why are you confident he wouldnt want to do that.”
Answer: There has been no factual proof for your opinion whatsoever. Neither in what he said, nor in what he wrote. Ever. He never said that. He never indicated that. He never played with that image.
“With all respect professor, why would you believe Vladimir Putin if he told you what the weather was, I mean the guy is a serial liar [he is not, in the past, all war pretexts excluded, russia was always exceptionally transparent in their foreign policy directives - including why they went to war this time around, that they would go to war about this, just not “when”], I judge people by their actions. All I’m seeing is a russian dictator, illegally invading a sovereign democratic country and seizing large junks of it, causing absolute mayham and I see to my surprise a lot of american commentators, particular on the conservative side, who seem fairly relaxed about letting Putin keep the land he’s stolen, and that would never have happened in conservative circles 30 year ago, I’m kind of mystified, why you would allow Putin to win.”
Answer: There is no evidence to support your view, that Putin is out on an imperialistic endeavor.
[The actual answer here being, that Mr. Morgan might find it hard to deal with the fact, that 30 years ago Britain was an imperialistic power, rectifying its wars with bullshit like “public image” and honor, but in reality this is not why wars are fought. Because all of that is propaganda. Don’t tell Mr. Morgan though.]
Answer: No Piers, the question is why did he invade Georgia and why is he at war with Ukraine? It all goes back to the 2008 Nato summit, where Nato membership was set as the target for those two countries.
“Well, you are putting a lot of good faith into Putin, taking him at his word [because, yes thats mostly how foreign relations work, countries usually dont lie for 16 years to then do exactly what they had warned their adversaries all those 16 years about to “become zars”], I would argue that what Putin has done in the last few years, illustrates exactly why it was the correct decision to try to move countries like Ukraine into Nato, because they were always going to get attacked and invaded by Putin, if he thought he could get away with it [this is not how and why wars are started (because someone personally thought they’d get away with it)] and what concerns me no is that I think he is going to get away with it, because I can see the american support so absolutely crucial to hold russia off, or even for them to prevail is disappearing, because of the conservative right is putting huge pressure to stop any funding going to ukraine which I again think is a real sea change in the conservative rights view of people like Vladimir Putin.”
Answer: Ukraine is losing and even the 60 billion would not make a difference in that. [Because its manpower, Artillery shells, and air superiority they are lacking and never getting back in a war of attrition, where those three elements are key].
“But the truth is, if Ukraine would have kept their nuclear weapons, I dont think Putin would have done this, and secondly if Ukraine had been fast-tracked into Nato I dont think Putin would have done this. He would not have attacked another Nato country, knowing that there is THATAGREEMENT, THATIFYOUATTACKONEOFTHEMTHEYALLWILLATTACKYOUBACK, so in a way you could say it is a chicken and the egg problem.”
Answer: Yes I agree with you that Putin wouldnt have attacked, but this isnt how it turned out is it?
[Actual answer: This is hardly a chicken and the egg problem, if both sides openly told each other and the public what would happen, and Nato chose to expand anyhow, against Macrons and Merkels wishes, because we absolutely need a war in europe, and its so very fucking convenient to blame that on “principles of open door policies that need to be uphold” WHENYOUAREEXPANDINGNATOFORTHEFIFTH (edit: sorry, I factchecked myself, turns out - tenth) TIME. Also that Putin was worried because of rapid economic developent in Ukraine, because of the EU membership is something you cant even try to prove in any fucking way. Its made up conjecture, not backed up by any economical figures beforehand - so unless you know that for sure, because you have an insight into what caused that decision to be made internally its fucking Propaganda. But stupid public likes narrative! Also there is the tight integration of the EU into Nato, that also comes into play, when joining the EU is on the table, because there are bilateral defense agreements that trigger, that always include Nato forces, which then - for “readiness” start to deploy troops in your country -- you know the stuff, that never gets picked up in public debate for a reason…]
“Ann Applebaum called you a usefull idiot though!”
Answer: Her predictions never come true, mine do. She has to attack ad hominem.
“I watched Putin’s interview with Tucker Carlson the other day and he talked about this [the Ukraine having rejected a peace offer at the pre war lines of contact with neutrality as the only demand from the russian side (as well as an agreement about the number of arms that can be stationed in the Ukraine)] and blamed Boris Johnson for sqandering the peace deal telling Selenskyj not to do any deal with Putin, but I watched Putin and I saw somebody who’s for for example - his half hour rambling answer to to Carson’s first question giving his version of the history uh was so completely skewed to one way of thinking, to Russia’s way of thinking and the rest of his his general demeanor in that interview suggested to me a narcissist a quite delusional guy uh a pretty nasty piece of work certainly not somebody that I would instinctively want to trust, did you watch the interview and did you feel comfortable about absolutely trusting what Putin says”
Answer: Are you an idiot, Morgan? Are you asking me what I feel? Well not really - but I the blogger, am ending this here, simply because of concerns about my blood pressure.
Later on Mearsheimer explains that Stoltenberg now has publicly declared for the third time, this week, that he (who will be gone (replaced) in about half a year) thinks russia attacked, because it wanted to prevent Ukraine becoming a member of Nato. But Piers still wants to ask if you feel that you’d trust Putin, trust Putin.
Which coincidently was the ukrainian propaganda line on March 20th, when the Selenskyj government had to signal to the US, that they were not becoming a neutral country:
But you’d never know, from watching Bumblefuck Idiotfaces videos. I mean its just Piers Morgan, but when you get shown how FUCKINGIDIOTIC the western “why we need this war” narrative is condensed in a one hour time period, it just underlines how the Propaganda works so well.
Putin is just another Hitler hellbent on getting his Poland as “Lebensraum” for his shrinking population, in a country with an even faster shrinking population, and it was such a pitty, that we didnt expand Nato faster, because he would always have done that, and we could have prevented it.
Then why didn’t Putin annex the Donbas, when the leaders of the separation movement asked for it and instead went with Minsk 2 first, which he believed in as a compromise, preventing a war?
Well --- you know, he violated Minsk 2 you know…
The same Misk 2 ukrainian propagandists on Al Jazeera will now tell you was “null and void, because it was forced upon the people of Ukraine by its ouside partners!”
Why cant we deindustrialize Europe for longer says the independent conservative commentator from the UK, bringing one “pax britannia” argument, well “pax americana” argument after the other. 30 years ago, we would have shown him, this would never have been even a question! Because how dare Putin, and we have a face to keep!
Ok. War ends in 6 years as planned by Wasley Clark?
In the Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom posting, I alluded to the promise of higher pensions in Crimea under the russian occupation, which was partly why Ukraines eastern demographic (which is also older) voted for upholding economic ties with russia.
Turns out, in reality there are huge caveats with this “view”:
Socio-economic development
Before the annexation, Russia has promised Crimeans an increase in wages and pensions. In 2015, the average wage in Crimea increased by 68 euros (up to 330 euros) compared to previous Ukrainian wages. Over the next period, the average earnings of Crimeans increased to 452 euros, but they have declined to 423 euros since 2020. The modal wage (received by the vast majority of the working population) is about 300 euros. Almost 18% of Crimeans receive a wage of less than 172 euros.
The situation with pensions is similar: the average pension was slowly growing during the occupation period and reached 166 euros in 2021. However, this figure does not correspond to the real situation due to the significant number of retired military who have actively settled on the peninsula after the annexation and have a significantly higher pension. So, the real pension coverage for most Crimean pensioners is not more than 130 euros.
Along with the transition to Russian wages and pensions, Crimea applies Russian prices for goods and services that are significantly higher than the Ukrainian ones. Accordingly, prices increased by 43% (for products – by 53%) in 2014, and by another 28% (by 23% for products) in 2015. In the following years, inflation rates slowed to 5-7% per year, but in 2021, food inflation was 11% in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and 14% in Sevastopol.
Russia has invested significant funds in Crimea (more than 17 billion euros during the occupation period), but most of this money was spent on large-scale infrastructure projects (“Crimean Bridge”, Taurida highway between Kerch and Sevastopol) and the military industry.
src: click (University of Turku, Finland (2022))
see also:
From Russia with love
While the Crimean economy has done well on a surface level since its annexation, the region has received more than a little bit of help. Huge subsidies from Moscow have been a mainstay since 2014, fluctuating between $1bn and $2.7bn per annum (see Fig 1). These figures are not necessarily putting a significant strain on Russia’s economy, which is the world’s 12th-largest by nominal GDP, but they do appear to be contributing to a slowdown (see Fig 2).
Just a few months after Crimea formally rejoined the Russian Federation, Moscow launched a programme called the Socioeconomic Development in the Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol. The initiative has a budget of RUB 669.6bn ($10.06bn), 95.9 percent of which comes directly from Russia’s federal budget.
Gut, vor zwei Tagen wurde auf allen Seiten noch von fünf mal mehr Toten gesprochen, aber jetzt wo Mediazona plötzlich russische Tote um den Faktor 5 niedriger einschätzt als US Senatoren, sind die ukrainischen Toten laut Selenskyj um den Faktor 2.3 auf 31.000 gesunken.
Was enorm erstaunlich ist, denn ein unabhängiges ukrainisches Projekt hat in der Vergangenheit bereits 47.000 getötete ukrainische Soldaten gelistet, deren Validität durch Mediazona in Zufallsstichproben verifiziert werden konnte.
Dann stelle im Februar 2024 fest, dass du 60% drüber bist, und korrigier dann deine EIGNEN Opferzahlen auf dem Papier um 34% nach unten - also gegenüber dem was bereits durch open Source Quellen bestätigt wurde, DIENICHTMALHOCHRECHNEN!
(Mediazona hat eine Hochrechnung veröffentlicht. Dh. 50.000 gezählt, und 75.000 hochgerechnet.)
Setzen wir den Faktor (+50%) bei den gezählten getöteten ukrainischen Soldaten des unabhängigen ukrainischen Portals an, kommen wir auf 70.500 getötete Ukrainer (Hochrechnung) von denen Selenksyj heute 31.000 gemeldet hat. Nice.
Sauber rechnen mit dem ukrainischen Staatsoberhaupt.
Wasley Clark “I believe this is a war that lasts another 6 years, but then the Ukraine can win!”. Fuck you.
Second off:
Mr. I’m Responsible for the Messaging “We need to tell western populations, that this is about the western world and western values to get them on board”. Fuck you
Third off:
Mr. “I’m an entrepreneur, and the more I think about this, I think we are going to win this in the long run”. Fuck you. Why? Later.
Fourth off:
Media: “Russia is trying to play the long game here - Putin thinks he can win in the long run!” Yeah, narrative fits like a glove, dont you think?
Also fuck you.
Because of what “another 6 years” means. (Thats basically contingency planning for another failed offensive.)
Also fuck you for “I think about the Ukraine war as ending in Taiwan.”
Fuck you especially for that, Wasley Clark.
To the people that are dumb enough to fall for that - please do.
I scream in agony, each and every day.
(Also word to the russians - I’d not plan on the ukrainian Artillery capability to “catastrophically fail five months from now”, like that one guy said into the microphone on stage - because “he wanted to be very open and helpful”. Actually, plan for the opposite being the case.
Just a hunch.)
edit: On second thought - just listen to Wasley Clark, guys…
General thinks you need 500 aircraft, and that a tactical nuke is probably likely to be droped on Ukraine in the upcoming 6 years the fighting will still prolong - and that you need to toughen up and face this as Ukraine. Because, and I quote “You are fighting the battle for western civilization . We can finish it here.”
Just make that your main messaging towards european political leaders from now on and see where it takes you..
Also that reliance on “combined tactical forces” seems like a disaster in the making - because of new capabilities in the electronic warfare space. Disrupting just one class of military devices seems far more likely to become a factor going forward. So to amplify power - sure, but to depend on that structurally? Well - I’m totally out of my depth here, so -- seems wrong… 😉
edit: John E. Herbst (former (2003-2006) US Ambassador to Ukraine):
“The problem we have in the framing of the war in Ukraine is that we frame it as the war in Ukraine, therefore it is perceived especially by people in the United States who are not focusing on foreign policy, that this is not an american [western] problem. If we frame it precisely - we have an aggressive nuclear super power, who has identified the United States as is principle adversary if not its enemy, and every day senior russian officials, Narishkin, Putin, the russian media Samaljov [Solowjow?], Simonjan, talk about the nasty things they want to do to the United States, if we understand that this is a problem about containing an aggressive Kremlin, not a problem of helping the poor Ukrainians, the response would be very different. We need a policy of containment of an aggressive Russia, which is actually going to set the way for a more aggressive China. We frame it that way, we can win this fight.
[…]
Wednesday the Atlantic council organized a conference advocating containment of russia, as an american policy. Our leaders have to start to point this out every day. The white house has to do this, our leaders in europe have to do this. If repetition is a way to get this accross, we do that - we can change the debate, thank you!”
Yeah, fuck you. For that lie you’re pandering, but I’m sure the german news media will be very willing to accommodate and follow your feverdreams - and just fuck over the public perception, like they did for the past two years.
Fuck you for the suggestion to take russian TV propaganda as the template for reality.
Fuck you.
edit: In more “Wait, what?!” news: According to the Centre of Eastern Studies, Russia blew up the Nova Kachowka dam, so the Ukrainians “could not bring over Himars to target the Kertsch Bridge from the other side of the river”.
Yeah, about that… yeah…
Wanna draw lines from Robotyne?
Maybe rethink that, before it becomes part of our history books… Thanks.
Propaganda hat aber schon wieder niemand entdeckt, was will man machen…
Orange line is the world average in any given category!
Lets goooo!
Overall score: A mostly unfree country well below the world average!
Property rights: A mostly strongly repressed country, well below the world average!
Judicial effectiveness: A mostly strongly repressed country, well below the world average!
Government Integrity: A mostly strongly repressed country, well below the world average!
Tax burden: A mostly tax burden free country, well above world average, because we politicians get our money from oligarchs, why should we bother with taxes!
Government spending: A mostly repressed country, well below the world average! No taxes, remember? What should we spend money on? Pensions for the russian speaking old folks in the east?! Ha. Lets pivot toward EU membership, young generation - lets go!
Fiscal health: Well healthy enough for the US military industrial complex to sell us and our neighbors four years of weapons on credit alone! Mostly free, so well above the world average!
Business Freedom: Hey, good news, finally world average! So moderately free! Good on you Blackrock for buying all that farmland already! You must have felt totally free to do so!
Labor freedom: Moderately free: For the first time in 2022, jumping two entire categories in that year alone. Ok, who bought off the regulator? Or… The result of finally increasing the countries grain production capacity by 10x?
Monetary freedom: Below the world average! Mostly free! At least you can buy what you want! Or could, before the war!
Trade Freedom: Constantly above world average, mostly free - but sinking, having lost an entire category in the past five years!
Investment Freedom: Strongly repressed! Well below world average!
Financial Freedom: Strongly repressed! Well below world average!
Can we get any media statements on that? Well of course we can!
Ukraine: A nation at war, yet firmly on the path to EU membership (part 1)
Ukraine: A nation at war, yet firmly on the path to EU membership (part 2)
Co-Funded by the European Union!
Become a journalist they said, do reporting and research they said. Visit Alpbach they said, great opportunities - for the right people they said!
Stimmungsbarometer: 8 von 10 deutschsprachigen Journalisten sind begeistert.
Propaganda hat aber wieder niemand entdeckt.
Vielleicht kann man das mal mit einer Zusammenfassung der Rede kontrastieren die Selenskyj vor etwa einem Jahr im österreichischen Parlament gehalten hat:
30.03.2023, 17:30
Selenskyj hielt Videoansprache im Parlament
Der ukrainische Präsident Wolodymyr Selenskyj zeigte sich überzeugt: Die Ukraine wird siegen und ihre Menschlichkeit und Moral bewahren.
Der ukrainische Präsident Wolodymyr Selenskyj wurde für eine Rede live ins österreichische Parlament zugeschaltet. Es ist der 400. Tag des Krieges. Der Präsident machte besonders auf die vielen zivilen Opfer in seinem Land aufmerksam. Selenskyj bedankte sich auch für die Unterstützung durch Österreich.
Der ukrainische Präsident sagte: Wenn die Ukraine um Hilfe bittet, bittet sie um Unterstützung dafür, Leben retten zu können.
Sein Land wollte sich nicht in das Leben anderer Menschen einmischen. Die Ukraine wollte nie etwas haben, das ihr nicht gehört. Die Ukraine will Sicherheit und Ruhe, Freiheit und Glück für ihre Kinder, in ihrem ukrainischen Haus.
Selenskyj sagte auch: Er ist überzeugt, dass die Ukraine in diesem Krieg siegen wird. Er ist überzeugt: Das Land wird seine Menschlichkeit, seine Zivilisiertheit und seine Moral bewahren. Und seinen Glauben daran, dass das Böse immer verlieren wird.
To see Herbadl Igor Micholaiowitch you have to fast forward trough the speeches of Justin Trudeau, Giorgia Meloni and Ursula von der Leyen.
Justin Trudeau and Giorgia Meloni were zyloning a bit, because the Ukraine bought microphones with that faulty chinese chipset, that is known for causing this audio artifact, when they are plugged in for more than one hour.
But it doesnt matter, because during von der Leyens speech, the Ukraine, simply rebooted their entire audio system, and after two minutes of dead silence, while von der Leyens mouth was still moving, the cyloning was gone.
So the speech of Herbadl Igor Micholaiowitch, hero of Ukraine, could be captured in full clarity.
Also - if you dont understand what Meloni was saying, because of the audio artefacting going on in parallel - just imagine, that for her two year anniversary, Moma got what she always wanted, a new gigantuous vacuum cleaner, delivery ready from Hostomml Airport, Ukraine. Which she loved with all her heart.
If you are not so much interested in Herbadl Igor Micholaiowitch, hero of Ukraine - then you could also watch the second press conference, held subsequently, indoors:
But then you would miss Herbadl Igor Micholaiowitch, the hero of Ukraine. And his medal. As well as all the other heroes.
The true, unfiltered authenticity, that can only be experienced, by watching press material in its entirety on the European Commissions youtube channel.
Grüße an Alpbach, bitte.
edit: In verwertbareren Nachrichten, die NZZ hat jetzt eine interaktive Karte des zweiten Kriegsjahres online: click
Der Standard hat es heute zusammengebracht ein Kommentar von Aleksander Palikot, Visiting Fellow am Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (IWM) in Wien, einem Journalisten mit Veröffentlichungen unter anderem bei Radio Free Europe, in “Krytyka Polityczna”, “New Eastern Europe” und der “Jüdischen Allgemeinen” -
- als Kommentar der Anderen zu bringen.
Ganz mein Humor.
Die gesamte Chef-Redaktion ist ideologisch auf “Interview Panel mit Nuland bei CSIS” Niveau, also jeder einzelne Talking Point den Nuland dort raushaut, mit einer Ausnahme - findet sich 1:1 in der “Berichterstattung” des Standard dieser Tage wieder.
In Vollabbildung, dh. Meldung, Argumentation, Gewichtung, Fazit. 30 Talkingpoints, durch die Bank weg.
Das IWMVienna bringt uns seit zwei Jahren ukrainische Propagandisten frei Haus, und das mit einer Regelmäßigkeit, dass sich bereites Gäste in Veranstaltungen offen erfreut darüber gezeigt haben, wie oft sie den ukrainischen Botschafter dort in der ersten Reihe bei Veranstaltungen sehen -- aber noch viel, viel schlimmer -
inklusive der gefeatureten Veranstaltungsrunden mit “Journalisten”, die sich dann als Gründer von Meinungsforschungseinrichtungen erweisen, die gerade Staatliches Ukrainisches Kriegsmessaging an der eigenen Bevölkerung testen, bevor es verwendet wird. Die selben Propagandisten (Gumenyuk) finden wir dann als Moderatoren auf der jährlichen Hauptveranstaltung der Ukrainischen PR am Rande von Davos wieder, wo sie wieder Nuland interviewen - und als Moderatoren ihre eigenen Projekte “die Geschichtsschreibung der Ukraine neu zu definieren” weiterführen dürfen, die sie selbst ein halbes Jahr zuvor bereits im IWMVienna angekündigt haben “We have Snyder to write our past, but we lack people writing narratives for our future”.
Und jetzt wo das IWMVienna endlich wieder einen neuen visiting Fellow hat, der eh bereits bei Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty publiziert (die ansonsten nur Clips der ukrainischen Propaganda - ungefiltert, gerne immer zu frisch geliefertem neuen Kriegsgerät mit Aufmacher: “30 cm entfernt berichtet unser Reporter embedded im Ukrainischen Militär - wies sichs damit so schießt, toll schießt sichs damit!” raushauen)…
… bringen wir das, im Standard, als Kommentar der Anderen.
Fairer Konsens
Mit jedem Monat wächst die Notwendigkeit, einen neuen Gesellschaftsvertrag zu schmieden, aber ein fairer Konsens ist während eines umfassenden Krieges unmöglich.
In den Straßen von Wien und anderer ruhiger europäischer Städte herrscht auffallende Stille, und nur in dieser Stille kann man hören, was hinter Europas unglückseliger Kriegsstrategie steckt: Gleichgültigkeit. Die passive Haltung des Westens, der direkte Hilfen für die Ukraine von vornherein ausgeschlossen hat, und der sich abmüht, ohnehin nur unzureichende Unterstützung zu gewinnen, all das versetzt uns in die Lage eines ängstlichen Beobachters der Gewalt. Wir täuschen uns, wenn wir glauben, dass wir uns gegen das Böse abschirmen können und nicht von ihm angesteckt werden. (Aleksander Palikot, 24.2.2024)
aber unser verfickter vom Standard als “ein [ganz ein] Anderer” gefeatureter Scheinoppositioneller ist schon wieder so besorgt, dass Europa (EUROPA!) den Krieg nur hinauszögern und garnicht gewinnen will!
Wie viel neue Soldaten wollte Selenskjy unlängst nicht mehr rekrutieren um ein Rotationssystem zu haben, und hat dafür Saluschnyj gefeuert? Achso, ja - scheisse.
Und außerdem ist das ja die einzige Sorge die man als jemand mit “anderer Meinung” im Moment haben darf.
Diese Gesellschaft ist das absolut grotesk und abartigst Allerletzte.
Es ist beinahe physisch nicht mehr möglich Gesellschaften noch mehr zu verarschen. Wir sind bereits absolut am Limit.
Zum Glück können wir aber noch darauf vertrauen, dass der durchschnittliche Bürger dieses Landes wirklich ein komplett bildungsferner Vollidiot ist -- und immer noch glaubt, dass er Qualitätsmedien, die seit eineinhalb Jahren wissen, dass “die Ukraine gewinnen muss, weil verlieren keine Option ist” weiterhin uneingeschränkt vertrauen können wird.
Die werden ihm auch in Zukunft die kritischen Stimmen bringen die im kleinen Kreis von den Eigentümern von Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty vorgegecastet wurden.
Nur aus Interesse, wer ist denn das so?
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) is a United States government funded media organization that broadcasts and reports news, information, and analysis to countries in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the Middle East where it says that “the free flow of information is either banned by government authorities or not fully developed”.[7][8]
Ja genau, die Nachrichten, die US staatlich finanziert sind, von den US die nicht mal mit NPR einen Newschannel haben, der staatlich finanziert wäre -- aber für die Länder die sich leider keine freien Medienorganisationen leisten können, haben sie einen, deshalb geben wird denen auch nicht CNN oder BCC, sondern Radio Free Europe meine Damen und Herren.
Schalten sie auch morgen wieder ein, wenn es dort heisst:
And of course.
Und ein Autor von denen wurde soeben vom Standard in der Rubrik “Meinung der Anderen” gefeatured.
Mit dem Knaller-(Alternativ-)Meinung “Die Europäer tun zu wenig für den Sieg der Ukraine”.
Es geht nicht mehr - wir sind bereits bei maximaler Öffentlichkeitsverarsche angelangt. Mehr schwarz ist weiß ist nicht mehr möglich. Das ist das Maximum.
Propaganda hat aber natürlich wieder niemand entdeckt.
Und hier noch als Belohnung fürs bis zum Ende dranbleiben, ÜBERRASCHUNG! DIEMEINUNGDESANDERENISTEXAKTDIEMEINUNGFÜRDIEDASATLANTICCOUNCILVOR 19 STUNDENEINPANELABGEHALTENHAT! UMDENEUROPÄERNAUFDENZAHNZUFÜHLEN!
Als gute Alpbacher glauben wir ja das was der Chef glaubt. Und der hat den Kuleba um ein Statement gebeten. Und der hat wieder Violinenmusik aufgelegt.
“Weeeeen die Uuuukraiiine fääällt, fääällt auch Taaaaiiwaaan.”
Im ganzen Saal ist es so ruhig geworden, und alle haben interessiert zugehört.
Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies um die Nutzungserfahrung für seine Besucher zu verbessern. Bitte informiere dich bei Gelegenheit darüber wie sich Cookies auf deine Privatsphäre im Web auswirken.
