Autorenarchiv

The not at all staged attack on Mariupol maternity ward

23. November 2023

I final­ly could source a 1080p copy of “20 days in Mariupol”.

… fea­turing Vla­di­mir, the hand­ler of the (wait for it) -

Mstys­lav Cher­nov wider­spricht sich erneut

Che­vron shopping!

Wis­sen sie noch in Mariupol!?

- Cher­nov crew.

So lets count spe­cial unit bad­ges and appearan­ces of peop­le with the Donezk regi­on poli­ce head­quar­ters emblem on their jackets, why not?

Nor­mal poli­ce unit guy, and his buff nor­mal poli­ce unit friend (you know, the one with a head­lamp), tel­ling the jour­na­lists were to go to get to the mater­ni­ty ward (they saw smo­ke, so they went. First up a sky­s­cra­per to film the smo­kes source of cour­se, then to the mater­ni­ty hospital).

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 09 27

First Donezk regi­on poli­ce head­quar­ters badge:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 10 31

Beau­ti­ful badge, ori­gin 501st Sepa­ra­te Bat­tali­on of the Mari­ne Infan­try of the Ukrai­ni­an Navy:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 15 16

Unknown badge, ori­gin still to be determinded:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 16 39

Second unknown badge, ori­gin still to be determined:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 18 23
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 19 38

Shoul­der patch of the patrol poli­ce of Mariu­pol:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 18 54

Ah, hi, whos that? We know her!
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 21 00

She feels fine.
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 21 07

So does this lad next to her with the nor­mal ukrai­ni­an poli­ce emblem on his head:

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 21 25
Oh, also the lad with the second “Donezk regi­on, poli­ce head­quar­ters” emblem on his shoulder!
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 20 51

Oh look, its the crater!
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 22 13
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 22 29

[CUT]

[Below] Third Donezk regi­on, poli­ce head­qua­ters badge at the sce­ne. Its a litt­le hard to see, zoom in if you have to. Tho­se guys are real­ly eager first responders!

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 24 12

Oh look! Its Vla­di­mir! The Cher­nov Crew hand­ler in Mariu­pol! Who was on the Mater­ni­ty ward bom­bing site!

The guy who will later dri­ve the Cher­nov Crew out of Mariu­pol in his Hyun­dai! The guy that accord­ing to two Cher­nov inter­views they met at the sce­ne “by acci­dent!” The guy that the Cher­nov crew didnt know befo­re then! The guy that pro­bab­ly dro­ve them [on the same day] to whe­re they could find inter­net! To upload the mater­ni­ty ward bom­bing videos!

Look, he has some­thing to say into the came­ra! On the day of the Mater­ni­ty Hos­pi­tal bombing!

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 23 33
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 23 41
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 24 04
[Coin­ci­dent­ly also, the Mater­ni­ty Ward hos­pi­tal, not exact­ly in the cen­ter of Mariu­pol. But hey what gives. Vla­di­mir then swit­ches to eng­lish, addres­sing what they need from the inter­na­tio­nal com­mu­ni­ty at lar­ge. Vla­di­mir of cour­se only being a ran­dom poli­ce offi­cer with the Poli­ce head­qua­ters, Donezk regi­on badge on his shoulder.]

Rus­si­an tro­ops com­mit warcri­mes. Our Fami­ly. Our women, our child­ren, need help. Our peop­le, need help from inter­na­tio­nal socie­ty. Plea­se, help Mariupol.”

(He has to search for the word warcri­mes during the state­ment, so it doesnt seem excep­tio­nal­ly staged/prepared - may­be just asked for by the jour­na­lists, becau­se he alrea­dy gave a state­ment in ukrainian.)

TWO DAYS LATER:

Look its the Vla­di­mir guy again! With the Donezk regi­on poli­ce head­qua­ters emblem on his jacket!

In a dif­fe­rent hos­pi­tal! Whe­re, accord­ing to Cher­nov in the initi­al Al Jaze­e­ra Inter­view in march of 2022 was just “some poli­ce offi­cer”, pro­tec­ting the inter­net on the seventh floor of the hos­pi­tal the mater­ni­ty ward women were evacua­ted to! Whe­re Cher­nov and Crew found him by acci­dent! Again!

To then film the intro of the 20 Days in Mariu­pol docu­men­ta­ry the­re! Isnt that convenient?!

The same guy who later dro­ve Cher­nov and crew out of Mariu­pol in his Hyundai!

Through 15 rus­si­an check­points! To Freedom!

Which Cher­nov in two inter­views mis­re­pre­sen­ted by say­ing, that they were poin­ted “by a poli­ce offi­cer, in a cel­lar to which they were evacua­ted” towards some cars, that “were about to dri­ve out of the city” whe­re they -at random- found a fami­ly with which they escaped. End­an­ge­ring the fami­ly mem­bers lives! With their mate­ri­al. Which the poli­ce offi­cers never copied. Alt­hough it alrea­dy was a topic of dis­cus­sion in the UN secu­ri­ty coun­cil. Which the edi­tor which Cher­nov was in con­ta­ct with told Cher­nov. Through 15 rus­si­an checkpoints!

Look, he still has got his Poli­ce Head­qua­ters Donezk regi­on badge on!

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 13 51 26

edit:

Final pro­c­lai­med pro­gres­si­on of the events, after watching all avail­ab­le sources.

- Jour­na­list are in Mariu­pol “alo­ne”, alt­hough every jour­na­list team in Ukrai­ne by that point needs to be accredi­ted by the Ukrai­ni­an Patrol Poli­ce, see click.
- Jour­na­lists see smoke
- Jour­na­lists go up a mul­ti floor buil­ding to film the source of the smo­ke, see - its a hospital.
- Jour­na­lists go there.
- Jour­na­lists first meet Vla­di­mir (their poli­ce hand­ler in Mariu­pol, also the most pro­mi­nent per­son with a Donezk poli­ce head­qua­ters badge on his jacket) the­re “by acci­dent”. Vla­di­mir over­he­ars them talking -

Our bat­te­ries were almost out of juice, and we had no con­nec­tion to send the images. Cur­few was minu­tes away. A poli­ce offi­cer over­he­ard us tal­king about how to get news of the hos­pi­tal bom­bing out.

This will chan­ge the cour­se of the war,” he said. He took us to a power source and an inter­net connection.

src: click
- Vla­di­mir makes a state­ment “what this was, and what we need from the inter­na­tio­nal com­mu­ni­ty now” into the camera.
- Vla­di­mir takes the Jour­na­lists to “the only spot in Mariu­pol whe­re the­re is still internet:

This will chan­ge the cour­se of the war,” he said. He took us to a power source and an inter­net connection.

src: click
- Jour­na­lists lea­ve Vla­di­mir, whom they met by accident:

In the dark, we sent the images by lining up three mobi­le pho­nes with the video file split into three parts to speed the pro­cess up. It took hours, well bey­ond cur­few. The shel­ling con­ti­nued, but the offi­cers assi­gned to escort us through the city wai­ted patiently.

Then our link to the world out­side Mariu­pol was again severed.

We went back to an empty hotel base­ment with an aqua­ri­um now fil­led with dead gold­fi­sh. In our iso­la­ti­on, we knew not­hing about a gro­wing Rus­si­an dis­in­for­ma­ti­on cam­pai­gn to dis­credit our work.

src: click Noti­ce also that by then they “had offi­cers assi­gned to them”.
- On the next day they meet Vla­di­mir again and film the last fire bri­ga­de sta­ti­on bom­bed by rus­si­ans in Mariu­pol. Then they return to the only spot in Mariu­pol with inter­net AGAIN, to upload the foo­ta­ge. The­re in the movie the line “its post the cur­few, so Vla­di­mir had to come with us” is men­tio­ned (see Docu­men­ta­ry (20 Days in Mariupol)).
- On the next day they meet Vla­di­mir again, who now is only with them, becau­se now the hos­pi­tal they want to go to on this day, to catch up with and film the women from the mater­ni­ty ward again - is in “the red zone”, so Vla­di­mir [their ran­dom acquaintance/their hand­ler in mari­pol] has to come. (see Docu­men­ta­ry (20 Days in Mariupol))

On March 11, in a brief call without details, our edi­tor asked if we could find the women who sur­vi­ved the mater­ni­ty hos­pi­tal [attack] to pro­ve their exis­tence. I rea­li­sed the foo­ta­ge must have been power­ful enough to pro­vo­ke a respon­se from the Rus­si­an government.

We found them at a hos­pi­tal on the front line, some with babies and others in labour. We also lear­ned that one woman had lost her baby and then her own life.

src: click

The­re in that hos­pi­tal, they try to find the mater­ni­ty ward - but the­re is no mater­ni­ty ward. They find some of the women having been trans­fe­red from the ori­gi­nal mater­ni­ty ward, and a doc­tor who can con­firm the death of the women (and her child) they filmed being trans­por­ted on the stret­cher, two days before. 

They try to lea­ve, with their escort asking for a way out, also having a Poli­ce Head­quar­ters of Donezk emblem on his jacket - pro­bab­ly Vladimir:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 16 36 28

But they cant lea­ve, becau­se in front of the hos­pi­tal the­re is a sni­per that had been seen, and the­re is an ongo­ing fire­fight, while peop­le are whee­led into the hos­pi­tal on stret­chers, by mili­ta­ry personal.

Then they hear a rum­ble. Tanks?

So now they go to the 7th floor of that hos­pi­tal, to their “obser­va­ti­on point” (see: Docu­men­ta­ry (20 Days in Mariu­pol)) OR - AGAIN “to send the video” (see Al Jaze­e­ra Inter­view from March 2022), from a dif­fe­rent spot, other than the only spot, whe­re they have a inter­net con­nec­tion in Mariu­pol (the spot Vla­di­mir show­ed them befo­re, which wasnt in that hos­pi­tal), whe­re they all of a sud­den have inter­net again, and all of a sud­den are with Vla­di­mir again -- going by this Al Jaze­e­ra interview:

We found them at a hos­pi­tal on the front line, some with babies and others in labour. We also lear­ned that one woman had lost her baby and then her own life.

We went up to the seventh floor to send the video from the tenuous inter­net link. From the­re, I wat­ched as tank after tank rol­led up along­side the hos­pi­tal com­pound, each mar­ked with the let­ter “Z” that had beco­me the Rus­si­an emblem for the war. 

src: click

Pick one of the nar­ra­ti­ves, whiche­ver you like best, really…

Or pick the one from the docu­men­ta­ry, becau­se in the docu­men­ta­ry, the­re is a voice over line “we need to send the foo­ta­ge, the­re is no con­nec­tion the­re, and we cant get to our car”.

Well too bad for the 10 news­out­lets that pushed the actu­al inter­view with Cher­nov that sta­ted other­wi­se (went to the 7th floor to send the video using the inter­net in the hos­pi­tal), in march of 2022.

But that was befo­re the movie released at Sundance, in Novem­ber of 2023, of course.

To then, on the seventh floor - film the intro of 20 days of Mariupol.

Its tanks!

Then the­re is a time­cut in the docu­men­ta­ry - whe­re an insert is pla­ced about night­ma­rish fever­dreams of the past.

At just the moment whe­re in the initi­al Al Jaze­e­ra inter­view Vla­di­mir vanis­hes for a while…

The Ukrai­ni­an sol­di­ers who had been pro­tec­ting the hos­pi­tal had vanis­hed. And the path to our van, with our food, water and equip­ment, was cove­r­ed by a Rus­si­an sni­per who had alrea­dy struck a medic ven­tu­ring outside.

src: click

To see the vanis­hing sol­di­ers, look at the screen­shot befo­re, whe­re you see three soldiers.

The para­graph abo­ve also mis­re­pres­ents that time­li­ne wise, becau­se when they heard about the sni­per, right befo­re they tried to exit, Vla­di­mir was still with them, and so were ukrai­ni­an sol­di­ers (see pre­vious screen cap­tu­re), and Vla­di­mir was still with them later, when they first went to the 7th floor - but no big­gy. Vla­di­mir vanis­hed later that night.

Or actual­ly - in the docu­men­ta­ry, Vla­di­mir didnt vanish. Becau­se in the docu­men­ta­ry - Vla­di­mir used the last of his radi­os bat­te­ry, to con­ta­ct a spe­cial mili­ta­ry task for­ce, which res­cued them from the hospital.

Voice over line at 1:18:00 into the docu­men­ta­ry. (see: Docu­men­ta­ry (20 Days in Mariupol))

Which is inte­res­ting, because…

In ano­t­her Cher­nov inter­view - they were in the area, becau­se they were alrea­dy going through the battle­field, also… 

Has Vla­di­mir cal­led the 12 peop­le taskfor­ce to the hospital?

Well, who can say exact­ly… Not Chernov.
Bildschirmfoto 2023 03 03 um 19 40 09
src: click , well - they alrea­dy were going through the battle­field and took us out. Is how this sen­tence ends.

Again, pick any nar­ra­ti­ve you like…

Becau­se in the Docu­men­ta­ry they - voice over line again, said “we were alrea­dy behind enemy lines” when they ent­e­red the hos­pi­tal -- with a hearty:

Sud­den­ly at dawn, a dozen sol­di­ers burst in, “Whe­re are the jour­na­lists, for f***’s sake?”

I loo­ked at their arm­bands, blue for Ukrai­ne, and tried to cal­cu­la­te the odds that they were Rus­si­ans in dis­gui­se. I step­ped for­ward to iden­ti­fy mys­elf. “We’re here to get you out,” they said.

The walls of the sur­ge­ry shook from artil­le­ry and machine-gun fire out­side, and it see­med safer to stay insi­de. But the Ukrai­ni­an sol­di­ers were under orders to take us with them.

src: click

Becau­se in the Al Jaze­e­ra Inter­view Vla­di­mir by then had vanis­hed, and Cher­nov - in a moment of prac­ti­cal heroi­cism had to iden­ti­fy hims­elf, which is why in the video inter­view lin­ked abo­ve the inter­view­er asked him (befo­re Novem­ber 2023), who had sent the res­cue team.

So pick any nar­ra­ti­ve you like, really.

Becau­se in the Al Jaze­e­ra Inter­view, the res­cue team also HAD THE ORDER to take them with them:

I loo­ked at their arm­bands, blue for Ukrai­ne, and tried to cal­cu­la­te the odds that they were Rus­si­ans in dis­gui­se. I step­ped for­ward to iden­ti­fy mys­elf. “We’re here to get you out,” they said.

The walls of the sur­ge­ry shook from artil­le­ry and machine-gun fire out­side, and it see­med safer to stay insi­de. But the Ukrai­ni­an sol­di­ers were under orders to take us with them.

src: click

So with Vla­di­mir at his side and also vanis­hed, the res­cue team that was alrea­dy in the area, burst into the hos­pi­tal with a “whe­re the fuck are the jour­na­lists”, becau­se they had the order to take them with them, becau­se Vla­di­mir who was with the jour­na­lists had radio­ed them with the last of the bat­te­ry in his radio and also stood right bes­i­de the journalists.

Again, you pick any nar­ra­ti­ve you like.

In the docu­men­ta­ry the­re is a time­cut (remem­ber?) so we see none of it. After the time­cut the­re is 5 minu­te of shaky cam foo­ta­ge of the extrac­tion though, so thats a plus. Which ends when they reach a van.

Then again helicopter/drone shots with poe­tic voice over. “The city is slow­ly dying, like a human being”.

Then in the docu­men­ta­ry they were dri­ven “to an area still under ukrai­ni­an con­trol”, which in the Al Jaze­e­ra inter­view was a dar­ken­ed base­ment, and in the other video inter­view lin­ked abo­ve an area in the city center.

Then the voice over sim­ply cuts to -- “then for days we tried to find a way to get out of the city” -- while in the Al Jaze­e­ra inter­view they meet ano­t­her poli­ce offi­cer! (Poli­ce offi­cer not a mili­ta­ry guy from their res­cue unit, important for later.)

Very likely Vla­di­mir, becau­se its the poli­ce­man that had said to them befo­re “show the world my dying city”, but also very likely not Vla­di­mir, in the Al Jaze­e­ra Inter­view its just “a poli­ce offi­cer” they met in the base­ment, because -

We reached an ent­ry­way, and armou­red cars whis­ked us to a dar­ken­ed base­ment. Only then did we learn from a poli­ce­man why the Ukrai­ni­ans had ris­ked the lives of sol­di­ers to extract us from the hospital.

If they catch you, they will get you on came­ra and they will make you say that ever­ything you filmed is a lie,” he said. “All your efforts and ever­ything you have done in Mariu­pol will be in vain.”

The offi­cer, who had once beg­ged us to show the world his dying city, now plea­ded with us to go. He nud­ged us toward the thousands of bat­te­red cars pre­pa­ring to lea­ve Mariupol.

It was March 15. We had no idea if we would make it out alive.

[…]

It didn’t feel like a res­cue. It felt like we were just being moved from one dan­ger to ano­t­her. By this time, nowhe­re in Mariu­pol was safe, and the­re was no reli­ef. You could die at any moment.

I felt ama­zin­gly gra­te­ful to the sol­di­ers, but also numb. And asha­med that I was leaving.

We cram­med into a Hyun­dai with a fami­ly of three and pul­led into a five-kilometre-long (3.1-mile-long) traf­fic jam out of the city. Appro­xi­mate­ly 30,000 peop­le made it out of Mariu­pol that day — so many that Rus­si­an sol­di­ers had no time to look clo­se­ly into cars with win­dows cove­r­ed with flap­ping bits of plastic.

- becau­se Vla­di­mir who was with them all night, accord­ing to the docu­men­ta­ry, appar­ent­ly didnt tell them, why he had radio­ed in a res­cue team befo­re. Which took them in the morning, with orders to take “the Jour­na­lists”, but with Vla­di­mir (Poli­ce head­quar­ters Donezk regi­on) still bes­i­de them, alt­hough he also had vanis­hed (see Al Jaze­e­ra interview).

With the last of his radi­os battery.

Pick any nar­ra­ti­ve you want.

Then in the docu­men­ta­ry, Vla­di­mir still “insis­ted” that they should lea­ve Mariu­pol entirely.

But they go to the last func­tio­n­ing hos­pi­tal in the city first, on yet ano­t­her day, and film some more foo­ta­ge of peop­le in a hospital.

And a doc­tor unwrap­ping a dead baby in the hos­pi­tals basement.

With Vla­di­mir of course -
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 17 40 43
- who is STILL with them all­t­hough in the initi­al Al Jaze­e­ra Inter­view, they last spo­ke to him in the base­ment they were evacua­ted to by the spe­cial mili­ta­ry task force:

We reached an ent­ry­way, and armou­red cars whis­ked us to a dar­ken­ed base­ment. Only then did we learn from a poli­ce­man why the Ukrai­ni­ans had ris­ked the lives of sol­di­ers to extract us from the hospital.

If they catch you, they will get you on came­ra and they will make you say that ever­ything you filmed is a lie,” he said. “All your efforts and ever­ything you have done in Mariu­pol will be in vain.”

The offi­cer, who had once beg­ged us to show the world his dying city, now plea­ded with us to go. He nud­ged us toward the thousands of bat­te­red cars pre­pa­ring to lea­ve Mariupol.

It was March 15. We had no idea if we would make it out alive.

src: click
They lear­ned that from a poli­ce­man, not a sol­dier, mind you.

Then they “need to lea­ve” (accord­ing to the voice over).

We need to catch up with a con­voy. Vla­di­mir says, he can try to take us with his car. I tell him, that its dan­ge­rous, but he wants to help to get us and our mate­ri­als out. And he still hopes, that if the world saw ever­ything that hap­pen­ed in Mariu­pol, it would at least give some mea­ning to this horror.”

Then foo­ta­ge of them lea­ving the city through 15 rus­si­an check­points in Vla­di­mirs Hyun­dai, came­ras and hard­dri­ves hid­den under seats.
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 23 um 17 47 57

Then the­re is ano­t­her voice­over in the documentary:

Yes­ter­day I told one of the offi­cers who extrac­ted us from the hos­pi­tal - “Thank you for saving us.” He said: “Thank you for tel­ling the sto­ry of this city.”

Which is kind of stran­ge, becau­se -- again, in the Al Jaze­e­ra interview:

We reached an ent­ry­way, and armou­red cars whis­ked us to a dar­ken­ed base­ment. Only then did we learn from a poli­ce­man why the Ukrai­ni­ans had ris­ked the lives of sol­di­ers to extract us from the hospital.

If they catch you, they will get you on came­ra and they will make you say that ever­ything you filmed is a lie,” he said. “All your efforts and ever­ything you have done in Mariu­pol will be in vain.”

The offi­cer, who had once beg­ged us to show the world his dying city, now plea­ded with us to go. He nud­ged us toward the thousands of bat­te­red cars pre­pa­ring to lea­ve Mariupol.

That was a poli­ce offi­cer. Not a spe­cial mili­ta­ry task for­ce offi­cer. A poli­ce offi­cer, they see­med to know from befo­re (“who had once beg­ged us to show the world his dying city”), and the fol­lowing points in the CBS Front­li­ne Docu­men­ta­ry are ALL attri­bu­t­ed to Vla­di­mir exclu­si­ve­ly, again, all via voice over:

1. “They will get you on came­ra and they will make you say that ever­ything you filmed is a lie” said Vladimir
2. “All your efforts and ever­ything you have done in Mariu­pol will be in vain.” … you have to lea­ve the city, said Vladimir.
3. “He nud­ged us toward the thousands of bat­te­red cars pre­pa­ring to lea­ve Mariu­pol.” Vla­di­mir did. In the docu­men­ta­ry. More than once.

Oh well, you pick any nar­ra­ti­ve you like.

Which all is so gre­at to begin with, becau­se in this other inter­view, the Cher­nov crew is also dri­ven around Mariu­pol “by the patrol poli­ce”, and also dri­ven to the “patrol poli­ce head­quar­ters” (which the Docu­men­ta­ry never shows):

Bildschirmfoto 2023 03 03 um 20 02 47
Bildschirmfoto 2023 03 05 um 09 13 56
src: click

Which only beco­mes excep­tio­nal­ly gre­at, once you know, that the patrol poli­ce is the sec­tion of ukrai­ni­an poli­ce that holds clas­si­cal con­certs in their head­qua­ters around christ­mas, to which they invi­te jour­na­lists to, and also the insti­tu­ti­on that you need to be accredi­ted by, to film in the Ukrai­ne at all. Star­ting two days after the begin­ning of the invasion.

See:

Embed­ded Repor­ting == Front­li­ne Journalism

So in essence, it real­ly is so very gre­at, that they found their Vla­di­mir at the mater­ni­ty hos­pi­tal by accident.

Lie­be Grü­ße an das VERFICKTE ARSCHLOCH VON PSYCHOTHERAPEUTEN, der mich bei einem “Ent­las­tungs­ter­min” mit “jetzt hör ich mir das schon seit einer Stun­de an, hören sie mit dem Blöd­sinn auf” und “wie wärs mit einer Kur” aus der Betreu­ung getre­ten hat, mich dann an die Psych­ia­te­rin neben an ver­wie­sen hat, wo ich dann eine Stun­de spä­ter so aus­ge­zuckt bin, dass sie mir die WEGA nach Hau­se geschickt hat, die mir dann die Tür auf­ge­tre­ten hat, weil ich mich von ihr mit dem Spruch, “ich schließ mich jetzt zu Hau­se ein, und die ers­te Per­son die mir die Tür ein­tritt ***** ich ab” aus der Stun­de ver­ab­schie­det habe. Klei­ner Tipp, bis heu­te kei­ne psych­ia­tri­sche Dia­gno­se (also kei­ne psy­chi­sche Krank­heit außer einer mitt­le­ren Depres­si­on dia­gnos­ti­ziert) - die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Lie­be Grü­ße auch an Armin Wolf, der beim Inter­view des Pro­fils mit dem Rus­si­schen Bot­schaf­ter per Twit­ter alle Kol­le­gen ange­schrien hat, dass “die Behaup­tung das Atten­tat auf eine Kli­nik sei ges­ta­ged gewe­sen” die tiefs­te Pro­pa­gan­da gewe­sen wäre, die Armin Wolf in sei­nem bis­he­ri­gen Leben gese­hen habe.

Lie­be Grü­ße an die Kol­le­gen vom Pro­fil, die dar­auf hin nicht nur den rus­si­schen Bot­schaf­ter in Wien dis­kre­di­tiert haben, son­dern ver­laut­bart haben, die­se Äuße­rung des Bot­schaf­ters, die offen­sicht­lich Pro­pa­gan­da wäre - sei der Grund dafür, dass man in den öster­rei­chi­schen Medi­en, seit exakt die­sem Zeit­punkt die rus­si­sche Per­spek­ti­ve voll­kom­men raus­hal­ten müs­se -- denn selbst der rus­si­sche Bot­schaf­ter in Öster­reich ver­brei­te öffent­lich nur schwar­ze Propaganda.

Ach­ja, und lie­be Grü­ße an alle mei­ne zukünf­ti­gen Arbeit­ge­ber, ich bin nach einer Ein­sicht aller Quel­len auf der Sei­te des rus­si­schen Bot­schaf­ters in Öster­reich. Der rus­si­sche Bot­schaf­ter hat­te Recht. Das war gestaged.

Und Cher­nov lügt in sei­nen Inter­views. Nach­weis­lich. Und bekommt dafür Aus­zeich­nun­gen im EU Par­la­ment. Wäh­rend die Vic­tor Pin­chuk Foun­da­ti­on und das Pin­chuk Art Cen­ter Web­sei­ten (russianwarcrimeshouse.org) regis­triert und betreibt auf denen Pho­to­aus­stel­lun­gen der Cher­nov Crew bewor­ben werden: 

Embed­ded Repor­ting == Front­li­ne Journalism

Und die DREI Begeg­nun­gen Cher­novs mit Vla­di­mir sei­nem Hand­ler vom Poli­ze­haupt­quar­tier Donezk Regi­on waren kein Zufall. Also - nicht drei mal (Geburts­kli­nik Mariu­pol, ande­res Kran­ken­haus (beim Inter­net bewa­chen) in Mariu­pol) Zufall. An zwei (nein, drei) ver­schie­den Orten. (Nach dem ers­ten Tref­fen haben sich die Jour­na­lis­ten ja von den Poli­zis­ten den sie dort getrof­fen haben, und sie zufäl­lig über das Video reden hat hören ja noch ver­ab­schie­det - weil er war ja nur eine Zufalls­be­geg­nung…”) Und dann noch im Hyun­dai der sie aus der Stadt gefah­ren hat (sie­he Inter­view Cher­novs beim Sundance Film Fes­ti­val), an drei ver­schie­de­nen Tagen. Was Cher­nov zuerst in allen Inter­views ver­schwie­gen und aktiv miss­re­prä­sen­tiert hat.

Und jetzt sterbt ihr fuck­ing Schweine.

Der öster­rei­chi­sche Jour­na­lis­mus ist das abgrund­tief Allerletzte. 

Lie­be Grü­ße auch an die Stif­tung Concordia.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Das ist das Letz­te was ich in die­sem Blog jemals schrei­be - and thanks for all the fish.

Just utter skill

18. November 2023

Nach­dem es jetzt bereits Krei­se zieht, mach ich einen eige­nen Bei­trag draus:

Der Ver­fas­sungs­ge­richts­hof hat der aktu­el­len deut­schen Bun­des­re­gie­rung unter­sagt mit Gel­dern aus den Coro­na­fonds ihr Bud­get zu sanie­ren. Jetzt fehlt das Geld. Mit einem Blick dar­auf wofür das Geld bereits allo­ziert war, springt beson­ders ein Punkt ins Auge - die geplan­te Gleis­sa­nie­rung der Bahn. Die zuvor als Teil des Klima- und Trans­for­ma­ti­ons­fonds geear­markt war. Die Sanierung.

Gleis­sa­nie­run­gen sind das Para­de­bei­spiel das immer wie­der dafür ins Tref­fen geführt wird, war­um es öffent­li­che Ver­wal­tung gesell­schafts­theo­re­tisch braucht. Da der­art hohe lang­fris­tig akku­mu­lie­ren­de Einmal-Kosten, von kei­nem Unter­neh­men der Welt adäquat gema­na­get wer­den, da die­se über meh­re­re Manag­ment­ge­nera­tio­nen gebün­delt und dann auf ein­mal anfal­len und dies­be­züg­li­che Inves­ti­tio­nen daher ger­ne auf die nächs­ten Genera­ti­on abge­scho­ben wer­den. Also das Mus­ter­bei­spiel unter den “not under my watch” Pro­ble­ma­ti­ken der frei­en Markt­wirt­schaft. Also muss dafür seit jeher die Öffent­lich­keit her­hal­ten. Und da hat sich die­se deut­sche Bun­des­re­gie­rung gedacht, ver­schie­ben wir das (also die Sanie­rung der bestehen­den Bahn­in­fra­struk­tur) doch ein­fach mal in den Trans­for­ma­ti­ons­fond (einen “Zukunfts­fond”). Und zah­len den dann mit Covid Geld. Und als dann alles schon fer­tig ver­plant war -- bleibts halt lei­der beim Ver­fas­sungs­ge­richts­hof hängen…

HA.

Ehm. Gut, das kann unter einem Finanz­mi­nis­ter Lind­ner schon mal pas­sie­ren.. 😉 Infra­struk­tur brauchts in Deutsch­land ja eh kaum.

(via fefe)

A few moments later…

Nach Haus­halts­ur­teil
Esken will Schul­den­brem­se aussetzen
Stand: 18.11.2023 05:34 Uhr

SPD-Chefin Esken hat erneut dafür plä­diert, die Schul­den­brem­se für zwei Jah­re aus­zu­set­zen. Dies wür­de mehr Spiel­raum für staat­li­che Aus­ga­ben schaf­fen. Weder beim Kli­ma­schutz noch beim Sozi­al­staat wer­de man Ein­spa­run­gen zulassen.

src: click

Just another small Fiona Hill update

17. November 2023

So if you ever wan­ted to know how the pol­ling indus­try works in line with US for­eign poli­cy think­tanks to gene­ra­te public messaging - well, here is a bewil­de­ring example:

0
1
2

Here is the ent­i­re quote:

Shi­bley Tel­ha­mi: Let’s look at the next sli­de um which is what is “your impres­si­on of the per­for­mance of the fol­lowing par­ties in the Ukrai­ne war” and this is about Rus­sia is fai­ling and Ukrai­ne is uh suc­cee­ding. Let me tell you why - we have this mea­su­re, of cour­se the public does­n’t real­ly know whe­ther Rus­sia is is fai­ling or suc­cee­ding, but the the public forms a per­cep­ti­on, based on the coverage from the Press, what poli­ti­ci­ans say - um what the Ukrai­ni­ans say, what the Rus­si­ans say, and that impres­si­on we found throughout our pol­ling, to be high­ly cor­re­la­ted with the degree of sup­port. The more they think Rus­sia is fai­ling, the more they want to sup­port Ukrai­ne, the more they think Ukrai­ne is suc­cee­ding, the more they want to sup­port Ukrai­ne. So tho­se two mea­su­res about Rus­sia fai­ling and Ukrai­ne suc­cee­ding have been essen­ti­al. So to the extent that the­re is a chan­ge here, it is inte­res­ting not in the over­all, becau­se when you look at the total public uh all respondents there’s no chan­ge wit­hin the mar­gin of error, the chan­ges wit­hin the mar­gin of error, but the­re is a bit of a troub­ling shift wit­hin Demo­crats. So if you look at yeah um uh you know drop from 48 to 43% about Rus­sia is fai­ling and a big drop in Ukrai­ne is suc­cee­ding uh from 39 to 31% in Sep­tem­ber to Octo­ber and then one final sli­de I’ll show befo­re I ask you to react - which is a ques­ti­on that we only asked this time, becau­se it was about the coun­ter offen­si­ve we knew actual­ly in the spring, that a lot of peop­le were expec­ting a coun­ter expen­si­ve to see um, what - how it impacts you know the the cal­cu­lus of peop­le in terms of suc­cess of fail­u­re of Ukrai­ne. And I was obvious­ly -- initi­al­ly peop­le were hope­ful that the coun­ter offen­si­ve was going to be more suc­cess­ful, it it see­med to have bog­ged down may­be more than peop­le were expec­ting, uh befo­re at least, the public, but sur­pri­sin­gly it’s not uh as bad as I may have expec­ted, becau­se actual­ly it loo­ks like a plu­ra­li­ty of the public, 38%, say been some­what effec­ti­ve, only 5% say very inef­fec­ti­ve and 9% say some­what inef­fec­ti­ve, so obvious­ly a lot of don’t knows that you expect a ques­ti­on like that about 30%, but - you know the per­cep­ti­on about the coun­ter offen­si­ve is more - that it’s more suc­cess­ful than not suc­cess­ful, inclu­ding among Repu­bli­cans -- so that’s inte­res­ting and and obvious­ly pro­mi­sing from the point of view of sup­por­ting Ukrai­ne.

Any reac­tions you had?

Fio­na Hill: Yeah there’s a num­ber of reac­tions and I mean I know that you you know del­ve into a lot of the details in this I mean you just said yourself that a lot of it is shared by wha­te­ver peop­le are hea­ring poli­ti­ci­ans say and that might you know, very well you know, um uh I think um under­li­ned some of the you know issu­es and dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween Repu­bli­cans and Demo­crats, obvious­ly given you know the the fact that we’­re right in the midd­le now of um our pre­si­den­ti­al elec­tion cam­pai­gn and this has beco­me a domestic poli­ti­cal issue just like you know we alrea­dy said it is in Poland, or has been in Slo­va­kia and you know in Hun­ga­ry and you know else­whe­re whe­re you know ine­vi­ta­b­ly this is part of the fab­ric of uh poli­tics -- also in the media, I mean you know um the­re is a lot of um selec­ti­vi­ty in the way that um this is cove­r­ed by uh dif­fe­rent orga­niz­a­ti­ons some um news­pa­pers that peop­le are rea­ding have cor­re­sponds on the ground, others get it from wire feeds, a lot of peop­le par­ti­cu­lar­ly in youn­ger genera­ti­ons, and I know that you’­ve got some kind of age bra­cket, you know get­ting their infor­ma­ti­on from You­Tube and Insta­gram, you know…

Yeah, never mind that the majo­ri­ty of peop­le pol­led in the US got both of tho­se ques­ti­ons wrong - just - well, just com­ment that the fact that they did is -- obvious­ly pro­mi­sing from the point of view of sup­por­ting Ukrai­ne.

The­re is this say­ing in the pol­ling indus­try, that its not the results of the polls that are tel­ling about socie­ties pre­fe­ren­ces, its the chan­ging of the numbers.

So never­mind, that more peop­le got this wrong than right, the important part is that this loo­ks “obvious­ly pro­mi­sing from the point of view of sup­por­ting Ukraine”.

This (the strong cor­re­la­ti­on part) is then used to craft the public nar­ra­ti­ve, which media most­ly just copies, at least, when it comes from the Broo­kings Insti­tu­ti­on, which is being brie­fed here.

The cor­re­la­ti­on in its­elf is not that asto­nis­hing here (peop­le tre­at wars like a sports event), its more the bla­sé atti­tu­te in which “having a public that gets all of this objec­tively wrong” can be “obvious­ly pro­mi­sing from the point of view of sup­por­ting Ukraine”.

So, that more peop­le on the demo­cra­tic side got this right, is tal­ked about as a pro­blem, becau­se the num­bers fell.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

No words

17. November 2023

Jeru­sa­lem
CNN

Isra­el has drop­ped leaf­lets across parts of sou­thern Gaza cal­ling on civi­li­ans to evacua­te and “head towards known shel­ters,” indi­ca­ting Isra­el could soon expand its ground ope­ra­ti­on against Hamas to the south of the enclave.

Leaf­lets were drop­ped Wed­nes­day on four com­mu­nities to the east of Khan You­nis, the lar­gest city in sou­thern Gaza, warning peop­le living the­re to “evacua­te your resi­dence immediately.”

The com­mu­nities – Al Qar­rah, Khuza’a, Bani Suhai­la, and Absa­an – are near the peri­me­ter fence sepa­ra­ting the Gaza Strip from Isra­el, sug­ges­ting pos­si­ble new incur­si­on points by the Isra­el Defen­se For­ces (IDF) loo­king to take con­trol of the south.

src: click

edit: Es gibt aber natür­lich auch wie­der gute Nach­rich­ten, das hier ist das was der Stan­dard zum sel­ben Zeit­punkt berichtet:
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 17 um 20 37 13

[Zwei Tank­las­ter pro Tag sind sehr wahr­schein­lich zu wenig um den Mobil­funk in Gaza auf­recht­zu­er­hal­ten. Geschwei­ge denn das Internet.]

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

edit: Die NZZ hat dazu auch einen net­ten Angle:

Der Erfolg der israe­li­schen Ope­ra­ti­on im Gaza­strei­fen hängt von der Umsicht jedes ein­zel­nen Kom­man­dan­ten ab
Je mehr Gelän­de die Boden­trup­pen gewin­nen, des­to bes­ser ist die Zivil­be­völ­ke­rung geschützt. Der Ope­ra­ti­ons­plan kom­bi­niert des­halb mili­tä­ri­sche Kraft mit bewuss­ter Zurückhaltung.

src: click

Je mehr Land­raub, des­to bes­ser, da siche­rer für die Bevöl­ke­rung in Gaza und die Ver­ant­wor­tung für Völ­ker­rechts­ver­stö­ße hän­ge von der Umsicht jedes ein­zel­nen Kom­man­dan­ten ab und kön­ne nicht auf betei­lig­te Füh­rer von Staa­ten pro­ji­ziert werden.

I can’t belie­ve its not Neoimperialism!

I have resi­gned as poe­try edi­tor of the New York Times Magazine.

The Israe­li state’s U.S-backed war against the peop­le of Gaza is not a war for anyo­ne. The­re is no safe­ty in it or from it, not for Isra­el, not for the United Sta­tes or Euro­pe, and espe­cial­ly not for the many Jewish peop­le slan­de­red by tho­se who claim fal­se­ly to fight in their names. Its only pro­fit is the dead­ly pro­fit of oil inte­rests and wea­pon manufacturers.

The world, the future, our hearts—everything grows smal­ler and har­der from this war. It is not only a war of mis­si­les and land inva­si­ons. It is an ongo­ing war against the peop­le of Pales­ti­ne, peop­le who have resis­ted throughout deca­des of occup­a­ti­on, for­ced dis­lo­ca­ti­on, depri­va­ti­on, sur­veil­lan­ce, sie­ge, impr­i­son­ment, and torture.

Becau­se our sta­tus quo is self-expression, some­ti­mes the most effec­ti­ve mode of pro­test for artists is to refuse.

I can’t wri­te about poe­try amidst the ‘rea­son­ab­le’ tones of tho­se who aim to accli­ma­ti­ze us to this unre­a­son­ab­le suf­fe­ring. No more ghoulish euphe­misms. No more ver­bal­ly saniti­zed hell­scapes. No more war­mon­ge­ring lies.

If this resi­gna­ti­on lea­ves a hole in the news the size of poe­try, then that is the true shape of the present.
—Anne Boyer

src: click
Pri­ma­ry source: click

Israel hat noch geprüft…

16. November 2023

… ob es mehr von so Pau­sen ein­le­gen kann, siehe -

Tac­ti­cal Pau­ses? Die haben wir doch gemacht.

Der­weil hat sich der UN Sicher­heits­rat mitt­ler­wei­le dazu hin­rei­ßen las­sen doch eine Reso­lu­ti­on zu ver­ab­schie­den, die ist seit dem recht­lich bindend:

Der Uno-Sicherheitsrat hat eine völ­ker­recht­lich bin­den­de Reso­lu­ti­on mit der For­de­rung nach tage­lan­gen huma­ni­tä­ren Pau­sen im Gaza­strei­fen ange­nom­men. Nach lan­gem Rin­gen einig­te sich das mäch­tigs­te Uno-Gremium auf den gemein­sa­men Beschluss. Isra­el lehnt eine huma­ni­tä­re Pau­se ohne Frei­las­sung der Gei­seln ab.

src: click

Da hat sich Isra­el dazu ent­schie­den den Prüf­vor­gang zu beschleu­ni­gen, und ist zu fol­gen­dem Ent­schluss gekommen: 

Isra­el lehnt UN-Forderung nach “huma­ni­tä­ren Pau­sen” im Gaza­strei­fen ab

src: click

Ah. Na aber gut, dass sies geprüft haben!

Könn­ten wir viel­leicht in Öster­reich jetzt noch irgend­wel­che Demos absa­gen und Slo­gans durch Anlass­ge­setz­ge­bung ver­bie­ten? So zum Spass?

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Well, maybe just add a touch of propaganda…

15. November 2023

Israel’s offi­cial Ara­bic account affi­lia­ted with the Minis­try of For­eign Affairs pos­ted a sel­fie video of a Pales­ti­ni­an nur­se con­dem­ning Hamas for taking over al-Shifa hos­pi­tal in the Gaza Strip on Nov. 11.

But some things about the video didn’t add up.

Ever­ything about it sma­cked of high school theater—from the bot­ched accent that sound­ed like it was strai­ght out of an Israe­li soap ope­ra to the per­fect­ly scrip­ted IDF tal­king points rol­ling off her tongue.

Hamas were ste­aling the fuel. Check.

Hamas were taking mor­phi­ne. Check.

Then the­re was the pris­ti­ne white lab coat loo­king like it had just come back from the dry clea­ner, the audio track of bombs fal­ling that sound­ed like sam­ples from a late-’80s Casio key­board, and the con­tri­ved stethoscope-waving you‘d expect from an extra on Grey’s Anatomy.

Hamas hadn’t sto­len her make­up though, which was immaculate.

The Pales­ti­ni­an Minis­try of Health logo slap­ped stra­te­gi­cal­ly in the back­ground but visi­ble over her shoul­der loo­ked like an OSINT honeytrap.

This video must be authen­tic right, I can see the Health Minis­try logo”—at least that’s what whoever made it would hope the bur­geo­ning army of sket­chy anony­mous OSINT (open source intel­li­gence) rese­ar­chers might say.

The only thing mis­sing was a degree han­ging in the back­ground say­ing Tel Aviv Ups­tairs Medi­cal College.

Oh, and perhaps I should have men­tio­ned this first, no one at al-Shifa had ever seen the nur­se before.

Soon, the volu­me of ridi­cu­le direc­ted at tho­se sharing it reached such a pitch that the Isra­el Ara­bic account dele­ted their tweet. I guess they didn’t know the source either.

src: click (Dai­ly Beast)

Schon schei­ße, wenn man das im deutsch­spra­chi­gen Jour­na­lis­mus nicht erwäh­nen darf nicht?

Just a small Fiona Hill update

15. November 2023

Here is the gist of it, Fio­na Hill is still very much nume­ro­lo­gy obsessed.

So in the past 3 hours I tried to find out if what Fio­na Hill pre­sen­ted in a Broo­kings Insti­tu­ti­on talk, as the rea­so­ning for why “the Finns joi­ned NATO”, was a one off laps in arguing that reli­ed hea­vi­ly on an actu­al argu­ment popu­lar in fin­nish socie­ty, or if Fio­na Hill is inde­ed a fan of numerology.

Turns out Fio­na Hill, VERY MUCH a fan of numerology.

So here is the initi­al state­ment again, that was made by Fio­na Hill on the 16th of Sep­tem­ber 2023 in this Broo­kings insti­tu­ti­on video.

(See also: click)

[…] why the Finns joi­ned NATO, becau­se they’­re all in they know whe­re this is hea­ding 1989 for them, did seem like an aberra­ti­on and alt­hough the Finns were embra­cing the Euro­pean Uni­on and basing their embra­cing, their inde­pen­dence - they always had in the back of their minds that histo­ry would come back again - with ano­t­her nine [thats the num­ber 9] like 1939. So they were always rar­ing to go - so I think that we ought to our­sel­ves take a pau­se, you know, when we look through our own lens at 1989, and whe­re we’­ve been and you know how we feel about the war in Ukrai­ne, a lot of other coun­tries are all in, becau­se as uh Timo­thy said they have a dif­fe­rent year zero though they have a dif­fe­rent year nine - they think about a lot of the­se, uhm dates in dif­fe­rent his­to­ri­cal patterns[…]

Now in my mind the ques­ti­on still per­sis­ted, if she real­ly tal­ked about “how Finns think today”, or if she attri­bu­t­ed delu­sio­nal thin­king onto an ent­i­re natio­na­li­ty of peop­le here.

Well, what can I say.…

Not only the Finns are hea­vi­ly into nume­ro­lo­gy accord­ing to Fio­na Hill, the who­le of euro­pe is:

Refe­ren­cing this video deba­te from a Uni­ver­si­ty of Ida­ho Panel, uploa­ded on the 9th of Octo­ber 2023, at about 9 Minu­tes in:

[…] and Sena­tor Borah was of cour­se someo­ne who famous­ly wan­ted to end an out­law war um which was a very Noble ide­al and of cour­se this was after the the May­hem of World War I and he sad­ly you know um pas­sed away in 1940, alt­hough perhaps for­tu­n­a­te­ly -- becau­se he did­n’t live to see uh the United Sta­tes drag­ged into World War II um after the attack on uh Pearl Harbor.

But all of this repe­ti­ti­on of War, a 100 years cycle of wars in Euro­pe, is also col­li­ding with major uh Inter­na­tio­nal cri­ses uh cli­ma­te chan­ge and cli­ma­te dis­as­ters uh which are um cer­tain­ly nota­ble uh around around the world uh, very fast demo­gra­phic chan­ge uh I was tal­king to someo­ne ear­lier about thin­king who would have thought and perhaps who would have thought if you were sit­ting here 50 years ago as an under­gra­dua­te that the world would go from two bil­li­on peop­le to 8 bil­li­on, … […] also very fast rapid tech­no­lo­gi­cal chan­ge uh and all of the con­cerns - I was mee­ting with stu­dents ear­lier who were asking about you know whe­re are we hea­ded with AI you know for examp­le, I’m sure that’s ano­t­her of the the­mes that will spin them­sel­ves out over um in the Borah sym­po­sia in the future and it cer­tain­ly feels like with the tit­le that you’­ve picked, that we’­re in one of the­se apo­ca­lyp­ti­cal uh moments, but I would sug­gest as a his­to­ri­an we’­ve been the­re befo­re - many times - uh Sena­tor Borah’s who­le um expe­ri­ence as the per­son that this com­me­mo­ra­tes would have he would have felt the same for sure, uh back in the the 1920s when he was, you know, part of the Kel­logg Bri­and pact, try­ing to sta­bi­li­ze a world…

src:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfmWBWG3zd0 (at about 9 Minu­tes in.)

So here the ENTIRE thought pat­tern is again. But now its not the Finns, its “us euro­peans”. And its not Nato we are aiming for, but a “bet­ter, more sta­ble world, with less change”.

So here are the mar­kers of the men­tal image:

1. Pro­po­sed lack of struc­tu­ral safe­ty in the self per­cep­ti­on of ent­i­re coun­tries populations

2. 100 years cycle of war in Europe

3. And both cou­pled to desas­ter moti­ves (cli­ma­te chan­ge, demo­gra­phic chan­ge), then moved into ano­t­her desas­ter moti­ve, with over­po­pu­la­ti­on at the 8 bil­li­on peop­le mark occu­ri­ning at the same time.

And the way she got the­re was through an asso­cia­ti­on with nega­ti­ve emo­ti­ons, per­cei­ved his­to­ric cycles, and numbers.

Coin­ci­dence? I don’t think so.

Mea­ning its Fio­na Hill who­se got a litt­le Covid 19 iso­la­tio­ny, not so much.. like, you know… the rus­si­an guy…

So turns out the lady is cra­zy. At least in part. Lets say she has a spleen.

Well, very well then - and gre­at - becau­se Fio­na Hill was the one that inven­ted the “Putin thinks like a czar” nar­ra­ti­ve for the who­le of Europe.

Which in its ent­i­re­ty goes as fol­lows: “Putin thinks like a czar becau­se of his­to­ri­cal pat­terns he fol­lows, in the stone sta­tu­es Fio­na saw in his office after diner years ago - and not only one but like five sta­tu­es, whe­re the one named Vla­di­mir, which is the only one in front of the Krem­lin and not his office, which she also noti­ced becau­se he was named Vla­di­mir, is dou­bly important, becau­se its Vla­di­mir Putin, and Vla­di­mir the czar, so “Dou­ble Vla­di­mir” (thats a quo­te), and dou­ble Vla­di­mir, is very important - for why Putin inva­ded Ukraine”.

Not joking, see Fio­na Hills arguing here:

Oh, the four stone sta­tu­es theo­ry now got two types of Vla­di­mir on top

So apart from being the main pro­pa­gan­dist for euro­pes war nar­ra­ti­ve, what does the Lady do cur­r­ent­ly - you know job wise?

Fio­na Hill is a seni­or fel­low in the Cen­ter on the United Sta­tes and Euro­pe wit­hin the For­eign Poli­cy pro­gram at Broo­kings. She also holds the pres­ti­gious posi­ti­on of chan­cellor at Durham Uni­ver­si­ty in the United King­dom and was recent­ly elec­ted to the Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty Board of Overseers.

src: click

Ah. Gre­at.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut abar­tigst, ver­lo­genst und hin­ter­trie­benst Allerletzte.

Well, nothing to add.

15. November 2023

G: If I should choo­se today bet­ween hell and Shi­fa I would choo­se hell. I got a report yes­ter­day from the minis­ter of health that 20 out of the 23 ICU pati­ents had died, 17 other pati­ents died becau­se of lack of sup­plies oxy­gen and water and three if not five of the 38 pre­ma­tu­re new­borns have died becau­se of this slow suf­fo­ca­ti­on that the Israe­li occup­a­ti­on Army is expo­sing all the hos­pi­tals to, by cut­ting electri­ci­ty, oxy­gen and medi­cal sup­plies. And it’s, it’s you know it’s bey­ond descrip­ti­on. I’m, I’m out of words to descri­be this sys­te­ma­tic man-made slaugh­te­ring of pati­ents in civi­li­an hos­pi­tals and, when I heard the crowd in the United Sta­tes shout - you know no, no cease­fire, I think that’s the only place on earth whe­re peop­le are sup­por­ting Isra­el and the other streets of the world are sup­por­ting a cease­fire, a human solu­ti­on, a lift of the sie­ge and a sup­port for the peop­le of Gaza - so this is a deeply divi­ded world, and the lies are fly­ing around like never befo­re - in any war - and I think we need to keep our heads and our hearts calm now and under­stand that what we are see­ing is an unpre­ce­den­ted attack on the civi­li­an socie­ty occu­p­ied by one of the most bru­tal and ruth­less armies in in the world, exer­cis­ing a sys­te­ma­tic attack on civi­li­an health­ca­re, com­ple­te­ly against inter­na­tio­nal law and the stan­dards that we want to app­ly and being back pat­ted all the time by the US pre­si­dent, I mean - we’­re in the dar­kest time of modern histo­ry now so far, if you look at the UN num­bers - the UN num­bers that are com­ing out every day in their fact she­ets -- 40,000 Pales­ti­ni­ans have been kil­led or are mis­sing under the reu­bel or have been inju­red. For four weeks, 40,000. 6,000 of the kil­led and mis­sing are child­ren. When did that beco­me defen­se of a coun­try, when did it beco­me decent to drag neo­na­tes out of their incu­ba­tors and kill child­ren you know. [Con­text: The neo­ni­tes had to be relo­ca­ted, becau­se Isra­el for­ced the relo­ca­ti­on of all peop­le in the inten­si­ve care ward. So hos­pi­tal staff star­ted to evacua­te ever­yo­ne inclu­ding pre­ma­tu­re­ly born babies.] The only explana­ti­on for this is a deep roo­ted and very frigh­tening racism, becau­se you don’t do the­se things to peop­le you con­si­der your equal. I’m extre­me­ly dis­tur­bed, I’m extre­me­ly upset and I bla­me the Euro­pean lea­ders and your pre­si­dent for this bloo­dy bloo­ds­hed of peop­le who are being com­ple­te­ly defen­seless. And I tal­ked to a col­league in Mus­ta­fa Al-Aqsa in the South yes­ter­day, he told me they were see­ing inf­lux of pati­ents com­ing wal­king from the north, having fol­lo­wed the Israe­li com­mand to lea­ve the North and they were being shot in the legs and they were trea­ting gunshots in the legs from peop­le try­ing to escape the north…

I: Dr. Gil­bert I wan­ted to ask you what uh the Israe­li government con­ti­nues to insist that Hamas is using the hos­pi­tals in Gaza as com­mand cen­ters and as under­ground head­quar­ters of sto­ring wea­pons and even hos­ta­ges, what is your respon­se to the­se claims?

G: Two­fold - why are you in the media con­vey­ing the­se fal­se claims con­ti­nuous­ly and taking the atten­ti­on away from what is the real pro­blem, name­ly the con­ti­nuous bom­bing and kil­ling of peop­le in Gaza. The­re is abso­lute­ly no pro­of so far that I know of neit­her from US intel­li­gence nor from Israe­li intel­li­gence and we’­ve heard the­se accu­sa­ti­ons for 16 years. Show us the pro­of show us the evi­dence and don’t for­get that the Gene­va Con­ven­ti­on, the fourth con­ven­ti­on is tel­ling the figh­t­ing par­ties to make both dis­tinc­tion and pre­cau­ti­on. If it’s a mixed mili­ta­ry and civi­li­an tar­get the civi­li­an pre­cau­ti­on takes prio­ri­ty over the mili­ta­ry gain and they have been bom­bing not only Shi­fa and Al-Quds but lots of hos­pi­tals with[out] even bothe­ring to claim that the­re is any mili­ta­ry acti­vi­ty in that hos­pi­tal. They bom­bed the Tur­kish they bom­bed Al-Rantisi pediatric hos­pi­tal and we all seen the­se ridi­cu­lous vide­os whe­re they say oh here are Pam­pers in a pediatric hos­pi­tal it’s got to be the ter­ro­rists, so I think this is a big sham and I’m a bit worried that you in the media are so uh easi­ly - are con­vey­ing the­se unsub­stan­tia­ted accu­sa­ti­ons and regard­less, they don’t have the right to bomb hos­pi­tals that’s very clear and now it’s not only Shi­fa now the Al-Quds hos­pi­tal are - is being evacua­ted with all the pati­ents and all the staff and it is real­ly a con­voy of shame to the Wes­tern World and United Sta­tes to see the­se hos­pi­tals, the last resort in a dra­ma­tic ass­ault on the civi­li­an popu­la­ti­on in Gaza who have done not­hing wrong other than being born Pales­ti­ni­ans in Gaza. And this con­voy of mise­ry is the result of a leni­ent atti­tu­de to the Israe­li vio­la­ti­ons of inter­na­tio­nal law. Through many, many years the Israe­li impu­ni­ty has reached a new level and we are all sin­king into that Abyss of dis­re­gard for human life and huma­ni­ty as as we are see­ing this going on without any­bo­dy try­ing to stop the Israe­li Army.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

France24 will have a legal expert on air this evening to talk about the legal rami­fi­ca­ti­ons. (edit: Here: click)

Jetzt gibts aber in Öster­reich wahr­lich wich­ti­ge­res zu tun, wie uns die Neos hier vorführen:

Meinl-Reisinger: “Wer das Kali­fat aus­ru­fen will, hat bei uns nichts verloren”

src: click

War das nicht mal ein FPÖ Wahlslogan?!

Nor­ma­li­sie­rung durch Hass­pro­pa­gan­da. Heu­te auf Posi­ti­on Eins im Standard.

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Willkommen bei der Informationsoperation des Tages

15. November 2023

The Isra­el Defen­se For­ces says tro­ops have found wea­pons and Hamas assets insi­de Shi­fa Hos­pi­tal, which indi­ca­tes the pre­sence of the ter­ror group.

The­re is no indi­ca­ti­on of hos­ta­ges cur­r­ent­ly being held in Shi­fa, but the IDF belie­ves the ope­ra­ti­on may bring intel­li­gence infor­ma­ti­on on the captives.

The mili­ta­ry says the­re has been no “fric­tion” bet­ween tro­ops and pati­ents and medi­cal staff at Shi­fa Hos­pi­tal during the ongo­ing operation.

At least five Hamas gun­men were kil­led by tro­ops during a gun batt­le out­side the hos­pi­tal. No sol­di­ers were hurt.

src: click (Times of Israel)

Das Are­al rund um Al Shi­fa war seit Tagen umkämpft - dass man dort und nicht inner­halb des Kran­ken­haus Kom­ple­xes ohne Ver­lus­te 5 Ter­ro­ris­ten aus­ge­schal­tet hat. Wow.

Dann geht man für acht Stun­den, und sie waren für acht Stun­den drin, in ein Are­al von 9 Hekt­ar (Al Shi­fa Hos­pi­tal has beco­me much more than just a hos­pi­tal during this war. It is Gaza’s big­gest hos­pi­tal, a spraw­ling com­plex of 22 acres, src: click)

9 Hekt­ar ent­spre­chen 13 Fuß­ball­fel­dern. Im unter­tun­nel­ten Gaza Stadt. Wie­viel das in Bade­wan­nen ist, kann ich noch nicht sagen.

Und fin­det dort nach 8 Stun­den ein paar Waffen.

Mei­ne Hochachtung.

Und zuvor woll­te das israe­li­sche Mili­tär mobi­le Brut­käs­ten nach al Shi­fa brin­gen, aber nur wenn die Babies dann weg­kom­men, aber irgend­wie woll­te das arme Mili­tär mit den mobi­len Brüt­käs­ten nie­mand vorlassen.

HAUPTQUATIER MY ASS.

Aber sie kön­nen ja noch eins finden!

In nur noch­mal acht Stunden.

edit: Oh, der Stan­dard hat einen Angle:

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 15 um 09 18 17
src: click

Noch bevor das Israe­li­sche Mili­tär auf das Are­al des Kran­ken­hau­ses ein­drin­gen konn­te war es AN DER GRENZE EINER 9 HEKTAR GROSSEN FLÄCHE MIT SPRENGFALLEN KONFRONTIERT! Die waren sicher “beim Ein­gang” der 13 Fuß­ball­fel­der. Und neben den Spreng­fal­len saßen 5 Terroristen!

edit: Es gibt aber auch wie­der gute Nach­rich­ten, die­se miss­feu­ern­den Rake­ten der Hamas, die noch in Gaza run­ter­ge­hen, die sind ja hocheffizient!

Accord­ing to the Israe­li mili­ta­ry, bet­ween 7 and 21 Octo­ber, 550 Pales­ti­ni­an rockets fell short in Gaza, kil­ling Palestinians. 

The Gaza Minis­try of Public Works and Housing repor­ted the dest­ruc­tion of 16,441 housing units and the ren­de­ring of 11,340 other units unin­ha­bi­ta­ble, as of 23 Octo­ber. About 150,000 housing units sus­tai­ned minor to mode­ra­te dama­ge. The total num­ber of housing units repor­ted as des­troy­ed or dama­ged accounts for at least 45 per cent of all housing units in the Gaza Strip. Ent­i­re neigh­bour­hoods have been des­troy­ed, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in Beit Hanoun, Beit Lahia, and Ash Shuja’iyeh, the area bet­ween Gaza and Ash Shati’ Refu­gee Camp, and Abbassan Kabeera. 

src: click (United Nati­ons Office for the Coor­di­na­ti­on of Huma­ni­ta­ri­an Affairs)

edit: Hier, ganz neu und brand­ak­tu­ell, Waffen-Bilder aus dem Hamas “Haupt­qua­tier” in Al Shifa!

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 17 um 08 51 03Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 17 um 08 46 28
Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 17 um 08 46 36

A Waun­sinn!

Die AK (?) war übri­gens bereits so mit Maga­zin drin­nen, quer rein­ge­wursch­telt und auf die Kame­ra zei­gend im mit gel­ben Schaum aus­ge­pols­ter­ten Kof­fer, als der israe­li­sche Kom­mu­ni­ka­ti­ons­spe­zia­list den Kof­fer öff­net. Man kennt das ja.

Ach­ja und die­ses “Grab Bag” war hin­ter einem (defek­ten?) Magnet­re­so­nanz­to­mo­gra­phen ver­steckt. Der eben­falls im Hamas Haupt­qua­tier in Al Shi­fa stand. Man kennt das ja.

Und wenn sie kei­ne Waf­fen gefun­den hät­ten, wäre es ein Kriegs­ver­bre­chen gewesen.

edit2: W00t? Refe­ren­ced: click

Aufklärung eines Missverständnisses -

14. November 2023

Bildschirmfoto 2023 11 14 um 18 50 03
Isra­el wür­de selbst­re­dend nie Kran­ken­häu­ser angrei­fen. Auch wenn 51 Kran­ken­häu­ser im Gaza Strei­fen in den letz­ten 37 Tagen age­grif­fen wur­den. Isra­el wür­de selbst­re­dend nur die wich­tigs­ten Kran­ken­häu­ser stürmen.

Damit sich dann die Bevöl­ke­rung für die Al Shi­fa zum Lebens­mit­tel­punkt in Gaza Stadt gewor­den ist, in den Süden des Gaza­strei­fens ver­zieht -- oder halt deswegen:

Gall­ants Bot­schaft rich­tet sich aber vor allem ans Aus­land, denn die Kri­tik an Isra­el nimmt zu, je mehr Zeit ver­geht und je mehr Kla­gen über die huma­ni­tä­re Kata­stro­phe in Gaza laut wer­den. Isra­el muss daher Signa­le aus­sen­den, dass man den rich­ti­gen Kurs ein­ge­schla­gen habe. Umso mehr, als man der­zeit nichts drin­gen­der braucht als ein grü­nes Licht aus Washing­ton für den nächs­ten und wohl umstrit­tens­ten Schritt: den Sturm auf das Al-Shifa-Krankenhaus.

Dass die Armee nun im Tun­nel unter einem ande­ren Spi­tal ein Waf­fen­ar­se­nal der Hamas aus­ge­ho­ben hat und sogar Bele­ge gefun­den haben will, dass dort Gei­seln fest­ge­hal­ten wur­den, soll in Washing­ton den ent­schei­den­den Ruck aus­lö­sen. (Maria Sterkl, 14.11.2023)

src: click

Man habe INDIZIEN! Blin­ken! Biden! KÖNNEN WIR JETZT BITTE DAS KRANKENHAUS STÜRMEN?

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

Naja, wenigs­tens ist der “für Euro­pa bes­te mul­ti­la­te­ral agie­ren­de US Prä­si­dent seit Jahr­zehn­ten” mitt­ler­wei­le für sein Ver­hal­ten vor US Gerich­ten angeklagt.

Pales­ti­ni­an human rights orga­niz­a­ti­ons, tog­e­ther with Pales­ti­ni­ans in Gaza and the U.S. filed a lawsu­it in U.S. federal court against Pre­si­dent Biden, Secreta­ry of Sta­te Blin­ken, and Secreta­ry of Defen­se Aus­tin for the U.S. offi­cials’ fail­u­re to pre­vent and com­pli­ci­ty in the Israe­li government’s unfol­ding geno­ci­de against them, their fami­lies, and the 2.2 mil­li­on Pales­ti­ni­ans in Gaza.

Cur­rent Status
The Cen­ter for Con­sti­tu­tio­nal Rights filed suit against the Pre­si­dent, Secreta­ry of Sta­te, and Secreta­ry of Defen­se on behalf of two Pales­ti­ni­an orga­niz­a­ti­ons and eight Pales­ti­ni­ans, some in the U.S. and some in Pales­ti­ne, to chal­len­ge the U.S. government’s aiding and abet­ting of geno­ci­de and demand that it work to pre­vent geno­ci­de and com­ply with its legal obli­ga­ti­ons under inter­na­tio­nal law.

src: click

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist das abso­lut gro­tesk und abar­tigst Allerletzte.

edit: Kon­text: click (NZZ)