harlekin.me

Das macht aber nichts, sei­ne Leser näm­lich auch nicht… (Kei­ne Rich­tig­stel­lung in den Kommentaren.)

404 Media zufol­ge nutz­te der Hacker eine Schwach­stel­le in Tele Mes­sa­ge, einem Signal-Klon, den Waltz wäh­rend einer Kabi­netts­sit­zung am Mitt­woch ver­wen­det haben soll, wie ein Reuters-Foto nahe­legt. Waltz wur­de am Don­ners­tag ent­las­sen, nur weni­ge Wochen nach­dem ein Skan­dal um die Grün­dung einer Signal-Gruppe durch ihn öffent­lich gewor­den war.

src: click (Der Standard)

So infor­miert der Stan­dard die Bevölkerung.

Und so die Quel­len die der Stan­dard nutzt, aber nie verlinkt:

Yes­ter­day, I publis­hed an ana­ly­sis of what I could publicly find about TM SGNL, the obscu­re and unof­fi­cial Signal app used by Mike Waltz, and pres­um­a­b­ly also by Pete Heg­seth, JD Van­ce, Tul­si Gab­bard, and other fascists in Trump’s government. After­wards, someo­ne pri­va­te­ly sent me the URL https://www.telemessage.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Signal.zip.

I down­loa­ded Signal.zip and was exci­ted to see that it’s the Android source code for the app!

src: click

The ser­ver that the hacker com­pro­mi­sed is hos­ted on Ama­zon AWS’s cloud infra­st­ruc­tu­re in Nort­hern Vir­gi­nia. By reviewing the source code of TeleMessage’s modi­fied Signal app for Android, 404 Media con­fir­med that the app sends mes­sa­ge data to this end­point. 404 Media also made an HTTP request to this ser­ver to con­firm that it is online.

src: click

Nein, der Hacker nutz­te kei­ne Schwach­stel­le in der App, son­dern im Ser­ver Backend. Nein, die App wur­de auch nicht gehackt, der Anbie­ter hat ein­fach auf sei­nem eige­nen Wor­d­Press blog den Quell­code gelea­ked, gehackt wur­de das Ser­ver­ba­ckend mit den Archiv files.

Archiv Datei­en?

“The only dif­fe­rence is the Tele­Mes­sa­ge ver­si­on cap­tures all inco­m­ing and out­go­ing Signal messages for archi­ving pur­po­ses,” the video continues.
It is not true that an archi­ving solu­ti­on pro­per­ly pre­ser­ves the secu­ri­ty offe­red by an end-to-end encryp­ted messaging app such as Signal. Ordi­na­ri­ly, only someo­ne sen­ding a Signal mes­sa­ge and their inten­ded reci­pi­ent will be able to read the con­tents of the mes­sa­ge. Tele­Mes­sa­ge essen­ti­al­ly adds a third par­ty to that con­ver­sa­ti­on by sen­ding copies of tho­se messages some­whe­re else for sto­rage. If not stored secu­re­ly, tho­se copies could in turn be sus­cep­ti­ble to moni­to­ring or fal­ling into the wrong hands.
That theo­re­ti­cal risk has now beco­me very real. 

src: click

Gut auch das muss der Stan­dard sei­nen Nut­zern nicht erklä­ren, wo kämen wir denn da hin wenn, der Stan­dard sei­ne Leser für voll neh­men würde?

Schnell mehr Qua­li­täts­jour­na­lis­mus För­de­rung für den Stan­dard. VIEL, VIEL mehr Qua­li­täts­jour­na­lis­mus För­de­rung für das Drecksblatt.

edit: In other “Gut das wirs anspre­chen kön­nen!” News:

Dau­er­haf­te Beset­zung des Paläs­ti­nen­ser­ge­biets: Isra­el mit Plan zur „Erobe­rung“ des Gazastreifens

NEIN! (Doch. Oh!)

Bei der Welt hat zum ers­ten Mal jemand auch ukrai­ni­sche Pro­pa­gan­da entdeckt!

Ja dür­fen die das?

under fal­se pre­ten­ses. And kept him in pri­son for two weeks.

Which as a com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons major, is the dum­best shit I’ve seen, read, or con­su­med in an ent­i­re life­time. Until this point. And thats not hyper­bo­le - I’m just being honest here.

They could have got­ten vide­os like this one out of it:

(minus the tit­le, becau­se that was publis­hed after he was jai­led for two weeks on drum­med up charges) -

But ins­tead they got this gem out of it:

Which would have been ins­a­nely idio­tic, if it was any Vlog­ger with a lar­ge audi­ence - but is the dum­best executive/legal action any one could have pos­si­b­ly made in the histo­ry of auto­cra­tic governments - com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons wise, when you know who they were dealing with.

Why? Becau­se you watch that you­tuber, becau­se you want decent impres­si­ons of run down parts of coun­tries inter­na­tio­nal­ly. You usual­ly want that, becau­se you are a pro­fes­sio­nal tra­ve­ler thats inte­res­ted in that per­spec­ti­ve, or you watch them as the usu­al you­tube user to get that emo­tio­nal fix, of fin­ding “huma­ni­ty” in the unli­keliest of places.

So, some fiver group of regio­nal FSB agents just got a kick out of “well, we dro­ve to this town to inter­view him for two hours, we cant pos­si­b­ly put in our report - that it was not­hing… -- well, lets discri­mi­na­te against THE ONLY PERSON THATS A 10 OUT OF 10 PERFECT MATCH as a “feel good per­son” for high pro­fi­le inter­na­tio­nal tra­velers, and reli­gious people.

Its like --- you know ever­y­whe­re in the world, has tho­se unspo­ken rules in adju­di­ca­ted law, whe­re you dont impr­i­son the reli­gious­ly dri­ven, insa­ne peop­le, by law, for cri­mes they didnt com­mit, just becau­se you would have to wri­te into your report, that it was not­hing. Yeah. Rus­si­an FSB Agent reads “well if its an Ame­ri­can”, thats the care­er oppor­tu­ni­ty of a life­time into this!

The issue is not that we can all dedu­ce, why his tre­at­ment was struc­tu­red the way it was - I mean five minu­te court hea­rings ftw, its - that we can ALL SEE LAID BARE what errors in jud­ge­ment - actual­ly led to this.

And its so frea­king hard to eva­lua­te, whats more idio­tic - that tho­se errors in judgment were made becau­se of what was likely seen as a care­er oppor­tu­ni­ty wit­hin the sys­tem at first, or becau­se a group of in the end 12 flip­ping FSB agents couldnt for the FUCK of it iden­ti­fy what this you­tube chan­nel is about.

So lets go over this with a fine comb, why dont we. Lear­ning oppor­tu­nities for your coun­tries com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on prac­ti­ces - everywhere.

Who you are dealing with:

Some­what decent­ly edu­ca­ted view­ers of that you­tube chan­nel under­stand that some­thing like watch­ful hand­lers are a thing, in many of the coun­tries that that media per­so­na­li­ty visits, and under­stand, that when that you­tuber talks about a per­son fol­lowing him for two hours by now, after he just visi­ted the most run down part of town and didnt take the pre­ar­ran­ged trip to a bud­dhist temp­le with the ent­i­re rest of the tou­rist group, that was boo­ked into the only hotel in town - its pro­bab­ly not exclu­si­ve­ly him pro­jec­ting para­noia. But the thing thats kept him “rather safe” from actu­al mistre­at­ment so far - is that rather reli­gious urge to find huma­ni­ty in the oddest of pla­ces - being kind of odd himself.

So - we alrea­dy know that thats happening.

But then in rus­sia, a local poli­ce offi­cer first flips out, that “per­son wan­de­ring around doesnt have pass­port with him, only pho­to on pho­ne, like tho­se chi­ne­se do” - and then when the vlog­ger visits a clo­se tra­ver­sal point of cri­ti­cal infra­st­ruc­tu­re bet­ween rus­sia and chi­na, becau­se its the only thing near a sett­le­ment worth watching, gets actual­ly arres­ted by bor­der guards.

So far ever­ything is as expec­ted. That stuff is idio­tic, but at least understandable.

How you then get from “I filed report” to “FSB had to dri­ve for three hours, and the peop­le arri­ved whe­re the dum­best pos­si­ble kind of per­son that thinks they are smart” -- when dealing with a you­tuber with 800.000 sub­scri­bers, is abso­lute­ly bey­ond me. How tho­se peop­le then can see a car­re­er oppor­tu­ni­ty in it, becau­se they arres­ted an ame­ri­can, that can speak chi­ne­se - is an art­form in itself.

And it beco­mes the worst kind of press you can ima­gi­ne, if that you­tuber, then also is able to point out, that they told him “he wasnt on government PR line, and that was a sign - that he isnt rus­sia friend­ly” - becau­se they read (or could under­stand) one word in you­tube sum­ma­ry - is so fuck­ing insa­ne, that it immedia­te­ly makes it clear to EVERY view­er, that the rus­si­an exe­cu­ti­ve is much less a top down con­trol­led sys­tem, than a gagg­le of idi­ots, that want to be pro­mo­ted, and kick down every per­son per­cei­ved as “below them”, when the actu­al aut­ho­ri­ty isnt looking.

So much about the “huma­ni­ty in the oddest of pla­ces” point.

After that, the over­re­ac­tion by the FSB is so flip­ping har­sh, that by now they all have to pull sche­me 33f with night­ly trips through forests, just to sca­re the per­son shit­less, into play - so they under­stand that they arent wel­co­me in the coun­try any­mo­re and no one should fol­low their examp­le - to also show the run down pla­ces of a coun­try, you know on you­tube, when that doesnt fit the messaging of the coun­try at war.

Gre­at - this will work won­ders, ban­king on the Strei­sand effect. Except that you still didnt under­stand who was watching the­se vide­os. Which again - are pro­fes­sio­nal tra­velers, and reli­gi­os nutcases/people that want the emo­tio­nal fix of “friend­ly inter­ac­tions” in the oddest of places.

So essen­ti­al­ly, the FSB just broad­cas­ted to the world - hey peop­le, that alrea­dy knew that this is hap­pe­ning, how about we show you how we abu­se someo­ne you real­ly care about - and to peop­le that are in it for the reli­gious con­no­ta­ti­on (becau­se they cant help it), in modern day rus­sia tho­se reli­gious and ethi­cal safe­guards - of not mistrea­ting a per­son that might have a screw lose, are worth not­hing. Not­hing at all.

YOU OUGHT TO TAKE A FUCKING HINT, when even the chi­ne­se ste­war­dess on his flight out of rus­sia smi­les like a can­dy­ca­ne pri­ce pony - when he final­ly lands in some god for­sa­ken pro­vin­ce in chi­na, BECAUSE THE STORY OF WHAT THE FSB DID TO THIS PERSON made the rounds.

Can a group of 12 offi­cers be any more incom­pe­tent than the FSB was in this case? No. Abso­lute­ly not.

So just for the ran­dom rea­ders enter­tain­ment -- HERE IS THE PERSON, YOU JUST ALMOST MIGHT HAVE ARRESTED FOR 20 YEARS BECAUSE OF first drum­med up drug pos­ses­si­on char­ges, and then becau­se of the oppor­tu­ni­ty of being pro­mo­ted, becau­se he actual­ly could have had them!

First you­tuber that almost didnt make it out of Nige­ria, after a visit to a gang run Village:

First you­tuber that tried to film the Wuhan labs after Covid:

First you­tuber that lost his spon­sor­s­hips, ins­tead of pul­ling this video:

Or that time, when they…

I mean, you always hear tho­se sto­ries, about socio­lo­gists being kil­led, becau­se some aut­ho­ri­ta­ri­an coun­tries bureau­cra­cy fucked up, and now the­re is one posi­tively cra­zy per­son less in exis­tence, haha fun­ny joke, we all laug­hed -- but to actual­ly hear that from the per­son after being dri­ven out of rus­sia, and it inclu­ding 12 FSB offi­cers and the towns fuck­ing eng­lish teacher!?!?

Wow­zers.

So the sto­ries about the gra­dua­ti­on clas­ses of an ent­i­re year of FSB gra­dua­tes pho­to­gra­phing them­sel­ves for social media, and get­ting open source iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on matched to the local poli­ce sta­ti­ons they are working at now are true then! I mean, may­be someo­ne could teach them why reli­gious free­doms are a thing (peop­le get­ting real­ly emo­tio­nal about dumb stuff like this), like they do in offi­cer trai­ning in the rest of the world, and may­be even, that when you are dealing with a social media mul­ti­pli­ca­tor “having vide­os of run down rural vil­la­ges in rus­sia floa­ting around not being the worst thing that pos­si­b­ly could happen”.

Essen­ti­al­ly, in one sen­tence, this was like tel­ling the ent­i­re diplo­ma­tic com­mu­ni­ty in the world, that the FSB is still a place, whe­re mas­si­ve fuck­ups hap­pen routinely.

And Chi­na is not.

A com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons sci­ence marvel.

Should be taug­hed in every mas­ters level cur­ri­cu­lum in every com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons school from now on, as a how not to hand­le this situation.

Hmm, that Ukrai­ni­an peop­le dont want to live under rus­si­an occup­a­ti­on, gai­ned so much emo­tio­nal believa­bi­li­ty after watching that! And yes, I kind of know the ratio of peop­le that would actual­ly care, and peop­le that would rather igno­re most things poli­ti­cal and go on with their lives, so ratio­nal­ly I shouldnt -- but becau­se of this HUMONGOUS FSB FUCKUP, I stran­ge­ly do. And will pro­bab­ly remem­ber that, as a fuck­up, for the ent­i­re rest of my life…

When you thought auto­cra­tic regimes had figu­red out how to con­trol popu­la­ti­ons, an FSB offi­cer didnt want to have made a two hour trip in vein and bad­ly wan­ted a promotion…

Can’t make this shit up.

In post soviet rus­sia, sta­te arrests and detains you for two weeks for - ehm, ehm, ehm, -- word inva­si­on in a you­tube video descrip­ti­on, when you hold an ame­ri­can passport?

Non con­tex­tua­li­zed? Becau­se OFFICER COULDNT SPEAK GOOD ENOUGH ENGLISH.

And fax machi­ne to ask hea­d­of­fice in Moscow cost too much, dont take away his pro­mo­ti­on oppor­tu­ni­ty of a life­time! It could be a spy! Quick - lets all take photo!

The offi­cial chi­ne­se minis­te­ry of invi­ta­ti­ons to tea par­ties must have pis­sed them­sel­ves laughing…

Peak Demo­kra­tie.

Peak Kampf gegen Fake News.

src: click

Wie jetzt - wir sol­len Kon­text brin­gen und weni­ger lügen?

Denkt denn kei­ner an die Clickzahlen!?

Hier: Müt­ter für ukrai­ni­schen Mineralienabbau:

src: click

Was wären wir nur ohne Mine­ra­li­en - ich mei­ne Mütter.

Nichts.

So liess Bes­sent die For­de­rung von Prä­si­dent Trump fal­len, die USA müss­ten aus dem neu zu schaf­fen­den Fonds für die bereits geleis­te­te Mili­tär­hil­fe ent­schä­digt wer­den. Nun sol­len nur künf­ti­ge ame­ri­ka­ni­sche Waf­fen­lie­fe­run­gen als US-Zustupf zum Fonds betrach­tet wer­den. Swiri­den­ko erwähn­te in die­sem Zusam­men­hang Luft­ver­tei­di­gungs­sys­te­me aus ame­ri­ka­ni­scher Produktion.

Ich könnt nur noch Schreien…

Johan­nes Pucher vor 5 Stunden

Russ­land spricht von Frie­dens­ge­sprä­chen ohne Vor­be­din­gun­gen - stellt aber trotz­dem Bedingungen

In der Mitt­lei­ung, dass man eine Feu­er­pau­se von 8. bis 10. Mai abhal­ten wol­le, hat der Kreml auch erklärt, dass man zu Frie­dens­ver­hand­lun­gen mit der Urkai­ne bereit - und zwar ohne Vor­be­din­gun­gen. Gleich­zei­tig erklär­te der rus­si­sche Außen­mi­nis­ter Ser­gej Law­row in einem Inter­view mit der bra­si­lia­ni­schen Zei­tung “O Glo­bo”, dass Russ­land wei­ter­hin dar­auf bestehe, dass die ukrai­ni­schen Gebie­te Krim, Luhansk, Donezk, als rus­sisch aner­kannt wer­den. Außer­dem müs­se das Nach­bar­land bünd­nis­frei blei­ben und dür­fe nicht der Nato bei­tre­ten, sag­te Law­row in dem Inter­view, das auch vom Außen­mi­nis­te­ri­um in Mos­kau ver­öf­fent­licht wurde.

src: click

Gut Vor­be­din­gun­gen für Frie­dens­ver­hand­lun­gen und Vor­be­din­gun­gen für Frie­den, was ist der Unterschied?

Kei­ner, hat der Stan­dard herausgefunden!

Wir brau­chen wie­der mehr Qua­li­täts­jour­na­lis­mus­för­de­rung für den Stan­dard! Viel, Viel mehr.

Im Sin­ne von Mea Cul­pa - wer hier ein Pos­ting gese­hen hat, das hier nicht mehr zu fin­den ist. am and pm are a hell of a thing… Das trump­sche Truth Social Pos­ting wur­de 12 Stun­den nach sei­nem Selen­skyj Tref­fen abgesetzt.

Wenn man nicht alles dop­pelt prüft… Hät­te man glatt mei­nen kön­nen, es wäre davor gewesen.

Ukrai­ni­scher Ex-Aussenminister Dmi­tro Kule­ba: «Die Ame­ri­ka­ner kön­nen tun, was sie wol­len – der Krieg geht weiter»

Kei­ne Chan­ce für Donald Trumps Frie­dens­plan, die Ukrai­ne wer­de nicht kapi­tu­lie­ren, sagt der frü­he­re Aus­sen­mi­nis­ter des Lan­des. Alles hängt nun von den Euro­pä­ern ab und davon, wie schnell sie bei der Unter­stüt­zung der Ukrai­ne an die Stel­le der USA tre­ten können.

src: click (NZZ)

So here is how the mee­tings in Rome, must have went:

Hey Donald - Its a me Macron, with me bud­dy Star­mer, and our prop depart­ment from the Vati­can! Ear­ly in the day, lets do this pho­to op - whe­re Selen­skyj talks to you about HORRIFYING rocket attack with 9 civi­li­an deaths - which is two below the nor­mal dai­ly average for civil deaths per day.

Then it was con­fir­med, that Trump was swar­med by at least a dozen other world lea­ders during the rest of the day - and slow­ly (!) “tur­ned around” opi­ni­on wise.

The alter­na­ti­ve sto­ry here is, that the posi­ti­on chan­ge came more from wit­hin the Trump depart­ment, and that the Mear­s­hei­mer - Kara­ga­nov inter­view was instru­men­tal for that. Whoever told Kara­ga­nov to dou­ble down on “Cra­zy Ivan who can demand it all” was respon­si­ble for a “rus­sia will con­ti­nue the war” shift in “rus­si­an friend­ly US repor­ting”, which could have spoo­ked the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on - if it inde­ed loo­ked at public pol­ling figu­res dro­ping at that time - or the rea­liz­a­ti­on of the immense issue of sel­ling a con­ti­nuing war to its own popu­la­ti­on spoo­ked the Trump team.

Issue: If you pres­su­re rus­sia into a tem­pora­ry sei­ze fire - at least for 30 days, which will only be a bene­fit to Ukria­ne but 30 days MAYBE could be short enough, so struc­tu­ral battle­field chan­ges may be small enough so rus­sia could be seen to be pres­su­red into this -- Trump can sell it to his domestic audi­ence as the 100 day suc­cess of his war diplo­ma­cy. Now the issue:

A con­ti­nua­tion past said 30 days is almost impos­si­ble, and all sides should under­stand this, but by then the euro­pean nar­ra­ti­ve would have got­ten enough trac­tion in US media to be swap­ped over to -- with the bla­me being put on Rus­sia for having moved too litt­le, to keep peace talks alive.

The bla­me stacking is alrea­dy under­way (“if rus­sia doesnt grab this oppor­tu­ni­ty now, it doesnt want peace”), and the euro­pean coun­ter pro­po­sal sim­ply means 2-4 years of more war, in its cur­rent form.

Euro­pe will pre­vent against more con­ces­si­ons being extrac­ted from the ukrai­ni­an side - and will make sure, that de jure annex­a­ti­on of Cri­mea will not be put into play--

and then the key poli­ti­cal game turns back to get­ting Ukrai­ne finan­ced for ano­t­her 2-4 years, with US sup­port, becau­se by now the US and Euro­pean nar­ra­ti­ve is shared again.

So ways for rus­sia to work against this resul­ting in the mess it will result in?

Play along. Use bet­ter PR than what Lav­rov put out the­re in the past few days, sim­ply to sta­te, whe­re you are pres­su­red towards NEW con­ces­si­ons, and how you have ful­fil­led ever­ything that Trump deman­ded from you pri­or. Minus the “the ener­gy infra­st­ruc­tu­re sei­ze fire we stuck to -” talk becau­se that doesnt play well. Focus on post “his­to­ri­cal moment, with US pho­to­gra­pher” changes.

Issue - Kiew might sabo­ta­ge the sei­ze­fire in every way ima­gin­ab­le - if it is inde­ed limi­ted to 30 days. So nar­ra­ti­ve domi­nan­ce might be hard to attain.

But if Rus­sia can get it - Trumps “flip” will beco­me so obvious, that essen­ti­al­ly he gets an issue in the messaging to his core voter base, with the fact of him flip­ping mea­ning, that now the war will con­ti­nue for ano­t­her two to four years.

Which it likely will.

But the US is working on the flip to “the Trump posi­ti­on chan­ge was Rus­si­as fault” as we speak. (See video.) So - a coun­ter stra­te­gy would have to be clean, fast, and clo­se to pas­si­ve aggres­si­ve, but not pas­si­ve aggres­si­ve - which is not easy to pull off.

And which If I am not mista­ken Rus­sia doesnt have the trai­ned talent for.

The alter­na­ti­ve is to instill in Trump the fear, that his base will under­stand what he is pul­ling here, and that it will pro­long the war, and he knew it, and they will know, that he knew it.

Which would break ties earlier.

All pre­su­med on that Rus­sia might expe­ri­ence serious hardships wit­hin the next two years, battle­field, or eco­no­my rela­ted. Which it loo­ks like it likely might.

(If it doesnt. The respon­se is very simp­le. Pull a “Trump went too far -” right about now.)

Rus­sia run­ning into serious pro­blems in my under­stan­ding (well thats not right: as far as I can fathom) is the only explana­ti­on for why the EU is cur­r­ent­ly pushing for posi­ti­ons that will make it very hard for rus­sia to retain the occu­p­ied ter­ri­to­ries after 10 years.

edit: Part one - done:

src: click (Der Standard)

10th, 11th, who cares, right? Cer­tain­ly not Der Standard.

Da hat er sie gleich in einem Kom­men­tar ver­fasst und einen Nut­zer­kom­men­tar gepinnt.

src: click

Gut, Pro­pa­gan­da hat natür­lich wie­der nie­mand entdeckt.

Noch irgend­wel­che Fra­gen, war­um ich die­se Gesell­schaft has­se wie nichts ande­res auf die­ser ver­fick­ten, gro­tes­ken, abar­ti­gen Dreckswelt?

Btw. Das Gespräch war arran­ged, 15 Minu­ten lang, und danach gab es kein fol­lowup (wie bei ande­ren euro­päi­schen Natio­nen auf dem sel­ben Trip). Der US Foto­graph war anwesend.

Aber zum Glück liest die Mehr­heits­be­völ­ke­rung die Qua­li­täts­zei­tung Der Stan­dard. Ein leuch­ten­der Stern auf dem Him­mel der deutsch­spra­chi­gen Qualitätspresse.

Ich habe mitt­ler­wei­le nach­ge­le­sen, wie vie­le Tote die Rake­te ver­ur­sacht haben soll. Neun laut Ukrai­ne. Sech­zig Verletzte.

Trump hau­siert der­weil mit 5000 Toten pro Woche als Zahl für die “zu vie­len Toten”. Macht 714 Pro Tag. Wovon neun, bei einem Aus­rei­ßer Angriff auf die Bevöl­ke­rung (sonst nicht üblich), 1.261% Pro­zent wären.

Wir mer­ken uns also, als nicht “Aus­rei­ßer” Ereig­nis sind Zivi­lis­ten etwa 100 mal mehr “wert” als Soldaten. 

Die offi­zi­el­le OHCHR Sta­tis­tik für zivi­le Tote im Ukrai­ne Kon­flikt weist bis 31. März 2025 12910 Tote aus.

März 31 2025 war Tag 1132 des Krie­ges, macht im Schnitt 11 zivi­le Tote pro Tag.

Der Gaza Kon­flikt begann am 7. Okto­ber 2023, dh. vor 546 Tagen (zum Stich­tag der Wiki­pe­dia Quel­le). Wiki­pe­dia ver­zeich­net 52000 Paläs­ti­nen­ser getö­tet seit Kriegs­be­ginn. Das Israe­li­sche Mili­tär behaup­tet nach einer puren Schät­zung davon wären 20000 Kämp­fer gewesen.

Las­sen wir ihnen den Schwach­sinn mal durch­ge­hen, sind das 59 Tote Zivi­lis­ten pro Tag. Also 5.3 Mal mehr als Russ­land über die gesam­te Kriegs­dau­er Zivi­lis­ten pro Tag getö­tet hat.

Und ich glaub ein Zivi­list 100 Mal mehr Wert als ein getö­te­ter Sol­dat, soll­ten wir bei Isra­el auch nicht mehr als Maß anle­gen, oder?

Die­se Gesell­schaft ist ein­fach nur noch gro­tesk und abartig.

Ges­tern:

src: click

Heu­te:

src: click

src: click

Komisch, Trump ist so ver­däch­tig leise…

Hat Macron nicht noch a Gschicht­erl vom Rake­ten­ein­schlag mit 1,5 Toten, der bele­ge dass Russ­land Trump belü­ge, wor­auf Trump Sekun­där­sank­tio­nen ein­füh­ren muss auf Lager? KANN DENN NIEMAND IM WERTEWESTEN EINEN ANRUF ORGANISIEREN!

DER KRIEG WÄRE AUS (in Über­ein­stim­mung mit Euro­pas gerech­tem Frie­dens­plan), WENN TRUMP JETZT NUR SEKUNDÄRSANKTIONEN VERHÄNGEN WÜRDE. FÜR DIE RAKETE DIE IN KIEV 1,5 MENSCHEN GETÖTET HAT!

Scheiß auf Butscha, das Bemmerl -- Trump phi­lo­so­phiert ja viel lie­ber wegen einer Rake­te auf Kiew, ob ihn Putin viel­leicht per­sön­lich legt!

Weil Russ­land ja bereits gemein­sam mit Ste­ve Wit­koff ange­kün­digt hat jeder­zeit mit Kiev ohne Vor­be­din­gun­gen über einen Frie­den zu verhandeln.

Wäh­rend Kiev und Euro­pa auf eine Waf­fen­ru­he als Vor­be­din­gung pochen, die das ukrai­ni­sche Mili­tär stärkt, bis der Arzt (Ver­zei­hung, der GERECHTE Frie­den) kommt?

Wo ist Trump heu­te mit der FUCKING Lüge auf­grund Frau in Odes­sa ver­letzt, habe er Zwei­fel ob die Rus­sen, die Ver­hand­lun­gen ohne Vor­be­din­gun­gen gegreen­ligh­tet haben tat­säch­lich ver­han­deln wol­len würden?

Na wo isser denn der Trump?

Na wo?

Will er nicht dem Selen­skyj zum Arschaus­le­cken gerei­chen um das “Poten­tal eines his­to­ri­schen Moments” im Peters­dom (laut Selen­skyj) zu verwirklichen!?

149 Droh­nen geschickt kei­ne sech­zig abge­schos­sen, die ande­ren “ver­ir­ren sich” laut Ukrai­ne immer regel­mä­ßig wegen GPS spoo­fing und fal­len von selbst run­ter, und “Frau in Odes­sa verletzt”.

Das sind doch die BEWEGENDEN GESCHICHTEN, die für Trump eine Welt zusam­men­bre­chen las­sen, ob Russ­land etwa gar kei­nen Grund gehabt hät­te 149 Droh­nen auf Odes­sa (zivi­les Gebiet!) los­zu­schi­cken, wäh­rend des Kriegs.

Also, wenn ich Trump wäre, wür­de ich da jetzt Sekun­där­sank­tio­nen ver­hän­gen! Weil viel­leicht legt mich der Russe!

Der einem Waf­fen­still­stand nie zuge­stimmt hat, aber Frie­dens­ver­hand­lun­gen ohne Vorbedingungen!

Gott sei Dank ist der mäch­tigs­te Mensch der demo­kra­ti­schen, west­li­chen Welt kein kom­plet­ter Voll­trot­tel, sag ich immer…

Und Gott sei Dank hat­te das ges­tern ja das Poten­ti­al eine HISTORISCHE Aus­sa­ge gewe­sen zu sein.

Sowas ler­nen die Kin­der der Ukrai­ne mor­gen schon in der ers­ten Sekundarstufe!

Die deutsch­spra­chi­gen Medi­en haben berichtet.

Fuck me…