harlekin.me

- on a panel, I’ve seen.

edit: Second good reflec­tion I’ve seen:

Ukraine’s top diplo­mat tells CNN that “all wes­tern com­pa­nies must with­draw from Russia”
From CNN’s Emmet Lyons in London

Ukraine’s For­eign Minis­ter Dmy­t­ro Kule­ba has told CNN that “all wes­tern com­pa­nies must with­draw from Rus­sia” on huma­ni­ta­ri­an grounds. 

src: click

Thats app­lied CSR!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRuYvpgGJgk

Ists durch­aus auch wert hier ver­linkt zu werden.

for the war.

This one might be just enough non mono cau­sal, though.

Oh and its what con­ser­va­ti­ve dads usual­ly tell them­sel­ves in terms of child education.

Oh, and what a Femen acti­vist told Aus­tri­ans about a week ago.

Femen-Aktivistin Schewt­schen­ko: “Putin ist nicht plötz­lich ver­rückt geworden”
Die in Paris im Exil leben­de Ukrai­ne­rin Inna Schewt­schen­ko wirft der EU vor, Putins Krieg gegen demo­kra­ti­sche Wer­te lan­ge igno­riert zu haben. Jetzt brau­che es Waf­fen und huma­ni­tä­re Hilfe

src: click

You tell me the path of infor­ma­ti­on dis­se­mi­na­ti­on on that one.

Pro­bab­ly sounds good, and easy to remem­ber and repeat, right? With a ker­nel of truth.

Oh, and CNN is also inter­viewing a rus­si­an news direc­tor, who knows how mil­li­ons of rus­si­ans feel. Mil­li­ons! Thats at least more than a million!

- against Maers­hei­mer? Seven his­to­ri­ans views against Mearsheimers.

One of which has just publis­hed a book about Nato enlar­ge­ment, has media trai­ning, smi­les at the men­ti­on of now the­re having been a war thats bro­ken out, twice - becau­se of an under­pin­ning noti­on, that her book will sell well (or may­be becau­se she values the prai­se so much) - and then over­en­un­cia­tes reac­tions for the came­ra, becau­se she had Zoom trai­ning as well, oh and did I men­ti­on the fil­ler laughs?

Sor­ry dont know a thing about the rea­so­ning in the video yet, I pre­su­me it is excel­lent, when the Hoo­ver Insti­tu­te car­ri­ed in seven peop­le to speak on the topic, and this is only part one of an ongo­ing deba­te in a new ongo­ing series.

The intro­duc­tion state­ment is, that Mear­s­hei­mer is fake news though. Know your audience.

edit: Oh sor­ry, reached the con­tent part. Mear­s­hei­mers the­sis is not true becau­se of mono­cau­sa­li­ty. So by that logic, Nato expan­si­on doesnt mat­ter pro­por­tio­nal­ly to how many other rea­sons you can come up with, right?